ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is an extensive but highly inconsistent body of literature regarding donor adverse events (AEs) in haemapheresis. As the reports diverge with respect to types and grading of AEs, apheresis procedures and machines, the range of haemapheresis-related AEs varies widely from about 0.03% to 6.6%. METHODS: The German Society for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology (DGTI) formed a 'Haemapheresis Vigilance Working Party' (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Hämapheresevigilanz; AGHV) to create an on-line registry for comprehensive and comparable AE assessment with all available apheresis devices in all types of preparative haemapheresis: plasmapheresis (PLS), plateletpheresis (PLT), red blood cell apheresis, all kind of leukaphereses (autologous/allogeneic blood stem cell apheresis, granulocyte apheresis, lymphocyte/monocyte apheresis) and all possible types of multi-component apheresis. To ensure the comparability of the data, the AGHV adopted the 'Standard for Surveillance of Complications Related to Blood Donation' from the International Society for Blood Transfusion in cooperation with the International Haemovigilance Network (IHN) and the American Association of Blood Banks for AE acquisition and automated evaluation. The registry is embedded in a prospective observational multi-centre study with a study period of 7 years. RESULTS: A preliminary evaluation encompassed the time period from January, 2012 to December, 2015. During this time, the system proved to be safe and stable. Out of approximately 345,000 haemaphereses 16,477 AEs were reported (4.9%) from 20 participating centres. The majority of AEs occurred in PLSs (63%), followed by PLT (34.5%) and SC (2.2%). Blood access injuries (BAI) accounted for about 55% of the supplied AEs, whereas citrate toxicity symptoms, vasovagal reactions and technical events (e.g. disposable leakages, software failures) rather equally affected haemaphereses at 8-15%. Out of 12,348 finalized AEs, 8,759 (70.1%) were associated with a procedure-related break-off, with BAI being the prevailing cause (5,463/8,759; 62.4%). An automated centre- and procedure-specific AE evaluation according to the latest IHN standard and AGHV pre-settings is available within a few minutes. CONCLUSIONS: An on-line electronic platform for comprehensive assessment and centre-specific automated evaluation of AEs in haemaphereses has been developed and proved to be stable and safe over a period of 4 years.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: By shortening the pre-seroconversion window in the viral screening of donated blood, nucleic acid amplification testing greatly improves safety and efficiency, particularly when combined with multiple target detection and maximal automation. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of seronegative window reduction during HIV-1, HCV and HBV infection by the novel cobas TaqScreen MPX test for simultaneous nucleic acid detection of HIV-1 (groups M and O), HIV-2, HCV and HBV using the cobas s 201 system. STUDY DESIGN: Testing of HIV-1, HCV, and HBV seroconversion panels (20 each) using the cobas TaqScreen MPX test versus reference immuno- and nucleic acid technology assays. RESULTS: The cobas TaqScreen MPX test detected HIV-1 and HCV infection earlier than immunoassays in 20/20 and 19/20 panels, and HBV DNA earlier than or on the same day as HBsAg in 19/20 and 18/20 panels, and later in 1 and 2 panels on neat samples and 1:6 dilutions. Pre-seroconversion sensitivity exceeded that of COBAS AmpliScreen testing in pools of 24. CONCLUSION: The cobas TaqScreen MPX test shortens the pre-seroconversion window in minipools of six, evidencing high sensitivity, and significantly enhances blood-screening efficiency by the simultaneous automated detection of multiple viruses in a single test.
