Correction to: Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

A sentence under 'Results' heading in the Abstract section was published incorrectly. The correct sentence should read as follows.

Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice

Introduction: This study aimed to describe the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had disease progression after receiving anti-estrogen therapy in clinical practice, getting real-world data. Materials and methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Postmenopausal women with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer who received treatment with fulvestrant 500 mg after progression with a previous anti-estrogen therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), and safety profile. Results: A total of 263 women were evaluated (median age, 65.8 years). At a median follow-up of 21.5 months, median PFS and OS were 10.6 and 43.2 months, respectively. PFS according to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and ≥ 4th lines were 11.5, 10.6, 9.9, and 8.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0245). PFS in patients with visceral involvement was 10 months vs 10.6 months in patients without visceral involvement (p = 0.6604), 9.6 months in patients with high Ki67 vs 10 months in patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.7224), and 10.2 months in HER2+ patients vs 10.3 months in HER2− patients (p = 0.6809). The CBR was 56.5% and the DoCB was 18.4 months. The most frequently adverse events were injection site pain (10.3%) and musculoskeletal disorders (7.6%). Conclusions: Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials

No disponible

Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had disease progression after receiving anti-estrogen therapy in clinical practice, getting real-world data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Postmenopausal women with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer who received treatment with fulvestrant 500 mg after progression with a previous anti-estrogen therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), and safety profile. RESULTS: A total of 263 women were evaluated (median age, 65.8 years). At a median follow-up of 21.5 months, median PFS and OS were 10.6 and 43.2 months, respectively. PFS according to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and ≥ 4th lines were 11.5, 10.6, 9.9, and 8.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0245). PFS in patients with visceral involvement was 10 months vs 10.6 months in patients without visceral involvement (p = 0.6604), 9.6 months in patients with high Ki67 vs 10 months in patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.7224), and 10.2 months in HER2+ patients vs 10.3 months in HER2- patients (p = 0.6809). The CBR was 56.5% and the DoCB was 18.4 months. The most frequently adverse events were injection site pain (10.3%) and musculoskeletal disorders (7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials.

PET/CT with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose in the assessment of metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

