Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelets in Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether antiplatelets or anticoagulants are more effective in preventing early recurrent stroke in patients with cervical artery dissection. Following the publication of the observational Antithrombotic for STOP-CAD (Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection) study, which has more than doubled available data, we performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. METHODS: The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023468063). We searched 5 databases using a combination of keywords that encompass different antiplatelets and anticoagulants, as well as cervical artery dissection. We included relevant randomized trials and included observational studies of dissection unrelated to major trauma. Where studies were sufficiently similar, we performed meta-analyses for efficacy (ischemic stroke) and safety (major hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and death) outcomes using relative risks. RESULTS: We identified 11 studies (2 randomized trials and 9 observational studies) that met the inclusion criteria. These included 5039 patients (30% [1512] treated with anticoagulation and 70% [3527]) treated with antiplatelets]. In meta-analysis, anticoagulation was associated with a lower ischemic stroke risk (relative risk, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.94]; P=0.02; I2=0%) but higher major bleeding risk (relative risk, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.07 to 4.72]; P=0.03, I2=0%). The risks of death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the 2 treatments. Effect sizes were larger in randomized trials. There are insufficient data on the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy or direct oral anticoagulants. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with cervical artery dissection, anticoagulation was superior to antiplatelet therapy in reducing ischemic stroke but carried a higher major bleeding risk. This argues for an individualized therapeutic approach incorporating the net clinical benefit of ischemic stroke reduction and bleeding risks. Large randomized clinical trials are required to clarify optimal antithrombotic strategies for management of cervical artery dissection.

Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients with ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) are not well studied. We aimed to compare tenecteplase with alteplase in stroke due to MeVO. METHODS: Patients with baseline M2-middle cerebral artery (MCA), M3/M4-MCA, P2/P3/P4-posterior cerebral artery (PCA), A2/A3/A4-anterior cerebral artery (ACA) occlusions from the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) trial were included. Primary outcome was the proportion of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS 0-2, ordinal mRS, mortality, quality of life measures (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, EuroQol visual analog scale), and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Initial and final successful reperfusion were reported in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). RESULTS: Among 1,558 patients with available baseline computed tomography angiography; 455 (29.2%) had MeVO of which 27.5% (125/455) were proximal M2; 16.3% (74/455) were distal M2; 35.2% (160/455) were M3/M4; 7.5% (34/455) were A2/A3/A4; and 13.6% (62/455) were P2/P3/P4 occlusions. EVT was performed in 87/455 (19.1%) patients. mRS 0-1 at 90 days was achieved in 37.9% in the tenecteplase versus 34.7% in the alteplase group (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.25). Rates of 90-day mRS 0-2, sICH, and mortality were similar in both groups. No statistical difference was noted in initial successful reperfusion rates (13.0% vs. 7.5%) among the 87 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy. However, final successful reperfusion was higher in the tenecteplase group (71.7% vs. 60.0%, aRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.61). CONCLUSION: Intravenous tenecteplase had comparable safety, functional outcomes and quality of life compared to intravenous alteplase among patients with MeVO. Among those treated with EVT, tenecteplase was associated with higher successful reperfusion rates than alteplase.

Time From Hospital Arrival Until Endovascular Thrombectomy and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Importance: The time-benefit association of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in ischemic stroke with patient-reported outcomes is unknown. Objective: To assess the time-dependent association of EVT with self-reported quality of life in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were used from the Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial, which tested the effect of nerinetide on functional outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing EVT and enrolled patients from March 1, 2017, to August 12, 2019. The ESCAPE-NA1 trial was an international randomized clinical trial that recruited patients from 7 countries. Patients with EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) index values at 90 days and survivors with complete domain scores were included in the current study. Data were analyzed from July to September 2023. Exposure: Hospital arrival to arterial puncture time and other time metrics. Main Outcomes and Measures: EQ-5D-5L index scores were calculated at 90 days using country-specific value sets. The association between time from hospital arrival to EVT arterial-access (door-to-puncture) and EQ-5D-5L index score, quality-adjusted life years, and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) were evaluated using quantile regression, adjusting for age, sex, stroke severity, stroke imaging, wake-up stroke, alteplase, and nerinetide treatment and accounting for clustering by site. Using logistic regression, the association between door-to-puncture time and reporting no or slight symptoms (compared with moderate, severe, or extreme problems) was determined in each domain (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) or across all domains. Time from stroke onset was also evaluated, and missing data were imputed in sensitivity analyses. Results: Among 1105 patients in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, there were 1043 patients with EQ-5D-5L index values at 90 days, among whom 147 had died and were given a score of 0, and 1039 patients (mean [SD] age, 69.0 [13.7] years; 527 male [50.7%]) in the final analysis as 4 did not receive EVT. There were 896 survivors with complete domain scores at 90 days. There was a strong association between door-to-puncture time and EQ-5D-5L index score (increase of 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.04 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment), quality-adjusted life years (increase of 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-0.49 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment), and EQ-VAS (increase of 1.65; 95% CI, 0.56-2.72 per 15 minutes of earlier treatment). Each 15 minutes of faster door-to-puncture time was associated with higher probability of no or slight problems in each of 5 domains and all domains concurrently (range from 1.86%; 95% CI, 1.14-2.58 for pain or discomfort to 3.55%; 95% CI, 2.06-5.04 for all domains concurrently). Door-to-puncture time less than 60 minutes was associated higher odds of no or slight problems in each domain, ranging from odds ratios of 1.49 (95% CI, 1.13-1.95) for pain or discomfort to 2.59 (95% CI, 1.83-3.68) for mobility, with numbers needed to treat ranging from 7 to 17. Results were similar after multiple imputation of missing data and attenuated when evaluating time from stroke onset. Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that faster door-to-puncture EVT time was strongly associated with better health-related quality of life across all domains. These results support the beneficial impact of door-to-treatment speed on patient-reported outcomes and should encourage efforts to improve patient-centered care in acute stroke by optimizing in-hospital processes and workflows.

