Regression of perianeurysmal fibrosis and ureteral dilation following endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm.

An inflammatory component to abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is thought to occur in approximately 5% of cases. Accompanying ureteral entrapment may be involved in 20% of these. Transabdominal repair of inflammatory AAA with ureterolysis may result in increased complications. Many authorities have recommended a retroperitoneal approach to decrease dissection. Similarly, an endovascular approach has been utilized. We report here the results of a patient with an inflammatory AAA with bilateral ureteral obstruction successfully treated with endovascular stent graft repair and bilateral ureteral stents with exclusion of the aneurysm and resolution of hydronephrosis.

Hospital costs for elective endovascular and surgical repairs of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To determine and compare the average in-hospital costs of elective open surgical and endovascular repairs of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total actual cost data for patients undergoing elective endovascular (n = 181) or open surgical (n = 273) repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms between 1997 and 1999 were retrieved. The mean total hospital cost (including stent-graft costs and excluding attending physician fees) and mean postoperative length of stay were calculated for each treatment group. Costs were expressed in 1999 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Endovascular repair yielded a shorter postoperative length of stay than did open surgery (mean stay, 3.4 vs 8.0 days; P <.001) and a lower proportion of patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit for 1 full day or longer (2.8% vs 36.3%; P <.001). The mean total hospital cost was significantly higher for endovascular repair than for open surgery ($20,716 vs $18,484; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Hospital costs were higher for endovascular repair than for open surgical repair. However, endovascular repair was associated with a decreased length of stay and fewer intensive care unit admissions. The increased mean hospital cost for endovascular repair was smaller than one would expect, considering the higher costs of endovascular grafts, as compared with those for surgical grafts (approximately $6,400 according to literature data).

Contemporary management of aortic branch compromise resulting from acute aortic dissection.

PURPOSE: In an earlier report, we documented the incidence and impact of aortic branch compromise complicating acute aortic dissection (AD) over a 21-year interval (1965-1986). In the current study, management of peripheral vascular complications (PVCs) of AD over the past decade was reviewed. METHODS: Medical records of patients treated for AD over the interval January 1, 1990, to December 31, 1999, were reviewed. Patients with branch compromise confirmed with radiography or operation and patients with spinal cord ischemia that was based on results of a physical examination defined the study group. Comparisons between subgroups with and without PVC over a 30-year interval were analyzed with the chi(2) test. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients (101 proximal and 86 distal) were treated for AD over the study interval. A total of 53 (28%) of these patients had clinical evidence of organ or limb malperfusion (7 cerebral, 3 upper extremity, 5 spinal cord, 11 mesenteric, 12 renal, and 24 lower extremity [sites inclusive]), and one of three (17 patients) of these underwent specific peripheral vascular intervention. The remaining 65% (36) of the PVC group had complete or partial malperfusion resolution after central aortic therapy (medical or surgical) alone. Open techniques for treating PVC included aortic fenestration (9), femorofemoral grafting (2), and aortofemoral grafting (1). All had favorable outcomes with no mortality. Endovascular procedures in five patients included abdominal aortic fenestration (3) or stenting of the renal (2), mesenteric (2), and iliac (1) arteries with clinical success in three patients and two deaths. The in-hospital mortality rate for the entire group of 187 patients was 18% (15% for proximal aortic operation, 8% in medically treated patients). The presence of aortic branch compromise was not a statistically significant predictor of the patient mortality rate (23% with and 16% without; P =.26). Overall mortality rate in the current study (18% vs 37%; P =.000006) and the mortality rate with PVC (23% vs 51%; P =.001), in particular with mesenteric ischemia (36% vs 87%; P =.026), decreased significantly when compared with prior experience. CONCLUSIONS: The overall mortality rate from AD during the past decade has decreased significantly. Similar trends were noted in patients with PVCs, a previously identified high-risk subgroup. Increased awareness and prompt, specific management of PVCs, in particular when visceral ischemia is present, have contributed to improved outcomes in patients with AD.

