Patient Perspectives on the Cancellation of Elective Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in the unprecedented widespread cancellation of scheduled elective primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the United States. The impact of postponing scheduled total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty procedures on patients has not been well studied and may have physical, emotional, and financial consequences. METHODS: All patients whose elective primary TJA procedures at a tertiary academic medical center were postponed because of COVID-19 were surveyed. Seventy-four patients agreed to answer 13 questions concerning the physical, mental, and financial impact of surgery cancellation. Statistical analysis, including Pearson correlation coefficients, cross-tabulation analysis, and chi squares, was performed. RESULTS: 13.5% of patients strongly disagreed with the use of "elective" to describe their cancelled TJA surgery and 25.7% of patients reported substantial physical and/or mental deterioration due to postponement. Younger individuals experienced greater change in their symptoms (P = 0.034), anxiety about their pain (P = 0.010), and frustration/anger (P = 0.043). Poor quality of life, mood, and lower HOOS/KOOS Jr interval scores were correlated with greater financial strain, disagreement with the postponement, and disagreement with the use of "elective" to describe surgery. Disagreement with the use of "elective" to describe surgery was associated with greater financial strain (P = 0.013) and disagreement with the decision to postpone surgery (P = 0.008). In addition, greater financial strain was associated with disagreement with postponement (P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The cancellation of elective TJA during the COVID-19 pandemic had a variety of consequences for patients. One in four patients reported experiencing substantial physical and/or emotional deterioration. Associations of poor quality of life and mood with greater financial strain and disagreement with the term "elective" were seen. These results help quantify the deleterious effects of cancelling elective surgery and identify at-risk patients should another postponement of surgery occur. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-Prospective cohort study.

A Histologic Analysis of a Retrieved Specimen 24 Years after Hemiresurfacing for Avascular Necrosis.

Reports of long-term evaluation of the viability of the femoral head after a hemiresurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) are scarce. We report the case of a 41-year-old female with lupus and right HRA (performed 24 years previously for avascular necrosis) that was revised to a total hip arthroplasty for worsening right groin pain due to chondrolysis. We present a histologic evaluation of the resurfaced femoral head retrieved 24 years after HRA. To the authors' knowledge, this is the longest reported histologic follow-up of such a case. There was no evidence of fracture or inflammation and the underlying bone was viable. At 5-year follow-up after the revision, the patient is pain-free, fully functional, and walks without any assistive device.

Reducing perioperative blood loss with antifibrinolytics and antifibrinolytic-like agents for patients undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

Total hip and knee arthroplasties may be associated with a significant amount of perioperative blood loss. The severity of blood loss may be great enough to require the use of blood transfusions to treat perioperative anemia. Various methods of blood preservation have been studied. The use of antifibrinolytics and antifibrinolytic-like agents to reduce perioperative bleeding has been researched in orthopaedics and other surgical subspecialties. This review aims to evaluate the current evidence supporting the use of tranexamic acid, aminocaproic acid, fibrin tissue adhesive, and aprotinin in the reduction of perioperative blood loss in total hip and knee arthroplasties.

Have the Annual Trends of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Changed?

As the use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs have increased, it remains unclear whether or not this has affected the rates of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the annual trends of RA patients who underwent TKA. Specifically, we evaluated: (1) the annual trends of TKAs due to RA in the United States population; and (2) the annual trends in the proportion of TKAs due to RA in the United States. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify all patients who underwent TKA between 2002 and 2013 (n = 6,492,873). Then, we identified TKA patients who had a diagnosis of RA, defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code 714.0. The incidence of TKAs with a diagnosis of RA in the United States was calculated using the U.S. population as the denominator. Regression models were used to analyze the annual trends of RA in patients who underwent TKA. A total of 209,332 RA patients were identified who underwent TKA. The annual prevalence of RA in patients who underwent TKA slightly increased, from 33.2 per 1,000 TKAs in 2002 to 35 per 1,000 TKAs in 2013 (R2 = 0.254, p = 0.095). The annual number of TKAs with a diagnosis of RA increased by 93.1% from 11,618 to 22,430. After normalizing for the U.S. population, the incidence of TKAs with RA increased from 5.4 to 9.2 TKAs per 1 million U.S. adults (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.05; p < 0.001). In 2002, 11,618 (3.31%) TKAs, and in 2013, 22,430 (3.50%) TKAs were due to RA. The prevalence of RA in those who underwent TKA remained the same from 2002 to 2013 (coefficient = 0.02; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.05; p = 0.095). The results of this study demonstrated that the rates of TKA performed in RA patients have remained relatively stable. Furthermore, there may have been a decline in the rate of RA patients undergoing TKA, due to an increase in the U.S. population by approximately 28.8 million during the study period.

Does a simple syringe applicator enhance bone cement set up time in knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The time required for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement curing or hardening can be modified by a number of variables including the mixing technique, and the temperature and pressure at which the process is taking place. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate two different methods of PMMA application in terms of set up time. Specifically, we (I) compared the PMMA set up time of cement that remained in the mixing bowl to cement that was placed in a syringe and (II) extrapolated the associated annual cost difference on the national and individual surgeon levels. METHODS: The cement set up time was measured for a total of 146 consecutive patients who underwent either unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (n=136) or patellofemoral arthroplasty (n=10) between January 2016 and April 2017. One pack of PMMA powder and monomer were mixed, placed in a 300 mL small plastic bowl, and mixed with a tongue depressor. Then, 50 mL of the mixed PMMA was placed in a sterile 60 mL syringe with the tip cut to a 6-mm opening, and the syringe was used to apply the cement to the bone and the prosthesis surface. The remaining unused cement in the syringe (syringe group) and the remaining unused cement in the plastic bowl (bowl group) were removed and formed into a two separate 2 cm diameter cubes that were allowed to cure at room temperature on a sterile set of osteotomes. The two cubes of cement were timed for complete PMMA curing. A two-tailed student's t-test was used to compare the curing time for the two groups. Annual cost differences were calculated on the national and individual surgeon level. The total number of daily cases performed and the operative time savings using the syringe applicator was used to find daily and annual cost savings. RESULTS: The mean time for the cement to set up in the bowl group was 16.8±2.1 minutes, and the mean time for cement set up in the syringe group was 15.1±1.7 minutes. Compared to the bowl group cement set up time, the syringe group set up time was significantly lower (P<0.0001). An estimated 350,000 cemented knee arthroplasties are performed each year in the United States. With 1.7 minutes saved per case, 595,000 operating room minutes per year could be saved, resulting in a nearly $71,000,000 national and $110,000 individual surgeon annual cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study demonstrated that the utilization of a simple, inexpensive syringe applicator enhanced the cement set up time by over one and a half minutes. This may be a result of the pressure differences in the syringe applicator. In addition to the control of and precision of where the cement is placed, the syringe applicator could provide an important potential time advantage to the arthroplasty surgeon.