Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 66: 370-377, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32027985

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of stents for treating central venous occlusion is well described. Limited evidence exists related to Palmaz balloon-expandable stent use in inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction. We analyzed patency and complication rates after IVC reconstruction using Palmaz stents. METHODS: From 2002 to 2019, 37 patients (mean age: 51 year) underwent IVC reconstruction with 68 Palmaz stents. Indications were symptomatic chronic venous obstruction in the infrarenal (n = 25) and intrahepatic (n = 12) IVC. Demographic, operative, and imaging data were evaluated. Clinical data, abdominal CT, and/or duplex ultrasound were used to determine patency at follow-up. RESULTS: Restoration of caval patency was achieved in all patients, with complications in 2/37 (5.4%) patients (thrombus formation within the stent; stent embolization eight days after placement). Follow-up data were available for 27 patients. Primary patency was maintained through last follow-up in 19/27 (70%) patients (mean: 1.1 year), with successful stent redilation performed in 6 patients. Mean duration of primary-assisted patency (n = 5) was 1.2 year. Late lumen loss was (n = 13) was 40% during a mean time to follow-up of 2.0 years. Primary patency in patients with occlusion secondary to malignancy was 109 day (range: 1 day-1.0 year), whereas primary patency in patients with occlusion from other etiologies was 1.1 year (range: 2 day-5.9 year). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated primary and primary-assisted patency of 66% and 84%, respectively, at 24 and 48 months. CONCLUSIONS: Palmaz balloon-expandable stents for IVC reconstruction is feasible and effective for symptomatic IVC occlusion. Risk of stent migration was low.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Stents , Vena Cava, Inferior , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Adult , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Constriction, Pathologic , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Patency , Vena Cava, Inferior/diagnostic imaging , Vena Cava, Inferior/physiopathology , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/physiopathology
2.
Clin Nucl Med ; 42(3): 176-179, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28072623

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of substituting 50% Isovue (Bracco Diagnostics Inc, Monroe Township, NJ) for sterile water on the delivery of Y resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres [Sirtex Medical Limited, Sydney, Australia]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed all SIR-Spheres radioembolizations at the authors' institution from January 1, 2011, to February 10, 2014. From January 1, 2011, to April 30, 2013, all users performed SIR-Spheres radioembolization per the manufacturer's original instructions using sterile water in the B and D lines and intermittently checking the progress of the embolization by injecting contrast via the B line. Beginning May 1, 2013, a modified technique using Isovue diluted 50% with saline in place of sterile water in both the B and D lines of the infusion set. The authors compared the prepared versus administered activity of Y SIR-Spheres, fluoroscopy time, administration time, and frequency of radioembolizations terminated for stasis when using water versus dilute contrast in the B and D lines. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five radioembolizations were performed, 132 (75%) with water as the delivery medium and 43 (25%) with 50% contrast as delivery medium. The mean percentage of the Y activity administered was 98% with contrast versus 87% with water (P < 0.01). More than 95% of cases using contrast resulted in 90% or more delivery of the prepared Y activity versus 59% of cases with water (P < 0.01). For cases using water, 17% were terminated for stasis, whereas 2% (1 case) using contrast was terminated for stasis. The mean Y administration time was 7 minutes with contrast versus 22 minutes with water (P = 0.015). Excluding the 37 cases involving coil embolization, the mean fluoroscopy time was 8.3 minutes with contrast versus 11.5 minutes with water (P < 0.05). No complications occurred with the contrast method; however, there were 4 complications with water, including 1 nontarget gastric ulceration. CONCLUSIONS: Using dilute contrast as the delivery medium for SIR-Spheres resulted in a significantly greater percentage of the prepared activity administered to the patient with substantially shorter administration time. Termination for stasis occurred less often with dilute contrast. No complications were observed when using dilute contrast, which allowed continuous real-time monitoring of the Y microsphere administration.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Iopamidol , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Microspheres , Neuroendocrine Tumors/therapy , Yttrium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Aged , Brachytherapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/secondary , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL