ABSTRACT
Since 1 January 2020, the Central Research Ethics Committee of the Health Ministry implemented PRIISA.BA, an in-house developed electronic system for online submission of health research applications to the 63 public and private research ethics committees (RECs) of Buenos Aires City, Argentina. This study though to compare the times to first review and the time to approval among applications submitted prior to PRIISA.BA and thereafter, across public RECs. All public RECs of the city were invited to participate. Overall, 453 applications from 10 RECs (242 pre- and 211 post-PRIISA.BA) were available for the analyses. There was a decrease in the time to first review and an increase in the time to approval after PRIISA.BA implementation. The increase in time to approval was transient and limited to the first three months. The results were consistent with analyses limited to non-COVID applications. Our results show an increase in the times to approval after the implementation of an electronic system for online submission of health research applications that, although transient, was significant. These data could be relevant to other RECs implementing this technology since it emphasizes the need of monitoring potential unnecessary delays in reviews during the critical initial period.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Ethics Committees, Research , Filing , Humans , Filing/methodsABSTRACT
RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN un sistema de evaluación ética de las investigaciones en seres humanos es esencial para proteger los derechos de los participantes. Los desafíos impuestos por la pandemia de la COVID-19 para conducir investigaciones éticas que produzcan resultados con rapidez demuestran la necesidad de fortalecerlo. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir el estado de situación de los sistemas de evaluación ética de las provincias de Argentina y las adaptaciones realizadas por la pandemia. MÉTODOS se realizó una encuesta a los comités provinciales de ética en investigación o áreas similares de los ministerios de Salud que ejercen la vigilancia sobre la evaluación ética de las investigaciones de su jurisdicción. RESULTADOS respondieron 16 de las 17 provincias encuestadas. El 93,7% de los comités provinciales evalúa investigaciones en seres humanos y tiene procedimientos operativos estandarizados (POE). El 68,7% lleva un registro de los comités de ética en investigación (CEI) de su jurisdicción. Un 75% acredita a los CEI y un 68,7% los supervisa. El 100% tiene un registro de las investigaciones en salud; en 56,2% de los casos este registro es público. Del total, 81,2% realizan actividades de capacitación. El 100% adaptó los POE para evaluar estudios sobre la COVID-19. DISCUSIÓN los resultados muestran sistemas provinciales consolidados. Se requiere fortalecer la transparencia en la investigación mediante el registro público de las investigaciones. Se identificaron posibilidades de mejora para proponer acciones a futuro.
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION a research ethics system is essential to protect the rights of research participants. The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic to conduct research ethically to produce rapid results have demonstrated the need to strengthen this system. The objective of this study was to describe the state of the research ethics system of the Provinces of Argentina and the adaptations made due to the pandemic. METHOD: a survey was conducted with provincial research ethics committees or similar areas within the Ministries of Health of the provinces responsible for the oversight of research ethics review under their jurisdiction. RESULTS sixteen of the 17 provinces surveyed responded. 93.7% of the provincial committees review human research and have standard operating procedures (SOPs). 68.7% register the research ethics committees (REC) in their jurisdiction. Seventy-five percent accredit RECs and 68.7% supervise them. 100% have a registry of health research in the jurisdiction, only 56.2% have public access. 81.2% carry out training activities. 100% adapted the SOPs to evaluate studies on COVID-19. DISCUSSION the results show consolidated provincial systems. Transparency in research needs to be strengthened through public registration of research. Possibilities for improvement were identified to propose future actions.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: un sistema de evaluación ética de las investigaciones en seres humanos es esencial para proteger los derechos de los participantes. Los desafíos impuestos por la pandemia de la COVID-19 para conducir investigaciones éticas que produzcan resultados con rapidez demuestran la necesidad de fortalecerlo. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir el estado de situación de los sistemas de evaluación ética de las provincias de Argentina y las adaptaciones realizadas por la pandemia. MÉTODOS: se realizó una encuesta a los comités provinciales de ética en investigación o áreas similares de los ministerios de Salud que ejercen la vigilancia sobre la evaluación ética de las investigaciones de su jurisdicción. RESULTADOS: respondieron 16 de las 17 provincias encuestadas. El 93,7% de los comités provinciales evalúa investigaciones en seres humanos y tiene procedimientos operativos estandarizados (POE). El 68,7% lleva un registro de los comités de ética en investigación (CEI) de su jurisdicción. Un 75% acredita a los CEI y un 68,7% los supervisa. El 100% tiene un registro de las investigaciones en salud; en 56,2% de los casos este registro es público. Del total, 81,2% realizan actividades de capacitación. El 100% adaptó los POE para evaluar estudios sobre la COVID-19. DISCUSIÓN: los resultados muestran sistemas provinciales consolidados. Se requiere fortalecer la transparencia en la investigación mediante el registro público de las investigaciones. Se identificaron posibilidades de mejora para proponer acciones a futuro
INTRODUCTION: a research ethics system is essential to protect the rights of research participants. The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic to conduct research ethically to produce rapid results have demonstrated the need to strengthen this system. The objective of this study was to describe the state of the research ethics system of the Provinces of Argentina and the adaptations made due to the pandemic. METHOD: a survey was conducted with provincial research ethics committees or similar areas within the Ministries of Health of the provinces responsible for the oversight of research ethics review under their jurisdiction. RESULTS: sixteen of the 17 provinces surveyed responded. 93.7% of the provincial committees review human research and have standard operating procedures (SOPs). 68.7% register the research ethics committees (REC) in their jurisdiction. Seventy-five percent accredit RECs and 68.7% supervise them. 100% have a registry of health research in the jurisdiction, only 56.2% have public access. 81.2% carry out training activities. 100% adapted the SOPs to evaluate studies on COVID-19. DISCUSSION: the results show consolidated provincial systems. Transparency in research needs to be strengthened through public registration of research. Possibilities for improvement were identified to propose future actions.
