Elimination and penetration of amikacin into urine in patients with decreased glomerular filtration rate.

Background: Amikacin monotherapy is recommended for urinary tract infection (UTI) treatment with multi-resistant pathogens. Even though amikacin efficacy in the treatment of UTIs is dependent on its urinary concentration, there are no robust data proving that sufficiently high urinary concentration is reached in patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Methods: A prospective study to monitor amikacin penetration into urine of 70 patients [40 males, median (interquartile range) age 70 (65-79) years] with different levels of glomerular filtration decline, including patients treated by dialysis, was conducted. The bactericidal efficacy of amikacin in urine samples has been evaluated. Results: Patients with estimated GFR (eGFR) <30 mL/min had significantly lower median amikacin urinary concentration than patients with eGFR >30 mL/min (89.75 vs 186.0 mg/L, P < .0001; 200.5 vs 830.0 mg/L, P < .0001; and 126.0 vs 408.0 mg/L, P < .0001 for minimal, maximal and minimal together with maximal concentrations, respectively). The amount of amikacin eliminated in the first 10-13 h after dose administration was dependent on eGFR (r2 = 0.6144, P < .0001). The urinary concentration of amikacin in patients treated by dialysis was indirectly proportional to pH of urine. The plasma concentrations of amikacin did not correlate with urinary levels in patients in either of the GFR categories. Microbiological evaluation showed that the critical urinary concentration for efficacy of amikacin during UTI monotherapy in patients treated by dialysis is 100 mg/L. We found that 4 out of 11 patients treated by dialysis did not reach this level during the treatment. Conclusion: Systemic administration of amikacin monotherapy in patients treated by dialysis is questionable as the concentrations of amikacin in their urine are often below the threshold of effectivity. Amikacin plasma concentrations are not a major determinant of amikacin concentration in urine, therefore pulse dosing is neither necessary nor safe in patients treated by dialysis, and may cause undesirable toxicity.

Dosing of Aminoglycosides in Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Treated with Intermittent Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The dosing of aminoglycosides (AGs) in patients with kidney disease is challenging due to their markedly prolonged half-life, which renders pulse dosing schedules unsuitable. We performed a review of the literature that describes the pharmacokinetics of, and dosing recommendations for, AG for patients with abnormal renal functions and various renal replacement therapy modalities, focusing on patients treated with intermittent hemodialysis (iHD). SUMMARY: During one iHD session, dialysis removes a remarkable amount of the drug regardless of the dialyzer type. In patients with severely reduced kidney functions, the distribution phase is prolonged, which needs to be taken into account when drawing samples shortly after drug administration or following an iHD session. KEY MESSAGES: The doses recommended for the pulse dosing of patients without kidney disease leads to unacceptably high overall systemic exposure for patients with severely reduced kidney functions even with dosing intervals extended up to 48 h. Therefore, lower doses accompanied by extended dosing intervals must be applied for this patient group. The clinical evidence and current recommendations support the dosing of AG following, rather than before, HD sessions. In patients with end-stage kidney disease, the samples for TDM of AGs should not be drawn earlier than 2 h after end of the infusion and 4 h after the end of iHD session to allow full (re)distribution of the drug.

Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients treated with intermittent haemodialysis based on therapeutic drug monitoring.

Vancomycin is frequently used in haemodialysis (HD) patients but generally accepted target serum ranges and dosing strategy are still lacking in this group. Based on retrospective analysis of data from 118 HD patients treated with vancomycin the interdialytic elimination constant (Ke), apparent volume of distribution (Vd) and dialysis efficacy were calculated. The influence of possible clinical variables on the pharmacokinetic parameters of vancomycin have been tested. The median of Ke in interdialytic periods, corresponding half-life and Vd were 0.0073 h-1, 95.0 h and 0.87 L/kg, respectively. We found significant positive correlation between time in dialysis program and Ke. The Vd correlated best with lean body mass (LBM). For high- and low flux membrane HD of 4 hours duration the decline in vancomycin levels was 20.88% and 12.86%, respectively. Based on these data loading dose for vancomycin in HD patient should be calculated as 24.483 × LBM (kg) + 455 mg. The utility of this equation for entire HD population should be also verified prospectively.