Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 28(3): 124-9, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23629469

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There is substantial variation in the classification and management of scapula fractures. The first purpose of this study was to analyze the interobserver reliability of the OTA/AO classification and the New International Classification for Scapula Fractures. The second purpose was to assess the proportion of agreement among orthopaedic surgeons on operative or nonoperative treatment. DESIGN: Web-based reliability study. SETTING: Independent orthopaedic surgeons from several countries were invited to classify scapular fractures in an online survey. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred three orthopaedic surgeons evaluated 35 movies of three-dimensional computerized tomography reconstruction of selected scapular fractures, representing a full spectrum of fracture patterns. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Fleiss kappa (κ) was used to assess the reliability of agreement between the surgeons. RESULTS: The overall agreement on the OTA/AO classification was moderate for the types (A, B, and C, κ = 0.54) with a 71% proportion of rater agreement (PA) and for the 9 groups (A1 to C3, κ = 0.47) with a 57% PA. For the New International Classification, the agreement about the intraarticular extension of the fracture (Fossa (F), κ = 0.79) was substantial and the agreement about a fractured body (Body (B), κ = 0.57) or process was moderate (Process (P), κ = 0.53); however, PAs were more than 81%. The agreement on the treatment recommendation was moderate (κ = 0.57) with a 73% PA. CONCLUSIONS: The New International Classification was more reliable. Body and process fractures generated more disagreement than intraarticular fractures and need further clear definitions.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/classification , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Scapula/injuries , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Scapula/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 95(14): e99 1-13, 2013 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23864190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the elbow allows for high-resolution evaluation of osseous and soft-tissue structures, including ligaments, tendons, nerves, and muscles. Multiple imaging techniques and pulse sequences exist. The purpose of this article is to update orthopaedic surgeons on current MRI techniques and illustrate the spectrum of elbow pathology detectable by MRI. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE with use of the keywords "MRI" and "elbow" for studies less than five years old evaluating MRI techniques. These papers, our experience, and textbooks reviewing elbow MRI provided the information for this article. RESULTS: We discuss the essentials and applications of the following techniques: (1) conventional, non-gadolinium-enhanced MRI; (2) gadolinium-enhanced MRI; and (3) magnetic resonance arthrography. The classic MRI appearances of occult fractures, loose bodies, ulnar collateral ligament injuries, lateral collateral ligament complex injuries, biceps tendon injuries, triceps tendon injuries, lateral epicondylitis, medial epicondylitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, osteochondritis dissecans, compression neuropathies, synovial disorders, and various soft-tissue masses are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a valuable, noninvasive method of elbow evaluation. This article updates orthopaedic surgeons on the various available MRI techniques and facilitates recognition of the MRI appearances of the most commonly seen pathologic elbow conditions.


Subject(s)
Elbow Joint/pathology , Elbow/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Nerve Compression Syndromes/pathology , Tendon Injuries/pathology , Collateral Ligaments/injuries , Collateral Ligaments/pathology , Humans , Elbow Injuries
6.
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg ; 15(2): 115-8, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21606785

ABSTRACT

Few surgical techniques that address advanced thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthrosis specifically allow early mobilization postoperatively. After trapeziectomy, we carry out a ligament reconstruction using an absorbable interference screw to secure a flexor carpi radialis tendon autograft within the first metacarpal base. Theoretically, superior tendon graft fixation strength allows early mobilization within 2 weeks postoperatively. We have retrospectively compared our clinical results using this technique with another group of patients who underwent traditional ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition as described by Burton and Pellegrini. There were no differences in the verbal pain score, satisfaction rating, or DASH scores between groups. There was a statistically significant decrease in trapezial space ratio both at rest and with stress for the experimental group. Although the clinical significance of this finding is largely unknown, it did not correlate with clinical outcome in our patients. Although no conclusions could be drawn regarding early mobilization after thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty, further studies are planned to investigate this intriguing aspect of postoperative care. In this article, we present the details of the surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Arthroplasty/methods , Arthroplasty/rehabilitation , Bone Screws , Carpometacarpal Joints/surgery , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Tendons/transplantation , Thumb/surgery , Arthroplasty/adverse effects , Humans , Retrospective Studies
7.
J Hand Surg Am ; 35(7): 1082-1088.e4, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20610052