Subject(s)
Argentina , Ethical Review , Ethics Committees, Research , Health Research Policy , BetacoronavirusABSTRACT
This chapter will focus in the currently treatments for Alzheimer Disease. The meeting points in the proposed pathogenesis of the disease are the cholinergic and the cascade amyloid hypothesis based mainly in postmortem brain changes: 1- Pathological based on greater density of neuritic plaques and the characteristic presence of neurofibrillary tangles associated with neuronal loss, synaptic alterations and evidence for chronic inflammatory reactions, 2) Biochemical based on major depletion of cortical cholinergic innervation, dramatic loss in levels of biochemically determined choline acetyltransferase, accumulation of beta-amyloid peptide, oxidation, glutamatergic excitotoxicity and activation of the apoptotic cascade. The currently available therapies based on the hypothesized pathophysiology of AD are: Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine) and the NMDA receptor inhibitor Memantine. None of the "head to head" analyses done with cholinesterase inhibitors (CI) were able to demonstrate a between group effect for efficacy. However the treatment planning is based on their differences, their titration phase to reach the therapeutic doses, interactions and side effects. The non pharmacological treatment in the early and late stages of the disease, the different cognitive stimulation techniques and available prevention trials are also addressed and discussed.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/therapy , HumansABSTRACT
Among neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading cause of death in elderly individuals. AD is characterized, among other clinical findings, by unexplained weight loss, cachexia and altered immune function. To explore whether any relationship between gender and circulating levels of several eating-controlling metabolites exist, we evaluated leptin, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, triiodothyronine (T(3)), free (F) thyroxine (T(4)), TSH, PRL, insulin (INS), and cortisol in 15 AD-treated patients (age range 55-82 years): 9 postmenopausal females (without hormone replacement therapy) and 6 males. The results (mean +/- SEM) indicated that circulating leptin levels were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in female AD (40.34 +/- 11.1 ng/ml) than in male AD (6.07 +/- 1.39 ng/ml) patients. The difference found in circulating leptin levels was noticed regardless of BMI (26.75 +/- 1.77 and 24.55 +/- 1.93 kg/m(2), in females and males, respectively) and waist:hip ratios (0.91 +/- 0.03 and 0.94 +/- 0.02, in females and males, respectively). Moreover, serum TNF-alpha concentrations were also significantly (p < 0.02) higher in AD females (12.24 +/- 1.47 pg/ml) than in AD males (6.62 +/- 1.44 pg/ml), regardless of TNF-alpha:BMI ratios (0.50 +/- 0.09 and 0.28 +/- 0.08, in females and males, respectively; p > 0.05). Finally, no differences were observed between gender (in female and male AD patients, respectively) in circulating levels of T(3) (151.33 +/- 9.91 vs. 116 +/- 17.04 ng/dl), FT(4) (1.26 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.06 ng/dl), TSH (1.28 +/- 0.16 vs. 2.46 +/- 0.67 microIU/ml), PRL (10.53 +/- 2.47 vs. 12.61 +/- 2.37 ng/ml), INS (11.76 +/- 1.95 vs. 8.59 +/- 1.34 microIU/ml) and cortisol (15.71 +/- 1.23 vs. 12.63 +/- 1.47 microg/dl). These results indicate that our AD group of patients, with normal corticoadrenal and thyroid functions and normoprolactinemia, displayed a gender-related characteristic in the circulating levels of two very important anorectic signals, leptin and TNF-alpha, being both higher in female than in male AD patients, regardless of BMI. Our study suggests that increased circulating levels of both anorexigenic adipokines may contribute to the metabolic changes observed in AD females.