Aorto-uni-iliac endograft for complex aortoiliac aneurysms compared with tube/bifurcation endografts: results of the EVT/Guidant trials.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to present the results of the multicenter EVT/Guidant aorto-uni-iliac trial and to compare them with the tube, bifurcated graft, and open control series in regard to patient demographics, medical comorbidity, 30-day morbidity/mortality, and outcome at 1 year. METHODS: One hundred twenty-one patients not eligible for tube or bifurcated endografts were entered into the aorto-uni-iliac trial (A-I). These were compared with 153 patients in a tube (T) group, 268 patients in a bifurcated endograft (BI) group, and 111 patients in an open control (C) group. All data were audited and independently analyzed for presentation to the Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: Group demographics were similar with the following exceptions. Aneurysm diameter was significantly less in the T group (51.2 mm) but similar for the A-I (57 mm), BI (54.6 mm), and C (55.6 mm) groups (P < .001). There were more male patients in all endograft groups (A-I 92.6%, BI 89.5%, T 85.6% vs 76.6% for C, P = .002). Peripheral arterial occlusion was present more frequently in the A-I group (25.6% vs 13.8% BI, 10.5% T, and 10.8% C, P = .003). However, no differences were found in mean age, incidence of coronary artery disease, and American Society of Anesthesiologists III/IV classification. Implantation was achieved in 94.2% of the A-I group, 90.3% of the BI group, and 92% of the T group. No significant difference was seen in the operative mortality rate (4.2% A-I, 2.6% BI, O% T, 2.7% C). Postoperative cardiac complications were similar for the A-I (22%) and C (20.7%) groups but significantly less for the BI and T groups (13.4% and 10.5%, P = .019), whereas pulmonary problems were significantly reduced in all endograft groups (A-I 11.9%, BI 10.1%, and T 7.2% vs 22.5% for C, P = .002). Transient renal dysfunction occurred in 6.8% of the A-I group and 8.2% of the BI group but in only 3.3% of the T group and 1.8% of the C group (P = .028). Operating time was significantly longer for the A-I group than for the BI, T, or C groups (258 minutes vs 156, 179, and 174 minutes). Median blood loss, intensive care unit use, and hospital stays were markedly and significantly reduced in all endograft groups compared with the control group. The incidences of type I endoleak at 1 year were 2.4% A-I, 2.3% BI, and 3.8% T, and no ruptures occurred in any of the patients treated with endografts. No femoral-femoral graft thromboses occurred in the A-I group. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that patients with combined aortic and iliac aneurysms have a more complex repair requirement and have an increased rate of comorbidity, the results are competitive with endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm by tube and bifurcated graft systems and are associated with a lower morbidity than open operation.

Results of an aortic endograft trial: impact of device failure beyond 12 months.

PURPOSE: Analysis endpoints of patient survival and aortic rupture at a reporting interval of 12 months are regularly used to compare endograft aortic aneurysm (EAG) repair to conventional open surgical (COS) repair. This study reports a multicenter EAG repair versus COS repair parallel cohort trial at 12 months and additional observations of specific device failure types and their impact on an aortic endograft design beyond that follow-up period. METHODS: From August 1997 to September 1998, 240 patients who were treated with bifurcation EAG repairs and 28 patients who were treated with straight EAG repairs were compared with 98 patients who were treated with COS repair for elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair. Allocation to treatment was based on aneurysm anatomy. All cohorts underwent infrarenal procedures. Data from concurrent, nonrandomized patient accrual from 17 United States institutions were prospectively gathered and independently adjudicated for safety and efficacy. An independent core laboratory evaluated all imaging data. RESULTS: There were 308 men and 58 women (mean age, 72 years; range, 42-94 years) treated for infrarenal aortic aneurysm (mean diameter, 55 mm; range, 40-115 mm). Mean preoperative aneurysm diameters were clinically similar (EAG repair, 54 mm vs COS repair, 57 mm). The two cohorts were not significantly different in terms of gender (P = .30) or age (P = .32). EAG repair technical success (aneurysm exclusion, graft patency, patient survival) at 30 days was 89.2%. Five patients required immediate conversion to COS repair, four caused by access complications and one caused by operator-induced EAG repair malposition. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.5% for EAG repair and 3.1% for COS repair (P = .59). The 12-month survival rate was 94.3% for EAG repair and 95.9% for COS repair. The intermediate-term cumulative survival rate at 24 months was 84.9% for EAG repair and 80.3% for COS repair (P = .48). EAG repair device failure occurred from fabric erosion in six patients, with two deaths from ruptured aneurysm at 18 and 28 months after endografting and four device failures resolved by secondary procedures. Five endograft limb dislocations were all resolved by secondary endovascular procedures. Major or minor endograft migration required secondary procedures in five patients, including conversion in two patients. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcome at 12 months demonstrated effective aneurysm treatment and comparable safety between EAG repair and COS repair by conventional endpoints. Ongoing follow-up beyond 12 months revealed device-related adverse events that required endograft design changes. Diligent surveillance of outcomes beyond 12 months is necessary to adequately evaluate EAG repair devices.

