Pancreas Transplantation at a Single Latin-American Center; Overall Results with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) has become the treatment of choice for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients with chronic renal failure. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), was once considered to be a contraindication for pancreas transplantation; however, it has been accepted as a new indication, under strict criteria. Although favorable results have increase the indication for T2DM in developed countries, there have been no reports of long-term results for this indication from Latin American centers. METHODS: From April 2008 to March 2016, patients receiving SPK or pancreas transplant alone (PTA) for T2DM were included and compared with T1DM recipients. Variables were compared between groups with the use of χ2 and t tests; Kaplan-Meier with log rank was used for patient and graft survivals; P < .05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: A total of 45 SPK and 1 PTA were performed, 35 (76.1%) for T1DM and 11 (24.5%) for T2DM. Mean pre-transplantation C-peptide was significantly higher in the T2DM group (P = .01); HbA1c was higher in the T1DM group (P = .03). No differences were found in weight, body mass index, and pre-transplantation glycemia. Patient survivals for T1DM recipients were 88.2% and 84.8% at 1 and 5 years, respetively, versus 100% and 74.1% for T2DM recipients (P = .87). CONCLUSIONS: Our initial prospective experience in a single Latin American center showed that medium- and long-term outcomes for T1DM and T2DM individuals receiving pancreas transplants are similar, under strict selection criteria.

Left anterior descending coronary artery bypass grafting through minimal thoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting has emerged as a valid tool for revascularization in a select group of patients with severe lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Here we report the clinical results using two devices designed by us to facilitate the harvesting of the left internal mammary artery up to its origin and to occlude and stabilize the left anterior descending coronary artery while placing the anastomosis. METHODS: From January 1996 to January 1998, 122 patients underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting in the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Favaloro Foundation. One hundred twelve patients received a single left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending coronary artery bypass graft, and in 10 patients, an additional bypass graft was performed. RESULTS: Most patients were discharged on day 2 or 3 after the procedure. Three patients (2.5%) had a perioperative myocardial infarction. The overall hospital mortality rate was 3.3% (4 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of team experience, more careful dissection of the left internal mammary artery up to its origin, and use of the stabilizer-occluder and interrupted suture technique for the anastomosis has markedly improved our results.

Valve operations through a minimally invasive approach.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed in-hospital results of 87 patients undergoing minimally invasive valvular operations (right parasternal incision through third and fourth cartilages). METHODS: Age was 21 to 84 years (mean, 56.2 +/- 16); 45 patients (51.7%) were female. Five (5.7%) had a previous valvular operation and 8 (9.2%) had severe left ventricular dysfunction. Valve diseases were as follows: aortic in 35 patients (40.2%), mitral in 44 (50.5%), double in 5 (5.7%), tricuspid regurgitation in 2 (2.2%), and mitral periprosthetic leak in 1 (1.1%). RESULTS: Nineteen mitral repairs (21.9%), 22 replacements (25.3%), 1 leak closure (1.1%), 1 tricuspid repair (1.1%), and 1 replacement (1.1%) were performed. Thirty-one patients (35.7%) underwent aortic replacement, 2 (2.3%) aortic decalcification, 1 (1.1%) subaortic membrane resection, 4 (4.6%) a double-valve procedure, and 5 (5.7%) a single-valve operation combined with myocardial revascularization. In-hospital mortality was 5.7% (5 patients). Univariate analysis was significant for previous operation, New York Heart Association class IV and severe ventricular dysfunction. Multivariate analysis was significant for previous operation and severe ventricular dysfunction. Atrial fibrillation (12.6%) was the most frequent complication. Postoperative stay was 6.5 +/- 6 days. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive approach is a useful technique in valvular surgery. Patients with a previous valvular operation, severe ventricular dysfunction, and New York Heart Association class IV dyspnea have higher in-hospital mortality.