[Growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ultrasounds study and clinical outcome]. / Espansione degli aneurismi dell'aorta addominale. Studio ecografico e outcome clinico.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) >55 mm is actually represented by surgical repair mainly or by endovascular repair, in selected cases; conversely the debate is still open for those ranging 40-55 mm. These last and smaller aneurysms are usually followed-up by ultrasounds (US), in order to detect too fast expansions and to prevent sudden ruptures. Aim of this study is to present the results of the US follow-up of a series of asymptomatic AAAs and the correlation between expansion rate and associated risk factors. METHODS: All patients evaluated for an AAA between March 1991 and December 2000 were included and, according to the maximum diameters of the infrarenal aorta, were divided into 3 groups: A (26-29 mm), B (30-39 mm) and C (>39 mm). Groups A and B underwent US follow up at 6-month intervals, while group C underwent a complete preoperative evaluation. RESULTS: The mean follow up was 36+/-24 months for the entire series (225 AAA); the mean expansion rate was 1 mm/year for group A, <1.5 mm/year for group B for the first 5 years with a sharp increase (5 mm/year) in the following 2 years and 3 mm/year for group C up to 5 years. Among the associated risk factors, hypertension and smoking have confirmed their main role, independent from the initial diameter (p<0.01). Eight ruptures (3.8%) occurred in patients unsuitable for surgery or who refused it and in 7 cases they were lethal. The range between diagnosis and death (19-61 months) and the maximum size (38-93 mm) were absolutely unpredictable. The remaining 40 deaths were related to vascular diseases (MI and stroke 29.8%) or concurrent neoplasms (29.8%) mainly. The surgical treatment was carried out as elective repair on 45 patients (mortality rate 2.2%) and in emergency in 2 cases, both dead, with a mean interval from diagnosis to surgery of 28+/-17 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results agree with the literature data concerning the dilatative trend and the risk factors and, according to these, elective repair in patients with AAA ranging 45-55 mm should be considered.

[Defecography by spiral computed tomography]. / La defecografia con Tomografia Computerizzata spirale.

PURPOSE: We investigated the possible role of helical CT defecography in pelvic floor disorders by comparing our results with those of conventional defecography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our series consisted of 90 patients, namely 62 women and 28 men, ranging in age 24-82 years. They were all submitted to conventional defecography, and 18 questionable cases were also studied with helical CT defecography. The conventional examination was performed during the 4 standard phases of resting, squeezing, Valsalva and straining; we used a remote-control unit. The parameters for helical CT defecography were: 5 mm beam collimation, pitch 2, 120 KV, 250 mAs and 18-20 degrees gantry inclination to acquire coronal images of the pelvic floor. The rectal ampulla was distended with a bolus of 300 mL nonionic iodinated contrast agent (dilution: 3 g/cc). The patient wore a napkin and was seated on the table, except for those who could not hold the position and were thus examined supine. Twenty-second helical scans were performed at rest and during evacuation; multiplanar reconstructions were obtained especially on the sagittal plane for comparison with conventional defecographic images. RESULTS: An unquestionable diagnosis could be made in all the 18 patients submitted to helical CT defecography. The diagnosis was in agreement with proctology results and added new information in all cases. Sixteen patients had constipation and 2 fecal incontinence--one from rectal prolapse and the other from a rectovaginal fistula. In this latter case helical CT defecography permitted to confirm the fistula and suggest its course. One patient had a previously undetected ovarian cancer metastatic to the anterior rectal wall. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Coronal helical CT defecography images permitted to map the perineal floor muscles, while sagittal reconstructions provided information on the ampulla and the levator ani. To conclude, helical CT defecography performed well in the study of pelvic floor disorders and can follow conventional defecography especially in questionable cases.