Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 68(8): 1006-1015, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828497

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia is standard of care for patients undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). However, postoperative pain and bladder discomfort remains an issue, and optimising pain management could improve recovery and promote earlier home discharge. The main objective of this trial was to evaluate if patients receiving spinal anaesthesia are more frequently home ready at 8 pm on the same day compared with multimodal pain management following RALP under general anaesthesia. METHODS: This pragmatic, randomised controlled, multicentre trial was performed between January 2019 to December 2021. Patients undergoing RALP under general anaesthesia were randomised to either multimodal analgesia using parecoxib and morphine intra-operatively (Group GM) or spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine and sufentanil (Group GS). The primary aim, home readiness, was assessed using a post-anaesthesia discharge scoring system. RESULTS: Of 202 patients analysed, 27% patients reached home readiness criteria after 12 h, 46% after 24 h and 79% after 48 h, without differences between the groups. Urge to pass urine was greater in group GM than in group GS (p ⟨0.001) and lasted for a median of two hours in both groups. More patients expressed satisfaction with postoperative care in group GS (p ⟨0.001). No other significant differences were found between the groups. DISCUSSION: We found no difference in time to home readiness between the groups. Approximately one-fourth of the patients achieved home readiness the same day after surgery without difference between the groups. Fewer patients had urge, and patient satisfaction was greater in group GS.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Pain, Postoperative , Patient Discharge , Prostatectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Prostatectomy/methods , Male , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , Laparoscopy/methods , Single-Blind Method , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Anesthesia, General/methods , Pain Management/methods
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 107(2): 224-8, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11174186

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Controlled prospective studies are needed to determine whether surgical treatment in fact has an effect additive to that of medical treatment of nasal polyposis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effect of medical treatment versus combined surgical and medical treatment on olfaction, polyp score, and symptoms in nasal polyposis. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with nasal polyposis and symmetrical nasal airways were randomized to unilateral endoscopic sinus surgery after pretreatment with oral prednisolone for 10 days and local nasal budesonide bilaterally for 1 month. Postoperatively, patients were given local nasal steroids (budesonide). Patients were evaluated with nasal endoscopy, symptom scores, and olfactory thresholds. They were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: The sense of smell was improved by the combination of local and oral steroids. Surgery had no additional effect. Symptom scores improved significantly with medical treatment alone, but surgery had additional beneficial effects on nasal obstruction and secretion. After surgery, the polyp score decreased significantly on the operated side but remained the same on the unoperated side. Twenty-five percent of the patients were willing to undergo an operation also on the unoperated side at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Medical treatment seems to be sufficient to treat most symptoms of nasal polyposis. When hyposmia is the primary symptom, no additional benefit seems to be gained from surgical treatment. If nasal obstruction is the main problem after steroid treatment, surgical treatment is indicated. Selection of those who will benefit from surgery should be based on the patient's symptoms and not on the examiner's polyp score.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps/surgery , Nasal Polyps/therapy , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Prednisolone/therapeutic use
4.
Contraception ; 57(4): 251-5, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9649917

ABSTRACT

This survey comprised 50 consecutive perforations occurring with intrauterine devices (IUD) reported to the National Patient Insurance Scheme Register during 1990 to 1993. All 50 women were parous and > 20 years of age at the time of IUD insertion. Forty-two (84%) of the IUD were inserted by a midwife and eight by a gynecologist. A total of 45 women (90%) had their IUD inserted < 1 year after a full-term pregnancy and 31 women (62%) had their IUD inserted < or = 12 weeks after delivery. Of the 50 women, 27 (54%) reported that they were breastfeeding at the time of IUD insertion. No particular IUD was overrepresented in relation to its share on the market. In 31 cases (62%), severe pain at insertion and during the first 24 h was recorded. In 14 women (28%), the perforation was diagnosed early (i.e., within 1 month of insertion) and in 36 women (72%), the perforation was diagnosed > 1 month after insertion. Lower abdominal pain was the most frequent symptom at early diagnosis but in two cases, the main symptom was heavy bleeding. Among the 36 women in whom the perforation was discovered more than 1 month after insertion, the diagnosis was made when an unexpected pregnancy occurred in 20 women (56%). In 15 cases, the IUD strings were not visible during pelvic examination at a routine check-up, which led to efforts to locate the IUD. Thirty-two women (64%) underwent laparotomy for removal. We conclude that lactating women seem to be a risk group for perforation and that a national register of IUD perforations could provide a better means of quality control.


Subject(s)
Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Uterine Perforation/etiology , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adult , Breast Feeding , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Midwifery/standards , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Uterine Hemorrhage/etiology , Uterine Perforation/complications , Uterine Perforation/diagnosis
5.
Radiother Oncol ; 43(1): 23-8, 1997 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9165133

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 1986 a prospective, randomized, multi-centre trial for evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was initiated. As survival in this group of patients is poor the purpose was to find a possible survival benefit of the chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy only. METHODS: Four-hundred sixty-one patients from Denmark, Norway and Sweden with tumors in oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx were randomized to receive either standard treatment (radiotherapy or radiotherapy followed by surgery) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by standard treatment. Chemotherapy included three courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on day 1 followed by 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 per day continuous i.v. infusion for 120 hours. Radiotherapy 64-70 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction, 5 times/week, was given to patients in both treatment arms. RESULTS: Response rate was 71% for patients randomized to chemotherapy-radiotherapy and 66% for patients randomized to standard treatment (not statistically significant). Residual tumors were excised if possible. After surgery 62% of the patients randomized to chemotherapy-radiotherapy and 60% of the patients in the standard treatment group were clinically tumor free. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant benefit in survival was observed for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. Nor was there any impact of chemotherapy on the number of patients achieving loco-regional tumor control after primary treatment.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate
9.
Cancer ; 71(3): 751-8, 1993 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8431856

