Droxidopa for Vasopressor Weaning in Critically Ill Patients with Persistent Hypotension: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Single-Arm Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Persistent vasopressor requirements are a common reason for delayed liberation from the intensive care unit (ICU) and adjunct oral agents are sometimes used to hasten time to vasopressor discontinuation. We sought to describe the use of droxidopa for vasopressor weaning in critically ill patients with prolonged hypotension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-arm, observational study included adult patients admitted to an ICU at two academic centers between 06/2016-07/2023 who received droxidopa for vasopressor weaning. Patients who received droxidopa prior to admission or for another indication were excluded. The primary outcome was time to vasopressor discontinuation, defined as when vasopressors were stopped and remained off for at least 24 h. Secondary outcomes included rates of tachycardia and hypotension post-initiation, norepinephrine equivalents pre- and post-initiation, concomitant oral agent use, and dosing. A subgroup analysis was conducted in patients receiving droxidopa via feeding tubes. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 62 years old, 12 (40%) were female, and 73% were in a cardiac/cardiac surgical ICU. Patients were on vasopressors for a median of 16 days prior to droxidopa initiation. Median (IQR) time to vasopressor discontinuation was 70 h (23-192) and norepinephrine equivalents decreased immediately after initiation (0.08 vs 0.02 mcg/kg/min, p < 0.001). MAP increased after droxidopa initiation (68.8 vs 66.5 mm Hg, p = 0.008) while heart rates were unchanged (86 vs 84 BPM, p = 0.37) after initiation. Patients who weaned from vasopressors within 72 h versus longer than 72 h after droxidopa initiation were more likely to be on lower norepinephrine equivalents prior to initiation (0.05 vs 0.12 mcg/kg/min, p = 0.013). Feeding tube administration did not impact time to vasopressor discontinuation (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Droxidopa may be considered an adjunct therapy for vasopressor weaning. Effects were similar when analyzing patients receiving droxidopa via feeding tube.

Serial evaluation of loop diuretic efficiency following left ventricular assist device implantation.

More than 50% of heart failure (HF) patients require diuretic therapy after left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Although few data related to diuretic response (DR) exist in stage D patients, tubular sodium reabsorption may be clinically prognostic independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria within this cohort. We aimed to characterize DR serially before and after LVAD implantation in a stage D population. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study of HF patients receiving diuretics with plans to undergo LVAD implantation. We measured urine sodium (UNa) and creatinine (UCr) at three points after diuretic therapy: pre-LVAD, post-LVAD prior to discharge, and as an outpatient. Prior to LVAD, patients (N = 19) had an average eGFR of 54.0 ± 18.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, spot UNa of 74.8 ± 28.0 mmol/L, and fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) of 3.1 ± 2.7%. Pre-LVAD, eGFR did not correlate with spot UNa nor FENa (p > 0.05 for both). LVAD implantation did not improve DR post-LVAD (mean change FENa per 40 mg IV furosemide 0.5 ± 1.0%; p = 0.84), and 90% of patients required loop diuretics at 90 days post-surgery. Improved hemodynamics following LVAD may not improve DR or tubular function; larger studies are needed to confirm our results and assess the utility of DR to predict post-LVAD outcomes.

The economic impact of substandard and falsified antimalarial medications in Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: Substandard and falsified medications pose significant risks to global health. Nearly one in five antimalarials circulating in low- and middle-income countries are substandard or falsified. We assessed the health and economic impact of substandard and falsified antimalarials on children under five in Nigeria, where malaria is endemic and poor-quality medications are commonplace. METHODS: We developed a dynamic agent-based SAFARI (Substandard and Falsified Antimalarial Research Impact) model to capture the impact of antimalarial use in Nigeria. The model simulated children with background characteristics, malaria infections, patient care-seeking, disease progression, treatment outcomes, and incurred costs. Using scenario analyses, we simulated the impact of substandard and falsified medicines, antimalarial resistance, as well as possible interventions to improve the quality of treatment, reduce stock-outs, and educate caregivers about antimalarial quality. RESULTS: We estimated that poor quality antimalarials are responsible for 12,300 deaths and $892 million ($890-$893 million) in costs annually in Nigeria. If antimalarial resistance develops, we simulated that current costs of malaria could increase by $839 million (11% increase, $837-$841 million). The northern regions of Nigeria have a greater burden as compared to the southern regions, with 9,700 deaths and $698 million ($697-$700 million) in total economic losses annually due to substandard and falsified antimalarials. Furthermore, our scenario analyses demonstrated that possible interventions-such as removing stock-outs in all facilities ($1.11 billion), having only ACTs available for treatment ($594 million), and 20% more patients seeking care ($469 million)-can save hundreds of millions in costs annually in Nigeria. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the significant health and economic burden of poor quality antimalarials in Nigeria, and the impact of potential interventions to counter them. In order to reduce the burden of malaria and prevent antimalarials from developing resistance, policymakers and donors must understand the problem and implement interventions to reduce the impact of ineffective and harmful antimalarials.