Endovascular stent-graft in abdominal aortic aneurysms: the relationship between patent vessels that arise from the aneurysmal sac and early endoleak.

PURPOSE: To determine the association of patent sac branch vessels (lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries [IMAs]) with early endoleak rate after stent-graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) angiograms in 158 patients who underwent stent-graft AAA repair were retrospectively reviewed to determine the preoperative patency of IMAs and other sac branch vessels (feeders) and presence or absence of immediate postoperative endoleak. Relationships of early endoleak rate with total branch vessel, IMA, and lumbar artery patency and graft type were evaluated. RESULTS: There was a significant association between patency of sac feeders and rate of early endoleak, especially type 2. As total patent feeders increased from zero to three to four to six, total endoleak rate increased from 6% (one of 17) to 35% (30 of 86); type 2 endoleak rate, from 0% to 25%. IMA patency was significantly associated with total early endoleak rate. Increasing lumbar artery patency also was associated with significantly higher total and type 2 endoleak rates: With zero to three lumbar arteries, the total endoleak rate was 17% and type 2 endoleak rate was 13%, as compared with 60% and 50%, respectively, with more than six patent lumbar arteries. CONCLUSION: Sac branch vessel patency is associated with significantly higher early total and type 2 endoleak rates after stent-graft repair of AAAs; thus, patent sac branches play an important role in the pathogenesis of endoleaks.

Clinical outcome of internal iliac artery occlusions during endovascular treatment of aortoiliac aneurysmal diseases.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical outcome of hypogastric artery occlusion in patients who underwent endovascular treatment of aortoiliac aneurysmal disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 1994 to March 1998, 94 patients underwent endovascular treatment of aneurysmal diseases involving the infra-abdominal aorta or iliac arteries. Preoperative and intraoperative radiologic data were reviewed. Discharge summaries, clinic visits, and phone calls formed the basis for clinical follow-up, with a mean follow-up period of 7.3 months (range, 1-24 months). RESULTS: Because of the anatomy of the aneurysms, 28 patients required occlusion of one or more hypogastric arteries. One of the 28 patients died of unrelated causes before follow-up. Seven (26%) of the remaining 27 patients developed symptoms attributable to the hypogastric artery occlusions. Five patients developed new buttock or thigh claudication; of these five patients, three with initially mild symptoms noted complete or near complete resolution of symptoms upon follow-up. One patient with originally significant claudication at 2-year follow-up noted near resolution of symptoms. The other patient with severe pain did not improve significantly on final 1-year follow-up before his death (of unrelated causes). Other clinical complications were worsening sexual function in one patient and a nonhealing sacral decubitus ulcer that developed in a debilitated patient in the postoperative setting, which required surgery. No bowel ischemia was observed. CONCLUSION: When treating aortoiliac aneurysmal disease through an endovascular approach, the occlusion of internal iliac artery is often necessary but carries with it a small but finite chance of morbidity.

Epidural cooling for spinal cord protection during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: A five-year experience.

PURPOSE: We developed and applied a method for providing regional spinal cord hypothermia with epidural cooling (EC) during thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAA) repair. Preliminary results indicated significant reduction in spinal cord ischemic complications (SCI), compared with historical controls, and a 5-year experience with EC was reviewed. METHODS: From July 1993 to September 1998, 170 patients with thoracic aneurysms (n = 14; 8.2%) or TAAs (types I and II, n = 83 [49%]; type III, n = 66 [39%]; type IV, n = 7 [4.1%]) were treated with EC. An earlier aneurysm resection was noted in 44% of patients, an emergent operation was noted in 20% of patients, and an aortic dissection was noted in 16% of patients. The EC was successful (mean cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] temperature at cross-clamp, 26.4 +/- 3 degrees C) in 97% of cases, with all 170 patients included in an intention-to-treat analysis. The operation was performed with a clamp/sew technique (98% patients) and selective (T(9) to L(1) region) reimplantation of intercostal vessels. Clinical and EC variables were examined for association with operative mortality and SCI by means of the Fischer exact test, and those variables with a P value less than.1 were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was 9.5% and was weakly associated (P =.07) with SCI; postoperative cardiac complications (odds ratio [OR], 35. 3; 95% CI, 5.3 to 233; P <.001) and renal failure (OR, 32.2; 95% CI, 6.6 to 157; P <.001) were the only independent predictors of postoperative death. SCI of any severity occurred in 7% of cases (type I/II, 10 of 83 [12%]; all other types, 2 of 87 [2.3%]), versus a predicted (Acher model) incidence of 18.5% for this cohort (P =. 003). Half the deficits were minor, with good functional recovery, and devastating paraplegia occurred in three patients (2.0%). Independent correlates of SCI included types I and II TAA (OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 46.3; P =.021), nonelective operation (OR, 8.3, 95% CI, 1.8 to 37.7; P =.006), oversewn T(9) to L(2) intercostal vessels (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 28.8; P =.023), and postoperative renal failure (OR, 23.6; 95% CI, 4.4 to 126; P <.001). These same clinical variables of nonelective operations (OR, 7.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 41.4; P =.017), oversewn T(9) to L(2) intercostal arteries (OR, 9.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 61.2; P =.016), and postoperative renal failure (OR, 20.8; 95% CI, 3.0 to 142.1; P =.002) were independent predictors of SCI in the subgroup analysis of high-risk patients, ie, patients with type I/II TAA. CONCLUSION: EC has been effective in reducing immediate, devastating, total paraplegia after TAA repair. A strategy that combines the neuroprotective effect of regional cord hypothermia, avoiding the sacrifice of potential spinal cord blood supply, and postoperative adjuncts (eg, avoidance of hypotension, CSF drainage) appears necessary to minimize SCI after TAA repair.

Utility and reliability of endovascular aortouniiliac with femorofemoral crossover graft for aortoiliac aneurysmal disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the early efficacy of endovascular aortouniiliac stent grafts with femorofemoral bypass graft in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysmal disease. METHODS: We analyzed 51 consecutive patients from January 1997 to March 1999 with a mean follow-up of 15.8 months. Patients ranged in age from 44 to 93 years (mean, 75 years) with a mean aortic aneurysm diameter of 6.2 cm. Technical success was achieved in 50 patients; one patient required conversion to open repair intraoperatively. We placed 28 custom-made and 22 commercial devices. The mean operative time was 223 minutes. The endograft was extended to the external iliac artery in 42% of cases. The contralateral common iliac artery was occluded using either a closed covered stent or intraluminal coils. RESULTS: The median hospital stay was 4 days with an average intensive care unit stay of 0.25 days. There were no operative mortalities. Two patients died during follow-up from unrelated conditions. Endoleaks occurred in 11 patients (22%); seven patients (14%) required intervention (four catheter based, three operative). Other complications occurred in 38% of patients but were largely remote or wound related. One femorofemoral bypass graft occluded immediately postoperatively as a result of an intraprocedural external iliac dissection yielding a 98% primary patency and 100% secondary patency. Clinical success was achieved in 88% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that this strategy represents a reliable method of repair of aortoiliac aneurysmal disease and extends the capability of an endoluminal approach to patients with complex iliac anatomy.

Custom bifurcated stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysms: initial experience.

PURPOSE: To describe a custom bifurcated stent-graft for possible treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five male patients (mean age, 76 +/- 6 years), who had AAA (mean diameter, 4.7 +/- 0.4 cm) and who were considered to be at high risk for conventional surgery, were treated with a custom modular bifurcated stent-graft constructed with bifurcated 24-mm x 12-mm (upper body diameter x iliac limb diameter) Cooley Veri-Soft Woven polyester grafts and Gianturco-Rösch Z stents. The stent-graft body was delivered through 20-22-F sheaths, and the contralateral iliac limb was delivered through a 16-F sheath by means of surgical exposure of the common femoral arteries. A flared distal limb extender (12 mm to 14 mm) was created for one patient to accommodate a large common iliac artery. RESULTS: Stent-grafts were successfully deployed without complications in all five patients. There were no proximal or distal leaks. A lumbar-to-inferior mesenteric artery leak was seen in one patient at 24 hours. At 6-month follow-up, all devices were intact, with complete exclusion and shrinkage of the aneurysm in four of five patients. Aneurysm size remained stable in the one patient with a lumbar-to-inferior mesenteric artery leak. CONCLUSION: A custom, bifurcated stent-graft was utilized for endovascular treatment of AAA. Long-term follow-up is necessary for the device.

