ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Femoral nerve block (FNB) is a well-established analgesic technique for TKA. However, it associates quadriceps weakness. Therefore, femoral triangle block (FTB) and adductor canal block (ACB) were proposed as effective alternative motor-spearing techniques. The primary objective was to compare quadriceps muscle strength preservation between FNB, FTB and ACB in TKA. The secondary objective was to analyze pain control and functional outcomes. METHODS: This is a prospective, double-blinded RCT. From April 2018 to April 2019, patients who undergo a primary TKA were randomized into three experimental groups: FNB-G1/FTB-G2/ACB-G3. Quadriceps strength preservation was measured as the difference in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (G1, n = 22; G2, n = 26; G3, n = 30) met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients with FNB retained significantly lower baseline MVIC at 6 h postoperatively (p = 0.001), but there were no differences at 24 and 48 h. There were no differences between the groups in functional outcomes at any time point. Patients in the FNB-G1 presented significant lower pain scores at 6 h (p = 0.01), 24 h (p = 0.005) and 48 h (p = 0.01). The highest cumulative opioid requirement was reported in ACB-G3. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing TKA, FTB and ACB preserve quadriceps strength better than FNB at 6 h postoperatively, but there are no differences at 24 and 48 h. Moreover, this early inferiority does not translate to worse functional outcomes at any time point. FNB is associated with better pain control at 6, 24 and 48 h after surgery, while ACB presents the highest cumulative opioid requirement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03518450; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03518450 ; submitted March 17, 2018).
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Nerve Block , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Femoral Nerve/physiology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Nerve Block/methodsABSTRACT
IntroducciónEn un escenario de circulación comunitaria del virus, el impacto de la pandemia sobre el sistema sanitario y en las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) se preveía devastador. El Hospital Universitario Vall dHebron (HUVH) ha desplegado un dispositivo de atención a pacientes críticos sin precedentes.MétodosSe describen las previsiones realizadas, las medidas tomadas y los principales resultados en una cohorte de pacientes críticos durante los primeros dos meses (3 de marzo al 2 de mayo del 2020) de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el HUVH de Barcelona.ResultadosEn el periodo de estudio, ingresaron en las Unidades de Críticos del HUVH 333 pacientes. El porcentaje de los pacientes en VMI o VMI y ECMO se mantuvo constantemente por encima del 78%. La mayoría de pacientes han sido hombres (65%); el grupo de edad más frecuente entre 60 y 70 años. Veintitrés pacientes recibieron ECMO, 18 de los cuales fueron canulados en otro centro y trasladados al HUVH. A fecha de cierre del estudio, 14 pacientes se decanularon satisfactoriamente, tres pacientes fallecieron y el resto siguen en soporte con ECMO. Han sido atendidas en UCI ocho gestantes, con una supervivencia del 100%. La mortalidad en UCI de los pacientes menores de 60 años fue el 3,2%. La estancia media en UCI de las altas y los fallecimientos ha sido de 14 días.ConclusionesLas estrategias de organización de la expansión de recursos para la atención de pacientes críticos, sus principales retos y los resultados obtenidos, pueden servir de clave para futuros escenarios similares.
IntroductionIn the context of community transmission of the virus, the impact of the pandemic on health-care systems, mainly on intensive care units (ICU), was expected to be devastating. Vall d́Hebron University Hospital (HUVH) implemented an unprecedented critical patient-care planning and management of resources.MethodsWe describe a cohort of critically ill patients during the first two months of the pandemic (from March 3, 2020, to May 2, 2020) in HUVH, Barcelona.In this manuscript, we report our previsions, strategies implemented, and the outcomes obtained.ResultsThree-thousand and thirty-three patients were admitted to the HUVH Critical Care Units. Throughout the study period, the proportion of patients on IMV or IMV and ECMO remained above 78%. Most patients were men (65%); the most common age group was 60-70 years. Twenty-three patients received ECMO, and eighteen were cannulated at another center and transferred to HUVH. At the end of the study, fourteen patients were successfully decannulated, three patients died, and the rest of the patients were still on ECMO. Eight pregnant women have been treated in the ICU, with a survival rate of 100%. The ICU mortality of patients younger than 60 years was 3.2%. The mean ICU stay of both survivors and nonsurvivors was 14 days.ConclusionThe adequate preparation for resource expansion for critically ill patients care, main challenges, and overall positive results can serve as a precedent for similar future scenarios.
