Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 42(1): 111-114, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28947836

ABSTRACT

Increased sedentariness has been linked to the growing prevalence of obesity in children, but some longitudinal studies suggest that sedentariness may be a consequence rather than a cause of increased adiposity. We used Mendelian randomization to examine the causal relations between body mass index (BMI) and objectively assessed sedentary time and physical activity in 3-8 year-old children from one Finnish and two Danish cohorts [NTOTAL=679]. A genetic risk score (GRS) comprised of 15 independent genetic variants associated with childhood BMI was used as the instrumental variable to test causal effects of BMI on sedentary time, total physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). In fixed effects meta-analyses, the GRS was associated with 0.05 SD/allele increase in sedentary time (P=0.019), but there was no significant association with total physical activity (beta=0.011 SD/allele, P=0.58) or MVPA (beta=0.001 SD/allele, P=0.96), adjusting for age, sex, monitor wear-time and first three genome-wide principal components. In two-stage least squares regression analyses, each genetically instrumented one unit increase in BMI z-score increased sedentary time by 0.47 SD (P=0.072). Childhood BMI may have a causal influence on sedentary time but not on total physical activity or MVPA in young children. Our results provide important insights into the regulation of movement behaviour in childhood.


Subject(s)
Adiposity/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/epidemiology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Sedentary Behavior , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Exercise/physiology , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/genetics
2.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 70(10): 1155-1161, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27302673

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We previously found that the OPUS School Meal Study improved reading and increased errors related to inattention and impulsivity. This study explored whether the cognitive effects differed according to gender, household education and reading proficiency at baseline. SUBJECTS/METHODS: This is a cluster-randomised cross-over trial comparing Nordic school meals with packed lunch from home (control) for 3 months each among 834 children aged 8 to 11 years. At baseline and at the end of each dietary period, we assessed children's performance in reading, mathematics and the d2-test of attention. Interactions were evaluated using mixed models. Analyses included 739 children. RESULTS: At baseline, boys and children from households without academic education were poorer readers and had a higher d2-error%. Effects on dietary intake were similar in subgroups. However, the effect of the intervention on test outcomes was stronger in boys, in children from households with academic education and in children with normal/good baseline reading proficiency. Overall, this resulted in increased socioeconomic inequality in reading performance and reduced inequality in impulsivity. Contrary to this, the gender difference decreased in reading and increased in impulsivity. Finally, the gap between poor and normal/good readers was increased in reading and decreased for d2-error%. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of healthy school meals on reading, impulsivity and inattention were modified by gender, household education and baseline reading proficiency. The differential effects might be related to environmental aspects of the intervention and deserves to be investigated further in future school meal trials.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Family Characteristics , Food Services , Schools , Child , Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Cross-Over Studies , Denmark , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Nutritional Status , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Br J Nutr ; 116(12): 2082-2090, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28065179

ABSTRACT

Dietary long-chain n-3 PUFA (n-3 LCPUFA) in infancy may have long-term effects on lifestyle disease risk. The present follow-up study investigated whether maternal fish oil (FO) supplementation during lactation affected growth and blood pressure in adolescents and whether the effects differed between boys and girls. Mother-infant pairs (n 103) completed a randomised controlled trial with FO (1·5 g/d n-3 LCPUFA) or olive oil (OO) supplements during the first 4 months of lactation; forty-seven mother-infant pairs with high fish intake were followed-up for 4 months as the reference group. We also followed-up 100 children with assessment of growth, blood pressure, diet by FFQ and physical activity by 7-d accelerometry at 13·5 (sd 0·4) years of age. Dried whole-blood fatty acid composition was analysed in a subgroup (n 49). At 13 years of age, whole-blood n-3 LCPUFA, diet, physical activity and body composition did not differ between the three groups. The children from the FO group were 3·4 (95 % CI 0·2, 6·6) cm shorter (P=0·035) than those from the OO group, and tended to have less advanced puberty (P=0·068), which explained the difference in height. There was a sex-specific effect on diastolic blood pressure (P sex×group=0·020), which was driven by a 3·9 (95 % CI 0·2, 7·5) mmHg higher diastolic blood pressure in the FO compared with the OO group among boys only (P=0·041). Our results indicate that early n-3 LCPUFA intake may reduce height in early adolescence due to a delay in pubertal maturation and increase blood pressure specifically in boys, thereby tending to counteract existing sex differences.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Fish Oils/adverse effects , Growth Disorders/etiology , Lactation , Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Prehypertension/etiology , Adolescent , Adolescent Development , Adult , Body Height , Child , Denmark/epidemiology , Double-Blind Method , Exercise , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Growth Disorders/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Prehypertension/epidemiology , Puberty, Delayed/epidemiology , Puberty, Delayed/etiology , Risk , Seafood , Sex Factors
4.
Osteoporos Int ; 27(4): 1619-1629, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26667245