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a hybrid flexor carpi radialis (FCR) approach for volar plate osteosynthesis of displaced distal radius fractures with concurrent prophylactic carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients without preoperative signs or symptoms of acute carpal tunnel syndrome secondary to the fracture. METHODS: A total of 68 displaced distal radius fractures in 65 eligible adult patients (35 men, 30 women; mean age, 48.6 +/- 15.4 y) who had volar plate osteosynthesis and concomitant prophylactic CTR through a hybrid FCR approach by a single surgeon were included in this study. A systematic chart review and subsequent telephone questionnaire were performed to identify any postoperative median nerve dysfunction, recurrent motor or palmar cutaneous branch injury, tendon injury, or other complications directly related to the approach. RESULTS: Reported symptoms consistent with late median nerve dysfunction were identified in 2 cases; however, no patients in this series required additional surgery for early or late median neuropathy. Furthermore, no cases of median nerve sensory or motor branch injury or tendon injury were identified. No other unforeseen complications specifically related to the approach were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Volar plate osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures with a concurrent prophylactic CTR can be safely performed through the described hybrid FCR approach in patients without signs or symptoms of acute CTS. Routine release of the transverse carpal ligament with the hybrid FCR approach at the time of fracture fixation might reduce the incidence of postoperative median nerve dysfunction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.


Subject(s)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/prevention & control , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Radius Fractures/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Plates , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Healing/physiology , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Male , Median Nerve/injuries , Middle Aged , Palmar Plate/surgery , Radiography , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
J Hand Surg Am ; 35(2): 217-22, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20141892

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether a single-incision extensile approach to the distal radius used for open reduction internal fixation and a concomitant radial sided carpal tunnel (CT) release safely and effectively decompresses the carpal tunnel. METHODS: Five pairs of cadaveric forearms were mounted to a tabletop with a cable pulley system attached to the long finger. Each paired specimen was randomized to volar plating via either the flexor carpi radialis approach (control group) or the extensile volar exposure (combined flexor carpi radialis and radial-sided carpal tunnel release). Before and after the respective exposure and plating, increased CT pressures were created with 2.27, 4.54, and 6.81 kg of distraction. We used a paired t-test to compare the change in CT pressure at each level of distraction before and after intervention for the 2 groups, with significance set at p

Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Radius Fractures/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Dissection , Female , Forearm , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Ligaments, Articular/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Regeneration/physiology , Pressure , Random Allocation
9.
Hand (N Y) ; 5(4): 415-22, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22131925

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine current practice patterns and examine the influence of recent evidence in the surgical treatment of advanced thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthrosis. METHODS: A survey was sent to 2,536 American Society for Surgery of the Hand members. Information regarding specialty training, years of experience, annual cases performed, treatment of choice, technique, and postoperative immobilization was collected. Respondents were asked whether their current treatment of choice differs from what they performed 5 years ago and about the importance of ligament reconstruction and "interposition" to thumb CMC arthroplasty success. RESULTS: One thousand twenty-four respondents completed the survey (40% response rate). Treatment of choice was trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (68%), regardless of specialty training, years of experience, and annual cases performed. Over 70% favored treatment that was not different from what they performed 5 years ago. Less than 3% of respondents perform a trapeziectomy alone; only 14 surgeons have changed to this procedure in the last 5 years. Only 35% of the 822 respondents who perform a ligament reconstruction and 14% of the 764 respondents who perform an interposition believe those techniques are "extremely important" to thumb CMC arthroplasty success. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent evidence that suggests neither ligament reconstruction nor tendon interposition confers any additional benefit over trapeziectomy alone, few respondents have converted to the simpler procedure. Either the current evidence is not convincing enough to drastically change practice patterns, or other factors apart from this evidence have a greater influence on surgical decision-making for advanced thumb CMC osteoarthrosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11552-010-9275-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

11.
J Hand Surg Am ; 31(6): 1001-11, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16843164

ABSTRACT

The utility of magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow has noticeably improved over the past decade. Advances in equipment and refinement of pulse sequences has allowed for superior visualization of many pathologic processes involving the elbow joint and its surrounding structures. At this time, magnetic resonance imaging is most valuable in detecting occult fractures, osteochondritis dissecans, collateral ligament tears, nonossified intra-articular loose bodies, and soft tissue masses. It may also aid in the diagnosis of tendinous injuries, compression neuropathies, and synovial disorders. This article serves as an educational update for hand surgeons and illustrates the features of normal anatomy and specific disorders of the elbow.


Subject(s)
Arthrography/methods , Elbow Joint/pathology , Elbow/pathology , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Joint Diseases/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Diagnosis, Differential , Elbow/surgery , Elbow Joint/surgery , Humans , Joint Diseases/surgery , Joint Loose Bodies/diagnosis , Joint Loose Bodies/surgery , Osteochondritis Dissecans/diagnosis , Osteochondritis Dissecans/surgery , Reference Values , Elbow Injuries
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL