Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 56
Filter
1.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(5): 174, 2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758250

ABSTRACT

Understanding patient non-adherence to prescribed antibiotics can inform clinical practices, patient counseling, and antibiotic efficacy study design in dermatology. The primary objective was to determine the rate of and reasons for antibiotic non-adherence in the dermatologic surgery setting. The secondary objective was to test the applicability of previously studied survey questions for antibiotic non-adherence screening in the dermatologic surgery setting. Five academic outpatient dermatologic surgery centers across the United States conducted one multicenter prospective cohort study. Dermatologic surgery patients ≥ 18 years of age who were prescribed an antibiotic were included as part of this study. 15.2% (42/276) of patients did not adhere to their antibiotic regimen after dermatologic surgery. Most common reasons for incomplete antibiotic courses included forgotten antibiotics (42.9%,18/42) and side effects (28.6%, 12/42). Previously evaluated questions to identify and predict non-adherence had modest performance in the dermatologic surgery setting (Area under the curve of 0.669 [95% CI (0.583-0.754)]). Antibiotic non-adherence after skin surgery is prevalent and commonly due to reasons that physicians can address with patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Medication Adherence , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Adult , United States , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
2.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(5): 130, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662106

ABSTRACT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare type of skin cancer that requires a multidisciplinary approach with a variety of specialists for management and treatment. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have recently been established to standardize management algorithms. The objective of this study was to appraise such CPGs via the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Eight CPGs were identified via systematic literature search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Four appraisers trained in AGREE II protocols evaluated each CPG and deemed two CPGs as high quality, five as moderate quality, and one as low quality. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to verify reviewer consistency as excellent, good, and moderate across four, one, and one domain, respectively. The majority of MCC CPGs are lacking in specifying stakeholder involvement, applicability, and rigor of development. The two high quality CPGs are from the Alberta Health Services (AHS) and the collaboration between the European Dermatology Forum, the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EDF/EADO/EORTC). The EDF/EADO/EORTC CPG had the highest overall score with no significant deficiencies across any domain. An important limitation is that the AGREE II instrument is not designed to evaluate the validity of each CPG's recommendations; conclusions therefore can only be drawn about each CPG's developmental quality. Future MCC CPGs may benefit from garnering public perspectives, inviting external expert review, and considering available resources and implementation barriers during their developmental stages.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis
6.
Dermatol Surg ; 49(12): 1077-1084, 2023 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37910540

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The lifetime risk for basal carcinoma (BCC) is 90% in patients with Gorlin syndrome, also known as basal cell nevus syndrome. Compared with non-Gorlin patients, Gorlin patients often develop BCCs at a younger age and in greater numbers up to 500 BCCs in a lifetime. OBJECTIVE: To review the options available for Gorlin patients and highlight existing knowledge gaps where future studies are indicated to optimize the care of this unique population. METHODS: We review the current literature on managing patients with Gorlin syndrome from the lens of a dermatologic surgeon. RESULTS: Although Mohs surgery is still the gold standard for large and aggressive BCCs, other less-invasive approaches may be considered for smaller, more numerous lesions. As dermatologic surgeons, we must be open to the full spectrum of surgical and nonsurgical options to individualize treatment and optimize patients' quality of life. Without maintaining a balance between optimal cure rate and volume management, Gorlin patients become at risk for surgical burn out and loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Gorlin patients undergo numerous surgeries especially on the central face which can lead to disfigurement and reduce the quality of life. Identifying gaps in the current literature, continuing ongoing research, and eventually establishing appropriate guidelines that help to guide the formation of an individualized treatment plan is crucial in developing a balance between conservative and complex treatments for this population.


Subject(s)
Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome , Carcinoma, Basal Cell , Skin Neoplasms , Surgeons , Humans , Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome/surgery , Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome/pathology , Quality of Life , Tertiary Care Centers , Mohs Surgery , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/pathology
7.
Dermatol Surg ; 49(12): 1066-1071, 2023 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38019008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgery may be discontinued with positive margins as an anticipated strategy for multidisciplinary care or as an unanticipated occurrence. Management of primary tumors has not been compared after anticipated versus unanticipated incomplete Mohs micrographic surgery (iMMS). OBJECTIVE: To compare rates and timing of adjuvant surgery after iMMS and final margin status when iMMS is anticipated versus unanticipated. Secondary outcomes were preoperative and intraoperative clinicopathologic factors associated with iMMS. METHODS: Cases of iMMS of keratinocyte carcinomas at a tertiary academic center between 2005 and 2022 were classified as anticipated (preoperative assembly of multidisciplinary teams) or unanticipated (ad hoc management of positive margins). Rate, timing, and final margin status of adjuvant surgery was compared between anticipated and unanticipated iMMS cohorts using χ2/Fisher exact test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Of 127 iMMS cases, 51.2% (65/127) were anticipated. Anticipated iMMS cases were more likely to undergo additional resection (98.5% vs 72.6%, p < .001), with fewer delays (3.9 vs 13.2 days, p < .001) and higher rates of final margin clearance (84.6% vs 59.7%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: When iMMS is anticipated as part of multidisciplinary care, patients are more likely to undergo additional resection, with fewer delays to next surgery and higher final margin clearance rates.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Mohs Surgery , Time-to-Treatment , Treatment Outcome , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology , Margins of Excision , Retrospective Studies
9.
JAMA Dermatol ; 159(8): 848-853, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405725