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: We examined fat-independent associations of hormones with height and whole-body bone size and mineral content in 633 school children. IGF-1 and osteocalcin predict growth in height, while fat, osteocalcin, and in girls also, IGF-1 predict growth in bone size. Leptin and ghrelin are inversely associated with bone size in girls. INTRODUCTION: Obesity causes larger bone size and bone mass, but the role of hormones in this up-regulation of bone in obesity is not well elucidated. We examined longitudinal associations between baseline body fat mass (FM), and fat-independent fasting levels of ghrelin, adiponectin, leptin, insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1), osteocalcin, and intact parathyroid hormone, and subsequent changes in height and in whole-body height-adjusted bone area "BAheight" and size-adjusted bone mineral content "BMCsize" in 8- to 11-year-olds. METHODS: Analyses were carried out separately for boys (n = 325) and girls (n = 308) including data from baseline, 3 and 6 months from OPUS School Meal Study. RESULTS: In both sexes: gain in BAheight was positively associated with baseline FM (≥2.05 cm(2)/kg, both p ≤ 0.003). Furthermore, gain in height was positively associated with baseline IGF-1 (≥0.02 cm/ng/ml, p = 0.001) and osteocalcin (≥0.13 cm/ng/ml, p ≤ 0.009); and gain in BAheight was positively associated with baseline osteocalcin (≥0.35 cm(2)/ng/ml, p ≤ 0.019). In girls only, gain in BAheight was also positively associated with baseline IGF-1 (0.06 cm(2)/ng/ml, p = 0.017) and inversely associated with both baseline ghrelin (-0.01 cm(2)/pg/ml, p = 0.001) and leptin (-1.21 cm(2)/µg/ml, p = 0.005). In boys, gain in BMCsize was positively associated with osteocalcin (0.18 g/ng/ml, p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This large longitudinal study suggests that in 8- to 11-year-old children, IGF-1 and osteocalcin predict growth in height, while FM, osteocalcin, and in girls also, IGF-1 predict growth in BAheight. Fat-independent inverse associations of leptin and ghrelin with BAheight in girls' are contrary to proposed growth-stimulating effects of leptin. Osteocalcin in boys predicts gain in BMCsize.


Subject(s)
Adiposity/physiology , Body Height/physiology , Bone Density/physiology , Child Development/physiology , Hormones/blood , Anthropometry/methods , Bone Development/physiology , Child , Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena/physiology , Female , Food Services , Ghrelin/blood , Humans , Insulin/blood , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/metabolism , Leptin/blood , Longitudinal Studies , Lunch , Male , Osteocalcin/blood , Schools , Sex Characteristics , Sexual Maturation/physiology
5.
Clin Obes ; 5(2): 60-6, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25808903

ABSTRACT

Behaviours of several animal species have been linked to lunar periodicity. Evidence for such links in humans is weak; however, recently, shorter sleep duration was reported around full moon in two small samples of adults. As restrictions in sleep duration have been shown to adversely affect glucose regulation and physical activity to improve glucose regulation, one could speculate that cardiometabolic risk factors might also be affected by the lunar phase. We retrospectively examined 795 Danish children, aged 8-11 years, with more than 13,000 24-h accelerometer recordings of activity and sleep as well as 2000 measurements of different cardiometabolic risk factors, including insulin sensitivity, appetite hormones and blood pressure, during nine lunar phases. During the period around full moon, children were 5.0 and 3.2 min per day less active, slept 2.4 and 4.1 min per night longer, had 0.03 and 0.05 higher homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and 0.6 and 0.8 mmHg higher mean arterial blood pressure compared with days around half moon and new moon, respectively (all P ≤ 0.02). Furthermore, ghrelin was lower and leptin was higher during the period around full moon compared with days around half moon (both P < 0.001). The results suggest that physical activity rather than sleep is responsible for the metabolic alterations observed around full moon. However, we have no understanding of potential mechanisms that may mediate a potential true link between childhood behaviour and the lunar cycle or confounders that may explain this, apparently leading to fluctuation in a number of cardiometabolic risk markers conjointly with lunar phases.


Subject(s)
Moon , Motor Activity/physiology , Periodicity , Sleep/physiology , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Pressure , Child , Female , Ghrelin/blood , Humans , Insulin Resistance , Leptin/blood , Lipids/blood , Male , Retrospective Studies
6.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 69(5): 626-31, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25491500

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A nutritionally adequate diet in childhood is important for health and resistance of allergies and infections. This study explored the effects of school meals rich in fish, vegetables and fibre on school attendance, asthma, allergies and illness in 797 Danish 8- to 11-year-old children. No comparable studies conducted in high-income settings have been identified. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The OPUS School Meal Study was a cluster-randomised cross-over trial. Children from third and fourth grades at nine Danish schools received school meals or usual packed lunch (control) for two 3-month periods. Occurrence and duration of illnesses, asthma and allergies during the last 14 days were recorded by parental questionnaires at baseline and after each 3-month period. Self-reported well-being was assessed by visual analogue scales. RESULTS: The school meals did not affect school attendance, parent-reported occurrence or duration of asthma and allergies or self-reported well-being. The most common symptoms of illness were stomach pain (24%), headache (28%) and cold (24%). A slightly higher number of children experienced headaches in the school meal (27%) compared with the control period (22%) (P=0.02). However, subgroup analyses showed that this effect was only seen in children eating school meals in the classroom (P=0.007), and not in common dining areas (P=0.2). No effect was found on other symptoms of illness. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of nutritionally balanced school meals did not affect school attendance, asthma, allergies, illness or well-being in 8- to 11-year-old children. The slight increase in occurrence of headaches seems to be related to the physical eating environment.


Subject(s)
Child Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Diet/standards , Food Services/standards , Headache/epidemiology , Schools , Asthma/epidemiology , Child , Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Cluster Analysis , Cross-Over Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Headache/etiology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Lunch , Male , Meals , School Health Services , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 68(2): 277-80, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24327119

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Transformation of outcomes is frequently used in the analysis of studies in clinical nutrition. However, back-transformation of estimated treatment means and differences is complicated by the nonlinear nature of the transformations. It is not straightforward to obtain an estimated treatment difference that can be interpreted without any reference to the additional predictors included in the statistical model; and moreover, standard errors are not easily available. The aim of this work was to provide a generally applicable, yet operational procedure for obtaining back-transformed estimated differences, and corresponding standard errors and 95% confidence intervals. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Based on data from two randomized controlled studies and an exemplary data set that had all previously been published, we evaluated our approximate procedure by comparing results for different approaches for showing back-transformed estimated treatment differences. RESULTS: Estimated differences obtained on logarithm, square root and reciprocal square root-transformed scales were back-transformed into estimated differences on the original scales, and these estimates were in good agreement with the results reported by the original studies. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approximate procedure provides a flexible approach for obtaining quite accurate back-transformed estimated differences in terms of medians and for deriving the corresponding standard errors.


Subject(s)
Statistics as Topic/methods , Treatment Outcome , Animals , Confidence Intervals , Cytokines/blood , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Denmark , Dietary Supplements , Fish Oils/administration & dosage , Humans , Immunity/drug effects , Infant , Infant Formula , Milk , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Skinfold Thickness
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...