Update of the SFMV (French society of vascular medicine) guidelines on the conditions and safety measures necessary for thermal ablation of the saphenous veins and proposals for unresolved issues.

Venous insufficiency is a very common disease affecting about 25% of the French population (if we combine all stages of its progression). It is a complex disease and its aetiology has not yet been fully elucidated. Some of its causes are well known, such as valvular dysfunction, vein wall defect, and the suctioning effect common to all varicose veins. These factors are generally associated and together lead to dysfunction of one or more of the saphenous veins. Saphenous vein dysfunction is revealed by ultrasound scan, a reflux lasting more than 0.5 seconds indicating venous incompetence. The potential consequences of saphenous vein dysfunction over time include: symptoms (heaviness, swellings, restlessness, cramps, itching of the lower limbs), acute complications (superficial venous thrombosis, varicose bleeding), chronic complications (changes in skin texture and colour, stasis dermatitis, eczema, vein atresia, leg ulcer), and appearance of unaesthetic varicose veins. It is not possible to repair an incompetent saphenous vein. The only therapeutic options at present are ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, physical removal of the vein (saphenous stripping), or its thermal ablation (by laser or radiofrequency treatment), the latter strategy having now become the gold standard as recommended by international guidelines. Recommendations concerning thermal ablation of saphenous veins were published in 2014 by the Société française de médecine vasculaire. Our society has now decided to update these recommendations, taking this opportunity to discuss unresolved issues and issues not addressed in the original guidelines. Thermal ablation of an incompetent saphenous vein consists in destroying this by means of a heating element introduced via ultrasound-guided venous puncture. The heating element comprises either a laser fibre or a radiofrequency catheter. The practitioner must provide the patient with full information about the procedure and obtain his/her consent prior to its implementation. The checklist concerning the interventional procedure issued by the HAS should be validated for each patient (see the appended document).

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: 20 year experience of open surgical treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Both open surgery (OS) and endovascular surgery (ES) have been proposed for the treatment of symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI). OS was considered the gold standard but ES is increasingly proposed as the first option. The aim was to report long-term outcomes associated with OS in patients suffering CMI in the modern era in order to help in choose between the two techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single centre analysis of all consecutive digestive artery revascularizations performed for CMI between January 2003 and December 2012 was carried out. Primary outcomes were 30 day mortality and morbidity, and secondary outcomes were survival, primary patency (PP), secondary patency (SP), and freedom from digestive symptoms, depending on the completeness of the revascularization performed. RESULTS: Eighty-six revascularizations were performed. Median follow up was 6.9 years (range 0.3-20.0). The 30 day mortality and morbidity rates were respectively 3.5% and 13.9%. Ten year survival was 88% for complete revascularization (CR) and 76% for incomplete revascularization (IR) (p = .54). The PP was 84% at 10 years for CR and 87% respectively for IR (p = .51). The 10 year SP was 92% for CR and 93% for IR (p = .63). Freedom from digestive symptoms was influenced by the completeness of revascularization: 79% for CR versus 65% for IR at 10 years (p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: OS for CMI, especially complete revascularization, provides lasting results despite high morbidity.

[Current clinical applications of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in vascular surgery]. / Pratique clinique du vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) en chirurgie vasculaire.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in vascular patients presenting limb ulcers or non healed amputations. The efficacy of the VAC was studied in terms of healing, walking distance, and autonomy of life. This retrospective study included 14 patients, 11 men and three women, who were treated by a VAC therapy between December 2003 and February 2007. Two patients presented critical ischemia with limb ulcers and 12 patients non healed amputations despite previous revascularisation. Vascular reconstruction was performed in all cases before the VAC therapy. The rate of wound healing with VAC therapy was 87%. After wound healing, 92% of patients were walking and 62% of them were independent. In conclusion, VAC therapy may be a useful tool to accelerate healing of lower-limb wounds or non healing wounds secondary to amputation, allowing a faster recovery with a good level of autonomy.