AIM: The aim of this paper was to prospectively evaluate FDG PET/CT in the assessment of metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and correlation with tumor cellularity in locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS: Images were acquired with a PET/CT scanner in 50 patients at baseline and after completion of treatment, just before surgery. All findings were confirmed by histopathological analysis. PET/CT quantification (SUVmax) at baseline and after finishing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4 cycles of epirubicin + cyclophosphamide +/- taxanes) were compared using RECIST criteria and Miller & Payne (M&P) scale. RESULTS: Baseline mean tumor size was 4.4±1.6 cm. Thirty eight patients were considered responders and 12 nonresponders. According to M&P scale, 10 patients had good prognosis (grades 4-5) and 40 patients had bad prognosis (grades 1-3). All patients with grade 5 M&P had no significant postchemotherapy FDG uptake. Patients with bad prognosis had lower SUVmax variation (∆SUVmax) than patients with good prognosis (60.7% vs. 80.5%, P=0.0016). ∆SUVmax was lower in nonresponders than in partial responders according to RECIST criteria (38.9% vs. 67.6%, p<0.001), and was also lower in partial responders than complete responders (67.6% vs. 85.4%, P=0.005). A cut-off ∆SUVmax value of 52% differentiates responders from nonresponders with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 90%. Probability densities of the ∆SUVmax (%) for stable disease (<45), partial (>45 to <82) and complete response (>82) showed an overall accuracy of 78% (Weighted Kappa=0.74). CONCLUSION: PET/CT is useful to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. ∆SUVmax on PET/CT correlates with tumor cellularity after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Early and delayed consolidation chemotherapy significantly improves the outcome of children with intermediate risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Final results of the prospective randomized PETHEMA ALL-89 TRIAL.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of early and delayed consolidation chemotherapy on the outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) stratified according to risk groups. DESIGN AND METHODS: From 1989 to 1994, 195 children (< or = 15 years old) diagnosed as having ALL (ALL-L3 excluded) in 15 Spanish hospitals entered the prospective, randomized PETHEMA ALL-89 trial. Patients were stratified into low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) groups according to their initial features and the rate of response to induction therapy. LR-ALL patients were randomized to receive or not early consolidation chemotherapy (C-1). After receiving C-1, IR patients were randomized to receive or not delayed consolidation chemotherapy (C-2). HR patients received C-1 and C-2 chemotherapy. Standard maintenance chemotherapy was administered to all patients for 2 years. High doses of intravenous methotrexate and 12 triple intrathecal doses were given as prophylaxis against central nervous system (CNS) disease. RESULTS: The mean (and standard deviation) age was 6 (4) years and 120 patients were males. Fourteen patients had early pre-B-ALL, 149 common or pre-B-ALL, and 32 T-ALL. Complete remission (CR) was attained in 189 patients (97%), 11 of whom (6%) had a slow response. Risk group stratification after CR was: LR 89, IR 50 and HR 56 patients (including a subset of 26 patients at very high risk). Ten-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities for the whole series were 58% (95% CI: 52-64%) and 69% (61-77), respectively, with a median follow-up of 8.7 years. Dividing the patients according to risk group, the 10-year EFS and OS probabilities in the LR group were 71% (63-79) and 86% (80-92), respectively; in the IR group 69% (57-81) and 76% (64-88), respectively, and in the HR group 30% (18-42) and 44% (32-57), respectively. For LR patients receiving C-1, EFS and OS were 79% (57-92) and 90% (82-98), respectively, versus 62% (48-76) and 66% (51-81) in patients not receiving C-1 (p= 0.06). For IR patients, EFS and OS were significantly improved in those receiving early and delayed consolidation (EFS 87% (74-88) vs. 52% (41-70), and OS 92% (87-97) vs. 61% (51-71)(p=0.036). Prognostic factors for EFS identified in multivariable analyses were: age >10 years in the LR group (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.5, p=0.01), and treatment with C-2 in IR patients (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.4-17.8, p=0.01). The CNS relapse rate was 4% for all the series (including the HR subset). Tolerance to treatment was good. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: In this study, early consolidation seemed to improve the prognosis of children with LR-ALL, but differences in EFS were not significant. Delayed consolidation had a favorable influence on the outcome of IR-ALL. CNS preventive treatment without cranial irradiation was effective in all the groups of ALL patients.

Increased conventional chemotherapy does not improve survival in multiple myeloma: long-term results of two PETHEMA trials including 914 patients.

BACKGROUND: Melphalan and prednisone (MP) has been the standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) for the last 30 years. Combination chemotherapy at conventional doses has not shown a significant prolongation of survival when compared to MP. There are few data comparing conventional chemotherapy at standard doses with conventional treatment at higher doses. We present the long-term outcome of 914 patients from two randomized trials comparing three different dose intensity regimens. METHODS: From 1 January, 1985 to 31 December, 1989, 487 patients were randomized between MP (melphalan 9 mg/m(2) p.o. and prednisone 60 mg/m(2) days 1-4) and alternating VCMP (vincristine 1 mg i.v. on day 1, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, melphalan 6 mg/m(2) p.o. on days 1-4, and prednisone 60 mg/m(2) on days 1-4) and VBAP (vincristine 1 mg i.v. on day 1, BCNU and doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) i.v. each on day 1, and prednisone 60 mg/m(2) on days 1-4). From 1 January, 1990 to 31 May, 1994, 427 patients were randomized between VCMP/VBAP at the above detailed doses (VCMP/VBAP 'SD') and the same regimen increasing the doses of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin from 500 to 1200 mg/m(2) and from 30 to 50 mg/m(2), respectively (VCMP/VBAP 'HD'). RESULTS: Increasing dose intensity produced a significantly higher partial response rate (31% vs 45% vs 51% for MP, VCMP/VBAP 'SD', and VCMP/VBAP 'HD', respectively; P < 0.01). However, a significantly early death rate was observed in the HD arm (7.7, 7.5 and 12.1% for MP, VCMP/VBAP 'SD', and VCMP/VBAP 'HD', respectively; P = 0.05). Median duration of response (20 vs 18 vs 19 months for MP, VCMP/VBAP 'SD', and VCMP/VBAP 'HD', respectively; P = NS) and median survival (25 vs 31 vs 29 months for MP, VCMP/VBAP 'SD', and VCMP/VBAP 'HD', respectively; P = NS) were similar in the three groups. MP produced a higher degree of thrombocytopenia than combination chemotherapy at standard (P = 0.002) or high dose (P = 0.01), this leading to a significantly higher dose reduction in the MP arm (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003 for VCMP/VBAP 'SD' and VCMP/VBAP 'HD', respectively). CONCLUSION: In these trials the response rate significantly correlated with the regimen intensity. However, no significant differences in response duration and survival were found. This highlights the limited role of conventional chemotherapy in MM and the need for further trials, aimed at determining the impact of new treatment approaches such as high-dose therapy/autotransplantation.