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Results of surgical treatment of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) have been highly variable, probably because of patient selection. Therefore, a study of representative patients with this disease was performed. METHODS: In a defined area of Sweden, 581 patients were analyzed. Clinical records and histopathologic findings were reviewed. The minimum follow-up time was 7 years. Prognostic factors were evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Evaluation of sex distribution, age, and anatomic site of the primary tumor showed that the patients were representative of all Swedish patients with CMM of the head and neck. The mean patient age at diagnosis was 64 years for both sexes. Fifty-three percent of the patients were women. Female patients had more tumors of the face than did male patients, whereas male patients were overrepresented among patients with tumors of the auricle-external ear canal and scalp-neck area. Localization to the face was observed in 68%, which is an overrepresentation of three to four times when skin surface is taken into consideration. Twenty-four percent of the patients had lentigo maligna melanoma. Only 33% of the patients had superficial spreading melanoma. In univariate analyses, sex, anatomic site of the primary tumor, histogenetic type, Clark level of invasion, and tumor thickness had prognostic power. In a multivariate analysis, tumor thickness, anatomic site of the primary tumor, and sex of the patient were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: In representative patients with CMM of the head and neck, tumor thickness, anatomic site of the primary tumor, and sex of the patients were independent prognostic factors.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/surgery , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Skin Neoplasms/secondary , Sweden/epidemiology
11.
Qual Assur Health Care ; 1(4): 197-206, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2490965

ABSTRACT

The Swedish Patient Insurance scheme is presented, and experience gained during the first 10 years discussed. About 70% of the claims concerned treatment injuries sustained during surgical intervention. During the first 5 years (1975-79), altogether 9,968 claims were submitted; 275 claims (2.8%) concerned obstetrical and gynecological treatment. These cases have been analysed and the pattern of complications was consistent with that found in the literature reviewed. Continuous follow-up and reporting of the claims is suggested. The need for stricter definitions of compensibility is obvious.


Subject(s)
Gynecology , Insurance, Liability/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics , State Medicine/economics , Birth Injuries/economics , Female , Gynecology/economics , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease , Malpractice , Obstetrics/economics , Postoperative Complications/economics , Pregnancy , Sweden
12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2711833

ABSTRACT

The Patient Insurance (PI) scheme in Sweden was instituted on 1 January 1975. From the PI it is possible for a patient to obtain acknowledgement of an injury sustained in connection with medical treatment or operation--and receive financial compensation therefore--without having to prove that the injury was the result of fault or neglect. Special conditions of undertaking are laid down for the guidance of PI assessors which, if fulfilled, will entitle the patient to indemnity from the respective county council (via the PI) for injury sustained in connection with medical care received from county institutions or staff. As the Swedish PI scheme was the first of its kind in the world, an evaluation of its application during the first 5 years seemed justified. The present work constitutes the obstetrical-gynaecological part of that project. The objectives of the study were: to analyse and group according to injury all claims concerning obstetrical or gynaecological intervention submitted to the PI during 1975-79; to evaluate available literature on such injuries in relation to the present findings; to make recommendations for changes in the treatment routines of frequently occurring or serious injuries; and to study the working procedures of the PI, especially regarding its assessment of patient claims. Chapter I sets out the historical background of the PI. The extent of a patient's right to indemnity from the PI is discussed, covering the conditions of undertaking that must be fulfilled on the patient's part, and the PI's obligations. The Patient Injuries Committee is presented, to which injured parties can appeal against decisions of the PI. Chapters II--X. During the period studied, altogether 275 claims concerning obstetrical and gynaecological treatment were submitted to the PI, i.e. 2.5% of all claims received by the PI during that period. Most of the injuries resulted from surgical intervention. The claims have been grouped into six gynaecological and three obstetrical chapters. The reporting frequency to the PI was low during this period and therefore no statistical information can be derived from the analysis. A review of the current literature revealed a similar pattern of severe complications as that found among claims to the PI. In one respect, however, the present study is unique, since complications resulting from certain types of intervention, though performed under so varying circumstances, have never before been compiled and evaluated. The reported injuries were fairly evenly distributed among the 26 counties and the three different sizes of hospital.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Gynecology/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics/economics , Abortion, Induced/economics , Adult , Birth Injuries/economics , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/economics , Intrauterine Devices/economics , Obstetric Labor Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/economics , Pregnancy , Sterilization, Reproductive/economics , Sweden , Urinary Incontinence/economics
16.
Scand J Soc Med ; 6(1): 43-8, 1978.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-635500

ABSTRACT

Risk factors during pregnancy and delivery of immigrant women are analysed. Individual birth delivery records of 1 235 immigrant women and of 412 Swedish women are studied. Most of the immigrants--65%--were Scandinavians, while 10% had come from Southern Europe and 4% were non-Europeans. The immigrant groups differed somewhat amongst themselves, and also vis-à-vis the Swedes in some social and demographic respects. Participation in antenatal care was not lower among the immigrants than in the control group, but the former did not attend antenatal exercises to the same extent. The perinatal mortality and prematurity rates were 1.5% and 5%--about the same as among the Swedish women. The rate of premature delivery was found to be related to the duration of residence in Sweden. Women who had lived less than one year in this country more often delivered prematurely than did the more settled immigrant women. Further studies on the emotional reactions of immigrant women during pregnancy and delivery are proposed.


Subject(s)
Emigration and Immigration , Labor, Obstetric , Pregnancy , Adaptation, Psychological , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Parity , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Prenatal Care , Risk , Sweden
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL