Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;87(6): e2022, 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1520247

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate early changes after the first antivascular endothelial growth factor injection for macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion and the relationship between longterm outcomes. Methods: The study enrolled patients who received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for treatment-naive macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion and diabetic retinopathy. The central macular thickness was measured at baseline, post-injection day 1, week 2, and month 1, and at the last visit using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. A good response was defined as a central macular thickness reduction of ≥10% on post-injection day 1. Patients were reassessed at the last visit with regard to treatment response on post-injection day 1 based on the favorable anatomic outcome defined as a central macular thickness <350 µm. Results: In total, 26 (44.8%) patients had macular edema-retinal vein occlusion and 32 (55.2%) had macular edema-diabetic retinopathy. The mean follow-up time was 24.0 (SD 8.5) months. A statistically significant decrease in the central macular thickness was observed in both patients with macular edema-retinal vein occlusion and macular edema-diabetic retinopathy after antivascular endothelial growth factor injection therapy (p<0.001 for both). All patients with macular edema-retinal vein occlusion were good responders at post-injection day 1. All nongood responders at post-injection day 1 belong to the macular edema-diabetic retinopathy group (n=16.50%). The rate of hyperreflective spots was higher in nongood responders than in good responders of the macular edema-diabetic retinopathy group (p=0.03). Of 42 (2.4%) total good responders, one had a central macular thickness >350 µm, whereas 5 (31.2%) of 16 total nongood responders had a central macular thickness >350 µm at the last visit (p=0.003). Conclusion: The longterm anatomical outcomes of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and diabetic retinopathy may be predicted by treatment response 1 day after antivascular endothelial growth factor injection.


RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar as alterações precoces após a primeira injeção de anticorpos antifator de crescimento endotelial vascular (anti-VEGF) em casos de edema macular secundário à retinopatia diabética e oclusão da veia da retina e a relação entre essas alterações e o resultado a longo prazo. Métodos: Foram incluídos no estudo pacientes que receberam uma injeção de antifator de crescimento endotelial vascular para edema macular, virgem de tratamento e devido à oclusão da veia retiniana ou a retinopatia diabética. A espessura macular central foi medida no início do tratamento e no 1º dia, 2ª semana e 1º mês após a injeção, bem como na última visita, através de tomografia de coerência óptica de domínio espectral. Definiu-se uma "boa resposta" como uma redução ≥10% na espessura macular central no 1º dia após a injeção. Os pacientes foram reavaliados na última visita com relação à resposta ao tratamento no 1º dia após a injeção, com base em um resultado anatômico favorável, definido como uma espessura macular central <350 µm. Resultado: Foram registrados 26 (44,8%) pacientes com edema macular e oclusão da veia da retina e 32 (55,2%) com edema macular e retinopatia diabética. O tempo médio de acompanhamento foi de 24,0 meses (desvio-padrão de 8,5 meses). Foi observada uma diminuição estatisticamente significativa da espessura macular central após o tratamento antifator de crescimento endotelial vascular tanto em pacientes com edema macular e oclusão da veia retiniana quanto naqueles com edema macular e retinopatia diabética (p<0,001 para ambos). Todos os pacientes com edema macular e oclusão da veia retiniana responderam bem no 1º dia pós-injeção. Todos os que responderam mal no 1º dia pós-injeção pertenciam ao grupo com edema macular e retinopatia diabética (n=16,50%). A presença de manchas hiperrefletivas foi maior nos pacientes que responderam mal do que naqueles que tiveram boa resposta no grupo com edema macular e retinopatia diabética (p=0,03). Um dos 42 (2,4%) pacientes com boa resposta total teve espessura macular central >350 um, enquanto 5 (31,2%) do total de 16 pacientes com resposta ruim apresentaram espessura macular central >350 µm na última visita (p=0,003). Conclusão: O resultado anatômico de longo prazo do edema macular secundário à oclusão da veia retiniana e à retinopatia diabética pode ser previsto pela resposta ao tratamento no 1º dia após a injeção de antifator de crescimento endotelial vascular.

