Neurological outcomes for patients meeting radiographic criteria for DEFUSE 3 and SELECT2.

BACKGROUND: The DEFUSE 3 and SELECT2 thrombectomy trials included some patients with similar radiographic profiles, although the rates of good functional outcomes differed widely between the studies. OBJECTIVE: To report neurological outcomes for patients who meet CT and CT perfusion (CTP) inclusion criteria common to both DEFUSE 3 and SELECT2. METHODS: Retrospective study of thrombectomy patients, presenting between November 2016 and December 2023 to a large health system, with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score ≥6, core infarction 50-69 mL, mismatch ratio ≥1.8, and mismatch volume ≥15 mL. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of the primary outcome. RESULTS: 85 patients, with mean age 64.6 (16.6) years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 18 (15-23), were included. Thirty-eight of 85 patients (44.7%) were functionally independent at 90 days. Predictors of functional independence included age (OR=0.943, 95% CI 0.908 to 0.980; P=0.003), initial glucose (OR=0.989, 95% CI 0.978 to 1.000; P=0.044), and time last known well to skin puncture (OR=0.997, 95% CI 0.994 to 1.000; P=0.028). The area under the curve for the multivariable model predicting the primary outcome was 0.82 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Nearly half of patients meeting radiographic criteria common to DEFUSE 3 and SELECT2 are functionally independent at 90 days, similar to rates reported for the treated DEFUSE 3 cohort. This might be due to their moderate core volumes and large ischemic penumbra.

Predictors of devastating functional outcome despite successful basilar thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Basilar thrombosis frequently leads to poor functional outcomes, even with good endovascular reperfusion. We studied factors associated with severe disability or death in basilar thrombectomy patients achieving revascularization. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed records from a health system's code stroke registry, including successful basilar thrombectomy patients from January 2017 to May 2023 who were evaluated with pretreatment computed tomography perfusion. The primary outcome was devastating functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 5-6). A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to determine independent predictors of the primary outcome. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated for the model distinguishing good from devastating outcome. RESULTS: Among 64 included subjects, with mean (standard deviation) age 65.6 (14.1) years and median (interquartile range) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 18 (5.75-24.5), the primary outcome occurred in 28 of 64 (43.8%) subjects. Presenting NIHSS (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.14, p = 0.02), initial glucose (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.00, p < 0.05), and proximal occlusion site (OR 7.38, 95% CI 1.84-29.60, p < 0.01) were independently associated with 90-day mRS 5-6. The AUC for the multivariable model distinguishing outcomes was 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.92). CONCLUSION: We have identified presenting stroke severity, lower glucose, and proximal basilar occlusion as predictors of devastating neurological outcome in successful basilar thrombectomy patients. These factors may be used in medical decision making or for patient selection in future clinical trials.

The Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score predicts independent outcome after thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Predicting functional outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is of interest to patients and families as they navigate hospital and post-acute care decision-making. We evaluated the prognostic ability of several scales to predict good neurological function after EVT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed records from a health system's code stroke registry, including consecutive successful thrombectomy patients from August 2020 to February 2023 presenting with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who were evaluated with pre-EVT CT perfusion. Primary and secondary outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-2 and 0-1, respectively. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of each scale to predict the outcomes. Scales were compared by calculating the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 465 patients (mean age 68.1 [±14.9] years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 16 [11-21]) met inclusion criteria. In the logistic regression, the Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS), Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events, Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy-2, Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular therapy, and Stroke Prognostication using Age and NIHSS were significant in predicting the primary and secondary outcomes. CLEOS was superior to all other scales in predicting 90-day mRS 0-2 (AUC .75, 95% confidence interval [CI] .70-.80) and mRS 0-1 (AUC .74, 95% CI .69-.78). Twenty of 22 patients (90.9%) with CLEOS <315 had 90-day mRS 0-2. CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS predicts independent and excellent neurological function after anterior circulation EVT.