Endovascular Treatment for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Applying Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Arterial Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but severely disabling form of stroke. Acute treatment mainly consists of medical management, since there is no robust evidence suggesting the benefit of endovascular treatment for CVT. Given the relative lack of data to guide acute treatment decision-making, CVT treatment decisions are mostly made on a case-by-case basis. In some ways, the current status quo of endovascular treatment for CVT resembles the state of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke before the wave of major positive large vessel occlusion endovascular treatment trials in 2015. SUMMARY: The current state of evidence with regard to endovascular CVT treatment is summarized, parallels to acute ischemic stroke are drawn, and it is discussed how the lessons learned from the evolution of acute ischemic stroke endovascular treatment (EVT) trials could be applied to designing a trial of endovascular treatment for CVT. The review ends by outlining possible scenarios for the future of endovascular CVT treatment. KEY MESSAGES: CVT is a serious disease, affecting young patients and their families, and harbors a considerable social and economic burden. Working toward high-level evidence for the best possible treatment strategy and exploring a possible role for EVT to improve outcomes in CVT needs to remain a high priority in stroke research.

In cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy, apixaban did not reduce recurrent stroke vs. aspirin.

SOURCE CITATION: Kamel H, Longstreth WT Jr, Tirschwell DL, et al; ARCADIA Investigators. Apixaban to prevent recurrence after cryptogenic stroke in patients with atrial cardiopathy: the ARCADIA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331:573-581. 38324415.

Tenecteplase versus standard of care for minor ischaemic stroke with proven occlusion (TEMPO-2): a randomised, open label, phase 3 superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion are at increased risk of poor outcomes. Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase might improve outcomes in this population. We aimed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase over non-thrombolytic standard of care in patients with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, parallel group, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomised controlled trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were included at 48 hospitals in Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, Spain, and the UK. Eligible patients with minor acute ischaemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5) and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality were enrolled within 12 h from stroke onset. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg) or non-thrombolytic standard of care (control). Primary outcome was a return to baseline functioning on pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale score in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients randomly assigned to a treatment group and who did not withdraw consent to participate) assessed at 90 days. Safety outcomes were reported in the ITT population and included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02398656, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: The trial was stopped early for futility. Between April 27, 2015, and Jan 19, 2024, 886 patients were enrolled; 369 (42%) were female and 517 (58%) were male. 454 (51%) were assigned to control and 432 (49%) to intravenous tenecteplase. The primary outcome occurred in 338 (75%) of 452 patients in the control group and 309 (72%) of 432 in the tenecteplase group (risk ratio [RR] 0·96, 95% CI 0·88-1·04, p=0·29). More patients died in the tenecteplase group (20 deaths [5%]) than in the control group (five deaths [1%]; adjusted hazard ratio 3·8; 95% CI 1·4-10·2, p=0·0085). There were eight (2%) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages in the tenecteplase group versus two (<1%) in the control group (RR 4·2; 95% CI 0·9-19·7, p=0·059). INTERPRETATION: There was no benefit and possible harm from treatment with intravenous tenecteplase. Patients with minor stroke and intracranial occlusion should not be routinely treated with intravenous thrombolysis. FUNDING: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the British Heart Foundation.