2.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 87(6): e20220228, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878875

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate early changes after the first antivascular endothelial growth factor injection for macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion and the relationship between longterm outcomes. METHODS: The study enrolled patients who received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for treatment-naive macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion and diabetic retinopathy. The central macular thickness was measured at baseline, post-injection day 1, week 2, and month 1, and at the last visit using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. A good response was defined as a central macular thickness reduction of ≥10% on post-injection day 1. Patients were reassessed at the last visit with regard to treatment response on post-injection day 1 based on the favorable anatomic outcome defined as a central macular thickness <350 µm. RESULTS: In total, 26 (44.8%) patients had macular edema-retinal vein occlusion and 32 (55.2%) had macular edema-diabetic retinopathy. The mean follow-up time was 24.0 (SD 8.5) months. A statistically significant decrease in the central macular thickness was observed in both patients with macular edema-retinal vein occlusion and macular edema-diabetic retinopathy after antivascular endothelial growth factor injection therapy (p<0.001 for both). All patients with macular edema-retinal vein occlusion were good responders at post-injection day 1. All nongood responders at post-injection day 1 belong to the macular edema-diabetic retinopathy group (n=16.50%). The rate of hyperreflective spots was higher in nongood responders than in good responders of the macular edema-diabetic retinopathy group (p=0.03). Of 42 (2.4%) total good responders, one had a central macular thickness >350 µm, whereas 5 (31.2%) of 16 total nongood responders had a central macular thickness >350 µm at the last visit (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: The longterm anatomical outcomes of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and diabetic retinopathy may be predicted by treatment response 1 day after antivascular endothelial growth factor injection.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Retinal Vein Occlusion , Humans , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications , Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Endothelial Growth Factors/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Intravitreal Injections
3.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;86(6): e20230061, 2023. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1520204

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT We report a case of a young woman presenting with decreased vision in the right eye. One month earlier, she developed severe preeclampsia at 22 weeks of gestation and the pregnancy was terminated. Fundus examination revealed cotton wool spots and hard exudates in the macula bilaterally, with a yellow spot at the center of the fovea in the right eye. Optic coherence tomography showed a full thickness macular hole with elevated cystoid edges in the right eye. The patient was diagnosed with macular hole secondary to preeclampsia and followed up for spontaneous closure. One month after the first visit, surgical intervention was suggested due to declining vision. Three months later, the patient agreed to surgery. She underwent pars plana vitrectomy with a temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap and C3F8 endotamponade, which provided anatomic and visual improvement.


RESUMO Relatamos o caso de uma jovem com diminuição da visão do olho direito. Um mês antes do primeiro atendimento, a paciente desenvolveu pré-eclâmpsia grave com 22 semanas de gestação e interrompeu a gravidez. O exame de fundo revelou manchas algodonosas e exsudatos duros na mácula em ambos os olhos, com uma mancha amarela no centro da fóvea do olho direito. A tomografia de coerência óptica mostrou um buraco macular de espessura total com bordas cistoides elevadas no olho direito. A paciente foi diagnosticada com buraco macular secundário a pré-eclâmpsia e acompanhada para fechamento espontâneo. Um mês após a primeira visita, foi-lhe sugerida a intervenção cirúrgica, devido a um declínio em sua visão. Três meses depois, o paciente aprovou a cirurgia e foi submetida a uma vitrectomia via pars plana com retalho invertido de membrana limitante interna e tampão interno C3F8, o que proporcionou uma melhora anatômica e visual.

