ABSTRACT
Background Though various advancements came into the field of surgery to do the atraumatic procedure, post-operative pain, and swelling are unavoidable complications. Hence, various medicaments are packed in the extracted third molar sockets to prevent these post-operative complications. Aim The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oxytetracycline hydrocortisone-soaked gauze in reducing post-operative pain and swelling compared to conventional surgical procedures without any packing in patients undergoing surgical extraction of the impacted mandibular third molars. Materials and methods The study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai. In this study, 50 patients were randomly included in two groups of 25 participants each. In group A, oxytetracycline hydrocortisone-soaked gauze was placed, and in group B, conventional closure was done without any pack after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Post-operative pain was assessed on days one, three, and five using a 10-point visual analog scale. Post-operative swelling was assessed on the third and seventh days using a four-point swelling measurement. Data analysis was done using SPSS (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Independent sample t-test was done to compare the outcomes between the two groups. Results The results demonstrated that group A (Oxytetracycline Hydrocortisone-soaked gauze) showed superior pain reduction compared to group B (conventional closure) at all post-operative intervals (P=0.001). Moreover, group A exhibited reduced swelling, resulting in higher patient satisfaction levels compared to group B on the third post-operative day (P=0.001). Conclusion It can be concluded from the study that there was a significant reduction in post-operative pain and swelling with the use of oxytetracycline hydrocortisone-soaked gauze, as it acts like a local drug delivery system in patients undergoing impacted mandibular third molar surgeries.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue healing. The oral cavity harbors a diverse microbial population, and oral surgical procedures can introduce potential pathogens into the surgical site. Understanding the impact of suture material on wound infection rates and the colonization of potentially harmful microorganisms is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study was aimed to evaluate and compare the microbiological properties of prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures used after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. Materials and methods A total of 40 patients requiring surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars were assigned to four groups: prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Surgical extraction of impacted tooth was done, and wound was sutured with the abovementioned four different materials in four groups, respectively. After seven days, the sutures were removed and sent to the microbiology lab for colony count assessment. Total microbial colony count, streptococcus count, and lactobacillus count were assessed. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) with p-values less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test were done to compare intergroup relations. Results The microbiological evaluation of the sutures revealed significant differences in bacterial colonization among the four groups. More bacterial quantities were found in the silk group followed by the monocryl, vicryl plus, and prolene groups in the descending order. Prolene demonstrated the lowest incidence of bacterial growth (p<0.001) compared to vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Bacterial colony count was highest in the silk group. The predominant bacterial species found in all groups were Streptococcus viridans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Lactobacillus. Conclusion It was found that prolene and vicryl plus sutures exhibited superior microbiological properties compared to monocryl and silk sutures when used for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The lower incidence and less quantity of bacterial colonization on prolene sutures suggest their potential for reducing the risk of postoperative infection; hence, these sutures can be preferred for oral surgical procedures.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Local anesthesia plays a crucial role in ensuring patient comfort during orthodontic extractions. Among the various local anesthetic agents commonly used in the field of oral surgery are articaine and lidocaine, which differ in their duration of action and pain effectiveness (pain control) during surgical procedures. This article aimed to analyze the characteristics of 2% lignocaine with 1:80000 adrenaline and 4% articaine with 1:100000 adrenaline regarding duration of action and pain control in patients undergoing bilateral orthodontic maxillary premolar extractions. Materials and methods A split-mouth comparative study was conducted at Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, for which 50 patients of age less than 30 years and who required bilateral orthodontic premolar extractions were selected. Approximately 4% articaine hydrochloride solution was administered on one side, and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride was administered on the contralateral side. Palatal infiltration was not given in the articaine group. The degree of extraction difficulty was similar in both groups, with no discernible variation. In each patient, the duration of anesthesia and pain control were assessed. The IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 24.0, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) was used to perform the student's paired t-test for detecting the difference in outcome parameters between the two groups. Results Upon comparing both groups, it was concluded that the articaine group had a longer mean anesthetic duration of action of 217 minutes, whereas for the lignocaine group, it was 169 minutes, and greater pain reduction was present with the articaine group. The articaine group exhibited less pain (superior pain control) with a mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 1.07 compared to that of the lignocaine group with a mean VAS score of 1.53 during orthodontic premolar extractions. Both the results were statistically significant (P=0.001). Conclusion This split-mouth comparative study concludes that articaine is a more effective local anesthetic in terms of duration of action and pain reduction than that of lignocaine, and it can be used as a local anesthetic of choice for orthodontic maxillary premolar extractions.
