Update on PI-RADS Version 2.1 Diagnostic Performance Benchmarks for Prostate MRI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background Prostate MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is standardized by the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), currently in version 2.1. A systematic review and meta-analysis infrastructure with a 12-month update cycle was established to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS over time. Purpose To provide estimates of diagnostic accuracy and cancer detection rates (CDRs) of PI-RADS version 2.1 categories for prostate MRI, which is required for further evidence-based patient management. Materials and Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and multiple trial registers (English-language studies published from March 1, 2019, to August 30, 2022) was performed. Studies that reported data on diagnostic accuracy or CDRs of PI-RADS version 2.1 with csPCa as the primary outcome were included. For the meta-analysis, pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, and CDRs were derived from extracted data at the lesion level and patient level. Sensitivity and specificity for PI-RADS greater than or equal to 3 and PI-RADS greater than or equal to 4 considered as test positive were investigated. In addition to individual PI-RADS categories 1-5, subgroup analyses of subcategories (ie, 2+1, 3+0) were performed. Results A total of 70 studies (11 686 lesions, 13 330 patients) were included. At the patient level, with PI-RADS greater than or equal to 3 considered positive, meta-analysis found a 96% summary sensitivity (95% CI: 95, 98) and 43% specificity (95% CI: 33, 54), with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.93). For PI-RADS greater than or equal to 4, meta-analysis found an 89% sensitivity (95% CI: 85, 92) and 66% specificity (95% CI: 58, 74), with an area under the SROC curve of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.92). CDRs were as follows: PI-RADS 1, 6%; PI-RADS 2, 5%; PI-RADS 3, 19%; PI-RADS 4, 54%; and PI-RADS 5, 84%. The CDR was 12% (95% CI: 7, 19) for transition zone 2+1 lesions and 19% (95% CI: 12, 29) for 3+0 lesions (P = .12). Conclusion Estimates of diagnostic accuracy and CDRs for PI-RADS version 2.1 categories are provided for quality benchmarking and to guide further evidence-based patient management. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Tammisetti and Jacobs in this issue.

Deep learning reconstructed T2-weighted Dixon imaging of the spine: Impact on acquisition time and image quality.

PURPOSE: To assess the image quality and impact on acquisition time of a novel deep learning based T2 Dixon sequence (T2DL) of the spine. METHODS: This prospective, single center study included n = 44 consecutive patients with a clinical indication for lumbar MRI at our university radiology department between September 2022 and March 2023. MRI examinations were performed on 1.5-T and 3-T scanners (MAGNETOM Aera and Vida; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using dedicated spine coils. The MR study protocol consisted of our standard clinical protocol, including a T2 weighted standard Dixon sequence (T2std) and an additional T2DL acquisition. The latter used a conventional sampling pattern with a higher parallel acceleration factor. The individual contrasts acquired for Dixon water-fat separation were then reconstructed using a dedicated research application. After reconstruction of the contrast images from k-space data, a conventional water-fat separation was performed to provide derived water images. Two readers with 6 and 4 years of experience in interpreting MSK imaging, respectively, analyzed the images in a randomized fashion. Regarding overall image quality, banding artifacts, artifacts, sharpness, noise, and diagnostic confidence were analyzed using a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = non-diagnostic to 5 = excellent image quality). Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (mean age 53 years (±18), male sex: 39 %) were prospectively included. Thirty-one examinations were performed on 1.5 T and 13 examinations on 3 T scanners. A sequence was successfully acquired in all patients. The total acquisition time of T2DL was 93 s at 1.5-T and 86 s at 3-T, compared to 235 s, and 257 s, respectively for T2std (reduction of acquisition time: 60.4 % at 1.5-T, and 66.5 % at 3-T; p < 0.01). Overall image quality was rated equal for both sequences (median T2DL: 5[3 -5], and median T2std: 5 [2 -5]; p = 0.57). T2DL showed significantly reduced noise levels compared to T2std (5 [4 -5] versus 4 [3 -4]; p < 0.001). In addition, sharpness was rated to be significantly higher in T2DL (5 [4 -5] versus 4 [3 -5]; p < 0.001). Although T2DL displayed significantly more banding artifacts (5 [2 -5] versus 5 [4 -5]; p < 0.001), no significant impact on readers diagnostic confidence between sequences was noted (T2std: 5 [2 -5], and T2DL: 5 [3 -5]; p = 0.61). Substantial inter-reader and intrareader agreement was observed for T2DL overall image quality (κ: 0.77, and κ: 0.8, respectively). CONCLUSION: T2DL is feasible, yields an image quality comparable to the reference standard while substantially reducing the acquisition time.

Comparison of data fusion strategies for automated prostate lesion detection using mpMRI correlated with whole mount histology.

