Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure.

Background: Incisional herniae (IH) are reported in 5->20 % of patients undergoing open celiotomy, and can be linked to closure technique. The STITCH randomized trial favors a small bite technique for midline celiotomy closure with a 1-year IH rate of 13 % over larger bites (23 %). Methods: A continuous musculofascial mass closure with absorbable looped #1 PDS suture with 2-cm bite size was used for all open celiotomies. IH frequency and associated clinicopathologic factors were retrospectively analyzed from prospective data in 336 consecutive patients undergoing visceral resections by a single surgeon. Results: The study population included 192 men and 144 women, 81 % of whom had a cancer diagnosis, who underwent hepatobiliary, pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and colorectal resections, or a combination. The majority of patients (84 %) had subcostal incisions, and 10 % received a midline incision. At a median follow-up of 19.5 months, the overall IH rate was 3.3 %. Hernia rates were 2.5 % for subcostal margin, 2.9 % for midline, and 5.5 % for other incisions (p = 0.006). Median time to hernia detection was 492 days. Factors associated with IH were increased weight, abdominal depth/girth, male sex, spleen size, visceral fat, and body height (p ≤ 0.04 for all), but not type of resection, prior operations, underlying diagnosis, weight loss, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, incision length or suture to incision ratio. Conclusions: The described technique leads to a low IH rate of <3 % in subcostal or midline incisions, and can be recommended for routine use. The observed results appear superior to those of the STITCH trial, even for the smaller midline incision cohort.

Physician derived versus administrative data in identifying surgical complications. Fact versus Fiction.

BACKGROUND: Administrative data are widely used as determinants of surgical quality. We compared surgical complications identified in a structured surgical review to coding and billing data of over a 19-month period. METHODS: A retrospective review of monthly morbidity and mortality conference reports was compared to a report over the same time period generated from hospital coding and billing data. RESULTS: 807 sequential operative procedures were included. Physician derived data compared to administrative data identified a complication of any severity in 205 (25.4%) versus 111 (13.8%) cases (r = 0.39), and major complications in 68 (8.4%) versus 46 (5.7%) cases (r = 0.36). Review of the administrative data regarding major complications identified 80 false negatives, 52 false positives, and 38 true positive designations. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for administrative data in identifying major complications was 0.32, 0.99, 0.42, 0.99, and 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between physician determined and administrative data with regard to identifying surgical complications is poor. Administrative data are insensitive and lack positive predictive value.

Managing the Unmanageable: A Two-Staged Palliative Resection to Control Life-Threatening Duodenal Bleeding Due to Recurrent Paraganglioma.

BACKGROUND This report presents therapeutic decision-making and management of refractory, life-threatening duodenal bleeding in a young man with recurrent metastatic retroperitoneal paraganglioma. CASE REPORT The patient had been symptom free for 8 years after radioactive MIBG (metaiodobenzylguanidine) therapy. Failure of endoscopic or angiographic bleeding control led to urgent need to evaluate possible endocrine functional status, tumor curability, safety of incomplete resection, intra- and postoperative support needs, and anticipated recovery potential and postoperative function. Aside from these considerations, impact of tumor biology, alternative therapeutic options, current management guidelines, and ethical challenges of resource utilization for such complex palliative operative intervention were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS Based on the observed outcomes after an urgent presentation of an unusual tumor-related complication, palliation-intent therapy was justifiable even if significant treatment-related risks were expected and complex resources were required.

Quality measurement affecting surgical practice: Utility versus utopia.

The Triple Aim: improving healthcare quality, cost and patient experience has resulted in massive healthcare "quality" measurement. For many surgeons the origins, intent and strengths of this measurement barrage seems nebulous-though their shortcomings are noticeable. This article reviews the major organizations and programs (namely the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) driving the somewhat burdensome healthcare quality climate. The success of this top-down approach is mixed, and far from convincing. We contend that the current programs disproportionately reflect the definitions of quality from (and the interests of) the national payer perspective; rather than a more balanced representation of all stakeholders interests-most importantly, patients' beneficence. The result is an environment more like performance management than one of valid quality assessment. Suggestions for a more meaningful construction of surgical quality measurement are offered, as well as a strategy to describe surgical quality from all of the stakeholders' perspectives. Our hope is to entice surgeons to engage in institution level quality improvement initiatives that promise utility and are less utopian than what is currently present.