ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). METHODS: The PAOFI was completed by 182 participants 3 months after verified aSAH. Exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate the underlying factor structure of the PAOFI and reliability and concurrent validity were evaluated for each subscale. RESULTS: A three-factor structure accounted for 58.9% of the extracted variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for extracted factors ranged from .867 to .924. The PAOFI subscales demonstrated concurrent validity with neuropsychological tests measuring similar constructs. CONCLUSION: There is evidence of reliability and validity of the PAOFI following aSAH. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm/complications , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Psychometrics/standards , Recovery of Function , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Aged , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pennsylvania , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Black women receive less relative dose intensity with more dose reductions and early chemotherapy cessation compared with White women. Adding further risk, older patients with breast cancer are most at risk for treatment modifications; however, it is unclear if this remains true for Black patients. Furthermore, the clinical implications of treatment modifications and delays on survival is uncertain, particularly in Black patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The purpose was to investigate whether age was a moderator for the association between treatment modifications (dose held, dose delayed, and early cessation) and overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) in Black women with breast cancer using a retrospective cohort study of patients with early stage breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Across the entire sample (n = 115), 37.4% (n = 43) of patients experienced a treatment modification. There was a significant interaction between age group and held dose for DFS (P = .026). Specifically, those diagnosed at 55 years of age and older, who had doses of chemotherapy held, experienced worse DFS compared with those who did not (hazard ratio, 4.185; 95% confidence interval, 1.187-14.75). In contrast, there was no difference in DFS between those who did and did not have doses held in patients diagnosed below 55 years of age (hazard ratio, 0.626; 95% confidence interval, 0.177-2.218). CONCLUSION: In this study, Black women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of early stage breast cancer had roughly equal treatment modifications across age groups. However, held doses of chemotherapy in older Black patients were associated with worse DFS. Age may impact clinical outcomes seen with adjuvant chemotherapy treatment modifications.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/mortality , Adult , Age Factors , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , White People/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Inspired by the hypothesis that heterogeneity in the biology of breast cancers at the cellular level may account for cognitive dysfunction symptom variability in survivors, the current study explored relationships between host single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 25 breast cancer-related candidate genes (AURKA, BAG1, BCL2, BIRC5, CCNB1, CD68, CENPA, CMC2, CTSL2, DIAPH3, ERBB2, ESR1, GRB7, GSTM1, MELK, MKI67, MMP11, MYBL2, NDC80, ORC6, PGR, RACGAP1, RFC4, RRM2, and SCUBE2), identified from clinically relevant prognostic multigene-expression profiles for breast cancer, and pretreatment cognitive performance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample (n=220) was comprised of 138 postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with early stage breast cancer and 82 postmenopausal age- and education-matched healthy controls without breast cancer. Cognitive performance was assessed after primary surgery but prior to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy using a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests encompassing eight cognitive function composite domains: attention, concentration, executive function, mental flexibility, psychomotor speed, verbal memory, visual memory, and visual working memory. In total, 131 SNPs were included in the analysis. Standard and robust multiple linear regression modeling was used to examine relationships between each domain and the presence or absence of one or more minor alleles for each SNP. Genetic risk/protection scores (GRSs) were calculated for each domain to evaluate the collective effect of possession of multiple risk/protective alleles. RESULTS: With the exception of CMC2, MMP11, and RACGAP1, significant (P<0.05) SNP main effect and/or SNP by future prescribed treatment group interactions were observed for every gene between at least one domain and one or more SNPs. All GRSs were found to be significantly (P<0.001) associated with each respective domain score. CONCLUSION: Associations between host SNPs and computed GRSs and variability in pretreatment cognitive function performance support the study hypothesis, and warrant further investigations to identify biomarkers for breast cancer-related cognitive dysfunction.