A randomized Phase 2 trial of telavancin versus standard therapy in patients with uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: the ASSURE study.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is a common infection associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Telavancin is a bactericidal lipoglycopeptide active against Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 trial in patients with uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia. METHODS: Patients were randomized to either telavancin or standard therapy (vancomycin or anti-staphylococcal penicillin) for 14 days. Continuation criteria were set to avoid complicated S. aureus bacteremia. The primary end point was clinical cure at 84 days. RESULTS: In total, 60 patients were randomized and 58 received ≥1 study medication dose (all-treated), 31 patients fulfilled inclusion/exclusion and continuation criteria (all-treated target [ATT]) (telavancin 15, standard therapy 16), and 17 patients were clinically evaluable (CE) (telavancin 8, standard therapy 9). Mean age (ATT) was 60 years. Intravenous catheters were the most common source of S. aureus bacteremia and ~50% of patients had MRSA. A similar proportion of CE patients were cured in the telavancin (88%) and standard therapy (89%) groups. All patients with MRSA bacteremia were cured and one patient with MSSA bacteremia failed study treatment in each group. Although adverse events (AEs) were more common in the telavancin ATT group (90% vs. 72%), AEs leading to drug discontinuation were similar (7%) in both treatment arms. Potentially clinically significant increases in serum creatinine (≥1.5 mg/dl and at least 50% greater than baseline) were more common in the telavancin group (20% vs. 7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that telavancin may have utility for treatment of uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia; additional studies are warranted. (Telavancin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia (ASSURE); NCT00062647).

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an evolving pathogen.

The horizontal transmission of methicillin resistance to Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospital and community settings, and growing prevalence of these strains, presents a significant clinical challenge to the management of serious infections worldwide. While infection control initiatives have stemmed the rising prevalence, MRSA remains a significant pathogen. More recently, evidence that MRSA is becoming resistant to glycopeptides and newer therapies raises concern about the use of these therapies in clinical practice. Vancomycin resistance has become evident in select clinical settings through rising MICs, growing awareness of heteroresistance, and emergence of intermediate-resistant and fully resistant strains. While resistance to linezolid and daptomycin remains low overall, point mutations leading to resistance have been described for linezolid, and horizontal transmission of cfr-mediated resistance to linezolid has been reported in clinical isolates. These resistance trends for newer therapies highlight the ongoing need for new and more potent antimicrobial therapies.

Diagnostic dilemma in a returning traveler with fever.

This case report of fever of unknown origin in a returning traveler from South America illustrates the need for a thorough understanding of limitations of laboratory testing modalities in order to prevent delays in diagnosis in potentially fatal but curable diseases.

Telavancin for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia: findings from the ATTAIN studies.

Treatment options for hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by Gram-positive organisms are far from ideal. The increase in vancomycin MICs among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, and the slow bactericidal action and poor lung penetration of vancomycin have driven the search for an alternative agent. Telavancin, a once-daily lipoglycopeptide, displays strong bactericidal activity against S. aureus. Two large Phase III randomized trials have recently compared intravenous telavancin (10 mg/kg every 24 h) with vancomycin (1 g intravenously every 12 h) for 7-21 days for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by Gram positives. No significant differences were observed in the cure rates in the all-treated (n = 1503), the clinically evaluable (n = 654) and the microbiologically evaluable (n =480) populations. Telavancin performed better than vancomycin in patients with monomicrobial S. aureus pneumonia (84.2 vs 74.3%; 95% CI: 0.7-19.1), with MRSA (81.8 vs 74.1%; 95% CI: -3.5 to 19.3), and with strains having vancomycin MICs ≥1 µg/ml (87.1 vs 74.3; 95% CI: 0.5-23). The rate of adverse events, including serious adverse events, was similar in both groups, with a slightly higher rate of serum creatinine increase in the telavancin-treated group. Based on these results, telavancin (already approved for this indication by the EMA) could certainly be added to the current treatment options, particularly in patients with MRSA pneumonia.

TD-1792 versus vancomycin for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

TD-1792 is a first-in-class glycopeptide-cephalosporin heterodimer that exhibits bactericidal activity against Gram-positive pathogens. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-control, phase II trial in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-positive organisms. Patients 18 to 65 years old were randomized to receive 7 to 14 days of either TD-1792 (2 mg/kg of body weight intravenously [i.v.] every 24 h [q24h]) or vancomycin (1 g i.v. q12h, with dosage regimens adjusted per site-specific procedures). A total of 197 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. Rates of clinical success at the test-of-cure evaluation were similar in all analysis populations. Among 170 clinically evaluable patients, cure rates were 91.7% and 90.7% in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] of -7.9 to 9.7 for the difference). In microbiologically evaluable patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at baseline (n = 75), cure rates were 94.7% in the TD-1792 group and 91.9% in the vancomycin group. Microbiological eradication of Gram-positive pathogens (n = 126) was achieved in 93.7% and 92.1% of patients in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively. Seven patients were discontinued from study medication due to an adverse event (AE): 2 and 5 in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively. AEs were of similar types and severities between the two groups, other than pruritus, which was more common in patients who received vancomycin. No patients in the TD-1792 group experienced a serious AE. This study supports further clinical development of TD-1792 in patients with Gram-positive infection.