BACKGROUND: In this work, we compare input level, feature level and decision level data fusion techniques for automatic detection of clinically significant prostate lesions (csPCa). METHODS: Multiple deep learning CNN architectures were developed using the Unet as the baseline. The CNNs use both multiparametric MRI images (T2W, ADC, and High b-value) and quantitative clinical data (prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), prostate gland volume & gross tumor volume (GTV)), and only mp-MRI images (n = 118), as input. In addition, co-registered ground truth data from whole mount histopathology images (n = 22) were used as a test set for evaluation. RESULTS: The CNNs achieved for early/intermediate / late level fusion a precision of 0.41/0.51/0.61, recall value of 0.18/0.22/0.25, an average precision of 0.13 / 0.19 / 0.27, and F scores of 0.55/0.67/ 0.76. Dice Sorensen Coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the influence of combining mpMRI with parametric clinical data for the detection of csPCa. We compared the DSC between the predictions of CNN's trained with mpMRI and parametric clinical and the CNN's trained with only mpMRI images as input with the ground truth. We obtained a DSC of data 0.30/0.34/0.36 and 0.26/0.33/0.34 respectively. Additionally, we evaluated the influence of each mpMRI input channel for the task of csPCa detection and obtained a DSC of 0.14 / 0.25 / 0.28. CONCLUSION: The results show that the decision level fusion network performs better for the task of prostate lesion detection. Combining mpMRI data with quantitative clinical data does not show significant differences between these networks (p = 0.26/0.62/0.85). The results show that CNNs trained with all mpMRI data outperform CNNs with less input channels which is consistent with current clinical protocols where the same input is used for PI-RADS lesion scoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered retrospectively at the German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS) under proposal number Nr. 476/14 & 476/19.

Ex Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy of MRI-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsies for Rapid Detection of Clinically Significant Carcinomas-A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: MRI-guided prostate biopsies from visible tumor-specific lesions (TBx) can be used to diagnose clinically significant carcinomas (csPCa) requiring treatment more selectively than conventional systematic biopsies (SBx). Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a novel technique that can be used to examine TBx prior to conventional histologic workup. METHODS: TBx from 150 patients were examined with FCM on the day of collection. Preliminary findings were reported within 2 h of collection. The results were statistically compared with the final histology. RESULTS: 27/40 (68%) of the csPCa were already recognized in the intraday FCM in accordance with the results of conventional histology. Even non-significant carcinomas (cisPCa) of the intermediate and high-risk groups (serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 10 or 20 ng/mL) according to conventional risk stratifications were reliably detectable. In contrast, small foci of cisPCa were often not detected or were difficult to distinguish from reactive changes. CONCLUSION: The rapid reporting of preliminary FCM findings helps to reduce the psychological stress on patients, and can improve the clinical management of csPCa. Additional SBx can be avoided in individual cases, leading to lower rates of complications and scarring in the future surgical area. Additional staging examinations can be arranged without losing time. FCM represents a promising basis for future AI-based diagnostic algorithms.

Ultrashort VIBE-Dixon versus Cine and late gadolinium enhancement MRI sequences for cardiac thrombus detection.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequences with fat suppression in Dixon technique (VIBE-Dixon) for cardiac thrombus detection. METHOD: From our clinical database, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients between 2014 and 2022 who had definite diagnosis or exclusion of cardiac thrombus confirmed by an independent adjudication committee, serving as the reference standard. All patients received 2D-Cine plus 2D-Late-Gadolinium-Enhancement (Cine + LGE) and VIBE-Dixon sequences. Two blinded readers assessed all images for the presence of cardiac thrombus. The diagnostic accuracy of Cine + LGE and VIBE-Dixon was determined and compared. RESULTS: Among 141 MRI studies (116 male, mean age: 61 years) mean image examination time was 28.8 ± 3.1 s for VIBE-Dixon and 23.3 ± 2.5 min for Cine + LGE. Cardiac thrombus was present in 49 patients (prevalence: 35 %). For both readers sensitivity for thrombus detection was significantly higher in VIBE-Dixon compared with Cine + LGE (Reader 1: 96 % vs.73 %, Reader 2: 96 % vs. 78 %, p < 0.01 for both readers), whereas specificity did not differ significantly (Reader 1: 96 % vs. 98 %, Reader 2: 92 % vs. 93 %, p > 0.1). Overall diagnostic accuracy of VIBE-Dixon was higher than for Cine + LGE (95 % vs. 89 %, p = 0.02) and was non-inferior to the reference standard (Delta ≤ 5 % with probability > 95 %). CONCLUSIONS: Biplanar VIBE-Dixon sequences, acquired within a few seconds, provided a very high diagnostic accuracy for cardiac thrombus detection. They could be used as stand-alone sequences to rapidly screen for cardiac thrombus in patients not amenable to lengthy acquisition times.