Predicting severe disability or death in endovascular thrombectomy with large computed tomography perfusion core infarction and limited penumbra.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with large core infarctions benefit from treatment with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), with a notable 50% reduction in rates of severe disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 5) at 90 days. We studied the ability of previously reported prognostic scales to predict devastating outcomes in patients with a large ischemic core and limited salvageable brain tissue. METHODS: Retrospective analysis from a health system's code stroke registry, including consecutive thrombectomy patients from November 2017 to December 2022 with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, computed tomography perfusion core infarct ≥ 50 ml, and mismatch volume < 15 ml or mismatch ratio < 1.8. Previously reported scales were compared using logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC) analyses to predict 90-day mRS 5-6. RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 62.38 ± 14.25 years, median core volume 103 ml [74.75-153]) met inclusion criteria, of whom 27 (45%) had 90-day mRS 5-6. The Charlotte Large artery occlusion endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS) (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, 95% CI [1.14-1.60], p = 0.0005), Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy-2 (OR 1.35, 95% CI [1.00-1.83], p = 0.0470), and Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (OR 1.53, 95% CI [1.07-2.18], p = 0.0199) predicted the primary outcome in the logistic regression analysis. CLEOS performed best in the AUC analysis (AUC 0.83, 95% CI [0.72-0.94]). CONCLUSION: CLEOS predicts devastating outcomes after EVT in patients with large core infarctions and small volumes of ischemic penumbra.

The charlotte large artery occlusion endovascular therapy outcome score compares favorably to the critical area perfusion score for prognostication before basilar thrombectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The Critical Area Perfusion Score (CAPS) predicts functional outcomes in vertebrobasilar thrombectomy patients based on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) hypoperfusion. We compared CAPS to the clinical-radiographic Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS). METHODS: Acute basilar thrombosis patients from January 2017-December 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis from a health system's stroke registry. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for 6 CAPS raters. A logistic regression with CAPS and CLEOS as predictors was performed to predict 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 4-6. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic ability. RESULTS: 55 patients, mean age 65.8 (± 13.1) years and median NIHSS score 15.55-24, were included. Light's kappa among 6 raters for favorable versus unfavorable CAPS was 0.633 (95% CI 0.497-0.785). Increased CLEOS was associated with elevated odds of a poor outcome (odds ratio (OR) 1.0010, 95% CI 1.0007-1.0014, p<0.01), though CAPS was not (OR 1.0028, 95% CI 0.9420-1.0676, p=0.93). An overall favorable trend was observed for CLEOS (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.84) versus CAPS (AUC 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.64; p=0.051). Among 85.5% of patients with endovascular reperfusion, CLEOS had a statistically higher sensitivity than CAPS at identifying poor 90-day outcomes (71% versus 21%, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS demonstrated better predictive ability than CAPS for poor outcomes overall and in patients achieving reperfusion after basilar thrombectomy.

The Charlotte Large Artery Occlusion Endovascular Therapy Outcome Score Predicts Poor Outcomes 1 Year After Endovascular Thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the ability of several outcome prognostic scales to predict poor 1-year outcomes and mortality after endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis from the stroke registry of a large integrated health system, consecutive patients presenting from August 2020 to September 2021 with an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the ability of each scale to predict the primary outcome (1-year modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 4-6) and the secondary outcome (1-year mortality). Area under the curve analyses were performed for each scale. RESULTS: In 237 included patients (mean age 68 [±15] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 16 [11-21]), poor 1-year outcomes were present in 116 patients (49%) and 1-year mortality was 34%. The CLEOS (Charlotte Large Artery Occlusion Endovascular Therapy Outcome Score), which incorporates age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, initial glucose level, and computed tomography perfusion cerebral blood volume index, had a significant association with poor 1-year outcomes (per 25-point increase; odds ratio, 1.0134; P = 0.02). CLEOS and PRE (Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular Therapy) were both significantly associated with 1-year mortality. Area under the curve values were comparable for CLEOS, PRE, Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy 2, and Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events to predict 1-year mRS score 4-6 and mortality. Only 1 of 18 patients with CLEOS ≥690 had a 1-year mRS score of 0-3. CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS can predict poor 1-year outcomes and mortality for patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion using prethrombectomy variables.