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in Cogan's syndrome.

Cogan's syndrome is an autoimmune disease of unknown etiology, clinically manifested as non-syphilitic interstitial keratitis and audiovestibular symptoms. Increasing evidence suggests that Cogan's may be a systemic vasculitis. In this report, we review the vascular manifestations of Cogan's syndrome and report two cases of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with this disorder.

Surgical renal artery reconstruction without contrast arteriography: the role of clinical profiling and magnetic resonance angiography.

PURPOSE: Contrast arteriography is the accepted gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (RVD). In this study, the results of a selective policy of surgical renal artery reconstruction (RAR) with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as the sole preoperative imaging modality are reviewed. METHODS: From May 1993 to May 1998, 25 patients underwent RAR after clinical evaluation, and aortic/renal MRA performed with a gadolinium-enhanced and 3-dimensional phase contrast technique. Clinical presentations suggested severe RVD in all patients and included poorly controlled hypertension (16 patients), hospitalization for hypertensive crises and/or acute pulmonary edema (13), and deterioration of renal function within one year of operation (15). Thirteen patients had associated aortic pathologic conditions (12 aneurysms, 1 aortoiliac occlusive disease), and eight of these patients also underwent noncontrast computed tomography scans. Significant renal dysfunction (serum creatinine level, >/=2.0 mg/dL) was present in all but 4 patients with 14 of 25 patients having extreme (creatinine level, >/=3.0 mg/dL) dysfunction. RESULTS: Hemodynamically significant RVD in the main renal artery was verified at operation in 37 of 38 reconstructed main renal arteries (24/25 patients). A single accessory renal artery was missed by MRA. RAR was comprehensive (bilateral or unilateral to a single-functioning kidney) in 21 of 25 patients and consisted of hepatorenal bypass graft (3 patients), combined aortic and RAR (13 patients), isolated transaortic endarterectomy (8 patients), and aortorenal bypass graft (1 patient). Early improvement in both hypertension control and/or renal function was noted in 21 of 25 patients without operative deaths or postoperative renal failure. Sustained favorable functional results at follow-up, ranging from 5 months to 4 years, were noted in 19 of 25 patients. CONCLUSION: MRA is an adequate preoperative imaging modality in selected patients before RAR. This strategy is best applied in circumstances where the clinical presentation suggests hemodynamically significant bilateral RVD and/or in patients at substantial risk of complications from contrast angiography.

Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, effectiveness, and problems encountered with endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Initial experience with endoluminal stent grafts was examined and compared with outcome for a matched concurrent control group undergoing conventional operative repair of AAA. METHODS: Over a 3-year period, 30 patients underwent attempts at endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA. Of the 28 (93%) successfully implanted endografts, 8 were tube endografts, 8 bifurcated grafts, and 12 aortouniiliac grafts combined with femorofemoral bypass. Most of the procedures were performed in the past year because the availability of bifurcated and aortoiliac endografts markedly expanded the percentage of patients with AAA who might be treated with endoluminal methods. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 44 months, with a mean value of 11 months. RESULTS: Endovascular procedures demonstrated significant advantages with respect to reduced blood loss (408 versus 1287 ml), use of an intensive care unit (0.1 versus 1.75 days), length of hospitalization (3.9 versus 10.3 days), and quicker recovery (11 versus 47 days). Although the total number of postoperative complications was identical for the two groups, the nature of the complications differed considerably. Local and vascular complications characteristic of endovascular repair could frequently be corrected at the time of the procedure and tended to be less severe than systemic or remote complications, which predominated among the open surgical repair group. On an intent-to-treat basis, 23 (77%) of the 30 AAAs were successfully managed with endoluminal repair. The seven (23%) failures were attributable to two immediate conversions caused by access problems, three persistent endoleaks, one late conversion caused by AAA expansion, and one late rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Although less definitive than those for conventional operations, these early results suggest that endovascular AAA repair offers considerable benefits for appropriate patients. The results justify continued application of this method of AAA repair, particularly in the treatment of older persons at high risk.

