ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The value of a sural nerve biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is controversial. Evidence-based recommendations for its implementation are lacking. We investigated factors leading to biopsy and analyzed biopsy outcomes and consequences, assessed the predictability of biopsy outcomes through clinical parameters to avoid unnecessary biopsies, and compared results with electrophysiological and clinical severity to determine their prognostic value. METHODS: 190 sural nerve biopsies were analyzed in two cohorts. One consisted of 163 biopsies and the second of 72 biopsies from the prospective Immune-mediated Neuropathies Biomaterial and Data registry (INHIBIT). Both have an intersection of 45 patients. 75 data sets from patients without biopsy were used. Analysis of nerve conduction studies, treatment, overall disability sum score (ODSS), biopsy outcomes, and diagnosis was performed. RESULTS: 51% of biopsied patients received the diagnosis CIDP (77% fulfilled EFNS/PNS criteria), 21% were not CIDP typical, and 27% were unspecific. Biopsied patients responded less frequently to immunotherapies at time of biopsy than non-biopsied patients (p = 0.003). Immunotherapy was initiated more frequently after biopsy (p < 0.001) and more often with intravenous immunoglobulins (p < 0.0001). 76% of all biopsied patients met the electrophysiological criteria for CIDP. Sensory nerve action potential amplitudes of 0 µV still provide 73% of histological diagnostic value. Histologic signs of degeneration predicted ODSS worsening after 1 year (p = 0.028) but disease severity did not correlate with histological damage severity. DISCUSSION: The main indication for nerve biopsy was the treatment of refractory cases of autoimmune neuropathies with the therapeutic consequence of treatment initiation or escalation. Sural biopsy also provided prognostic information. Even with extinguished sural SNAP, the biopsy can still have diagnostic value.
Subject(s)
Sural Nerve , Humans , Sural Nerve/pathology , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Biopsy , Aged , Prognosis , Adult , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/diagnosis , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/physiopathology , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/pathology , Neural Conduction/physiology , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Corneal confocal microscopy is a noninvasive imaging technique to analyze corneal nerve fibers and corneal inflammatory cells (CICs). The amount of CICs is a potential biomarker of disease activity in chronic autoinflammatory diseases. To date, there are no standardized criteria for the morphological characterization of CICs. The aim was to establish a protocol for a standardized morphological classification of CICs based on a literature search and to test this protocol for applicability and reliability. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature about definitions of CICs was conducted. Existing morphological descriptions were translated into a structured algorithm and applied by raters. Subsequently, the protocol was optimized by reducing and defining the criteria of the cell types. The optimized algorithm was applied by 4 raters. The interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss kappa (K). RESULTS: A systematic review of the literature revealed no uniform morphological criteria for the differentiation of the individual cell types in CICs. Our first protocol achieved only a low level of agreement between 3 raters (K = 0.09; 1062 rated cells). Our revised protocol was able to achieve a higher interrater reliability with 3 (K = 0.64; 471 rated cells) and 4 (K = 0.61; 628 rated cells) raters. CONCLUSIONS: The indirect use of criteria from the literature leads to a high error rate. By clearly defining the individual cell types and standardizing the protocol, reproducible results were obtained, allowing the introduction of this protocol for the future evaluation of CICs in the corneal confocal microscopy.