Automated detection of intracranial large vessel occlusions using Viz.ai software: Experience in a large, integrated stroke network.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular thrombectomy is an evidence-based treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Commercially available artificial intelligence has been designed to detect the presence of an LVO on computed tomography angiogram (CTA). We compared Viz.ai-LVO (San Francisco, CA, USA) to CTA interpretation by board-certified neuroradiologists (NRs) in a large, integrated stroke network. METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2021, we compared Viz.ai detection of an internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery first segment (MCA-M1) occlusion to the gold standard of CTA interpretation by board-certified NRs for all code stroke CTAs. On a monthly basis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Trend analyses were conducted to evaluate for any improvement of LVO detection by the software over time. RESULTS: 3851 patients met study inclusion criteria, of whom 220 (5.7%) had an ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion per NR. Sensitivity and specificity were 78.2% (95% CI 72%-83%) and 97% (95% CI 96%-98%), respectively. PPV was 61% (95% CI 55%-67%), NPV 99% (95% CI 98%-99%), and accuracy was 95.9% (95% CI 95.3%-96.5%). Neither specificity or sensitivity improved over time in the trend analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Viz.ai-LVO has high specificity and moderately high sensitivity to detect an ICA or proximal MCA occlusion. The software has the potential to streamline code stroke workflows and may be particularly impactful when emergency access to NRs or vascular neurologists is limited.

Visualization of the Anterior Temporal Artery as a Predictor of Outcome in Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Patients Achieving Successful Recanalization After Transfer.

Introduction Anterior temporal artery (ATA) visualization on computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been previously associated with good outcomes in middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions, but not in the setting of patients who initially present to non-thrombectomy centers. Methods We retrospectively identified acute MCA (M1) occlusion patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy after transfer from non-thrombectomy-capable centers. Neuroradiologists confirmed the MCA (M1) as the most proximal site of occlusion on CTA and assessed for visualization of the ATA. Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b or greater revascularization scores were confirmed by neurointerventionalists blinded to patient outcomes. Ninety-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores were obtained via a structured telephone questionnaire. Results We identified 102 M1 occlusion patients over a three-and-a-half-year period presenting to a non-thrombectomy-capable center who underwent transfer and mechanical thrombectomy. There were no significant differences in age, gender, race, comorbidities, or median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores between the ATA visualized (n = 47) versus non-visualized (n = 55) cohort, and no significant differences in baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (ASPECT) scores, post-intervention TICI scores, or interval from last known well to revascularization. There was a strong trend in functional independent outcome (mRS ≤ 2) for patients with ATA visualization (63.8% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.064). Conclusion For patients presenting to non-thrombectomy centers without CT perfusion capability, ATA visualization should be further investigated as an outcome predictor, given its association with functional independence after successful recanalization. This article was previously presented as a meeting abstract at the 2021 International Stroke Conference on March 17-19, 2021.

Endovascular Thrombectomy Reduces Risk of Poor Functional Outcomes in Patients Presenting within 0-6 Hours with Large Ischemic Core Volumes on Computed Tomography Perfusion.

INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting with large ischemic core volumes (LICVs) on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) are at high risk for poor functional outcomes. We sought to identify predictors of outcome in patients with an internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and LICV. METHODS: A large healthcare system's prospectively collected code stroke registry was utilized for this retrospective analysis of patients presenting within 6 hours with at least 50 ml of CTP reduced relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) < 30%. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to identify independent predictors (p < 0.05) of poor discharge outcome (modified Rankin scale score 4-6). RESULTS: Over a 38-month period, we identified 104 patients meeting inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 65.4 ± 16.2 years, median presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 20 (IQR 16-24), median ischemic core volume (CBF < 30%) 82 ml (IQR 61-118), and median mismatch volume 80 ml (IQR 56-134). Seventy-five patients (72.1%) had a discharge modified Rankin scale score of 4-6. Sixty-six of 104 (63.5%) patients were treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). In the multivariable regression model, EVT (OR 0.303; 95% CI 0.080-0.985; p = 0.049) and lower blood glucose (per 1-point increase, OR 1.014; 95% CI 1.003-1.030; p = 0.030) were independently protective against poor discharge outcome. CONCLUSIONS: EVT is independently associated with a reduced risk of poor functional outcome in patients presenting within 6 hours with ICA or MCA occlusions and LICV.

Brain venography performance following the pause of Ad.26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccine administration.

