Radiotherapy dose response in bulky relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To assess whether a radiotherapy (RT) dose affects response in bulky tumors in relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Data from r/r DLBCL patients treated with salvage- or palliative-intent RT (2008-2020) at a single institution were examined. Index lesion size ≥7.5 cm was defined as bulky. Equivalent doses in 2 Gray (Gy) fractions (EQD2) were calculated to compare doses between conventional and hypofractionated (HF, ≥2.5 Gy/fraction) schemes. Objective response rates (ORR) were compared using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn's multiple comparison corrections. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyzes. RESULTS: 183 courses of 151 unique patients were included (salvage: 37%, palliative: 63%). Non-bulky and bulky tumors were irradiated in 109 (60%) and 74 (40%) courses, respectively. Median EQD2 was 33 Gy (IQR=23-39 Gy) with HF in 84 (46%) cases. Of those with post-RT imaging (80%), the ORR was 59% with a trend towards worsened ORR in bulky tumors (50% vs. 65%, p=0.077). For bulky tumors, RT regimens with EQD2s >30 Gy were associated with better ORR (≤30 Gy vs. >30 Gy: 27% vs. 64%, p=0.0073), whereas a lower EQD2 cut-off was sufficient for non-bulky tumors (≤20 Gy vs. >20 Gy: 38% vs. 75%, p=0.0011). On multivariable regression, bulky tumor size was associated with worsened FFLP (HR=2.07, 95% CI=1.16-3.68, p=0.014), while high EQD2s >30 Gy were associated with better FFLP (HR=0.48, 95% CI=0.25-0.93, p=0.031). Bulky tumors treated with EQD2s ≤30 Gy had the lowest median FFLP (4.0 months), while EQD2s >30 Gy had an unreached median FFLP (p=0.0047). CONCLUSIONS: Bulky r/r DLBCL tumors were associated with less favorable tumor control outcomes in the salvage and palliative settings. RT regimens with higher EQD2s (>30 Gy) should be considered if durable local control of bulky tumors is desired.

Salvage radiotherapy for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma following CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy.

Background and purpose: CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy is a promising treatment for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but most patients experience post-CART progression. We describe our institutional experience of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in this setting. Materials and methods: Of 94 patients who received CART therapy from 2018 to 2020, 21 received SRT for post-CART progression. Patients were divided into two groups: locoregional disease (n = 9 [43 %], all disease encompassable within an RT field) and advanced disease (n = 12 [57 %]). Patterns of failure, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were assessed. Results: Median time from CART infusion to SRT was 4.0 months (range, 0.6-11.5 months). In the locoregional disease group, 8/9 patients (89 %) were treated with comprehensive SRT to a median dose of 37.5 Gy in a median of 15 fractions. In the advanced disease group, all patients (n = 12) were treated with focal SRT to a median dose of 20.8 Gy in a median of 5 fractions. Median follow-up post-SRT was 15.2 months. In-field response was observed in 8/9 (89 %) in the locoregional disease and 8/9 (89 %) evaluable patients in the advanced disease groups. 17/18 evaluable patients (94 %) patients experienced post-SRT progression, all with a distant component. Median OS was 7.4 months; 21 months for locoregional disease versus 2.4 months for advanced disease (p = 0.0002). Median PFS was 1.1 month, and similarly poor regardless of group. No grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred. Conclusions: SRT post-CART therapy appears safe with encouraging in-field response but high rates of out-of-field progression, even for those presenting with locoregional disease, highlighting the need for integration of novel systemic agents.

Proton Radiation Therapy After Chemotherapy in the Management of Aggressive Mediastinal Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Lymphoma Subcommittee Collaboration.

Purpose: Combined modality therapy with multiagent chemotherapy and radiation therapy is a standard treatment option for aggressive mediastinal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (AMNHLs); however, concerns regarding acute and late radiation toxicities have fueled an effort to use systemic therapy alone. The use of proton therapy (PT) is a promising treatment option, but there are still limited data regarding clinical outcomes with this treatment modality. In this Particle Therapy Cooperative Group lymphoma subcommittee collaboration, we report outcomes of patients with AMNHL treated with pencil-beam scanning PT or double-scatter PT after chemotherapy. Methods and Materials: This was a multi-institutional retrospective observational cohort study of patients with AMNHL treated with PT following chemotherapy between 2011 and 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. PT toxicity was graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. A 2-tailed paired t test was used for dosimetric comparisons. Results: Twenty-nine patients were identified. With a median follow-up time of 4.2 years (range, 0.2-8.9 years), the estimated 5-year PFS for all patients was 93%, 5-year LRFS was 96%, and estimated 5-year OS was 87%. Maximum acute grade 1 (G1) toxicities occurred in 18 patients, and 7 patients had maximum G2 toxicities. No G3+ radiation-related toxicities were observed. Average mean lung dose and lung V20 Gy were lower for patients treated with pencil-beam scanning PT compared with double-scatter PT (P = .016 and .006, respectively), while patients with lower mediastinal disease had higher doses for all evaluated dosimetric heart parameters. Conclusions: PT after chemotherapy for patients with AMNHL resulted in excellent outcomes with respect to 5-year PFS, LRFS, and OS without high-grade toxicities. Future work with larger sample sizes is warranted to further elucidate the role of PT in the treatment of AMNHL.

