Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 7(4): 470-4, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21454130

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To standardize the history and physical examination of boys who present with acute scrotum and identify parameters that best predict testicular torsion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 5-month period, a standardized history and physical examination form with 22 items was used for all boys presenting with scrotal pain. Management decisions for radiological evaluation and surgical intervention were based on the results. Data were statistically analyzed in correlation with the eventual diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 79 boys evaluated, 8 (10.1%) had testicular torsion. On univariate analysis, age, worsening pain, nausea/vomiting, severe pain at rest, absence of ipsilateral cremaster reflex, abnormal testicular position and scrotal skin changes were statistically predictive of torsion. After multivariate analysis and adjusting for confounding effect of other co-existing variables, absence of ipsilateral cremaster reflex (P < 0.001), nausea/vomiting (P < 0.05) and scrotal skin changes (P < 0.001) were the only consistent predictive factors of testicular torsion. CONCLUSION: An accurate history and physical examination of boys with acute scrotum should be primary in deciding upon further radiographic or surgical evaluation. While several forces have led to less consistent overnight resident staffing, consistent and reliable clinical evaluation of the acute scrotum using a standardized approach should reduce error, improve patient care and potentially reduce health care costs.


Subject(s)
Medical History Taking/methods , Medical History Taking/standards , Medical Staff, Hospital/standards , Physical Examination/methods , Physical Examination/standards , Spermatic Cord Torsion/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Humans , Male , Pain/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Quality of Health Care , Scrotum , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Aesthet Surg J ; 30(1): 71-3, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20442077

ABSTRACT

Venous malformations may occur anywhere in the body but are rare in the genitourinary tract and external genitalia. The authors report a case of a venous malformation in the glans penis and discuss the controversy over optimal management.


Subject(s)
Penis/blood supply , Penis/surgery , Vascular Malformations/surgery , Adolescent , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Urol ; 180(4 Suppl): 1657-9; discussion 1659-60, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18708215

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We report our long-term experience with the Palomo technique for varicocele ligation in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1986 and December 2006, 312 patients 7 to 21 years old (median age 14.6) underwent varicocele ligation using the Palomo technique for complete retroperitoneal ligation of the internal spermatic veins and artery. In 234 patients the varicocele was grade III, in 75 it was grade II and in 3 it was grade I. Indications for surgery were relative left testicular volume loss compared to the right testicle in 248 patients, bilateral palpable varicoceles in 8 and pain or parental preference in the remainder. Postoperative followup was 2 weeks to 10.6 years (mean 17.4 months). A total of 233 patients had at least a 6-month followup. RESULTS: Persistent varicocele was noted in 9 of 233 patients (3.9%). Of the 233 patients 68 (29%) presented with a secondary hydrocele an average of 14 months (range 18 to 1,964 days) following surgery, of whom 12 (17.6%) underwent hydrocele correction. The 12 patients who underwent hydrocelectomy represented 5% of the patients with varicocelectomy. Postoperative testicular atrophy was not documented in any patient and no other surgical complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The Palomo procedure for adolescent varicocele repair is safe and effective with a high success rate and low complication rate. Postoperative hydrocele formation developed in 29% of our patients. However, most secondary hydroceles were small, asymptomatic and did not require surgical correction.


Subject(s)
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods , Varicocele/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Humans , Ligation , Male , Microsurgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Testicular Hydrocele/epidemiology , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/adverse effects
4.
BJU Int ; 100(4): 835-9, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17822464

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) with pudendal nerve stimulation (PNS) for interstitial cystitis (IC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with well-documented, refractory IC had a tined lead placed at S3 and a second electrode implanted at the pudendal nerve via a posterior approach. In a blinded, randomized design, each lead was tested for 7 days. The best lead was implanted to a pulse generator and patients were followed at 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The time required to place a sacral lead was 27.4 min, and a pudendal lead 19.6 min (P = 0.039). Of the 22 patients, 17 (77%) responded and had a permanent implant placed. PNS was chosen as the better lead in 77% and SNS in 24%. The order in which the lead was stimulated had no effect on the final lead implanted and there was no 'carry-over' effect. The overall reduction in symptoms was 59% for PNS and 44% for SNS (P = 0.05). At 6 months after implantation, voids improved by 41% (PNS) and 33% (SNS), and mean voided volume increased 95% and 21%, respectively; validated IC questionnaires improved markedly and complications were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first 'blinded' study of SNS vs PNS for IC. A pudendal lead was implanted successfully in all patients, and most chose PNS as better than SNS; the improvement was sustained over time.


Subject(s)
Cystitis, Interstitial/therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Lumbosacral Plexus , Adult , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Urodynamics
5.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 24(7): 643-7, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16178000

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The objective of the study was to compare sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) to pudendal nerve stimulation (PNS) for voiding dysfunction. METHODS: Thirty subjects with voiding dysfunction had a tined lead placed at S3 and a second electrode implanted at the pudendal nerve via a posterior approach. In a blinded, randomized fashion, each lead was tested for 7 days. Voiding diaries and questionnaires were completed and outcomes monitored. RESULTS: The time to place a sacral lead was 25.85 min, pudendal lead 23.71 min (P = 0.57). Twenty-four of 30 (80%) subjects responded and had a permanent implant placed. PNS was chosen as a superior lead in 79.2%, SNS was superior in 20.8%. The order in which the lead was simulated had no impact on the final lead implanted and no carry over effect was seen. Overall reduction in symptoms was 63% for PNS and 46% for SNS (P = 0.02). On a 7-point scale from markedly worse to markedly better, the pudendal lead was superior to sacral for pelvic pain (P = 0.024), urgency (P = 0.005), frequency (P = 0.007), and bowel function (P = 0.049). Complications were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first blinded study of sacral versus pudendal stimulation for voiding dysfunction. Successful implantation of a pudendal lead was achieved in all subjects. The majority of subjects chose PNS to be superior to SNS. More patients and longer term data is needed to confirm these promising results.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Lumbosacral Plexus , Perineum/innervation , Urination Disorders/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Urodynamics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...