Prognostic significance of the detection of circulating malignant cells by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in long-term clinically disease-free melanoma patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of the detection of circulating melanoma cells by reverse transcriptase-PCR in long-term clinically disease-free melanoma patients. Patients with melanoma who were free of clinical relapse for at least 6 months after primary tumor diagnosis were included and prospectively followed. Tyrosinase mRNA in peripheral blood from these patients was assayed by reverse transcriptase-PCR at the time of their inclusion in the study. One hundred six blood samples from 57 melanoma patients were analyzed. The median time between melanoma diagnosis and inclusion in the study was 24 months (range, 7-51 months). The median follow-up time calculated from the time of inclusion in the study was 27 months (range, 11-36 months). Tyrosinase mRNA in blood was detected in 10 (17.5%) of 57 patients: 2 (18%) of 11 stage I patients, 6 (19%) of 33 stage II patients, and 2 (15%) of 13 stage III patients. Actuarial 2-year DFS was 89% for the tyrosinase-negative patients versus 30% for the positive patients (P = 0.003). Actuarial 2-year OS was 97% for the tyrosinase-negative patients versus 72% for the positive patients (P = 0.001). Tyrosinase mRNA could be detected in the blood of a proportion of long-term disease-free melanoma patients, regardless of their initial clinical stage. The presence of late circulating melanoma cells in this selected group of clinically disease-free patients was significantly associated with a subsequent high risk of relapse and death.

[Comparison of chemotherapy CHOP vs. CHOP/VIA in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study of 132 patients. The PETHEMA group. Program for Study and Therapeutics of malignant hemopathies. Spanish Association of Hematology and Hemotherapy]. / Comparación de la quimioterapia CHOP frente a CHOP/VIA para el tratamiento de los linfomas no hodgkinianos agresivos: estudio multicéntrico aleatorizado en 132 pacientes. Grupo PETHEMA. Programa para el Estudio y la Terapéutica de las Hemopatías Malignas. Asociación Española de Hematología y Hemoterapia.

BACKGROUND: To compare standard chemotherapy CHOP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone) with the regimen CHOP/VIA (VP-16, iphosphamide and cytarabine) in terms of response to therapy, response duration, survival and toxicity in patients with aggressive lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 132 patients (84 males and 48 females; median age, 55 years) were included from 12 Spanish Institutions, diagnosed of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of intermediate or high grade, in stages II-IV and previously untreated. Patients were randomized to receive CHOP or CHOP/VIA. RESULTS: After excluding 14 not assessable cases, 62 patients (52.5%) received CHOP, and 56 (47.5%) CHOP/VIA. No significant differences were found on main prognostic factors between such groups. Response was assessable in 114 cases (CHOP: 61; CHOP/VIA: 53) 39 patients (64%) receiving CHOP achieved complete response (CR), and 2 (3%) partial response (PR), whereas in the CHOP/VIA group CR and PR rates were 63% (34/53), and 7% (4/53), respectively. 14 patients (36%) treated with CHOP and 12 (35%) treated with CHOP/VIA eventually relapsed, with an actuarial risk of relapse at 36 months of 43% and 40%, respectively. Median survival was 37 months. No differences were found between both therapeutic groups, with an overall survival at 36 months from diagnosis of 53.5% (CI 95%: 40-67) for CHOP and 48% (CI 95%: 34-62) for CHOP/VIA. Finally, toxicity was not different for both arms. CONCLUSION: In the present study in patients with aggressive NHL chemotherapy regimens CHOP and CHOP/VIA showed similar results in terms of response, response duration, survival and toxicity.