Radiation Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: What Is the Right Regimen for Palliation?

Purpose: To report objective response rates (ORR), time to local failure (TTLF), and overall survival (OS) among patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after salvage- or palliative-intent radiation therapy (RT) and to investigate whether outcomes differed with conventional versus hypofractionated (≥2.5 Gy/fraction) RT. Methods and Materials: A single-institution observational cohort study was performed for patients who completed a course of RT for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma between January 1, 2008, and April 1, 2020. Predictors of ORR, TTLF, and OS were calculated using univariable and multivariable regression models. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate TTLF and OS, and log-rank analysis was used to compare outcomes. Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was calculated using an α/ß of 10. Results: One-hundred and sixty-nine patients were treated with 205 RT courses (73 [36%] salvage, 132 [64%] palliative), and hypofractionated RT was used in 100 RT courses (49%). Median RT dose was 30 Gy (range, 8-60 Gy). ORR was 60% for the total cohort (53% and 69% for palliative and salvage cohorts, respectively). Over a median follow-up time of 4 months, median OS in all patients was 5 months (3 and 22 months for palliative and salvage cohorts, respectively). No statistically significant differences in ORR, TTLF, and OS were observed with hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation. EQD2 ≥35 Gy was associated with improved ORR (odds ratio, 3.79 [1.19-12.03]; P = .024) and prolonged TTLF (0.39 [0.18-0.87]; P = .022), while double-hit receptor status (8.18 [1.08-62.05]; P = .042), cell of origin (3.87 [1.17-8.74]; P = .0012), and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm; 2.12 [1.18-3.81]; P = .012) were associated with inferior TTLF. In the palliative-only cohort, a low-dose regimen of 8 Gy in 2 fractions was associated with similar ORR compared with other fractionation schema but trended towards inferior TTLF (P = .36). Conclusions: Hypofractionation is not associated with differences in disease outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, while higher RT dose (EQD2 ≥35 Gy) may improve ORR and TTLF. Future work is warranted to elucidate the ideal dose and fractionation schema for such patients who will likely also undergo novel systemic agents and cellular therapies.

Palliative Radiotherapy for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Recent improvements in chemoimmunotherapies, targeted agents, hematopoietic stem cell transplants, and cellular therapies have revolutionized treatment paradigms for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Even in the relapsed or refractory setting, contemporary treatment options are delivered with curative intent and can lead to lasting remissions. Although such therapies have improved overall outcomes, they have increasingly led to a wide variety of presentations of recurrent tumors in need of palliation. Here, we review the use of radiotherapy (RT) in the palliation of DLBCL. We draw particular attention to the evolving role for hypofractionated RT and low-dose RT for DLBCL. We review the available literature on these topics and focus on commonly encountered clinical scenarios.

Bridging Radiation Therapy Before Commercial Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma (r/rABL), culminating in 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies: tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Following leukapheresis and in preparation for CART infusion, contemporary bridging and lymphodepletion regimens rely mostly on cytotoxic chemotherapy. Here, in a cohort of patients treated with commercial tisa-cel and axi-cel, we show that bridging-RT may offer a supplemental approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-one patients receiving commercial tisa-cel (n = 13) or axi-cel (n = 18) between August 2018 and February 2019 for r/rABL were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: (1) bridging-RT within 30 days of CART infusion or (2) nonbridging-RT (NBRT), in which patients received either remote RT greater than 30 days before CART infusion or no prior RT. RESULTS: Five patients received bridging-RT within 30 days of CART infusion. Median bridging-RT dose was 37.5 Gy and was completed a median of 13 days before infusion. No grade 3 (G3) or higher RT-toxicities occurred. No patients in the bridging-RT group experienced G3 or higher CART-related toxicities (CRS or neurotoxicity), and 23% (n = 6) and 15% (n = 4) experienced G3-5 CRS and G3-5 neurotoxicity in the NBRT group, respectively. Overall treatment response in the bridging-RT and NBRT groups was 80% and 64%, respectively. The axi-cel CART product was associated with CRS (odds ratio [OR] = 26.67, P = .001) and CRS correlated with neurotoxicity (OR = 12.22, P = .028). There was a trend toward an association for CRS with metabolic tumor volume (OR = 1.06/mL, P = .141) and TLG (OR = 1.01/mL x standard uptake value, P = .099). CONCLUSIONS: Bridging-RT before commercial CART does not appear to increase the risk for CART-related toxicities or negatively affect outcomes in r/rABL patients. No G3 or higher RT-toxicities occurred in this series. Pretreatment metabolic tumor burden may be associated with CART-associated CRS; however, larger patient numbers are required to elucidate significant associations. Future work to prospectively assess the value of bridging-RT is warranted.