Telemedicine in vascular surgery: feasibility of digital imaging for remote management of wounds.

PURPOSE: Telemedicine coupled with digital photography could potentially improve the quality of outpatient wound care and decrease medical cost by allowing home care nurses to electronically transmit images of patients' wounds to treating surgeons. To determine the feasibility of this technology, we compared bedside wound examination by onsite surgeons with viewing digital images of wounds by remote surgeons. METHODS: Over 6 weeks, 38 wounds in 24 inpatients were photographed with a Kodak DC50 digital camera (resolution 756 x 504 pixels/in2). Agreements regarding wound description (edema, erythema, cellulitis, necrosis, gangrene, ischemia, and granulation) and wound management (presence of healing problems, need for emergent evaluation, need for antibiotics, and need for hospitalization) were calculated among onsite surgeons and between onsite and remote surgeons. Sensitivity and specificity of remote wound diagnosis compared with bedside examination were calculated. Potential correlates of agreement, level of surgical training, certainty of diagnosis, and wound type were evaluated by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Agreement between onsite and remote surgeons (66% to 95% for wound description and 64% to 95% for wound management) matched agreement among onsite surgeons (64% to 85% for wound description and 63% to 91% for wound management). Moreover, when onsite agreement was low (i.e., 64% for erythema) agreement between onsite and remote surgeons was similarly low (i.e., 66% for erythema). Sensitivity of remote diagnosis ranged from 78% (gangrene) to 98% (presence of wound healing problem), whereas specificity ranged from 27% (erythema) to 100% (ischemia). Agreement was influenced by wound type (p < 0.01) but not by certainty of diagnosis (p > 0.01) or level of surgical training (p > 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Wound evaluation on the basis of viewing digital images is comparable with standard wound examination and renders similar diagnoses and treatment in the majority of cases. Digital imaging for remote wound management is feasible and holds significant promise for improving outpatient vascular wound care.

Clinical experience with epidural cooling for spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: This report summarizes our experience with epidural cooling (EC) to achieve regional spinal cord hypothermia and thereby decrease the risk of spinal cord ischemic injury during the course of descending thoracic aneurysm (TA) and thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAA) repair. METHODS: During the interval July 1993 to Dec. 1995, 70 patients underwent TA (n = 9, 13%) or TAA (n = 61) (type I, 24 [34%], type II, 11 [15%], type III, 26 [37%]) repair using the EC technique. The latter was accomplished by continuous infusion of normal saline (4 degrees C) into a T11-12 epidural catheter; an intrathecal catheter was placed at the L3-4 level for monitoring of cerebrospinal fluid temperature (CSFT) and pressure (CSFP). All operations (one exception, atriofemoral bypass) were performed with the clamp-and-sew technique, and 50% of patients had preservation of intercostal vessels at proximal or distal anastomoses (30%) or by separate inclusion button (20%). Neurologic outcome was compared with a published predictive model for the incidence of neurologic deficits after TAA repair and with a matched (Type IV excluded) consecutive, control group (n = 55) who underwent TAA repair in the period 1990 to 1993 before use of EC. RESULTS: EC was successful in all patients, with a 1442 +/- 718 ml mean (range, 200 to 3500 ml) volume of infusate; CSFT was reduced to a mean of 24 degrees +/- 3 degrees C during aortic cross-clamping with maintenance of core temperature of 34 degrees +/- 0.8 +/- C. Mean CSFP increased from baseline values of 13 +/- 8 mm Hg to 31 +/- 6 mm Hg during cross-clamp. Seven patients (10%) died within 60 days of surgery, but all survived long enough for evaluation of neurologic deficits. The EC group and control group were well-matched with respect to mean age, incidence of acute presentations/aortic dissection/aneurysm rupture, TAA type distribution, and aortic cross-clamp times. Two lower extremity neurologic deficits (2.9%) were observed in the EC patients and 13 (23%) in the control group (p < 0.0001). Observed and predicted deficits in the EC patients were 2.9% and 20.0% (p = 0.001), and for the control group 23% and 17.8% (p = 0.48). In considering EC and control patients (n = 115), variables associated with postoperative neurologic deficit were prolonged (> 60 min) visceral aortic cross-clamp time (relative risk, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 16.5; p = 0.02) and lack of epidural cooling (relative risk, 9.8; 95% CI, 2 to 48; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: EC is a safe and effective technique to increase the ischemic tolerance of the spinal cord during TA or TAA repair. When used in conjunction with a clamp-and-sew technique and a strategy of selective intercostal reanastomosis, EC has significantly reduced the incidence of neurologic deficits after TAA repair.