Efficacy of telavancin in patients with specific types of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

BACKGROUND: Telavancin is approved in the USA and Canada for the treatment of Gram-positive complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) based on the results of the Phase 3 Assessment of TeLAvancin in complicated Skin and skin structure infections (ATLAS) trials, which demonstrated non-inferiority of telavancin to vancomycin. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the ATLAS studies (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00091819 and NCT00107978) to explore the efficacy of telavancin in patients with various types of cSSSIs. RESULTS: A total of 1794 patients were included in this analysis; 1434 patients were clinically evaluable (CE) and 563 of these had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Among CE patients with major abscesses (n = 619), cure rates were 91% for telavancin and 90% for vancomycin (95% CI for the difference -3.6 to 5.7). In patients with infective cellulitis (n = 519), cure was achieved in 87% and 88% of telavancin- and vancomycin-treated patients, respectively (95% CI for the difference -6.2 to 5.2). Cure rates in patients with wound infections were 85% in the telavancin group and 86% in the vancomycin group (95% CI for the difference -10.5 to 9.0). Cure rates for each type of cSSSI in patients infected with MRSA were also similar between the two treatment arms. Among CE patients infected with Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL)-positive MRSA (n = 447), cure rates were 93% for telavancin and 90% for vancomycin (95% CI for the difference -2.2 to 8.2). CONCLUSIONS: Cure rates were similar for telavancin and vancomycin in patients with different types of cSSSIs, including infections caused by MRSA and PVL-positive strains of MRSA.

Ceftaroline for complicated skin and skin-structure infections.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: A dramatic increase in infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been observed, in part as a result of the epidemic of community-associated MRSA skin and skin-structure infections (SSSIs). Simultaneously, decreasing sensitivities of S. aureus to vancomycin have been reported and invasive infections caused by these strains have been associated with worse clinical outcomes. Clearly, new agents active against MRSA are needed. Ceftaroline is a new cephalosporin active against MRSA and many Gram-negative bacteria, though it is not active against Pseudomonas spp. and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers (ESBL). AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: In this review we focus on the properties of ceftaroline such as in vitro activity, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, and its efficacy and safety observed in the clinical trials of patients with SSSI. Finally, we provide an overview of the possible future role of ceftaroline and other compounds in development for the treatment of SSSIs. The literature search was based on PubMed articles plus review of the abstracts presented in the most important international conferences in the field. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The reader will gain clear concepts to understand the value that ceftaroline might have in the treatment of SSSIs, including those caused by MRSA. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Ceftaroline has shown bactericidal activity against common pathogens associated with SSSIs including MRSA, noninferiority in clinical trials of patients with complicated SSSI (cSSSI), and a favorable safety profile.

Telavancin's interactions with the bacterial cell membrane.

Evaluation of: Lunde CS, Hartouni SR, Janc JW, Mammen M, Humphrey PP, Benton BM: Telavancin disrupts the functional integrity of the bacterial membrane through targeted interaction with the cell wall precursor lipid II. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 3375-3383 (2009). It has been previously demonstrated that telavancin has a dual mechanism of action: inhibition of the transglycosylation process of peptidoglycan cell wall synthesis by the formation of a complex with the D-alanyl-D-alanine precursors; and depolarization of the bacterial membrane. In this article the mechanism by which telavancin disrupts the bacterial cell membrane was studied by Lunde and colleagues using a variety of Staphylococcus aureus strains. The authors demonstrated that telavancin-induced depolarization requires both the presence of lipid II as well as an interaction between telavancin and D-alanyl-D-alanine residues. The authors were also able to show that telavancin's depolarization effect on membrane potential occurs in diverse S. aureus strains including those with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin. This study takes a significant step forward in our understanding of the concentration-dependent bactericidal activity of telavancin, a drug recently approved for use in skin and skin structure infections caused by Gram-positive cocci.

Determination of an inoculum effect with various cephalosporins among clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Using 98 clinical methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates of known beta-lactamase (Bla) type, we found a pronounced inoculum effect for cephalexin (mostly Bla type A and C strains), a mild inoculum effect for cephalothin (especially types B and C), and no inoculum effects for ceftriaxone and cefuroxime. Ceftobiprole showed the lowest MICs at a high inoculum but with a slight increase for Bla-positive versus Bla-negative strains. Since a potential therapeutic effect associated with a cephalosporin inoculum effect has been described, further studies are warranted.

Inoculum effect with cefazolin among clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: frequency and possible cause of cefazolin treatment failure.

Methicillin (meticillin)-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains producing large amounts of type A beta-lactamase (Bla) have been associated with cefazolin failures, but the frequency and impact of these strains have not been well studied. Here we examined 98 MSSA clinical isolates and found that 26% produced type A Bla, 15% type B, 46% type C, and none type D and that 13% lacked blaZ. The cefazolin MIC(90) was 2 microg/ml for a standard inoculum and 32 microg/ml for a high inoculum, with 19% of isolates displaying a pronounced inoculum effect (MICs of >or=16 microg/ml with 10(7) CFU/ml) (9 type A and 10 type C Bla producers). At the high inoculum, type A producers displayed higher cefazolin MICs than type B or C producers, while type B and C producers displayed higher cefamandole MICs. Among isolates from hemodialysis patients with MSSA bacteremia, three from the six patients who experienced cefazolin failure showed a cefazolin inoculum effect, while none from the six patients successfully treated with cefazolin showed an inoculum effect, suggesting an association between these strains and cefazolin failure (P = 0.09 by Fisher's exact test). In summary, 19% of MSSA clinical isolates showed a pronounced inoculum effect with cefazolin, a phenomenon that could explain the cases of cefazolin failure previously reported for hemodialysis patients with MSSA bacteremia. These results suggest that for serious MSSA infections, the presence of a significant inoculum effect with cefazolin could be associated with clinical failure in patients treated with this cephalosporin, particularly when it is used at low doses.