External validation of the SI2NCAL2C score for outcomes following cerebral venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: Prognostication for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) remains difficult. We sought to validate the SI2NCAL2C score in an international cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SI2NCAL2C score was originally developed to predict poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6) at 6 months, and mortality at 30 days and 1 year using data from the International CVT Consortium. The SI2NCAL2C score uses 9 variables: the absence of any female-sex-specific risk factors, intracerebral hemorrhage, central nervous system infection, focal neurological deficits, coma, age, lower level of hemoglobin, higher level of glucose, and cancer. The ACTION-CVT study was an international retrospective study that enrolled consecutive patients across 27 centers. The poor outcome score was validated using 90-day mRS due to lack of follow-up at the 6-month time-point in the ACTION-CVT cohort. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plots. Missing data were imputed using the additive regression and predictive mean matching methods. Bootstrapping was performed with 1000 iterations. RESULTS: Mortality data were available for 950 patients and poor outcome data were available for 587 of 1,025 patients enrolled in ACTION-CVT. Compared to the International CVT Consortium, the ACTION-CVT cohort was older, less often female, and with milder clinical presentation. Mortality was 2.5% by 30 days and 6.0% by one year. At 90-days, 16.7% had a poor outcome. The SI2NCAL2C score had an AUC of 0.74 [95% CI 0.69-0.79] for 90-day poor outcome, 0.72 [0.60-0.82] for mortality by 30 days, and 0.82 [0.76-0.88] for mortality by one year. CONCLUSIONS: The SI2NCAL2C score had acceptable to good performance in an international external validation cohort. The SI2NCAL2C score warrants additional validation studies in diverse populations and clinical implementation studies.

Health Care Encounters Prior to Hospitalization for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Unlike other causes of stroke, symptoms in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) can be nonspecific at onset with gradual worsening over time. To explore potential opportunities for earlier diagnosis, we analyzed healthcare interactions in the week prior to hospitalization for patients admitted with incident CVT in British Columbia (BC). METHODS: We constructed a population-based cohort (2000-2017) using linked patient-level administrative data to identify patients aged ≥18 diagnosed with CVT in BC. We used descriptive analysis to describe the frequency and types of healthcare encounters within the 7 and 3 days prior to hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to examine risk factors associated with prior encounters. RESULTS: The cohort included 554 patients (mean age 50.9 years, 55.4% female). Within the 7 days prior to CVT hospitalization, 57.9% of patients had ≥1 outpatient encounter and 5.6% had ≥1 inpatient encounter. In the 3 days prior to hospitalization, 46.8% of patients had ≥1 outpatient encounter and 2.0% had ≥1 inpatient encounter. Women more frequently had outpatient interactions within 7 days (64.8% women vs. 35.2% men, p < 0.001) and 3 days (51.8% vs. 48.2%, p = 0.01) before admission. Common provider specialties for outpatient encounters were general practice (58.0%), emergency (8.3%) and neurology (5.7%). Females had higher odds (OR = 1.79) of having ≥1 outpatient encounter after adjusting for confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Within our Canadian cohort, over half of patients had a healthcare encounter within 7 days before their hospitalization with incident CVT. Women more commonly had an outpatient encounter preceding hospital admission.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke with Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2): Rational and design of a multicenter, randomized open-label clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Almost half of acute ischemic stroke patients present with mild symptoms and there are large practice variations in their treatment globally. Individuals with an intracranial occlusion who present with minor stroke are at an increased risk of early neurological deterioration and poor outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis in the subgroup of patients with minor deficits showed benefit of alteplase in improving outcomes; however, this benefit has not been seen with intravenous alteplase in published randomized trials. DESIGN: TEMPO-2 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) is a prospective, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomized controlled trial, designed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) over nonthrombolytic standard of care, with an estimated sample size of 1274 patients. Adult patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ⩽ 5 and visible arterial occlusion or perfusion deficit within 12 h of onset are randomized to receive either tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or standard of care. The primary outcome is return to baseline neurological functioning, measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes include death and symptomatic hemorrhage (intra or extra-cranial). Other secondary outcomes include mRS 0-1, mRS 0-2, ordinal shift analysis of the mRS, partial, and full recanalization on follow-up computed tomography angiogram. CONCLUSION: Results of this trial will aid in determining whether there is benefit of using tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) in treating patients presenting with minor stroke who are at high risk of developing poor outcomes due to presence of an intracranial occlusion. DATA ACCESS STATEMENT: Data will be available upon reasonable request.

"We have dealt with so much. There's more coming?": Improving Knowledge About Brain Health in Adults Living With Congenital Heart Disease.

