Identifying value-based quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry.

OBJECTIVE: To define generic quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry from the perspectives of patients, professionals (physicians, nurses, and managers), and payers (health insurance companies). METHODS: Quality variables were identified by reviewing the relevant literature. A working. group consisting of patients', professionals' and payers' representatives was mandated by their respective umbrella organizations. The working group prioritized the quality variables that were identified. Core values were defined and subsequently linked to preliminary quality indicators. These were tested for feasibility in ten hospitals in a four-week period. Stakeholder consultation took place by means of two invitational conferences and two written commentary rounds. RESULTS: Forty-one quality variables were identified from the literature. After prioritization, seven core values were defined and translated to 22 preliminary indicators. Overall, the feasibility study showed high relevance scores and good implementability of the preliminary quality indicators. A final set of twenty-two quality indicators (17 structure, 3 process and 2 outcome indicators) was then established using a consensus-based approach. CONCLUSION: Consensus on a quality framework for general hospital psychiatry was built by incorporating the perspectives of relevant stakeholders. Results of the feasibility study suggest broad support and good implementability of the final quality indicators. Structural indicators were broadly defined, and process and outcome indicators are generic to facilitate quality measurement across settings. The quality indicator set can now be used to facilitate quality and outcome assessment, stimulate standardization of services, and help demonstrate (cost-) effectiveness.

Assessment of Biopsychosocial Complexity and Health Care Needs: Measurement Properties of the INTERMED Self-Assessment Version.

OBJECTIVE: The INTERMED Self-Assessment questionnaire (IMSA) was developed as an alternative to the observer-rated INTERMED (IM) to assess biopsychosocial complexity and health care needs. We studied feasibility, reliability, and validity of the IMSA within a large and heterogeneous international sample of adult hospital inpatients and outpatients as well as its predictive value for health care use (HCU) and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A total of 850 participants aged 17 to 90 years from five countries completed the IMSA and were evaluated with the IM. The following measurement properties were determined: feasibility by percentages of missing values; reliability by Cronbach α; interrater agreement by intraclass correlation coefficients; convergent validity of IMSA scores with mental health (Short Form 36 emotional well-being subscale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), medical health (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale) and QoL (Euroqol-5D) by Spearman rank correlations; and predictive validity of IMSA scores with HCU and QoL by (generalized) linear mixed models. RESULTS: Feasibility, face validity, and reliability (Cronbach α = 0.80) were satisfactory. Intraclass correlation coefficient between IMSA and IM total scores was .78 (95% CI = .75-.81). Correlations of the IMSA with the Short Form 36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, and Euroqol-5D (convergent validity) were -.65, .15, .28, and -.59, respectively. The IMSA significantly predicted QoL and also HCU (emergency department visits, hospitalization, outpatient visits, and diagnostic examinations) after 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results were comparable between hospital sites, inpatients and outpatients, as well as age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The IMSA is a generic and time-efficient method to assess biopsychosocial complexity and to provide guidance for multidisciplinary care trajectories in adult patients, with good reliability and validity across different cultures.

Feasibility and outcome of the implementation of a screening program for panic disorder in noncardiac chest pain patients in cardiac emergency department routine care.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the feasibility and outcome of the implementation of a screening program for classifying panic disorder (PD) in patients presenting with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP(1)), when integrated in routine cardiac emergency department (CED(2)) care. METHODS: Barrier analyses were made during the pilot phase and implementation period. NCCP patients aged 18-70 years presenting at the CED (n=252) were eligible for screening with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Those scoring above cutoff on the HADS were referred to the psychiatric department and received the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTS: Screening was initiated in 60 patients (23.8%), of whom nine refused participation. Staff adherence remained low despite implementing several improvements in the screening procedure. In total, 39 patients completed the program; 8 were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder, including 2 patients with PD. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of implementation of this screening program for PD in NCCP patients in routine CED care was limited because offering screening frequently conflicted with provision of acute care and because patients showed relatively high refusal rates. Contrasting our assumption, various other psychiatric disorders besides PD were classified.

[A medical-psychiatric unit in a general hospital: effective combined somatic and psychiatric care?]. / Medisch-psychiatrische unit in algemeen ziekenhuis: effectieve gecombineerde somatische en psychiatrische zorg?

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of combined integral somatic and psychiatric treatment in a medical-psychiatric unit (MPU). DESIGN: Retrospective case-note study. METHOD: The case notes of all patients admitted to the MPU at the VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, in 2011 were analysed. Data on reasons for referral and somatic and psychiatric diagnoses were collected. Using a global clinical assessment scale and the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales (HoNOS), data on psychiatric symptomology and limitations, behavioural problems, social problems and limitations associated with physical health problems were collected on both admission and discharge. In this way the effect of the admission period on various problems was determined. RESULTS: In 2011 there were 139 admissions to the MPU with a wide variation of somatic and psychiatric diagnoses. The average admission period was 9 days. Global clinical evaluation of the treatment goals set for somatic and psychiatric conditions showed that more than 90% and 85% of the treatment goals, respectively, were completely achieved. HoNOS scores showed a reduction in severity of both psychiatric and somatic problems. The total HoNOS-core was significantly reduced by nearly 3.5 points - a large effect size. CONCLUSION: The MPU has succeeded in its goal to deliver integral care to a very diverse group of patients with somatic and psychiatric co-morbidities. It is able to offer care to a vulnerable patient group in which it can be presumed that treatment on a non-integrated unit could not have been delivered or not delivered adequately, due to the complexity of their somatic and behavioural problems.