4.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 2022 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35544931

ABSTRACT

We report a case of a young woman presenting with decreased vision in the right eye. One month earlier, she developed severe preeclampsia at 22 weeks of gestation and the pregnancy was terminated. Fundus examination revealed cotton wool spots and hard exudates in the macula bilaterally, with a yellow spot at the center of the fovea in the right eye. Optic coherence tomography showed a full thickness macular hole with elevated cystoid edges in the right eye. The patient was diagnosed with macular hole secondary to preeclampsia and followed up for spontaneous closure. One month after the first visit, surgical intervention was suggested due to declining vision. Three months later, the patient agreed to surgery. She underwent pars plana vitrectomy with a temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap and C3F8 endotamponade, which provided anatomic and visual improvement.

5.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 79(5): 308-311, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27982209

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:: To evaluate subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) changes after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). METHODS:: In this retrospective study, we assessed the medical records of patients with CSC who received IVB (IVB group) or who were observed without intervention (control group). SFCT was measured using EDI-OCT. The main outcome measure was the change in SFCT. RESULTS:: Twenty-one eyes were included in the IVB group and 16 eyes were included in the control group. All patients showed resolution of neurosensory detachment and improvement in vision. In the IVB group, the mean SFCT was 315 µm at baseline, which decreased to 296 µm at the most recent visit. In the control group, the mean SFCT was 307 µm at baseline, which decreased to 266 µm at the most recent visit. Although there was a significant decrease in the mean SFCT for the control group, the decrease was not significant for the IVB group (41 vs 19 µm, p=0.003 vs p=0.071). CONCLUSIONS:: SFCT decreased in both groups with remission of the disease. However, the decrease was significantly greater in the control group. In terms of anatomic and functional outcomes, IVB injection is not promising.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/drug therapy , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/pathology , Choroid/drug effects , Choroid/pathology , Adult , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Choroid/diagnostic imaging , Female , Fluorescein Angiography , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity , Young Adult
6.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;79(5): 308-311, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-827968

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) changes after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). Methods: In this retrospective study, we assessed the medical records of patients with CSC who received IVB (IVB group) or who were observed without intervention (control group). SFCT was measured using EDI-OCT. The main outcome measure was the change in SFCT. Results: Twenty-one eyes were included in the IVB group and 16 eyes were included in the control group. All patients showed resolution of neurosensory detachment and improvement in vision. In the IVB group, the mean SFCT was 315 μm at baseline, which decreased to 296 μm at the most recent visit. In the control group, the mean SFCT was 307 μm at baseline, which decreased to 266 μm at the most recent visit. Although there was a significant decrease in the mean SFCT for the control group, the decrease was not significant for the IVB group (41 vs 19 μm, p=0.003 vs p=0.071). Conclusions: SFCT decreased in both groups with remission of the disease. However, the decrease was significantly greater in the control group. In terms of anatomic and functional outcomes, IVB injection is not promising.


RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar as alterações da espessura da coroide subfoveal (SFCT) após terapia com bevacizumab (IVB) para coriorretinopatia serosa central (CSC) usando tomografia de coerência óptica de domínio espectral com profundidade aprimorada (EDI-OCT). Métodos: Neste estudo retrospectivo, foram avaliados prontuários de pacientes com CSC que receberam IVB (grupo IVB) ou que foram apenas observados, sem intervenção (grupo controle). SFCT foi medido por meio de EDI-OCT. O desfecho principal avaliado foi a mudança na SFCT. Resultados: Houve 21 olhos no grupo IVB e 16 olhos no grupo de controle. Todos os pacientes apresentaram resolução de descolamento neurossensorial e melhora na visão. No grupo IVB, a SFCT media foi 315 μm no início e diminuiu para 296 μm na visita mais recente. No grupo controle, a SFCT média foi 307 μm no início e diminuiu para 266 μm na visita mais recente. Embora tenha havido uma diminuição significativa na SFCT média para o grupo controle, a diminuição não foi significativa para o grupo IVB (41 μm contra 19 μm, p=0.003 vs p=0.071). Conclusões: A SFCT diminuiu em ambos os grupos após a remissão da doença. Contudo, a diminuição foi significativamente maior no grupo de controle. Em termos de resultados anatômicos e funcionais, a injeção de IVB não foi promissora.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Choroid/drug effects , Choroid/pathology , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/pathology , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/drug therapy , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Fluorescein Angiography , Visual Acuity , Retrospective Studies , Choroid/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Intravitreal Injections
7.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 79(3): 159-62, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27463626