Background: Significant advances in managing congenital heart disease (CHD) have occurred over the past few decades, resulting in a fast-growing adult patient population with distinct needs requiring urgent attention. Research has recently highlighted the prevalence of neurocognitive differences among adults living with CHD. Yet, there is a lack of knowledge about the perspectives of people living with CHD and family members/caregivers on brain health. We sought to explore their perspectives to guide future research and clinical endeavours. Methods: Using the principles of integrated knowledge translation and qualitative interpretive description, we conducted 2 focus groups with 7 individuals with CHD and their family members as part of a virtual forum on brain health in CHD. Data analysis followed the principles of interpretive description. Results: A lack of understanding about overall brain health and neurocognitive differences in adult CHD was identified. To increase overall knowledge about brain health, initiatives should (1) focus on the individual living with CHD, involving family members and peers; (2) use social media and health care encounters for knowledge exchange; and (3) ensure a "balancing act" in the information provided to avoid feelings of worry and uncertainty about the future while simultaneously empowering people living with CHD. Conclusions: There is a pressing need for better education about brain health among individuals living with CHD. Our findings can guide clinicians in developing programmes of care and (re)design health services that address the brain-heart axis and neurocognitive differences in CHD.

Contexte: Des progrès significatifs ont été réalisés au cours des dernières décennies dans la prise en charge des cardiopathies congénitales, et il en résulte une croissance rapide de la population des patients adultes dont les besoins distincts requièrent une attention urgente. Des études récentes ont mis en évidence la prévalence des différences neurocognitives chez les adultes atteints de cardiopathies congénitales (CC). À ce jour, les connaissances sur les points de vue des personnes qui vivent avec la CC, des membres de leurs familles et de leurs aidants au sujet de la santé du cerveau sont insuffisantes. Notre objectif était d'explorer ces points de vue afin d'orienter les recherches à venir et les initiatives cliniques. Méthodologie: En nous basant sur les approches d'application des connaissances intégrées et de description interprétative (DI) qualitative, nous avons organisé deux groupes de discussion avec 7 personnes atteintes de CC et les membres de leur famille, dans le cadre d'un forum virtuel sur la santé du cerveau dans les CC. L'analyse des données a été réalisée selon les principes de la DI. Résultats: Un manque de connaissances au sujet de la santé du cerveau en général et des différences neurocognitives chez les personnes atteintes de CC a été observé. Afin d'améliorer le niveau des connaissances générales sur la santé du cerveau, les initiatives doivent : (1) être centrées sur les personnes qui vivent avec la CC, avec la participation des membres de leur famille et d'autres patients; (2) tirer profit des médias sociaux et des rencontres en contexte de soins de santé pour le partage de connaissances; et (3) veiller à maintenir un équilibre, puisqu'il convient d'outiller les personnes atteintes de CC sans toutefois causer de sentiment d'inquiétude ou d'incertitude quant à l'avenir. Conclusions: Nous avons constaté le besoin urgent d'améliorer les connaissances des personnes qui vivent avec une CC au sujet de la santé du cerveau. Les résultats obtenus pourront guider les cliniciens dans l'élaboration de programmes de soins et la conception (ou la refonte) de services de soins de santé qui intègrent l'axe cerveau-cœur et les différences neurocognitives associées aux CC.

Validation of the Passive Surveillance Stroke Severity Score in Three Canadian Provinces.

BACKGROUND: Stroke outcomes research requires risk-adjustment for stroke severity, but this measure is often unavailable. The Passive Surveillance Stroke SeVerity (PaSSV) score is an administrative data-based stroke severity measure that was developed in Ontario, Canada. We assessed the geographical and temporal external validity of PaSSV in British Columbia (BC), Nova Scotia (NS) and Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We used linked administrative data in each province to identify adult patients with ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage between 2014-2019 and calculated their PaSSV score. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between the PaSSV score and the hazard of death over 30 days and the cause-specific hazard of admission to long-term care over 365 days. We assessed the models' discriminative values using Uno's c-statistic, comparing models with versus without PaSSV. RESULTS: We included 86,142 patients (n = 18,387 in BC, n = 65,082 in Ontario, n = 2,673 in NS). The mean and median PaSSV were similar across provinces. A higher PaSSV score, representing lower stroke severity, was associated with a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals 0.70 [0.68, 0.71] in BC, 0.69 [0.68, 0.69] in Ontario, 0.72 [0.68, 0.75] in NS) and admission to long-term care (0.77 [0.76, 0.79] in BC, 0.84 [0.83, 0.85] in Ontario, 0.86 [0.79, 0.93] in NS). Including PaSSV in the multivariable models increased the c-statistics compared to models without this variable. CONCLUSION: PaSSV has geographical and temporal validity, making it useful for risk-adjustment in stroke outcomes research, including in multi-jurisdiction analyses.

