Safe Injection Self-Efficacy is Associated with HCV and HIV Seropositivity Among People Who Inject Drugs in the San Diego-Tijuana Border Region.

Safe injection self-efficacy (SISE) is negatively associated with injection risk behaviors among people who inject drugs (PWID) but has not been examined in differing risk environments. We compared responses to a validated SISE scale between PWID in San Diego, California and Tijuana, Mexico, and examine correlates of SISE among PWID in Tijuana. PWID were recruited via street outreach for a longitudinal cohort study from October 2020-September 2021. We compared SISE scale items by city. Due to low variability in SISE scores among San Diego residents, we restricted analysis of factors associated with SISE to Tijuana residents and identified correlates of SISE score levels (low, medium, high) using ordinal logistic regression. Of 474 participants, most were male (74%), Latinx (78%) and Tijuana residents (73%). Mean age was 44. Mean SISE scores among San Diego residents were high (3.46 of 4 maximum) relative to Tijuana residents (mean: 1.93). Among Tijuana residents, White race and having previously resided in San Diego were associated with higher SISE scores. HCV and HIV seropositivity, homelessness, fentanyl use, polysubstance co-injection, and greater injection frequency were associated with lower SISE scores. We found profound inequalities between Tijuana and San Diego SISE, likely attributable to differential risk environments. Associations with fentanyl and polysubstance co-injection, injection frequency, and both HIV and HCV seropositivity suggest that SISE contribute to blood-borne infection transmission risks in Tijuana. SISE reflects an actionable intervention target to reduce injection risk behaviors, but structural interventions are required to change the risk environment.

RESUMEN: La autoeficacia de inyección segura (SISE, por sus siglas en inglés) se asocia negativamente con conductas de riesgo de inyección entre las personas que se inyectan drogas (PWID, por sus siglas en inglés), pero no se ha examinado en diferentes entornos de riesgo. Comparamos las respuestas a una escala validada de SISE entre PWID en San Diego, California, y Tijuana, México, y examinamos los correlatos de SISE entre PWID en Tijuana. Participantes fueron reclutados por medio de alcance callejero para un estudio de cohorte longitudinal entre octubre 2020 ­septiembre de 2021. Comparamos los ítems de la escala SISE por ciudad. Debido a la baja variabilidad en los puntajes SISE entre los residentes de San Diego, restringimos el análisis de factores asociados con SISE a los residentes de Tijuana e identificamos factores correlacionados con niveles de SISE (bajo, medio, alto) mediante regresión logística ordinal. De 474 participantes, la mayoría eran hombres (74%), latinx (78%) y residentes de Tijuana (73%). La edad promedio fue de 44 años. Los puntajes medios de SISE entre los residentes de San Diego fueron altos (3.46 de un máximo de 4) en comparación con los residentes de Tijuana (media: 1.93). Entre los residentes de Tijuana, la raza blanca y haber residido previamente en San Diego se asociaron con puntajes más altos de SISE. La seropositividad para HCV y VIH, la falta de vivienda, el uso de fentanilo, la co-inyección de múltiples sustancias y una mayor frecuencia de inyecciónes se asociaron con puntajes más bajos de SISE. Encontramos profundas desigualdades entre SISE en Tijuana y San Diego, probablemente atribuibles a diferentes entornos de riesgo. Las asociaciones con fentanilo y la co-inyección de múltiples sustancias, la frecuencia de inyección y la seropositividad tanto para VIH como para HCV sugieren que SISE contribuye a los riesgos de transmisión de infecciones transmitidas por la sangre en Tijuana. SISE refleja un objetivo de intervención accionable para reducir las conductas de riesgo de inyección, pero se requieren intervenciones estructurales para cambiar el entorno de riesgo.

"Somebody Is Gonna Be Hurt": Involuntary Drug Treatment in Mexico.

Involuntary drug treatment (IDT) is ineffective in decreasing drug use, yet it is a common practice. In Mexico, there are not enough professional residential drug treatment programs, and both voluntary and involuntary drug treatment is often provided by non-evidence based, non-professional programs. We studied the experiences of people who inject drugs (PWID) in Tijuana who were taken involuntarily to drug centers under the auspices of a federally funded police operation. We provide insight into how the health, wellbeing, human rights, dignity, and security of PWID ought to be at the center of international drug policies included in universal health care systems.

Negotiating access: social barriers to purchasing syringes at pharmacies in Tijuana, Mexico.

BACKGROUND: One common public health response to the emergence of HIV has been the provision of sterile syringes to people who inject drugs. In Mexico specialized syringe exchanges are rare, and the sale of needles through pharmacies is often the only way people who inject drugs can obtain sterile syringes. However, people who inject drugs in Tijuana, Mexico report considerable social barriers to successfully purchasing syringes at pharmacies. METHODS: Between October 2008 and March 2009 we conducted seven in-depth focus groups with 47 people who inject drugs in Tijuana, Mexico. Focus group transcripts were analysed using a descriptive and thematic approach rooted in grounded theory. RESULTS: We found that injectors offered a number of explanations for why pharmacies were reluctant to sell them syringes, including fear of police; attitudes toward drug use; fear of stereotypical drug user behaviour such as petty theft, violence, or distressing behaviour; and related fears that an obvious drug using clientèle would drive away other customers. Injectors described a range of ways of attempting to re-frame or negotiate interactions with pharmacy staff so that these and related concerns were ameliorated. These included tactics as simple as borrowing cleaner clothing, through to strategies for becoming 'known' to pharmacy staff as an individual rather than as a member of a stigmatized group. CONCLUSION: Increasing the ability of pharmacy staff and people who inject drugs to successfully negotiate syringe sales are highly desirable. Interventions designed to improve this likelihood need to capitalize on existing solutions developed ad hoc by people who inject drugs and pharmacy staff, and should focus on broadening the range of 'identities' which pharmacy staff are able to accept as legitimate customers. Approaches to achieve this end might include sensitizing pharmacy staff to the needs of people who inject drugs; facilitating individual drug users meeting individual pharmacy staff; and working with drug users to reduce behaviours seen as problematic by pharmacy staff.

Reconciling incongruous qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed methods research: exemplars from research with drug using populations.

Mixed methods research is increasingly being promoted in the health sciences as a way to gain more comprehensive understandings of how social processes and individual behaviours shape human health. Mixed methods research most commonly combines qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis strategies. Often, integrating findings from multiple methods is assumed to confirm or validate the findings from one method with the findings from another, seeking convergence or agreement between methods. Cases in which findings from different methods are congruous are generally thought of as ideal, whilst conflicting findings may, at first glance, appear problematic. However, the latter situation provides the opportunity for a process through which apparently discordant results are reconciled, potentially leading to new emergent understandings of complex social phenomena. This paper presents three case studies drawn from the authors' research on HIV risk amongst injection drug users in which mixed methods studies yielded apparently discrepant results. We use these case studies (involving injection drug users [IDUs] using a Needle/Syringe Exchange Program in Los Angeles, CA, USA; IDUs seeking to purchase needle/syringes at pharmacies in Tijuana, Mexico; and young street-based IDUs in San Francisco, CA, USA) to identify challenges associated with integrating findings from mixed methods projects, summarize lessons learned, and make recommendations for how to more successfully anticipate and manage the integration of findings. Despite the challenges inherent in reconciling apparently conflicting findings from qualitative and quantitative approaches, in keeping with others who have argued in favour of integrating mixed methods findings, we contend that such an undertaking has the potential to yield benefits that emerge only through the struggle to reconcile discrepant results and may provide a sum that is greater than the individual qualitative and quantitative parts.