ABSTRACT
MicroRNA is a class of noncoding RNAs able to base pair with complementary messenger RNA sequences, inhibiting their expression. These regulatory molecules play important roles in key cellular processes including cell proliferation, differentiation and response to DNA damage; changes in miRNA expression are a common feature of human cancers. To gain insights into the mechanisms involved in breast cancer progression we conducted a microRNA global expression analysis on a 21T series of cell lines obtained from the same patient during different stages of breast cancer progression. These stages are represented by cell lines derived from normal epithelial (H16N2), atypical ductal hyperplasia (21PT), primary in situ ductal carcinoma (21NT) and pleural effusion of a lung metastasis (21MT-1 and 21MT-2). In a global microRNA expression analysis, miR-205-5p was the only miRNA to display an important downregulation in the metastatic cell lines (21MT-1; 21MT-2) when compared to the non-invasive cells (21PT and 21NT). The lower amounts of miR-205-5p found also correlated with high histological grades biopsies and with higher invasion rates in a Boyden chamber assay. This work pinpoints miR-205-5p as a potential player in breast tumor invasiveness.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics , Down-Regulation , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , MicroRNAs/genetics , Neoplasm Invasiveness/genetics , Breast/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/genetics , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathologyABSTRACT
Chick kainate binding protein was solubilized from cerebellar membranes and purified (x19) by use of two chromatographic steps. Measurements of [3H]kainate binding and GTPase activity in the different fractions reveal a consistent decrease of GTPase activity as the purification proceeds so that no GTPase is detectable after the final purification step. This fact, in the context of the differential involvement in nucleotide recognition of some critical amino acid residues in the p-loop motif of GTPases and in the guanine nucleotide-binding sequence of ionotropic glutamate receptors, together with significant discrepancies concerning the activity of individual nucleotides, suggests that both guanine nucleotide-recognizing sequences are unlikely to be alternative expressions of the same functional domain.