Regional Collaboration and Trends in Clinical Management of Thyroid Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the trends in the management of thyroid cancer and clinical outcomes in the Southwestern region of The Netherlands from 2010 to 2021, where a regional collaborative network has been implemented in January 2016. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study encompasses all patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer of any subtype between January 2010 and June 2021 in 10 collaborating hospitals in the Southwestern region of The Netherlands. METHODS: The primary outcome of this study was the occurrence of postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes were trends in surgical management, centralization, and waiting times of patients with thyroid cancer. RESULTS: This study included 1186 patients with thyroid cancer. Median follow-up was 58 [interquartile range: 24-95] months. Surgery was performed in 1027 (86.6%) patients. No differences in postoperative complications, such as long-term hypoparathyroidism, permanent recurrent nerve paresis, or reoperation due to bleeding were seen over time. The percentage of patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma referred to the academic hospital decreased from 85% (n = 120/142) in 2010 to 2013 to 70% (n = 120/171) in 2014 to 2017 and 62% (n = 100/162) in 2018 to 2021 (P < .01). The percentage of patients undergoing a hemithyroidectomy alone was 9% (n = 28/323) in 2010 to 2013 and increased to 20% (n = 63/317; P < .01) in 2018 to 2021. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a regional oncological network coincided with a de-escalation of thyroid cancer treatment and centralization of complex patients and interventions. However, no differences in postoperative complications over time were observed. Determining the impact of regional oncological networks on quality of care is challenging in the absence of uniform quality indicators.

Recombinant or endogenous thyroid-stimulating hormone for radioactive iodine therapy in thyroid cancer: state of knowledge and current controversies.

For patients undergoing radioiodine therapy (RIT) of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation prior to RIT can be achieved using thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or administration of recombinant human TSH (rhTSH). As THW can lead to nausea, headaches, vomiting, fatigue, and dizziness secondary to transient acute hypothyroidism, rhTSH could be a good alternative. Recombinant human TSH has been administered in patients in order to stimulate TSH for RIT since 2005. According to the Martinique criteria formulated by the leading professional societies involved in care of patients with DTC, rhTSH can be applied in 3 settings: for remnant ablation, adjuvant treatment, and treatment of known disease. Numerous studies have investigated the effects of rhTSH as a method of TSH stimulation on the thyroid cell, the systemic effects, biokinetics, and clinical outcomes; however, no consensus has been reached about many aspects of its potential use. Recombinant human TSH is able to stimulate sufficient TSH levels (>30 mIU L-1) and is hypothesized to decrease risks of tumor cell proliferation. As rhTSH-use avoids the transiently impaired renal function associated with THW, radioiodine excretion is faster with the former, leading to a lower iodine-131 uptake and a difference in fractional remnant uptake, effective half-life, mean residence time, and dose to the blood. Differences between rhTSH and THW were observed in radioiodine genotoxic effects and endothelial-dependent vasodilation and inflammation. For thyroid remnant ablation, THW and rhTSH lead to similar remnant ablation rates. For adjuvant therapy and treatment of known disease, insufficient trials have been conducted and future prospective studies are recommended. The current review provides a state-of-the-science overview on the issues and debates surrounding TSH stimulation through either rhTSH adminsitration orendogenous TSH production after levothyroxin withdrawal.

Deescalating Follow-up After Hemithyroidectomy for Patients With Low-risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.

Importance: Structural recurrent disease (RD) after surgical treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (mPTC) is rare. We hypothesized that the RD rate after hemithyroidectomy in low-risk patients with mPTC is low. Objective: To assess the occurrence of RD in Dutch patients with mPTC who received surgical treatment according to the Dutch guidelines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide retrospective cohort study included all patients who had undergone surgery with a diagnosis of cN0/cNx mPTC in the Netherlands between January 2000 and December 2020 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry database. Patients with preoperative lymph node metastases were excluded. Two groups were defined: group 1 (incidental), mPTC in pathology report after thyroid surgery for another indication; and group 2 (nonincidental), patients with a preoperative highly suspect thyroid nodule (Bethesda 5) or proven mPTC (Bethesda 6). Dutch guidelines state that a hemithyroidectomy is sufficient in patients with unifocal, intrathyroidal mPTC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The occurrence of RD in patients with low-risk mPTC after hemithyroidectomy. Results: In total, 1636 patients with mPTC were included. Patients had a median (IQR) follow-up time of 71 (32-118) months. Median (IQR) age at time of diagnosis was 51 (41-61) years and 1292 (79.0%) were women. Overall, RD after initial treatment was seen in 25 patients (1.5%). The median (IQR) time to RD was 8.2 (3.6-16.5) months and 22 of the 25 (88%) patients developed RD within 2 years. Recurrent disease was not significantly different between both groups (group 1, n = 15 [1.3%]; group 2, n = 10 [2.1%]; difference, 0.8%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 2.5%). Of the 484 patients with nonincidental mPTC (group 2), 246 (50.8%) patients were treated with a hemithyroidectomy and follow-up in accordance with Dutch guidelines. Lymph node metastases were found in 1 of 246 (0.4%) patients after hemithyreoidectomy, and new mPTC in the contralateral thyroid was detected in 3 of 246 (1.2%) patients. Median (IQR) follow-up of this patient group was 37 (18-71) months. The 10-year probability of RD was 1.3% for patients without vascular invasion and 24.4% for patients with vascular invasion. Conclusions and Relevance: This nationwide cohort study found that overall, RD after hemithyroidectomy for patients with low-risk mPTC was rare (<2%). Based on these results, it seems reasonable to deescalate follow-up of patients with low-risk mPTC without vascular invasion after hemithyroidectomy. From a health care perspective, deescalation of follow-up may contribute to increased sustainability and accessibility to health care, both large challenges for the future.

[Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules; an alternative treatment option to surgery]. / Radiofrequente ablatie van benigne schildkliernodus.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a technique that uses a needle to generate local thermal energy. This minimally invasive technique is used in patients with a symptomatic benign thyroid nodule, so that surgical resection can be avoided. There is now scientific evidence that RFA can reduce the volume of the benign symptomatic thyroid nodule and contributes to a significant reduction of complaints. RFA is also included in international guidelines as an alternative treatment option for patients with a symptomatic benign thyroid nodule, in addition to surgery.

Assessment of Radiofrequency Ablation for Papillary Microcarcinoma of the Thyroid: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Papillary microcarcinomas of the thyroid (mPTCs) account for an increasing proportion of thyroid cancers in past decades. The use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been investigated as an alternative to surgery. The effectiveness and safety of RFA has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RFA for low-risk mPTC. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the top 100 references of Google Scholar were searched from inception to May 28, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Articles reporting on adult patients with mPTC treated with RFA were included. Studies that involved patients with pre-ablation lymph node or distant metastases, recurrence of disease, or extrathyroidal extension were excluded. Final article selection was conducted by multiple reviewers based on consensus. The proportion of eligible articles was 1%. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the MOOSE guidelines. Random and fixed-effect models were applied to obtain pooled proportions and 95% CIs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the complete disappearance rate of mPTC. Secondary outcomes were tumor progression and complications. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 1770 patients (1379 women [77.9%]; mean [SD] age, 45.4 [11.4] years; age range, 42.5-66.0 years) with 1822 tumors were treated with RFA; 49 tumors underwent 1 additional RFA session and 1 tumor underwent 2 additional RFA sessions. Mean (SD) follow-up time was 33.0 (11.4) months (range, 6-131 months). The pooled complete disappearance rate at the end of follow-up was 79% (95% CI, 65%-94%). The overall tumor progression rate was 1.5% (n = 26 patients), local residual mPTC in the ablation area was found in 7 tumors (0.4%), new mPTC in the thyroid was found in 15 patients (0.9%), and 4 patients (0.2%) developed lymph node metastases during follow-up. No distant metastases were detected. Three major complications occurred (2 voice changes lasting >2 months and 1 cardiac arrhythmia). Minor complications were described in 45 patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that RFA is a safe and efficient method to treat selected low-risk mPTCs. Radiofrequency ablation could be envisioned as step-up treatment after local tumor growth under active surveillance for an mPTC or initial treatment in patients with mPTCs with anxiety about active surveillance.