ABSTRACT
Experimental autoimmune neuritis is a common animal model for acute human immune-mediated polyneuropathies. Although already established in 1955, a number of pathophysiological mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, we extensively characterize experimental autoimmune neuritis progression in Lewis rats, including new insights into the integrity of small nerve fibres, neuropathic pain and macrophage activation. Acute experimental autoimmune neuritis was induced with P253-78 peptide and consequently investigated using the gait analysis system CatWalk XT, electrophysiological and histopathological analyses, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), dorsal root ganglia outgrowth studies, as well as the von Frey hair and Hargreaves tests. For the longitudinal setup, rats were sacrificed at Day (d) 10 (onset), d15 (peak), d26 (recovery) and d29 (late recovery). We confirmed the classical T-cell and macrophage-driven inflammation and the primarily demyelinating nature of the experimental autoimmune neuritis. The dual role of macrophages in experimental autoimmune neuritis is implicated by the high number of remaining macrophages throughout disease progression. Furthermore, different subpopulations of macrophages based on Cx3-motif chemokine receptor 1 (Cx3cr1), platelet factor 4 (Pf4) and macrophage galactose-type lectin-1 (Mgl1) expressions were identified. In addition, modulation of the sensory system in experimental autoimmune neuritis was detected. An outgrowth of small fibres in the plantar skin at the onset and peak of the experimental autoimmune neuritis was evident parallel to the development of acute hyperalgesia mediated through transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 modulation. Our data depict experimental autoimmune neuritis as a primary demyelinating disease with implicated axonal damage, a small unmyelinated fibre impairment throughout the disease progression course, and underline the pivotal role of macrophages in the effector and during the recovery stage.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To develop a composite score to assess the severity of the multiple symptoms present in anti-IgLON5 disease. METHODS: The anti-IgLON5 disease composite score (ICS) was designed to evaluate 17 symptoms divided into 5 clinical domains (bulbar, sleep, movement disorders, cognition, and others). Each symptom was scored from 0 (absent/normal) to 3 or 6 (severe) depending on the contribution of the symptom to neurologic disability with a maximum ICS of 69. The ICS was tested in patients from 2 cohorts (Barcelona, Spain, and GENERATE, Germany) that included cases personally seen by the authors (internal) and patients whose ICS was obtained from information of questionnaires completed by the referring neurologists (external). Test-retest and interrater reliabilities of the ICS were assessed by the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and the correlation between the ICS and modified Rankin scale (mRS) with the nonparametric Spearman rank coefficient. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the ICS at diagnosis of anti-IgLON5 disease and follow-up in a subset of patients with available clinical information. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients (46 from Barcelona cohort; 40 from GENERATE cohort) were included. The median ICS was 15 (range 2-31). The ICS was higher in the Barcelona cohort than in the German cohort (18 vs 12, p < 0.001), due to higher partial scores in sleep and movement disorder domains. There were no significant differences in the ICS between internal and external patients (15 vs 14, p = 0.96). The ICS correlated with the mRS score (r = 0.429, p < 0.001). Test-retest and interrater reliabilities were excellent with an ICC of 0.997 (95% CI 0.992-0.999) and 0.973 (95% CI 0.925-0.990), respectively. ICS was retested during follow-up in 27 patients, and it was similar to that at diagnosis in 10 clinically stable patients (median ICS at diagnosis 11.5 vs 11.5 at follow-up; p = 1), higher in 8 patients who worsened (12.5 vs 18; p = 0.012), and lower in 9 patients who improved after immunotherapy (14 vs 10; p = 0.007). DISCUSSION: The ICS is a valid method to assess the extension and severity of the different clinical manifestations of anti-IgLON5 disease.
Subject(s)
Encephalitis , Hashimoto Disease , Movement Disorders , Parasomnias , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease with humoral and cellular autoimmunity causing demyelination of peripheral nerves, commonly treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), encoded by the FCGRT gene, prevents the degradation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by recycling circulating IgG. A variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the promoter region of the FCGRT gene is associated with different expression levels of mRNA and protein. Thus, patients with genotypes associated with relatively low FcRn expression may show a poorer treatment response to IVIg due to increased IVIg degradation. METHODS: VNTR genotypes were analyzed in 144 patients with CIDP. Patients' clinical data, including neurological scores and treatment data, were collected as part of the Immune-Mediated Neuropathies Biobank registry. RESULTS: Most patients (n = 124, 86%) were VNTR 3/3 homozygotes, and 20 patients (14%) were VNTR 2/3 heterozygotes. Both VNTR 3/3 and VNTR 2/3 genotype groups showed no difference in clinical disability and immunoglobulin dosage. However, patients with a VNTR 2 allele were more likely to receive subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIg) than patients homozygous for the VNTR 3 allele (25% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to receive second-line therapy (75% vs. 54%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The VNTR 2/3 genotype is associated with the administration of SCIg, possibly reflecting a greater benefit from SCIg due to more constant immunoglobulin levels without lower IVIg levels between the treatment circles. Also, the greater need for second-line treatment in VNTR 2/3 patients could be an indirect sign of a lower response to immunoglobulins.