Reducing the global burden of cerebral venous thrombosis: An international research agenda.

BACKGROUND: Due to the rarity of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), performing high-quality scientific research in this field is challenging. Providing answers to unresolved research questions will improve prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, and ultimately translate to a better outcome of patients with CVT. We present an international research agenda, in which the most important research questions in the field of CVT are prioritized. AIMS: This research agenda has three distinct goals: (1) to provide inspiration and focus to research on CVT for the coming years, (2) to reinforce international collaboration, and (3) to facilitate the acquisition of research funding. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: This international research agenda is the result of a research summit organized by the International Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Consortium in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in June 2023. The summit brought together 45 participants from 15 countries including clinical researchers from various disciplines, patients who previously suffered from CVT, and delegates from industry and non-profit funding organizations. The research agenda is categorized into six pre-specified themes: (1) epidemiology and clinical features, (2) life after CVT, (3) neuroimaging and diagnosis, (4) pathophysiology, (5) medical treatment, and (6) endovascular treatment. For each theme, we present two to four research questions, followed by a brief substantiation per question. The research questions were prioritized by the participants of the summit through consensus discussion. CONCLUSIONS: This international research agenda provides an overview of the most burning research questions on CVT. Answering these questions will advance our understanding and management of CVT, which will ultimately lead to improved outcomes for CVT patients worldwide.

Treatment and Outcomes of Cervical Artery Dissection in Adults: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Cervical artery dissection is an important cause of stroke, particularly in young adults. Data conflict on the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected cervical artery dissection, leading to variability in practice. We aim to provide an overview of cervical artery dissection in the setting of minor or no reported mechanical trigger with a focus on summarizing the available evidence and providing suggestions on the diagnostic evaluation, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Writing group members drafted their sections using a literature search focused on publications between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2022, and included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, meta-analyses, opinion papers, case series, and case reports. The writing group chair and vice chair compiled the manuscript and obtained writing group members' approval. Cervical artery dissection occurs as a result of the interplay among risk factors, minor trauma, anatomic and congenital abnormalities, and genetic predisposition. The diagnosis can be challenging both clinically and radiologically. In patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection, acute treatment strategies such as thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are reasonable in otherwise eligible patients. We suggest that the antithrombotic therapy choice be individualized and continued for at least 3 to 6 months. The risk of recurrent dissection is low, and preventive measures may be considered early after the diagnosis and continued in high-risk patients. Ongoing longitudinal and population-based observational studies are needed to close the present gaps on preferred antithrombotic regimens considering clinical and radiographic prognosticators of cervical artery dissection.

Trends in cerebral venous thrombosis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to provide updated incidence and trend data for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in the United States from 2016-2020, examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CVT, and identify predictors of in-hospital mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Validated ICD-10 codes were used to identify discharges with CVT in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Sample weights were applied to generate nationally representative estimates, and census data were used to compute incidence rates. The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was defined as January-May 2020. Trend analysis was completed using Joinpoint regression. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2020, the incidence of CVT increased from 24.34 per 1,000,000 population per year (MPY) to 33.63 per MPY (Annual Percentage Change (APC) 8.6 %; p < 0.001). All-cause in-hospital mortality was 4.9 % [95 % CI 4.5-5.4]. On multivariable analysis, use of thrombectomy, increased age, atrial fibrillation, stroke diagnosis, infection, presence of prothrombotic hematologic conditions, lowest quartile of income, intracranial hemorrhage, and male sex were associated with in-hospital mortality. CVT incidence was similar comparing the first 5 months of 2020 and 2019 (31.37 vs 32.04; p = 0.322) with no difference in median NIHSS (2 [IQR 1-10] vs. 2 [1-9]; p = 0.959) or mortality (4.2 % vs. 5.6 %; p = 0.176). CONCLUSIONS: CVT incidence increased in the US from 2016 to 2020 while mortality did not change. Increased age, prothrombotic state, stroke diagnosis, infection, atrial fibrillation, male sex, lowest quartile of income, intracranial hemorrhage, and use of thrombectomy were associated with in-hospital mortality following CVT. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, CVT volumes and mortality were similar to the prior year.

Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection: The STOP-CAD Study.

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45-1.12]; P=0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28-2.24]; P=0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35-5.45]; P=0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53-20.13]; P=0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18-0.88]; Pinteraction=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.