Cerebrospinal-fluid drain-related complications in patients undergoing open and endovascular repairs of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal-fluid (CSF) drainage is recommended by current guidelines for spinal protection during open and endovascular repairs of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms. In the published literature, great variability exists in the rate of CSF-related complications and morbidity. Herein, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of CSF drainage-related complications, and compare the complication rates between open and endovascular repairs. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Thirty-four studies (4714 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis. The CSF drainage-related complications were categorised as mild, moderate, and severe. Pooled event rates for each complication category were estimated using a random-effect model. Random-effect uni- and multivariable meta-regression analyses were used to assess the effect of aortic-repair approach (open vs endovascular) and the CSF drainage criteria on CSF drainage-related complications. RESULTS: The pooled event rates were 6.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3-9.8%] for overall complications, 2% (95% CI: 1.1-3.4%) for minor complications, 3.7% (95% CI: 2.5-5.6%) for moderate complications, and 2.5% (95% CI: 1.6-3.8%) for severe complications. The drainage-related-mortality pooled event rate was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.6-1.4%). The uni- and multivariable meta-regression analyses showed no difference in complication rates between the open and endovascular approaches, or between the different CSF drainage protocols. CONCLUSION: The complication rate for CSF drainage is not negligible. Our results help define a more accurate risk-benefit ratio for CSF drain placement at the time of repair of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aneurysms.

Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds.

The aortic valve exhibits complex three-dimensional (3D) anatomy and heterogeneity essential for the long-term efficient biomechanical function. These are, however, challenging to mimic in de novo engineered living tissue valve strategies. We present a novel simultaneous 3D printing/photocrosslinking technique for rapidly engineering complex, heterogeneous aortic valve scaffolds. Native anatomic and axisymmetric aortic valve geometries (root wall and tri-leaflets) with 12-22 mm inner diameters (ID) were 3D printed with poly-ethylene glycol-diacrylate (PEG-DA) hydrogels (700 or 8000 MW) supplemented with alginate. 3D printing geometric accuracy was quantified and compared using Micro-CT. Porcine aortic valve interstitial cells (PAVIC) seeded scaffolds were cultured for up to 21 days. Results showed that blended PEG-DA scaffolds could achieve over tenfold range in elastic modulus (5.3±0.9 to 74.6±1.5 kPa). 3D printing times for valve conduits with mechanically contrasting hydrogels were optimized to 14 to 45 min, increasing linearly with conduit diameter. Larger printed valves had greater shape fidelity (93.3±2.6, 85.1±2.0 and 73.3±5.2% for 22, 17 and 12 mm ID porcine valves; 89.1±4.0, 84.1±5.6 and 66.6±5.2% for simplified valves). PAVIC seeded scaffolds maintained near 100% viability over 21 days. These results demonstrate that 3D hydrogel printing with controlled photocrosslinking can rapidly fabricate anatomical heterogeneous valve conduits that support cell engraftment.

Perfusion method for thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using the open distal technique.

Challenges related to perfusion support of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair include maintenance of distal aortic perfusion, rapidity of fluid resuscitation, and avoidance of both hypothermia and excessive hemodilution. Using available technology, we have devised a circuit and protocol that addresses these issues. To accomplish such support a bypass circuit consisting of 3/8 inch tubing connected to a centrifugal pump and low-prime heat exchanger was constructed. The circuit was primed via 1/4 inch spiked connectors attached to a 3-liter bag of normal saline. After initial de-airing, the solution was recirculated through this bag. Patients were anticoagulated with 1 mg/kg of heparin prior to initiation of support. Left atrial-descending aorta bypass was used primarily. A cell salvage device was used for autotransfusion. All blood products were delivered via a rapid infusion device. During partial exsanguination, shed blood was not processed, but directed to the rapid infusor for immediate retransfusion. Any packed cells given were washed prior to transfusion. Citrate dextrose solution was used as an anticoagulant for the cell scavenger. This configuration was used successfully in 50 procedures during an 18-month period. Use of this low-prime, custom circuit reduced both hemodilution and cost. A connection off the cell salvage pump offers fast retransfusion of shed blood during partial exsanguination. Minimal heparinization and citrate anticoagulation appears to reduce coagulopathy.

Type B aortic dissection and thoracoabdominal aneurysm formation after endoluminal stent repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Endoluminal stent graft repair of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms is being performed in increasing numbers. The long-term benefits of this technology remain to be seen. Reports have begun to appear regarding complications of stent graft application, such as renal failure, intestinal infarction, distal embolization, and rupture. Many of these complications have been associated with a fatal outcome. We describe a case of acute, retrograde, type B aortic dissection after application of an endoluminal stent graft for an asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. An extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm subsequently developed and was successfully repaired. Aggressive evaluation of new back pain after such a procedure is warranted. Further analysis of the short-term complications and long-term outcome of this new technology is indicated before universal application can be recommended.

Repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: Reports on octogenarians undergoing coronary revascularization, valve replacement, and abdominal aneurysmorrhaphy demonstrate little increase in operative risk during elective procedures. However, the mortality in this group of patients increases rapidly when urgent or emergent procedures are performed. We analyzed the outcome of patients in their ninth decade of life undergoing repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: A retrospective review of 39 consecutive octogenarians undergoing repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of the past 900 patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (5.2%) repaired by us were between the ages of 80 and 89 years. The median age was 84 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1:3. Two of 39 patients (5%) had acute type III dissections, and the remainder had chronic aneurysms. Twelve patients had Crawford extent I aneurysms, whereas 7, 10, and 10 patients were extent II, III, and IV, respectively. The overall in-hospital mortality was 10.3% (4 of 39 patients). Major postoperative complications included paraperesis/paraplegia, 5% (n = 2); renal failure, 18% (n = 7) including hemodialysis in 3 patients; stroke, 5% (n = 2); myocardial infarction or arrhythmia, 18% (n = 7); and respiratory insufficiency, 36% (n = 14) including 4 patients requiring tracheostomy. A univariate analysis of perioperative risk factors was performed using the Fisher's exact test. The need for hemodialysis (p = 0.035), a tracheostomy (p = 0.0001), or a perioperative myocardial infarction (p < 0.001) significantly increased the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. However, survival decreases dramatically with even single system organ failure. An extended period of recovery is usually required in these elderly, high-risk patients.

Pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial sclerosis: effective therapy for malignant pericardial effusions.

BACKGROUND: Pericardial effusions remain a formidable problem in patients with an advanced malignancy. We reviewed our experience with pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial sclerotherapy versus open surgical drainage as the treatment for these effusions. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of one surgeon's experience (M.E.B.) with the surgical treatment of malignant pericardial effusions at a tertiary-care cancer center. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent 72 procedures during 8 years. Thirty-seven (51%) pericardiocenteses and 35 (49%) open procedures were performed in patients with effusions. There was no significant difference in the complication rates seen between those effusions drained via pericardiocentesis (n = 5; 13%) and those drained in an open surgical procedure (n = 5; 14%). Similar results were seen with respect to the development of a recurrent effusion. There were no procedure-related deaths. The median survival for all patients was 97 days. Patients with breast cancer as their primary malignancy survived significantly longer after drainage than did all others (p = 0.01). The type of procedure did not influence survival. Costs of surgical drainage exceed those of pericardiocentesis by nearly fortyfold. CONCLUSIONS: Pericardiocentesis with intrapericardial sclerotherapy is as effective as open surgical drainage for the management of malignant pericardial effusions.

Aortic root replacement: results using the St. Jude Medical/Hemashield composite graft.

BACKGROUND: Aortic root replacement remains a formidable operation. Although perioperative mortality has declined steadily, there is no consensus regarding the preferred method of reconstruction or type of composite to be used. We present our last 2 years' experience with aortic root replacement using the St. Jude Medical/Hemashield composite valve conduit. METHODS: A retrospective review of 52 consecutive patients undergoing aortic root replacement from February 1994 through October 1996 is presented. Both the open/exclusion and Cabrol methods of reconstruction were used. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of the patients had undergone previous procedures of the aortic root. Thirty-seven percent required aortic arch replacement and 35% required concomitant cardiac or vascular procedures. Perioperative morbidity was low, as was perioperative mortality (3.8%). Both of the deaths that occurred were related to complications with the management of remaining thoracoabdominal aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Using meticulous surgical technique and the St. Jude Medical/Hemashield composite valve conduit, one can expect low mortality and complication rates for complex aortic root reconstruction.

Inflammatory aneurysm of the ascending aorta and aortic arch.

Inflammatory aortic aneurysms are distinct clinical entities seen mostly in the infrarenal abdominal aorta and rarely in the descending thoracic aorta. We present the case of a 61-year-old woman with an inflammatory aortic aneurysm of the ascending aorta and aortic arch.

Improved survival after intraoperative cardiac arrest in noncardiac surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that improvements in intraoperative and perioperative critical care are resulting in an improved outcome after intraoperative cardiac arrest. DESIGN: A retrospective consecutive series of patients who experienced an intraoperative cardiac arrest during noncardiothoracic surgical procedures between January 1986 and June 1994. SETTING: A tertiary care university-based hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four consecutive patients who experienced an intraoperative arrest among 162,661 noncardiothoracic surgical procedures during the designated period. INTERVENTION: Advanced cardiac life support and advanced trauma life support methods were used appropriately. Postarrest pharmacologic and mechanical cardiopulmonary support were used as needed in the setting of a surgical intensive care unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival out of the operating room and survival to discharge. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (62%) were resuscitated in the operating room and taken to the surgical intensive care unit or recovery room. Nine patients (38%) survived to discharge from the hospital. Twelve arrests (50%) were primarily cardiac in origin. Predictors of mortality included a need for pressor or inotropic support (P < .001) and duration of the arrest greater than 15 minutes (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Survival from an intraoperative cardiac arrest in a noncardiothoracic surgical patient is much improved over rates in historical controls who experienced in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Rapid identification and aggressive correction of mechanical and metabolic derangements is warranted.