Current controversies in the management of aortoiliac occlusive disease.

The numerous options currently available for treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease have led to considerable controversy in regard to the optimal method of revascularization in such patients. Differences of opinion exist not only with respect to certain technical aspects of direct anatomic aortic reconstruction, which has traditionally been regarded as the "gold standard" treatment, but even more importantly as to whether alternative methods including a variety of catheter-based endoluminal therapies and extraanatomic grafts may offer nearly equivalent results with less risk and possible cost advantages. Although little truly definitive data is available, a review of published information can help clarify many of these management dilemmas. In the final analysis, the various methods may not be as competitive with one another as first seems apparent. Each has its own specific advantages and disadvantages and when used, in appropriate circumstances can provide excellent results. Indeed, it is this broad spectrum of options that can be matched to each patient's own unique anatomic and risk characteristics that make treatment of aortoiliac disease one of the most successful areas of contemporary vascular surgery practice.

Magnetic resonance angiography in the management of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective study to clarify the clinical utility of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the treatment of patients with lower extremity arterial occlusive disease. METHODS: During the interval of September 1993 through March 1995, 79 patients (43% claudicants, 57% limb-threatening ischemia) were studied with both MRA and contrast arteriography (ANGIO) and underwent intervention with either balloon angioplasty (9%), surgical inflow (28%), or outflow (63%) procedures. MRA and ANGIO were interpreted by separate blinded vascular radiologists, and arterial segments from the pelvis to the foot were graded as normal or with increasing degrees of mild (25% to 50%), moderate (51% to 75%), or severe (75% to 99%) stenosis or occlusion. Treatment plans were formulated by the attending surgeon and were based initially on hemodynamic, clinical, and MRA data and thereafter with ANGIO. Additional study surgeons formulated independent and specific treatment plans based on MRA or ANGIO alone. Indexes of agreement (beyond chance) for arterial segments depicted by MRA and ANGIO were assessed (kappa value), and treatment plans formulated were compared (chi-square). RESULTS: Precise agreement (%) and the percent of major discrepancies (segment classified as normal/mild stenosis on one study and severe stenosis/occlusion on the other) between MRA and ANGIO for respective arterial segments was as follows: common and external iliacs (n = 256) 77/3.5; superficial femoral and above-knee popliteal (n = 255) 73/6.7; below-knee popliteal (n = 131) 84/3.8; infrapopliteal runoff vessels (n = 864) 74/12.4; pedal vessels (n = 111) 69/19.8 Kappa values indicated moderate agreement (between MRA and ANGIO) beyond chance for all arterial segments. Treatment plans formulated by the attending surgeon, the MRA surgeon, and the ANGIO surgeon agreed in more than 85% of cases. Inability of MRA to assess the significance of inflow disease and inadequate detail of tibial/pedal vessels were the principal deficiencies of MRA in those cases where it was considered an inadequate examination. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest MRA and ANGIO are nearly equivalent examinations in the demonstration of infrainguinal vascular anatomy. MRA is an adequate preoperative imaging study (and may replace ANGIO), particularly in those circumstances when the risk of ANGIO is increased or when clinical and hemodynamic evaluation predict the likelihood of straightforward aortofemoral or femoral-popliteal reconstruction.

Current status of the surgical treatment of patients with carotid artery disease: the surgical management of carotid atherosclerosis.

Patients with carotid artherosclerotic disease present with a history of a neurologic event or with the presence of a bruit on physical examination. Recently, large randomized prospective studies have examined this group of patients to determine the optimal course of medical and surgical management. The data from these studies, together with the natural history of carotid disease and factors associated with stroke risk, are reviewed.