Profile of oropharyngeal swallowing in healthy Brazilian adults and older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the findings of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES) in asymptomatic young and older adults, comparing results across different age groups. Additionally, this study aims to test the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) as an instrument to identify dysphagia risk. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional observational analysis was conducted on a sample of individuals aged 20 and above, asymptomatic for dysphagia, stratified by age groups. The EAT-10 questionnaire was completed, and the FEES was employed to assess oropharyngeal swallowing function. Various parameters, including salivary stasis, swallowing reflex trigger, swallowing sequence, residue, penetration, and aspiration were blindly analyzed by two otolaryngologists. RESULTS: A total of 184 participants were included, with a mean age of 44.7 ±â€¯18.5 years. There was good to excellent agreement between examiners for FEES parameters. The EAT-10 score ≥3 suggested dysphagia risk in 7.6% (n = 14) of the sample, with no association with age or any FEES parameter. Individuals aged ≥80 years presented more residue (50%; n = 5/10) compared to younger individuals (11.5%; n = 20/174; p =  0.039). Salivary stasis was found exclusively in individuals aged ≥60 years (n = 5/39; 12.8%; p = 0.027). Age did not influence on the swallowing reflex trigger, swallowing sequence, penetration, and aspiration. Penetration was observed in 4.9% (n = 9) of subjects and aspiration occurred in 0.5% (n = 1) of subjects, with no statistical significance in age groups. CONCLUSION: Age does not have a linear influence on swallowing in healthy adults and elderly people. However, individuals aged ≥80 years showed a higher prevalence of residue, and individuals aged ≥60 years showed a higher prevalence of salivary stasis, suggesting an increased risk or presence of dysphagia. Other FEES parameters were not influenced by age. These findings provide valuable insights into the nuanced dynamics of swallowing across different age groups, emphasizing the importance of age-specific considerations in dysphagia assessment.

The Effects in the Upper Airway of Heat and Exposure to Combustion Byproducts of Burning Materials on Larynx of Firefighters.

INTRODUCTION: High exposure to heat and combustion byproducts is associated with health problems and an increased risk of cancer. OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of heat and smoke derived from burning on the upper airway of firefighters. METHODS: Thirteen firefighters underwent a 4-week training program in Compartment Fire Behavior Training simulators while working with live fire, heat, and smoke from pallets and oriented-strand board sheet burns. The firefighters were evaluated before exposure and at the end of the first and fourth weeks of training. The larynx was assessed by the Voice Handicap Index GRBASI scale, laryngoscopy, and peak expiratory flow. RESULTS: There was no change in Voice Handicap Index and GRBASI (only one in three speech therapists judged tension as worse by one point). Laryngoscopy showed alterations in one-third of the firefighters, with the most frequent being increased viscous mucus. Peak expiratory flow decreased significantly from 685 to 552 and 550 L/min in the first and fourth weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants were protected from gases and smoke during the exercises, which proved to be very effective, the airway was slightly impacted by heat and combustion-derived byproducts.

Continuum theory: presbyphagia to dysphagia? Functional assessment of swallowing in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether disclosed symptoms (coughing, choking and throat clearing) can be used as early predictors of swallowing disorders in non-hospitalized elderly population. In addition, to determine the presence of early findings of swallowing disorders through fiber optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred subjects older than 60 years were recruited from local community social meetings for seniors, they fulfilled inclusion criteria, and were given an oral interview and underwent FEES, with findings classified as: (1) saliva stasis; (2) pharyngeal residue; (3) penetration; (4) aspiration; (5) laryngeal sensitivity. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of subjects declared previous choking, 10% coughing, and 7% throat clearing, 39% had pharyngeal residue; 6% saliva stasis; 9% penetration; 2% aspiration; and 92% laryngeal sensitivity present. Thirty-three percent showed pharyngeal residue without saliva stasis, while only 6% showed positivity for both (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that health care professionals should be aware that among an apparently healthy population, some subjects may have swallowing disorders without clinical complaints and that a nasolaryngoscopy exam may not be enough to predict dysphagia. We suggest that FEES should be performed to look for surrogate of dysphagia such as pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration.