Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The smear layer may harbor microorganisms and necrotic pulp tissue, jeopardizing irrigant penetration. Recently, Dual Rinse®, a weak chelating agent, has been introduced to the market. However, its chelating capacity in the final irrigation protocol with different activation systems has not yet been deeply analyzed. PURPOSE: The aim of this ex vivo study was to evaluate the effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and XP-endo Finisher (XP) on smear layer removal in combination with two chelating agents, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and etidronic acid (HEDP). MATERIALS AND METHOD: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated fifty-two single-rooted human teeth were standardized to 16 mm in length. Root canal instrumentation was performed by the ProTaper Gold system up to the F4 file. The apical end of the samples was sealed with wax to simulate a closed system. Teeth from group 1 (n=24) were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% EDTA, while teeth from group 2 (n=24) were irrigated with 3% NaOCl mixed 9% HEDP. Both groups were divided into two subgroups (n=12) depending on the activation system used: XP (group XP-EDTA and XP-HEDP) or PUI (group PUI-EDTA and PUI-HEDP). The specimens were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy at 3, 5 and 8mm from the apex. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests considering p> 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: PUI-EDTA was the most effective at removing the smear layer, with a statistically significant difference from XP-EDTA (p< 0.042) and group XP-HEDP (p< 0.003). There were no statistically significant differences among the other groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this ex vivo study, no activation system was able to completely remove the smear layer from the root canal walls. However, the combination of NaOCl with ultrasonically activated EDTA obtained better results than the other treatments.

Actitud terapéutica frente a una reabsorción interna perforante / Therapeutic attitude against a perforating internal resorption

Atendiendo a la localización de la reabsorción radicular, ésta puede ser clasificada en externa o interna. La reabsorción interna es relativamente poco frecuente, y su etiología y patogénesis no está todavía del todo clara. Este artículo muestra la complejidad de un incisivo central superior con una reabsorción interna inflamatoria perforante. El diagnóstico definitivo lo hallamos a través del examen tridimensional, que confirmó la extensión y comunicación con la superficie externa radicular. Aunque como podremos ver a lo largo de la exposición del caso clínico, la ayuda del microscopio nos permitió abordar el caso con mayor seguridad. En todo momento pudimos eliminar el tejido inflamatorio y preparar el conducto de manera adecuada. La obturación en este tipo de casos supone un reto para el endodoncista, siendo éste, mayor cuando se realiza únicamente de manera ortógrada. Para la obturación realizamos una técnica descrita en la literatura, sellando la zona apical a la reabsorción con gutapercha adaptada mediante condensación vertical; la zona reabsortiva con material biocerámico y, por último, la zona coronal con guta-percha inyectada. Se realizó un 3D a los 26 meses para una nueva evaluación de la zona reabsortiva, y así evaluar el estado óseo alrededor de la misma. La paciente se presenta totalmente asintomática sin signos clínicos y con buena salud de los tejidos periapicales

Based on the location of the root resorption, it can be classified as external or internal. Internal resorption is relatively rare, and its etiology and pathogenesis is not yet entirely clear. This article shows the complexity of a superior central incisor with a perforating inflammatory internal resorption. The definitive diagnosis is found through the three-dimensional examination, which confirmed the extension and communication with the external root surface. Although as we can see throughout the presentation of the clinical case, the help of the microscope allowed us to address the case with greater certainty. At all times we were able to remove the inflammatory tissue and prepare the duct properly. The obturation in this type of cases supposes a challenge for the endodontist, being this one, greater when it is done only in an ortograde way. For the filling, we performed a technique described in the literature, filling the apical area with resorption with gutta-percha adapted by vertical condensation; the resorptive zone with bioceramic material and finally the coronal zone with injected gutta-percha. A 3D was performed at 26 months for a new evaluation of the resorptive zone, and thus evaluate the bone state around it. The patient presents totally asymptomatic without clinical signs and with good health of the periapical tissues