Distress and quality of life after autologous stem cell transplantation: a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the outcome of a web-based stepped care intervention.

BACKGROUND: Psychological distress (i.e. depression and anxiety) is a strong predictor of functional status and other aspects of quality of life in autologous stem cell transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy. Treatment of psychological distress is hypothesized to result in improvement of functional status and other aspects of quality of life. The aim is to evaluate the outcome of stepped care for psychological distress on functional status and other aspects of quality of life in patients with hematological malignancy treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is designed as a randomized clinical trial with 2 treatment arms: a stepped care intervention program versus care as usual. Patients are randomized immediately pre transplant. Stepped care and care as usual are initiated after a 6 weeks buffer period. Outcome is evaluated at 13, 30, and 42 weeks post transplant.In the experimental group, the first step includes an Internet-based self-help program. If psychological distress persists after the self-help intervention, the second step of the program is executed, i.e. a diagnostic evaluation and a standardized interview, yielding a problem analysis. Based on this information, a contract is made with the patient and treatment is provided consisting of individual face-to-face counseling, medication, or referral to other services. Care as usual comprises an interview with the patient, on ad hoc basis; emotional support and advice, on ad hoc basis; if urgent problems emerge, the patient is referred to other services.Primary outcome variables are psychological distress and functional status. Data are analyzed according to the intention to treat-principle. DISCUSSION: This study has several innovative characteristics. First, the outcome of the intervention for psychological distress in patients with hematological malignancy treated with autologous stem cell transplantation is evaluated in a randomized controlled study. Second, the impact of the intervention on functional status is evaluated: it is hypothesized that reduction of psychological distress results in improved functional status. Furthermore, the intervention concerns an Internet-based treatment in the first step. Finally, the intervention is characterized by an emphasis on self-management, efficiency, and a multi-disciplinary approach with nurses taking up a central role. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR1770.

Can we increase adherence to treatment recommendations of the consultation psychiatrist working in a general hospital? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to advice given by the consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatrist is a prerequisite for the effectiveness and success of psychiatric consultation. It is unknown which factors are associated with better adherence to advice. AIM: To review the adherence of consultees with advice given by the psychiatrist during inpatient consultation. METHOD: Systematic literature review. RESULTS: Eighteen studies reported on the level of adherence with recommendations given by the consultation psychiatrist in a hospital setting. All were retrospective cohort studies conducted before 1998. Thirteen of these reported on the association between clinical variables and the level of adherence. The median level of adherence with diagnostic advice was 56% (range 29-75%), with medication advice 79% (range 68-98%), and with discharge advice 91% (range 85-95%). Patient-related variables were not associated with adherence, nor were consultee-related variables. Consultant-related variables associated with adherence were level of professional expertise, organizing liaison activities, following up on patients after initial consultation, and prescription of medication by the consultant during the consultation. CONCLUSION: This review provides evidence for a role of consultant characteristics and an active approach of the consultant in terms of CL activities as well as consultation procedures, in attaining adherence to advice. Prospective qualitative research is needed to identify consultation methods that may further enhance adherence.

The guideline "consultation psychiatry" of the Netherlands Psychiatric Association.

BACKGROUND: In 2008, the Netherlands Psychiatric Association authorized a guideline "consultation psychiatry." AIM: To set a standard for psychiatric consultations in nonpsychiatric settings. The main objective of the guideline is to answer three questions: Is psychiatric consultation effective and, if so, which forms are most effective? How should a psychiatric consultations be performed? What increases adherence to recommendations given by the consulting psychiatrist? METHOD: Systematic literature review. RESULTS: Both in general practice and in hospital settings psychiatric consultation is effective. In primary care, the effectiveness of psychiatric consultation is almost exclusively studied in the setting of "collaborative care." Procedural guidance is given on how to perform a psychiatric consultation. In this guidance, psychiatric consultation is explicitly looked upon as a complex activity that requires a broad frame of reference and adequate medical and pharmacological expertise and experience and one that should be performed by doctors. Investing in a good relation with the general practitioner, and the use of a "consultation letter" increased efficacy in general practice. In the hospital setting, investing in liaison activities and an active psychiatric follow-up of consultations increased adherence to advice. CONCLUSION: Psychiatric consultations are effective and constitute a useful contribution to the patients' treatment. With setting a standard consultations will become more transparent and checkable. It is hoped that this will increase the quality of consultation psychiatry.

The effects of teaching medical professionalism by means of vignettes: an exploratory study.

The purpose of this study is (1) to evaluate whether an educational program for preclinical students has an effect on the knowledge of professional behaviour for clerks and (2) to study how preclinical students compare with advanced clinical students concerning this knowledge. The authors used an observer-rated test consisting of vignettes describing a dilemma concerning professional behaviour. Students' description of proposed behaviour was scored in one of three categories: unacceptable, acceptable or excellent. Preclinical students were compared with clinical students and the effect of an educational session on student scores on this test was assessed. The educational programme had a positive effect on student scores. However, the knowledge of professional behaviour did not generalize to situations that had not been the explicit topic of the session. A difference was found between preclinical and clinical students in two of the four vignettes: in one vignette clinical students had better scores, in another vignette they had worse scores. It is concluded that the educational programme had a positive effect on student knowledge of professional behaviour but there was no generalization. For more generic rules to sink in, probably many cases need to be discussed, with explicit attention paid to the rationales of these rules. Students who were advanced in their clerkships held different views on professional behaviour compared with preclinical students, possibly due to a socialization process.