Maintenance treatment with interferon alpha-2b in multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized study from PETHEMA (Program for the Study and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, Spanish Society of Hematology).

The objectives of the present study were to investigate whether interferon alpha (IFN) maintenance could prolong response duration and survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in objective response and to analyze the characteristics of relapse and subsequent survival. From January 1991 to November 1994, 92 patients from the Spanish Cooperative Group PETHEMA with MM in objective response after 12 courses of VCMP/VBAP chemotherapy were randomized to receive IFN maintenance vs no treatment until relapse. Prognostic factors at diagnosis were similar in both groups. IFN was administered at a starting dose of 3 mU/m2 three times per week. The IFN toxicity was moderate with granulocytopenia and fatigue being the most common adverse effects. Median duration of response from randomization until relapse was 13 months in the IFN group vs 7.7 months in the no treatment arm (P = 0.042). Median survival from randomization was 38.8 months for patients given IFN vs 32.7 months for those allocated to the no treatment arm (P = 0.12). Features at relapse were similar in patients who received IFN maintenance and in those assigned to no treatment. Finally, survival from relapse was identical in both groups. In summary, our results show a significant prolongation of response in patients maintained with IFN with no significant influence on survival. In addition, in our series features at relapse and subsequent outcome were similar in both groups.

Late intensification chemotherapy has not improved the results of intensive chemotherapy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial (PETHEMA ALL-89). Spanish Society of Hematology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intensive induction and post-remission therapies have improved the prognosis in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, different from children, the impact of late intensification therapy in the overall results of treatment has not been consistently evaluated. The objective of this study was to analyze the results of a multicenter prospective protocol, PETHEMA ALL-89, in which, after intensive induction and consolidation therapy, randomization to receive delayed intensification treatment was performed. DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and eight adults (age > or = 15 years) diagnosed with ALL (ALL L3 excluded) in 22 Spanish hospitals from 1989 to 1994 were treated with a five-drug induction therapy, followed by four cycles of early post-remission treatment during four months, and maintenance therapy for two years. Patients in remission at the end of the first year were randomized to receive one six-week cycle of late intensification therapy. Uni- and multivariate analyses of early response to treatment, complete remission (CR), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. RESULTS: The median (range) age of the series was 28 (15-74) years and leukocyte count 26 x 10(9)/L (1-600). ALL L1/L2 was present in 38/70 patients, early pre-B in 13, common in 53, pre-B in 12 and T in 30 cases. The CR rate was 86%, and refractory disease 9%. Median LFS was 34 months, with a 5-yr probability of 41% (95% CI, 29-53), whereas median OS was 51 months and 5-year probability 47% (34-59%). There were no differences in either LFS and OS between patients who did or did not receive delayed intensification therapy. Prognostic factors for CR attainment were advanced age and slow response to therapy. These two features were, in addition to high leukocyte counts, the parameters with negative influence in both LFS and OS. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The results of PETHEMA ALL-89 are similar to those referred in other chemotherapy-based protocols in adult ALL. Delayed intensification has not improved the length of remission and survival. Efforts to improve the prognosis of adult ALL patients must be mainly focused in early intensification treatment.

CHOP vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: long-term results of a multicenter randomized trial.(PETHEMA: Spanish Cooperative Group for the Study of Hematological Malignancies Treatment, Spanish Society of Hematology).

From May 1985 to May 1989, 175 patients with previously untreated aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive CHOP or ProMACE-CytaBOM. Eligibility criteria included follicular large-cell diffuse small cleaved-cell, diffuse mixed, diffuse large-cell and immunoblastic lymphoma with an Ann Arbor stage II, III or IV. One hundred and forty-eight patients were evaluable. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatments in response rate (83.5% [57.5% CR] for CHOP vs. 88% [62% CR] for ProMACE-CytaBOM), time to treatment failure (29% vs. 31% at 5 yr), or overall survival (42% in both groups at 5 yr). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the 2 regimens when response rates and outcome were analyzed for different prognostic subgroups. Toxicity was not significantly different between the 2 regimens, although only 1 patient died as result of treatment-related toxicity in the CHOP arm compared to 6 patient in the ProMACE-CytaBOM group (p = 0.126). In conclusion, in this study ProMACE-CytaBOM has not proved to be superior to CHOP in aggressive lymphomas. This trial gives support to the notion that CHOP still is the standard chemotherapy for aggressive lymphomas, and that new treatment approaches for these lymphomas should be compared to CHOP.

