Darpp-32 is regulated by dopamine and is required for the formation of GABAergic neurons in the developing telencephalon.

DARPP-32 (dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein Mr. 32 kDa) is a phosphoprotein that is modulated by multiple receptors integrating intracellular pathways and playing roles in various physiological functions. It is regulated by dopaminergic receptors through the cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway, which modulates the phosphorylation of threonine 34 (Thr34). When phosphorylated at Thr34, DARPP-32 becomes a potent protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) inhibitor. Since dopamine is involved in the development of GABAergic neurons and DARPP-32 is expressed in the developing brain, it is possible that DARPP-32 has a role in GABAergic neuronal development. We cloned the zebrafish darpp-32 gene (ppp1r1b) gene and observed that it is evolutionarily conserved in its inhibitory domain (Thr34 and surrounding residues) and the docking motif (residues 7-11 (KKIQF)). We also characterized darpp-32 protein expression throughout the 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish larval brain by immunofluorescence and demonstrated that darpp-32 is mainly expressed in regions that receive dopaminergic projections (pallium, subpallium, preoptic region, and hypothalamus). We demonstrated that dopamine acutely suppressed darpp-32 activity by reducing the levels of p-darpp-32 in the 5dpf zebrafish larval brain. In addition, the knockdown of darpp-32 resulted in a decrease in the number of GABAergic neurons in the subpallium of the 5dpf larval brain, with a concomitant increase in the number of DAergic neurons. Finally, we demonstrated that darpp-32 downregulation during development reduced the motor behavior of 5dpf zebrafish larvae. Thus, our observations suggest that darpp-32 is an evolutionarily conserved regulator of dopamine receptor signaling and is required for the formation of GABAergic neurons in the developing telencephalon.

Effects of L-Dopa, SKF-38393, and quinpirole on exploratory, anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in pubertal female and male mice.

Adolescence is a phase of substantial changes in the brain, characterized by maturational remodeling of many systems. This remodeling allows functional plasticity to adapt to a changing environment. The dopaminergic system is under morphological and physiological changes during this phase. In the present study, we investigated if changes in the dopaminergic tone alter mice behavior in a receptor and sex-specific manner, specifically at the beginning of the puberty period. We administered L-Dopa, SKF-38393 (D1 dopamine receptor agonist), and Quinpirole (D2 dopamine receptor agonist) and tested male and female mice's motor, anxiety- and depressive-like behavior. While females displayed an impaired exploratory drive, males presented an intense depressive-like response. Our results provide insights into the function of dopaminergic development in adolescent behavior and highlight the importance of studies in this time window with male and female subjects.

Impairment of motor but not anxiety-like behavior caused by the increase of dopamine during development is sustained in zebrafish larvae at later stages.

Many neuropsychiatric disorders are associated with both dopaminergic (DAergic) and developmental hypotheses. Since DAergic receptors are expressed in the developing brain, it is possible that alterations in dopamine (DA) signaling may impair brain development and consequent behavior. In our previous study, using a zebrafish model, we showed that an increase of DA during the 3 to 5 days postfertilization (dpf) developmental window (an important window for GABAergic neuronal differentiation) affects the motor behavior of 5 dpf larvae. In this study, we set out to determine whether these behavioral alterations were sustained in larvae at older stages (7 and 14 dpf). To test this hypothesis, we chronically treated zebrafish larvae from 3 to 5 dpf with DA. After washing the drug, we recorded and analyzed the first 5 and 30 min of the motor behavior of 5, 7, and 14 dpf subjects. We analyzed mobile episodes, distance traveled, time mobile, distance traveled per mobile episode, time in movement per mobile episode, and distance traveled per time mobile. We showed, once again, that an increase of DA during the 3 to 5 dpf developmental window reduces the number of movement episodes initiated by 5 dpf larvae. We also detected a decrease of other motor behavior parameters in 5 dpf DA-treated larvae. We observed that these alterations are sustained in the 7 dpf larvae. However, we did not see these general locomotor alterations in the 14 dpf larvae. Moreover, we detected a decrease of distance traveled and an increase of time of locomotion per episode in the first 5 min of behavioral analyses in 14 dpf DA-treated larvae. To test if the alterations in the first 5 min were due to anxiety-like behavior, we used a light/dark preference paradigm. We recorded 5dpf, 7dpf, and 14dpf larvae for 5 min and analyzed time of freezing, preference for light or dark, number of entries to the dark, percentage of time in the light. We observed that 5dpf larvae treated with DA showed more freezing, less passages to the dark, and more time spent in the light as compared to their control counterparts. But 7dpf and 14dpf larvae did not show these alterations. Taken overall, therefore, our results suggest that DA does play a role in the development of zebrafish motor behavior, and, furthermore, that some behaviors are more sensitive than others to the effects of DAergic imbalances during development.