BACKGROUND: Needs-based, patient-oriented palliative care includes palliative day care clinics as a specialized semi-inpatient care offer. However, the establishment and development of these facilities has been unsystematic. Research is needed to strengthen their transparency and ensure their accessibility, quality, and structural adequacy. A national Delphi study was conducted to generate appropriate recommendations for the establishment and development of palliative day care clinics in Germany. METHODS: Recommendations were formulated from focus group data on the development and expansion of palliative day care clinics in Germany. Experts on in- and outpatient palliative care rated 28 recommendations for relevance and feasibility, respectively, using a 4-point Likert-type scale. Suggestions for improvement were captured via free text comments. Items were considered consented when more than 80% of the experts scored them 4 (strongly agree) or 3 (somewhat agree), regarding both relevance and feasibility. RESULTS: A total of 23 experts (32% response rate) completed three Delphi rounds. Following the first round, 10 of 28 recommendations were revised according to participants' comments; 1 recommendation was rejected. After the second round, 3 of these 10 recommendations were revised, while 3 were rejected. Consensus was achieved after the third round for 22 of the initial recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi-consented recommendations provide a basis for the targeted evidence- and needs-based development of palliative day care clinics. The findings show a need for standards setting and the meaningful integration of these clinics into existing structures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The present study was prospectively registered on April 20, 2020, with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00021446).
Consensus , Delphi Technique , Focus Groups , Palliative Care , Humans , Germany , Palliative Care/standards , Palliative Care/methods , Focus Groups/methods , Day Care, Medical/standards , Day Care, Medical/methods , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Adult
INTRODUCTION: A needs-based and patient-oriented hospice and palliative care also includes day hospices as a specialised semi-inpatient care offer. The establishment and development of these facilities in Germany has been rather unsystematic. In order to ensure quality and adequacy of these structures, research is needed. METHODS: A Delphi consensus study was conducted online from November 2022 to February 2023 aiming at generating recommendations for the development and expansion of day hospices in Germany. For each recommendation, the participants indicated on a four-point verbal rating scale how much they agreed upon a) the relevance and b) the feasibility of the recommendation. Items were considered consented when 80% of the participants (strongly) agreed with the recommendation regarding both criteria. If no consensus was reached, the recommendations were revised according to the participants' free text comments and presented in the next Delphi round. Descriptive analyses were applied. RESULTS: A total of 64 experts participated in the first Delphi round and 44 in the second. In round 1, 34 recommendations and in round 2 six recommendations were consented. The final set contains a total of 40 recommendations: 18 on the tasks of day hospices, 13 on cooperation, 7 on funding, and 2 on public relations. DISCUSSION: Recommendations for the development and expansion of day hospices in Germany were developed. Due to their highly rated feasibility, the recommendations should be directly transferable into care practice. It remains to be seen to what extent they will be taken into account in the renegotiation of the framework agreement for day hospices. CONCLUSION: The Delphi-consented recommendations provide a basis to guide action in the currently very dynamic development of hospice work and palliative care in Germany.
Hospice Care , Hospices , Humans , Germany , Palliative Care , Consensus , Delphi Technique
BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome is a decisive risk factor for the manifestation of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Metabolic syndrome is the term used to describe the joint presence of specific diseases (obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, disorders of fat metabolism). A classification is made more difficult by inconsistent definition criteria and a missing International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) code. There are no known prevalence studies for Germany based on routine data of the statutory health insurance (GKV). OBJECTIVE: The main aim of the present study was to classify the metabolic syndrome based on routine data of the GKV and to estimate the frequency of diagnosis. In addition, the influence of social factors (school and educational qualifications) was examined for the subgroup of employees with social insurance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective routine data analysis was carried out based on routine administrative data from the AOK Lower Saxony (AOKN). In contrast to the established definitions, which use medical parameters, the risk factors are taken into account via four coded diagnoses according to the ICD-10 classification: 1) obesity (E66.0, E66.8, E66.9), 2) type 2 diabetes mellitus (E11), 3) hypertension (I10) and 4) metabolic disorders (E78). A metabolic syndrome is present if at least two of the four diagnoses are present. RESULTS: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the population of the AOKN in 2019 was 25.7%. The standardized comparison according to the census population of 2011 showed an increase in the frequency of diagnosis (2009: 21.5% and 2019: 24%). The frequency of diagnosis differed according to school and educational qualifications. CONCLUSION: A classification and analysis of the frequency of the metabolic syndrome based on routine data of the GKV is possible. Between 2009 and 2019 there was a clear increase in the frequency of diagnoses.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Hypertension , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Metabolic Syndrome/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Prevalence , Obesity/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Insurance, Health
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common chronic liver diseases in Germany. In the long term, there is an increased risk of developing liver cirrhosis and subsequent diseases. Epidemiologic studies on NAFLD prevalence in Germany are scarce. The aim of the study was to assess administrative incidence and prevalence or, more specifically, the number of patients diagnosed with NAFLD in the period from 2008 to 2018. METHODS: Analyses are based on administrative data of a large statutory health insurance fund. All individuals who were insured in the year of analysis and in the three-year pre-observation period were included (between 1.7-2 million insured per analysis year). NAFLD-patients were identified using relevant ICD-10 codes (K76.0 und K75.8). RESULTS: In 2018, 4.66â% of insured persons had a NAFLD diagnosis, 0.87â% were diagnosed first-time. Diagnoses of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) were comparatively rare (0.09â%). Data show an uptake of NAFLD diagnoses over time. The number of incident cases per year has hardly changed. Patients with diseases of the metabolic syndrome had an increased chance of being diagnosed with NAFLD. CONCLUSION: It becomes evident that NAFLD is frequently diagnosed in everyday medical practice, although data from population-based studies suggest an even higher prevalence.
Metabolic Syndrome , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Humans , Incidence , Insurance, Health , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/diagnosis , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology , Prevalence
