Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide with concurrent radiation for limited-stage small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of adding paclitaxel to standard cisplatin/etoposide (EP) and thoracic radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled onto this study. During the phase I section of this study, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated in groups of three or more patients. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. For cycles 1 and 2, paclitaxel was administered according to the dose-escalation schema at doses of 100, 135, or 170 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 hours on day 1. Once the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel (for cycles 1 and 2, concurrent with radiation) was determined, that dose was used in all subsequent patients entered onto the phase II section of this study. For cycles 3 and 4, the paclitaxel dose was fixed at 170 mg/m(2) in all patients. On day 2, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) was administered for all cycles. On days 1, 2, and 3, etoposide 60 mg/m(2)/d (cycles 1 and 2) or 80 mg/m(2)/d (cycles 3 and 4) was administered. Chest radiation was given at 9 Gy/wk in five fractions for 5 weeks beginning on day 1 of cycle 1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used during cycles 3 and 4 only. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were assessable. The MTD of paclitaxel was 135 mg/m(2), with the dose-limiting toxicity being grade 4 neutropenia. Cycles 1 and 2 were associated with grade 4 neutropenia in 32% of courses, with fever occurring in 7% of courses and grade 2/3 esophagitis in 13%. Cycles 3 and 4 were complicated by grade 4 neutropenia in 20% of courses, with fever occurring in 6% of courses and grade 2/3 esophagitis in 16%. The overall response rate was 96% (complete responses, 39%; partial responses, 57%). After a median follow-up period of 23 months (range, 9 to 40 months), the median survival time was 22.3 months (95% confidence interval, 15.1 to 34.3 months) CONCLUSION: The MTD of paclitaxel with radiation and EP treatment is 135 mg/m(2) given over 3 hours. In this schedule of administration, a high response rate and acceptable toxicity can be anticipated.

Oral combination chemotherapy in the management of AIDS-related lymphoproliferative malignancies.

An oral combination chemotherapy regimen initially developed for AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma includes lomustine (CCNU), etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and procarbazine. This regimen takes advantage of oral administration, the in vitro synergy of these drugs and their first-line efficacy in lymphoma, and the ability of lomustine and procarbazine to cross the blood-brain barrier. This regimen was used to treat 38 patients with AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The overall objective response rate was 66% (34% complete response rate) with a 5% CNS relapse rate, and a median survival duration of 7.0 months. One-third of the patients survived for 1 year, 11% for 2 years, and half of the patients survived free from progression of their lymphoma. On the basis of these results, this oral regimen was modified and administered to 5 patients with AIDS-related primary CNS lymphoma as part of a sequential combined-modality chemotherapy and radiation regimen. Rapid progression of CNS disease was observed in this group of patients, with a median survival duration of 1.0 month. The identical regimen was administered to 7 patients with AIDS-related Hodgkin's disease: we observed a 71% partial remission rate and a median survival duration of 7.0 months. Myelosuppression remains the most significant clinical toxicity. Our results with this oral regimen appear comparable to those of standard intravenous combination chemotherapy regimens in patients with AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A brief intensive cisplatin-based outpatient chemotherapy regimen with filgrastim and megestrol acetate support for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of a phase II trial.

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a brief, intensive cisplatin-based outpatient chemotherapy regimen with filgrastim and megestrol acetate support for patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a favorable performance status. Thirty patients with no prior chemotherapy were enrolled in this phase II protocol. Patients received cisplatin 50 mg/m2, ifosfamide 2 g/m2, mesna, and a 7-day course of oral etoposide beginning on days 1, 15, 29, 43. and 57 for a total treatment duration of 10 weeks. Filgrastim was administered for 7 days after each course of oral etoposide. Megestrol acetate 250 mg PO was administered throughout the duration of chemotherapy. Thirty patients were evaluable for toxicity and 27 for response. Among those evaluable for response, partial remission occurred in 11 (41%) patients, and median survival was 10.5 months. Nadir neutrophil count of < 500/mm3 occurred in 19 (63%) patients. Weight loss occurred in only nine patients (median 3.4 kg, range 1.6-7.3). There was no difference between pre- and post-treatment weights (P=0.35). Two patients developed pulmonary embolism. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity occurred infrequently. This regimen appears to be similar in efficacy to the most active regimens reported by other investigators. Innovative features of the regimen include the brief treatment duration, the use of serial 7-day courses of filgrastim to facilitate weekly chemotherapy treatments, and the use of megestrol acetate to minimize constitutional symptoms. However the use of megestrol acetate in this setting may be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications. This may provide a model for other palliative regimens specifically designed for patients with a favorable performance status and advanced NSCLC.