ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Ectomesenchymal chondromyxoid tumor is a rare oral soft tissue neoplasm that should be differentiated from other neural and chondromyxoid entities. The aim of this study was to report the clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features of 3 additional cases of this condition. METHODS: Clinical data were obtained from the clinical records and all cases were evaluated through light microscopy and immunohistochemistry to cytokeratins, vimentin, S100 protein, desmin, smooth muscle actin, and glial fibrilary acidic protein. RESULTS: All 3 cases affected the tongue as a long-lasting submucosal swelling and were managed through conservative surgery. They all showed myxoid and chondroid histological patterns, and vimentin, S100, and glial fibrilary acidic protein immunoexpression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reinforce the typical features of ectomesenchymal chondromyxoid tumor previously described, helping to confirm and establish the clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical profile of this uncommon lesion.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/immunology , Mesenchymoma/pathology , Myxoma/pathology , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Tongue Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Mesenchymoma/immunology , Mesoderm/pathology , Myoepithelioma/immunology , Myoepithelioma/pathology , Myxoma/immunology , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/immunology , Tongue Neoplasms/immunologyABSTRACT
Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is an entity whose origin is still controversial. Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) is a recently described lesion whose relationship to low-grade central MEC has been reported in the literature. Our aim was to assess the cytokeratin (CK) profile of central MEC and GOC, and compare the results with CK expression in salivary gland MEC and odontogenic cysts and tumors. Eighty-five cases, including 6 central MECs, 23 salivary gland MECs, 10 GOCs, 34 odontogenic cysts and 12 ameloblastomas, were studied through immunohistochemistry using eleven monoclonal anti-CK antibodies. All central MECs expressed CKs 5, 7, 8, 14, and 18 and all GOCs expressed CKs 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, and 19. Comparing CK expression from GOC and central MEC we found differences in CKs 18 (30% vs 100%) and 19 (100% vs 50%). Central MEC and GOC are probably distinct entities with CK profiles similar to lesions of glandular and odontogenic origins, respectively, and expression of CKs 18 and 19 could be useful in their differential diagnosis.