ABSTRACT

Importance: Patient preferences for pain medications after Mohs micrographic surgery are important to understand and have not been fully studied. Objective: To evaluate patient preferences for pain management with only over-the-counter medications (OTCs) or OTCs plus opioids after Mohs micrographic surgery given varying levels of theoretical pain and opioid addiction risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective discrete choice experiment was conducted in a single academic medical center from August 2021 to April 2022 among patients undergoing Mohs surgery and their accompanying support persons (≥18 years). A prospective survey was administered to all participants using the Conjointly platform. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to February 2023. Main outcome and measure: The primary outcome was the pain level at which half of the respondents chose OTCs plus opioids equally to only OTCs for pain management. This pain threshold was determined for varying opioid addiction risk profiles (low, 0%; low-moderate, 2%; moderate-high, 6%; high, 12%) and measured via a discrete choice experiment and linear interpolation of associated parameters (pain levels and risk of addiction). Results: Of the 295 respondents (mean [SD] age, 64.6 [13.1] years; 174 [59%] were female; race and ethnicity were not considered) who completed the discrete choice experiment, 101 (34%) stated that they would never consider opioids for pain management regardless of the pain level experienced, and 147 (50%) expressed concern regarding possible opioid addiction. Across all scenarios, 224 respondents (76%) preferred only OTCs vs OTCs plus opioids after Mohs surgery for pain control. When the theoretical risk of addiction was low (0%), half of the respondents expressed a preference for OTCs plus opioids given pain levels of 6.5 on a 10-point scale (90% CI, 5.7-7.5). At higher opioid addiction risk profiles (2%, 6%, 12%), an equal preference for OTCs plus opioids and only OTCs was not achieved. In these scenarios, patients favored only OTCs despite experiencing high levels of pain. Conclusion and relevance: The findings of this prospective discrete choice experiment indicate that the perceived risk of opioid addiction affects the patient's choice of pain medications after Mohs surgery. It is important to engage patients undergoing Mohs surgery in shared decision-making discussions to determine the optimal pain control plan for each individual. These findings may encourage future research on the risks associated with long-term opioid use after Mohs surgery.


Subject(s)
Opioid-Related Disorders , Pain Management , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Mohs Surgery/adverse effects , Patient Preference , Prospective Studies , Pain/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy
10.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 89(2): 301-308, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36918082

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Conventional excision of female genital skin cancers has high rates of local recurrence and morbidity. Few publications describe local recurrence rates (LRRs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for female genital skin cancers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate LRRs, PROs, and interdisciplinary care after MMS for female genital skin cancers. METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted of female genital skin cancers treated with MMS between 2006 and 2021 at an academic center. The primary outcome was local recurrence. Secondary outcomes were PROs and details of interdisciplinary care. RESULTS: Sixty skin cancers in 57 patients were treated with MMS. Common diagnoses included squamous cell cancer (n = 26), basal cell cancer (n = 12), and extramammary Paget disease (n = 11). Three local recurrences were detected with a mean follow-up of 61.1 months (median: 48.8 months). Thirty-one patients completed the PROs survey. Most patients were satisfied with MMS (71.0%, 22/31) and reported no urinary incontinence (93.5%, 29/31). Eight patients were sexually active at follow-up and 75.0% (6/8) experienced no sexual dysfunction. Most cases involved interdisciplinary collaboration 71.7% (43/60). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the retrospective single-center design, heterogeneous cohort, and lack of preoperative function data. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating MMS into interdisciplinary teams may help achieve low LRRs and satisfactory function after genital skin cancer surgery.


