Asking questions during breast cancer consultations: does being alone or being accompanied make a difference?

PURPOSE: Companions often accompany patients to cancer consultations. The number of questions asked by patients and companions is an indicator of their active participation. The present study aims to provide first descriptive evidence on the characteristics of unaccompanied and accompanied Italian breast cancer patients that attend the first consultation after surgery and to analyse companions contribution to the type and quantity of questions asked during the consultation. METHOD: Seventy consultations of female patients with breast cancer were audio taped. Questions were transcribed and coded by content. Companion's questions were also classified in terms of function. Socio-demographic and clinical data, patients' role preference and confidence in decision making measures were gathered for each patient. Post consultation satisfaction with decision and the perceived level of shared decision making were collected either for the patient and the companion. RESULTS: 69% of patients were accompanied, usually by one close family member, either husband or adult child. Non employed or retired patients and those with a preference for passive role in decision making were more likely to be accompanied. Unaccompanied patients and accompanied patients had comparable levels of anxiety, emotional distress and depression and were equally active in asking questions. These levels were far greater than those reported for other cancer patients in the literature. Companions did not increase significantly the number of questions per consultation. CONCLUSION: Accompanied and non accompanied patients differed more in socio-demographic than clinical characteristics. Companions sustained the patient and shared information without reducing the level of patient involvement.

[Inadequate treatment and control of arterial hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus]. / L'ipertensione arteriosa non e' adeguatamente trattata e controllata nei pazienti con diabete mellito di tipo 2.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment and control of arterial hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We identified 5815 diabetic patients in our health-care district (191,568 inhabitants) through prescriptions for insulin and/or hypoglycaemic drugs in the first 6 months of 2000; 3810 of them (65%) also had prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs. We evaluated a randomly selected sample of 171 patients with type 2 diabetes, 100 of whom were receiving antihypertensive drugs (94 males and 77 females, mean age 66.6 +/- 8 years, mean diabetes duration 12+/-9 years). RESULTS: Fifty-seven out of 71 patients not treated with antihypertensive drugs (80.3%) had a BP = 130/85 mmHg; 24.4% of them had a diastolic BP = 85 mmHg and 79% had a systolic BP = 130 mmHg. Thirteen out of 100 treated patients (13%) had a BP < 130/85 mmHg. Among the patients treated with antihypertensive drugs 36% received one drug, 36% two drugs and 28%=3 drugs; mean 1.98 +/- 0.9 drugs/patients. Among the patients treated with monotherapy 36.1% received ACE-inhibitors, 36.1% dihydropyridinic calcium-antagonists, 11.1% alpha-blockers, 11%, diuretics, 2.8% non-dihydropyridinic calcium-antagonists, and 2.8% angiotensin II antagonists. Patients treated with two antihypertensive drugs received more frequently an ACE-inhibitor plus a diuretic (31%) or an ACE-inhibitor plus an alpha-blocker (23%) or an ACE-inhibitor plus a dihydropyridinic calcium-antagonists (20%). A diuretic was used in 40% of the patients with two antihypertensive drugs and in 78% of those with >= 3 drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Many hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients are left untreated and only a minority of those treated reach optimal blood pressure control. The importance of an elevated systolic pressure is underestimated, and the number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed is suboptimal.

[Current management in the diagnosis and treatment of necrotic lesions of the diabetic foot]. / Attuali indirizzi nella diagnosi e nel trattamento delle lesioni necrotiche del piede diabetico.

A simplified classification for clinical pratical purposes of the diabetic foot necrotic lesions is proposed. Two types are considered both possibly with infection: 1. The angiopathic foot, as a manifestation of the diabetic macro- and microangiopathy. 2. The angioneuropathic foot, as an association of the preminent diabetic neuropathy with diabetic microangiopathy and macroangiopathy. This classification proved suitable to 63 personal observations during the last 7 years. Diagnosis and treatement, planned by a diabetological-orthopedic cooperation, are specified for the two headings. The measure of systolic peripheral blood pressure by means of the ultrasonic device Doplette 10 Danica is introduced.