Subject(s)
Humans , Health Sciences , Ambulatory Care , Pandemics , Hospitals , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , Coronavirus , Pneumonia , Health Systems , Spain , Intensive Care Units , Communicable Diseases , MicrobiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In the context of community transmission of the virus, the impact of the pandemic on health-care systems, mainly on intensive care units (ICU), was expected to be devastating. Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH) implemented an unprecedented critical patient-care planning and management of resources. METHODS: We describe a cohort of critically ill patients during the first two months of the pandemic (from March 3, 2020, to May 2, 2020) in HUVH, Barcelona. In this manuscript, we report our previsions, strategies implemented, and the outcomes obtained. RESULTS: Three-thousand and thirty-three patients were admitted to the HUVH Critical Care Units. Throughout the study period, the proportion of patients on IMV or IMV and ECMO remained above 78%. Most patients were men (65%); the most common age group was 60-70 years. Twenty-three patients received ECMO, and eighteen were cannulated at another center and transferred to HUVH. At the end of the study, fourteen patients were successfully decannulated, three patients died, and the rest of the patients were still on ECMO. Eight pregnant women have been treated in the ICU, with a survival rate of 100%. The ICU mortality of patients younger than 60 years was 3.2%. The mean ICU stay of both survivors and nonsurvivors was 14 days. CONCLUSION: The adequate preparation for resource expansion for critically ill patients care, main challenges, and overall positive results can serve as a precedent for similar future scenarios.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Aged , Critical Illness , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , PregnancyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In the context of community transmission of the virus, the impact of the pandemic on health-care systems, mainly on intensive care units (ICU), was expected to be devastating. Vall dÌHebron University Hospital (HUVH) implemented an unprecedented critical patient-care planning and management of resources. METHODS: We describe a cohort of critically ill patients during the first two months of the pandemic (from March 3, 2020, to May 2, 2020) in HUVH, Barcelona. In this manuscript, we report our previsions, strategies implemented, and the outcomes obtained. RESULTS: Three-thousand and thirty-three patients were admitted to the HUVH Critical Care Units. Throughout the study period, the proportion of patients on IMV or IMV and ECMO remained above 78%. Most patients were men (65%); the most common age group was 60-70 years. Twenty-three patients received ECMO, and eighteen were cannulated at another center and transferred to HUVH. At the end of the study, fourteen patients were successfully decannulated, three patients died, and the rest of the patients were still on ECMO. Eight pregnant women have been treated in the ICU, with a survival rate of 100%. The ICU mortality of patients younger than 60 years was 3.2%. The mean ICU stay of both survivors and nonsurvivors was 14 days. CONCLUSION: The adequate preparation for resource expansion for critically ill patients care, main challenges, and overall positive results can serve as a precedent for similar future scenarios.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: En un escenario de circulación comunitaria del virus, el impacto de la pandemia sobre el sistema sanitario y en las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) se preveía devastador. El Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron (HUVH) ha desplegado un dispositivo de atención a pacientes críticos sin precedentes. MÉTODOS: Se describen las previsiones realizadas, las medidas tomadas y los principales resultados en una cohorte de pacientes críticos durante los primeros dos meses (3 de marzo al 2 de mayo del 2020) de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el HUVH de Barcelona. RESULTADOS: En el periodo de estudio, ingresaron en las Unidades de Críticos del HUVH 333 pacientes. El porcentaje de los pacientes en VMI o VMI y ECMO se mantuvo constantemente por encima del 78%. La mayoría de pacientes han sido hombres (65%); el grupo de edad más frecuente entre 60 y 70 años. Veintitrés pacientes recibieron ECMO, 18 de los cuales fueron canulados en otro centro y trasladados al HUVH. A fecha de cierre del estudio, 14 pacientes se decanularon satisfactoriamente, tres pacientes fallecieron y el resto siguen en soporte con ECMO. Han sido atendidas en UCI ocho gestantes, con una supervivencia del 100%. La mortalidad en UCI de los pacientes menores de 60 años fue el 3,2%. La estancia media en UCI de las altas y los fallecimientos ha sido de 14 días. CONCLUSIONES: Las estrategias de organización de la expansión de recursos para la atención de pacientes críticos, sus principales retos y los resultados obtenidos, pueden servir de clave para futuros escenarios similares
INTRODUCTION: In the context of community transmission of the virus, the impact of the pandemic on health-care systems, mainly on intensive care units (ICU), was expected to be devastating. Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH) implemented an unprecedented critical patient-care planning and management of resources. METHODS: We describe a cohort of critically ill patients during the first two months of the pandemic (from March 3, 2020, to May 2, 2020) in HUVH, Barcelona. In this manuscript, we report our previsions, strategies implemented, and the outcomes obtained. RESULTS: Three-thousand and thirty-three patients were admitted to the HUVH Critical Care Units. Throughout the study period, the proportion of patients on IMV or IMV and ECMO remained above 78%. Most patients were men (65%); the most common age group was 60-70 years. Twenty-three patients received ECMO, and eighteen were cannulated at another center and transferred to HUVH. At the end of the study, fourteen patients were successfully decannulated, three patients died, and the rest of the patients were still on ECMO. Eight pregnant women have been treated in the ICU, with a survival rate of 100%. The ICU mortality of patients younger than 60 years was 3.2%. The mean ICU stay of both survivors and nonsurvivors was 14 days. CONCLUSION: The adequate preparation for resource expansion for critically ill patients care, main challenges, and overall positive results can serve as a precedent for similar future scenarios
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Child , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pandemics , Critical Illness/therapy , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Critical Care/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/supply & distribution , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SpainABSTRACT
This study aimed to describe the impact of implementing a protocol on the perioperative management of patients admitted for hip fracture treated with antithrombotics. A protocol was designed based on the recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). After its implementation (May 2012), information on antithrombotic management was collected from admission to 3 months after surgery in retrospective (October 2011-March 2012) and prospective (October 2012-March 2013) cohorts. Patients' thromboembolic risk was classified into high, moderate or low according to the ACCP categories. A total of 113 and 101 cases were included in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. No differences in age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiology score or thrombotic risk categories were observed between cohorts. Most patients were treated with aspirin or triflusal (55.1% and 48.1% in each cohort, respectively), clopidogrel (24.5% and 26.6%) or acenocoumarol (16.3% and 20.2%). In moderate to high thromboembolic risk patients, a higher rate of bridging therapy with full doses of enoxaparin (18.5% and 50%, p = 0.04 before and 9.1% and 43.7%, p = 0.02 after surgery) and a lower rate of aspirin discontinuation (76% and 55.3%, p = 0.03) were observed in the prospective cohort. Both cohorts had a similar percentage of cases with bleeding (68.1% and 68.3%) and thrombotic events (11.5% and 13%). No differences in the timing between surgery and the discontinuation or resumption of antithrombotics were noted. After the protocol implementation, aspirin was less often stopped and bridging therapy with therapeutic doses of enoxaparin was used more often. However, interruption and resumption times of antithrombotics remained almost unchanged. In order to achieve these goals, more efforts should be made to implement the protocol in clinical practice.