APC and KRAS mutations in distal colorectal polyps are related to smoking habits in men: results of a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was (a) to evaluate the association between cigarette smoking and the prevalence of distal colorectal polyps and adenocarcinoma and (b) to analyse genetic alterations representing different molecular pathways of the colorectal carcinogenesis. METHODS: A total of 623 asymptomatic male (mean age: 53 years; 50-65) car factory workers were included. Information on smoking habits and other lifestyle factors were collected followed by a 60 cm colonoscopy. APC and KRAS mutations and microsatellite status were determined in colorectal lesions (colorectal carcinoma (CRC), hyperplastic (HP) and adenomatous polyps (AP)). Data were analysed using unconditional multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: Smokers had a higher prevalence of AP (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-3.6; p<0.05) and HP (OR 5.4; 95% CI 2.6- 11.1; p<0.05). No differences in CRC were observed. There was a dose-response relationship with the number of cigarettes smoked. The risk of developing AP or HP decreased after smoking cessation, even among heavy smokers (≥20 packs/year). KRAS mutations were more prevalent among smokers AP (OR 5.6; 95% CI 1.6-20.4; p=0.007). There was a trend of positive association with APC mutations (OR 3.5; 95% CI 0.9-4.4; p=0.096). APC and KRAS mutations were found in 36% and 61% of the HP of smokers, but were absent in non-smokers (p=0.89 and 0.78, respectively). There were no differences in MSI between smokers and non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking is associated with a higher risk of developing both HP and AP and a higher prevalence of mutations in APC and KRAS.

A phase II trial of first-line sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma unwilling to receive or with early intolerance to immunotherapy: SOGUG Study 06-01.

AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with sorafenib in patients unwilling to receive immunotherapy or with early intolerance to immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had clear-cell mRCC with good or intermediate risk status, were unsuited to cytokine therapy due to preference or intolerance (based on <4 weeks prior immunotherapy) and had not received antiangiogenic agents. Patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Twenty-six evaluable patients were enrolled at six centres between March and July 2006. The most common metastatic sites were lung and bone; nine patients had one or two metastatic lesions. Median PFS was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1-17.5) and overall survival (OS) 15.4 months (95% CI 12.9-17.4). Among 21 patients evaluable for response, 19 (90.5%) experienced disease control (including one complete response; four partial responses; 14 stable disease). The majority of adverse events were grade 1-2 (87.3%). The most common were asthenia (53.0%) and diarrhoea (50.0%). CONCLUSION: In patients with mRCC who were unwilling to receive or intolerant to immunotherapy, treatment with sorafenib led to a high rate of disease control with toxicities that were generally mild and manageable. The PFS achieved in this essentially treatment-naïve population compares favourably with that obtained in the randomised first-line phase II study.