Treatment of multiple myeloma in elderly people: long-term results in 178 patients.

The purposes of the present study have been to analyse the presenting features, response to therapy and survival of myeloma patients aged 70 years or more, in comparison to younger patients. From January 1985 to December 1989, 487 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were randomized to receive melphalan and prednisone (MP) versus alternating cycles of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, and prednisone (VCMP) and vincristine, BCNU, adriamycin, and prednisone (VBAP). The subset of 178 patients who were 70 or more years is the subject of this study, whereas the 309 patients younger than 70 years were used as a control group. The presenting features and response to chemotherapy of older patients were no different to those of the younger population. However, the survival of elderly patients was significantly shorter (median 23.4 vs. 33.5 months, p < 0.001). The overall response rate to MP in older patients was 50% (28% objective plus 22% partial response) compared with 61% (44% objective plus 17% partial response) to combination chemotherapy (p = not significant). Myelosuppression was moderate in both arms, although MP produced a higher degree of thrombocytopenia. There were no significant differences in survival between patients given MP versus VCMP/ VBAP (median, 20 vs. 27 months, p = 0.2). Response to treatment was associated with a significantly longer survival. Older patients with symptomatic myeloma tolerate chemotherapy and should be offered treatment.

Survival of multiple myeloma patients who are potential candidates for early high-dose therapy intensification/ autotransplantation and who were conventionally treated.

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were potential candidates for early high-dose therapy (HDT) intensification followed by autotransplantation from a series treated with conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1985 through December 1989, 487 patients with symptomatic MM were entered onto a randomized study to compare melphalan and prednisone (MP) versus vincristine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, and prednisone (VCMP) /vincristine, carmustine (BCNU), doxorubicin, and prednisone (VBAP). The sub-group of 77 patients who could have been candidates for early intensification with HDT followed by stem-cell support (ie, < 65 years of age, stage II or III disease, performance status < 3, and objective or partial response to initial chemotherapy) are the subjects of this report. RESULTS: Seventy-seven of 487 patients could have been candidates for early intensification. The median age was 56 years (range, 27 to 64). At diagnosis, 12% had abnormal renal function, 16% hypercalcemia, and 42% serum beta 2-microglobulin level > or = 6 mg/L; 62% had stage III disease at diagnosis. Thirty-six patients were initially treated with MP and 41 with VCMP/VBAP. The median response duration to initial chemotherapy was 22 months, and the actuarial probability of being in continued first response at 5 years was 14%. After a median follow-up time of 58 months, 59 patients have died, one was lost to follow-up evaluation, and 17 are still alive 69 to 119 months after initial chemotherapy. The median survival time from initiation of treatment was 60 months and from the time when autotransplantation would be considered, 52 months. The only independent prognostic parameter for survival was renal function at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The median survival time of patients with MM who are less than 65 years of age and who respond to initial chemotherapy is 5 years. This survival duration is similar to that reported in selected series of patients given early HDT and stresses the importance of ongoing randomized trials to determine the role of HDT in the treatment of younger myeloma patients.

Treatment of melphalan-resistant multiple myeloma with vincristine, BCNU, doxorubicin, and high-dose dexamethasone (VBAD).

A total of 65 patients (35 male/30 female) with multiple myeloma primarily (33) or secondarily (32) resistant to melphalan and prednisone were treated with vincristine, carmustine (BCNU), doxorubicin, and high-dose dexamethasone (VBAD) at 4-week intervals. Among 60 evaluable patients the overall response was 36.6% (21.6% objective response plus 15% improvements). The response rate was significantly higher in primarily resistant patients than in those becoming resistant after a prior response (48.4 vs. 24.1%, P < 0.05). The median duration of response was 17.5 months. When survival of responders and non-responders were compared by the conventional method, a highly significant difference was observed (P < 0.001). However, using the Mantel and Byar procedure and the landmark method, only a trend for longer survival in the responders was registered. These results indicate that although VBAD is effective in at least one third of patients with advanced multiple myeloma resistant to melphalan, its impact on survival is limited.