Subject(s)
Mohs Surgery , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Genitalia, Female/surgery
14.
Dermatol Clin ; 41(1): 101-115, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36410971

ABSTRACT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a neuroendocrine carcinoma that typically presents as a rapidly enlarging violaceous papulonodule on sun-damaged skin in elderly patients. MCC has high rates of local recurrence, metastasis, and poor survival. Treatment of the primary tumor involves surgical excision with possible adjuvant radiation therapy, whereas regional nodal disease is treated with some combination of lymph node dissection and radiation therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as avelumab and pembrolizumab, are first-line agents for metastatic MCC. Monitoring for recurrence can be aided by Merkel cell polyomavirus oncoprotein antibody titers.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell , Merkel cell polyomavirus , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Node Excision
15.
Dermatol Clin ; 41(1): 141-162, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36410975

ABSTRACT

Patients with immunosuppressive conditions experience an increased frequency and severity of cutaneous malignancies. This article highlights management of keratinocyte carcinoma, melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and Kaposi sarcoma in the setting of lymphoproliferative disorders, acquired immunodeficiencies, and organ transplantation. Advances in the safety of organ transplant recipient immunosuppression, early identification of risk factors, and new targeted therapies are improving skin cancer outcomes in immunocompromised populations.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Skin/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/therapy , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects
17.
Dermatol Surg ; 48(11): 1135-1139, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36342245

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists for bupivacaine injection after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate how bupivacaine affects postoperative pain and narcotic use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial, patients received bupivacaine or saline (placebo) immediately after MMS with flap reconstructions identified by American Academy of Dermatology expert consensus as high-risk for pain and narcotic use. For 48 hours postoperatively, patients logged analgesic use, pain scores (0-10), and whether pain was controlled. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients were included. Narcotic analgesic use was higher in the placebo group during the first 24 hours (odds ratio 2.18; confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-4.41; p = .03), second 24 hours (odds ratio 2.18; CI: 0.91-5.29; p = .08), and 48 hours combined (odds ratio 2.58; CI: 1.28-5.24; p < .01). Pain scores were lower in the bupivacaine group during the first 8 hours (mean difference 1.6; CI: 0.73-2.38; p < .001). Overall analgesic use (narcotic and non-narcotic) and percentage of patients reporting pain under control were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in demographics or surgical characteristics. No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Single-dose bupivacaine decreased postoperative pain and narcotic analgesic use after MMS with reconstructions likely to cause significant pain. Bupivacaine may have a role in postoperative pain management and reducing narcotic use in this population.


Subject(s)
Bupivacaine , Opioid-Related Disorders , Humans , Anesthetics, Local , Pain Management , Mohs Surgery/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Narcotics/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method
18.
Dermatol Surg ; 48(11): 1148-1154, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36194726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for sebaceous carcinoma (SC) may reduce local recurrence rates, but published case series have small cohorts and limited follow-up. Mohs micrographic surgery is particularly suitable for sensitive functional and cosmetic locations, such as the face, because it facilitates tissue conservation using complete peripheral and deep margin assessment before reconstruction. Coordinated care between Mohs and oculoplastic surgeons has not been described. OBJECTIVE: To assess rates of local recurrence and metastasis after MMS of facial SC and to describe coordinated care between Mohs and oculoplastic surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review identified facial SC cases treated with MMS at a single institution from January 2005 to August 2020. Tumor characteristics and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive and predictive analyses were performed. RESULTS: Forty-nine cases were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 51 months. The most common sites were periorbital, infraorbital cheek, and nasal ala. No patients experienced regional recurrence after MMS. One patient with Muir-Torre syndrome developed metastatic recurrence (at 82.9 months). All patients underwent 2-stage reconstruction with dermatology-performed MMS and oculoplastic reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Collaboration between Mohs and oculoplastic surgeons with a tissue-sparing approach of MMS can reduce recurrence and optimize cosmesis and function for central facial SC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Sebaceous , Face , Mohs Surgery , Sebaceous Gland Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma, Sebaceous/surgery , Adenocarcinoma, Sebaceous/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , Sebaceous Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Sebaceous Gland Neoplasms/surgery , Face/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods
20.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 75(9): 3406-3413, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35906159

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: When traditional V-Y advancement flaps cannot span cutaneous defects, the modified Pacman™ V-Y advancement flap (Pacman™ VYAF) design increases its utility for challenging facial defects. OBJECTIVE: To describe the usage and surgical outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) defects repaired with the Pacman™ VYAF. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on MMS defects repaired with the Pacman™ VYAF in the division of dermatologic surgery at a large academic institution between January 01, 2013 and August 01, 2019. RESULTS: Twenty-nine instances of Pacman™ VYAF reconstructions were identified. Reconstruction of the cheek (22/29, 76%) was the most common, followed by the temple (4/29, 14%), and the post-auricular neck (3/29, 10%). Distal flap necrosis occurred more frequently in large Pacman™ VYAF repairs (6/29, 21% of cases), requiring surgical revision in 1 case. Surgical scars from the Pacman™ VYAF are rated favorably by dermatologic surgeons. CONCLUSION: The Pacman™ VYAF is a useful reconstruction option for surgical defects of the head and neck, and it is advantageous compared to traditional V-Y advancement flaps for defects with length greater than width.


Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Cheek/surgery , Humans , Mohs Surgery/adverse effects , Neck/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Surgical Flaps/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...