Cases of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) associated with vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) were reported following administration of the adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines, resulting in a pause in Ad.26.COV2.S vaccine administration in the United States, beginning on April 14, 2021. We aimed to quantify and characterize an anticipated increase in brain venograms performed in response to this pause. Brain venogram cases were retrospectively identified during the three-week period following the vaccine pause and during the same calendar period in 2019. For venograms performed in 2021, we compared COVID vaccinated to unvaccinated patients. There was a 262% increase in venograms performed between 2019 (n = 26) and 2021 (n = 94), compared to only a 19% increase in all radiologic studies. Fifty-seven percent of patients in 2021 had a history of COVID-19 vaccination, with the majority being Ad.26.COV2.S. All patients diagnosed with CVT were unvaccinated. COVID vaccinated patients lacked platelet or D-dimer measurements consistent with VITT. Significantly more vaccinated versus unvaccinated patients had a headache (94% vs 70%, p = 0.0014), but otherwise lacked compelling CVT presentations, such as decreased/altered consciousness (7% vs 23%, p = 0.036), neurologic deficit (28% vs 48%, p = 0.049), and current/recent pregnancy (2% vs 28%, p = 0.0003). We found a dramatic increase in brain venograms performed following publicity of rare COVID-19 vaccine associated CVT cases, with no CVTs identified in vaccinated patients. Clinicians should carefully consider if brain venogram performance is indicated in COVID-19 vaccinated patients lacking thrombocytopenia and D-dimer elevation, especially without other compelling CVT risk factors or symptoms.

Case series demonstrating the value of computed tomography perfusion in differentiating ischemic strokes from seizures in patients with isolated aphasia.

The value of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging in suspected stroke patients who are not candidates for mechanical thrombectomy is promising. This case series demonstrates how CTP imaging aided in distinguishing seizure from stroke in 5 patients who presented to the emergency department with acute onset of isolated aphasia.

Outcomes After Decompressive Craniectomy for Ischemic Stroke: A Volumetric Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a treatment of space-occupying hemispheric infarct. Current surgical guidelines use criteria of age <60 years and surgery within 48 hours of stroke onset. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neurologic outcome after DHC and evaluate the relationship of stroke volume and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing DHC for cerebral infarct from 2016 to 2019. Unfavorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score >3. Patients with precraniectomy magnetic resonance imaging were selected as a subset for volumetric stroke volume analysis using RAPID software (iSchemaView, Redwood City, California), with stroke volume defined as apparent diffusion coefficient <620 on diffusion-weighted imaging. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. At 90 days, favorable outcome was achieved in 11 patients (21.2%), and 41 patients (78.8%) had unfavorable outcomes (15 [29%] died). Surgery after 48 hours, age >60 years, and multivessel distribution did not significantly affect 90-day mRS score (P = 0.091, 0.111, and 0.664, respectively). In volumetric subset analysis, 10 patients of 41 (31.3%) achieved favorable outcomes, and no patients with volume of infarct >280 mL had a favorable outcome. There was a trend of lower volumes associated with favorable outcomes, but this did not meet significance (favorable 207 ± 68.7 vs. unfavorable 262 ± 117.1; P = 0.163). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after DHC for malignant hemispheric infarct were not affected by current accepted guidelines. Volume of infarct may have an effect on outcome after DHC. Further research to aid in predicting which patients benefit from decompressive craniectomy is warranted.

Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Two-Year Study Evaluating Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes With Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF and TLIF) have gained significant popularity for management of lumbar degenerative spine over the last 3 decades. Expandable interbody spacers are a newer technology that can increase in size after placement, theoretically minimizing the operative risks of static spacers without sacrificing radiographic correction. The goal of this study is to further evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable spacers. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort that underwent elective 1- to 3-level PLIF/TLIF with expandable interbody spacers from 2014 to 2020 at a single institution. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale were collected at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Imaging was performed at 12 months, with follow up at 24 months in case of nonunion. Retrospective outcomes were computer tomography (CT) based and Bridwell-Lenke classification of fusion, radiographic parameters, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 50/53 (94.3%) otherwise eligible patients had 12-month PROMs and CT imaging for analysis. Here, 50% were obese (body mass index > 30), 58% had a smoking history, and 24% had a prior lumbar procedure. Also, 46/50 (92%) patients fused by CT criteria. Significant decrease in PROMs was seen as early as 6 weeks postoperatively. The mean change in preoperative-to-postoperative global lordosis values was 3.8° ± 15.6°. There were 4 (8%) intraoperative durotomies and 5 (10%) patients requiring reoperation for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the use of expandable spacers in a high comorbidity cohort with low complications, excellent improvement in PROMs despite minimal lordotic improvement, and high rates of fusion without recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) or iliac crest bone graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Expandable interbody fusion can significantly improve outcomes for degenerative lumbar spondylosis, with good safety profile, and high fusion rates.

Assessment of Vessel Density on Non-Contrast Computed Tomography to Detect Basilar Artery Occlusion.

INTRODUCTION: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) may be clinically occult due to variable and non-specific symptomatology. We evaluated the qualitative and quantitative determination of a hyperdense basilar artery (HDBA) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) brain for the diagnosis of BAO. METHODS: We conducted a case control study of patients with confirmed acute BAO vs a control group of suspected acute stroke patients without BAO. Two EM attending physicians, one third-year EM resident, and one medical student performed qualitative and quantitative assessments for the presence of a HDBA on axial NCCT images. Our primary outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity for BAO. Our secondary outcomes were inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the qualitative and quantitative assessments. RESULTS: We included 60 BAO and 65 control patients in our analysis. Qualitative assessment of the hyperdense basilar artery sign was poorly sensitive (54%-72%) and specific (55%-89%). Quantitative measurement improved the specificity of hyperdense basilar artery assessment for diagnosing BAO, with a threshold of 61.0-63.8 Hounsfield units demonstrating relatively high specificity of 85%-94%. There was moderate inter-rater agreement for the qualitative assessment of HDBA (Fleiss' kappa statistic 0.508, 95% confidence interval: 0.435-0.581). Agreement improved for quantitative assessments, but still fell in the moderate range (Shrout-Fleiss intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.635). Intra-rater reliability for the quantitative assessments of the two attending physician reviewers demonstrated substantial consistency. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the importance of carefully examining basilar artery density when interpreting the NCCT of patients with altered consciousness or other signs and symptoms concerning for an acute basilar artery occlusion. If the Hounsfield unit density of the basilar artery exceeds 61 Hounsfield units, BAO should be highly suspected.

Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of cervical total disc replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single-level cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: The results of 2 separate prospective, randomized, US FDA Investigational Device Exemption pivotal trials (Bryan Disc and Kineflex|C) from a single investigational site were combined to evaluate outcomes at long-term follow-up. The primary clinical outcome measures included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS), and neurological examination. Patients were randomized to receive cervical TDR in 2 separate prospective, randomized studies using the Bryan Disc or Kineflex|C cervical artificial disc compared with ACDF using structural allograft and an anterior plate. Patients were evaluated preoperatively; at 6 weeks; at 3, 6, and 12 months; and then yearly for a minimum of 48 months. Plain radiographs were obtained at each study visit. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the cervical TDR (n = 41) or ACDF (n = 33) group. A total of 63 patients (86%) completed a minimum of 4 years follow-up. Average follow-up was 6 years (72 months) with a range from 48 to 108 months. In both the cervical TDR and ACDF groups, mean NDI scores improved significantly by 6 weeks after surgery and remained significantly improved throughout the minimum 48-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Similarly, the median VAS pain scores improved significantly by 6 weeks and remained significantly improved throughout the minimum 48-month follow-up (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in mean NDI or median VAS scores. The range of motion (ROM) in the cervical TDR group remained significantly greater than the preoperative mean, whereas the ROM in the ACDF group was significantly reduced from the preoperative mean. There was significantly greater ROM in the cervical TDR group compared with the ACDF group. There were 3 reoperations (7.3%) at index or adjacent levels in the cervical TDR group; all were cervical laminoforaminotomies. There were 2 adjacent-level reoperations in the cervical TDR group (4.9%). There was 1 reoperation (3.0%) in the ACDF group at an index or adjacent level (a second ACDF at the adjacent level). There was no statistically significant difference in overall reoperation rate or adjacent-level reoperation rate between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both cervical TDR and ACDF groups showed excellent clinical outcomes that were maintained over long-term follow-up. Both groups showed low index-level and adjacent-level reoperation rates. Both cervical TDR and ACDF appear to be viable options for the treatment of single-level cervical radiculopathy.