Subject(s)
Histocompatibility Antigens Class I , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating , Receptors, Fc , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/drug therapy , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Minisatellite Repeats , Immunoglobulin G , Promoter Regions, GeneticABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) for the longitudinal assessment of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). METHODS: Prospective examination of twelve CIDP patients by neurological assessment, MRN, and nerve conduction studies in 2016 and 6 years later in 2022. Imaging parameters were compared with matched healthy controls and correlated with clinical and electrophysiological markers. The MRN protocol included T2-weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), T2 relaxometry, and magnetization transfer imaging (MTI). RESULTS: Nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) was increased in CIDP patients compared to controls (plexus: p = 0.003; sciatic nerve: p < 0.001). Over 6 years, nerve CSA decreased in CIDP patients, most pronounced at the lumbosacral plexus (p = 0.015). Longitudinally, changes in CSA correlated with changes in the inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment validated overall disability sum score (INCAT/ODSS) (p = 0.006). High initial nerve CSA was inversely correlated with changes in the INCAT/ODSS over 6 years (p < 0.05). The DTI parameter fractional anisotropy (FA) showed robust correlations with electrodiagnostic testing both cross-sectionally and longitudinally (p < 0.05). MTI as a newly added imaging technique revealed a significantly reduced magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) in CIDP patients (p < 0.01), suggesting underlying changes in macromolecular tissue composition, and correlated significantly with electrophysiological parameters of demyelination (p < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence that changes in nerve CSA and FA reflect the clinical and electrophysiological course of CIDP patients. Initial nerve hypertrophy might predict a rather benign course or better therapy response.
Subject(s)
Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating , Humans , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/pathology , Diffusion Tensor Imaging/methods , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is a marker for axonal degeneration. Patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) often report a fluctuation of symptoms throughout one treatment cycle with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). The aim of this study was to determine whether sNfL is suitable to quantify patient-reported symptom fluctuations. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with the diagnosis of CIDP or a CIDP-variant under treatment with IVIG were recruited in this study and underwent examination before IVIG infusion, in the middle of the treatment interval, and before their next IVIG infusion. Patients were surveyed regarding symptom fluctuations at the last visit and divided into two groups: those with and without fluctuations of symptoms. At the first visit, sociodemographic and disease-specific data were collected. Clinical scores were assessed at every examination. sNfL values were compared between both groups at the different time points after conversion into Z-scores-adjusted for age and body mass index. RESULTS: Patients with CIDP show elevated sNfL Z-scores (median at baseline: 2.14, IQR: 1.0). There was no significant change in sNfL Z-scores or questionnaire scores within the treatment cycle in either group. There was no significant difference in sNfL levels between the patients with and without symptom fluctuations. CONCLUSIONS: CIDP patients show elevated sNfL levels. However, sNfL is not suitable to reflect patient-reported fluctuations of symptoms. This indicates that symptom fluctuations during treatment with IVIG in patients with CIDP are not caused by a neuroaxonal injury. Furthermore, repeated sNfL measurements within one treatment cycle with IVIG seem to have no benefit for symptom monitoring.
Subject(s)
Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating , Humans , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/diagnosis , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/drug therapy , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Self Report , Intermediate FilamentsABSTRACT
Introduction: Blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier dysfunction is pivotal for diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies, especially in spinal nerve root inflammation. Typically, either total CSF protein or the CSF to serum albumin ratio (QAlb) is measured. Total CSF protein measurements have limitations, notably its fixed reference value regardless of age, in contrast to the age-dependent reference for QAlb. Our goal was to evaluate both markers in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies. Methods: In our multicenter research, we collected retrospective CSF data from patients suffering from immune-mediated neuropathies across four German research centers. These parameters were analyzed in relation to their clinical characteristics. Results: Out of 419 samples, 36 (8.6%) displayed a notable variation between total CSF protein and QAlb values. A detailed analysis revealed that patients displaying elevated QAlb but normal total CSF protein levels were significantly younger at disease onset (p = 0.01), at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.005), and when undergoing lumbar puncture (p = 0.001) compared to patients with elevated CSF protein and normal QAlb levels. These effects were especially evident for the subgroup of samples derived by female patients. Discussion: Our work confirms the crucial role of QAlb in diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies and particularly its efficacy as a marker for evaluating the blood-CSF barrier in patients with an earlier disease onset. Considering the significance of the albumin quotient, its assessment is especially advisable in younger patients of female sex to avoid missing a potential barrier dysfunction that might be falsely negative when using total protein.