Evaluation of the AltoStar AM16 system for the quantitation of AdV, CMV and HHV-6 DNA from clinical specimens.

The vulnerability of immunocompromised patients to common or opportunistic viral infections is particularly high. The quantitation of viral load in clinical specimens is important for the diagnosis and management of the infection and reactivation in this patient population, particularly transplant recipients. As the new regulation "IVDR" regarding in vitro diagnosis methods is about to come into effect in France, diagnostic laboratories have to implement methods and systems compatible with this new regulation. Technical performance of the AltoStar® Adenovirus (AdV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and human Herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) DNA PCR Kits 1.5 was assessed on the AltoStar Automation system AM16 using reference kits in 146 clinical samples. Overall agreement in clinical specimens was 87.5 % (28/32), 96.8 % (62/64), 100 % (22/22), 100 % (28/28) and 92.8 % (26/28) for AdV, CMV (WB samples and other matrices), HHV-6 A&B respectively. Quantitative results were highly correlated and estimated to be equivalent within a 0.057-0.648 log-amount difference.We found that altona kits on The AltoStar AM16 system are suitable for clinical monitoring of AdV, CMV and HHV-6 in immunocompromised hosts.

Transmission of hepatitis E virus by water: An issue still pending in industrialized countries.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an enteric virus divided into eight genotypes. Genotype 1 (G1) and G2 are specific to humans; G3, G4 and G7 are zoonotic genotypes infecting humans and animals. Transmission to humans through water has been demonstrated for G1 and G2, mainly in developing countries, but is only suspected for the zoonotic genotypes. Thus, the water-related HEV hazard may be due to human and animal faeces. The high HEV genetic variability allows considering the presence in wastewater of not only different genotypes, but also quasispecies adding even greater diversity. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that HEV particles may be either quasi-enveloped or non-enveloped, potentially implying differential viral behaviours in the environment. The presence of HEV has been demonstrated at the different stages of the water cycle all over the world, especially for HEV G3 in Europe and the USA. Concerning HEV survival in water, the virus does not have higher resistance to inactivating factors (heat, UV, chlorine, physical removal), compared to viral indicators (MS2 phage) or other highly resistant enteric viruses (Hepatitis A virus). But the studies did not take into account genetic (genogroups, quasispecies) or structural (quasi- or non-enveloped forms) HEV variability. Viral variability could indeed modify HEV persistence in water by influencing its interaction with the environment, its infectivity and its pathogenicity, and subsequently its transmission by water. The cell culture methods used to study HEV survival still have drawbacks (challenging virus cultivation, time consuming, lack of sensitivity). As explained in the present review, the issue of HEV transmission to humans through water is similar to that of other enteric viruses because of their similar or lower survival. HEV transmission to animals through water and how the virus variability affects its survival and transmission remain to be investigated.

Molecular features of Hepatitis E Virus circulation in environmental and human samples.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is emerging but its circulation between humans and the environment remains misunderstood. HEV ORF2 gene encodes the capsid playing a key role in viral interactions with surfaces, ORF3 products are involved in the viral cycle. Our aim was to study the molecular characteristics of ORF2 and ORF3 which could favor HEV fitness in patients and the environment. STUDY DESIGN: Samples from 69 patients with hepatitis (blood/stools), 20 urban wastewaters, 20 effluents of a pig slaughterhouse, 22 farm pigs (stools), 20 wild boars (liver/stools) were collected in North-Eastern France. HEV strains were analyzed by direct sequencing within the ORF2 M region, of ORF2/ORF3, for phylogeny and physicochemical prediction and for ORF2 by ultra-deep sequencing. RESULTS: The results showed frequent HEV-positive samples: 9.1% of the patient bloods, 23.1% of their stools; 25.0% of wastewaters, 75.0% for the slaughterhouse, 10.0% of the boar livers, 5.3% of their stools. The strains were classified as HEV genotype 3. In ORF2, HEV highlighted one homogeneous major viral variant within quasispecies and a decrease in predicted antigenicity for two minor mutations (D442G, V402A). A cysteine signature at position 81 in ORF3 was observed in the boars. CONCLUSIONS: HEV RNA genotype 3 was detected in patients and in animals, in a slaughterhouse effluent and in wastewater. Moreover, the low variability of amino acids in the ORF2 M region and molecular features in ORF2 and ORF3 suggested that HEV strains could be advantageous for key properties.