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of three different surgical techniques for foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation in vitrectomized eyes without capsular support. METHODS: A total of 60 patients with aphakic and vitrectomized eyes without capsular support were enrolled. All patients underwent three-piece foldable PCIOL implantation into the posterior chamber through a small corneal incision. Transscleral fixation (TSF), iris fixation (IF), and intrascleral tunnel fixation (ISF) surgical techniques were performed. RESULTS: Postoperative PCIOL subluxation or dislocation occurred in one case in the TSF group and two cases in the ISF group. Intraoperative PCIOL dislocation occurred in two patients in the IF group. The incidence of temporary postoperative complications, such as mild intraocular hemorrhage and cystoid macular edema, was higher in the ISF group. No statistically significant difference in PCIOL-related astigmatism was observed between groups. Visual acuity improved in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative outcomes were comparable between TSF, IF, and ISF for PCIOL in vitrectomized eyes without capsular support.


Subject(s)
Aphakia/surgery , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Lenses, Intraocular , Vitrectomy/methods , Aged , Astigmatism/etiology , Cornea/surgery , Female , Humans , Iris/surgery , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Sclera/surgery , Statistics, Nonparametric , Suture Techniques , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity , Vitrectomy/adverse effects
8.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;79(3): 159-162, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-787328

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of three different surgical techniques for foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation in vitrectomized eyes without capsular support. Methods: A total of 60 patients with aphakic and vitrectomized eyes without capsular support were enrolled. All patients underwent three-piece foldable PCIOL implantation into the posterior chamber through a small corneal incision. Transscleral fixation (TSF), iris fixation (IF), and intrascleral tunnel fixation (ISF) surgical techniques were performed. Results: Postoperative PCIOL subluxation or dislocation occurred in one case in the TSF group and two cases in the ISF group. Intraoperative PCIOL dislocation occurred in two patients in the IF group. The incidence of temporary postoperative complications, such as mild intraocular hemorrhage and cystoid macular edema, was higher in the ISF group. No statistically significant difference in PCIOL-related astigmatism was observed between groups. Visual acuity improved in all groups. Conclusions: Postoperative outcomes were comparable between TSF, IF, and ISF for PCIOL in vitrectomized eyes without capsular support.


RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados de três diferentes técnicas cirúrgicas para implantação da lente intraocular de câmara posterior (PCIOL) dobrável em olhos vitrectomizados sem apoio capsular. Métodos: Um total de 60 olhos de 60 pacientes afácicos vitrectomizados, sem apoio capsular foram inscritos. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos ao implante de PCIOL dobrável de três peças na câmara posterior, através de uma pequena incisão na córnea. Foram utilizados as técnicas cirúrgicas de fixação transescleral (TSF), fixação iriana (IF) e túnel de fixação intraescleral (ISF). Resultados: Subluxação ou luxação da PCIOL ocorreu em um caso no grupo TSF e em dois casos no grupo ISF. Deslocamentos intraoperatórios da PCIOL ocorram em dois pacientes no grupo IF. Frequência de complicações pós-operatórias temporárias como hemorragia intraocular leve e edema macular cistóide foi maior no grupo ISF. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa do astigmatismo relacionado à PCIOL entre os grupos. A acuidade visual melhorou em todos os grupos. Conclusões: Nenhuma das três técnicas cirúrgicas teve destaque em termos de resultados cirúrgicos comparativos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aphakia/surgery , Vitrectomy/methods , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Lenses, Intraocular , Postoperative Complications , Astigmatism/etiology , Sclera/surgery , Time Factors , Vitrectomy/adverse effects , Visual Acuity , Iris/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Suture Techniques , Treatment Outcome , Statistics, Nonparametric , Cornea/surgery , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL