ABSTRACT
Cosmetic surgeries are very popular and glamorized by the mainstream media and celebrities. Many individuals perceive certain bodily features as appealing for physical attraction and will attempt to obtain these features by surgery. However, these surgeries are not without risk, and significant consequences can occur if not performed by qualified medical professionals under sterile procedures. The authors present novel cases of two healthy young female patients who underwent a Brazilian butt lift (BBL) procedure a week apart by the same plastic surgeon in Mexico and developed dark painful lesions secondary to Mycobacterium abscessus (M. abscessus), a multidrug-resistant non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM). The literature review shows a paucity of data concerning NTM infections via surgical procedures of this type. The first case was of a 31-year-old woman who underwent a BBL and presented with bilateral dark painful buttock lesions weeks later. The patient returned to the plastic surgeon, who drained some lesions and prescribed oral antibiotics. The patient's clinical status continued to deteriorate and presented to the hospital for further assessment. The patient was initially started on broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. The patient was found to have an HIV infection with a relatively preserved CD4 lymphocyte count and was started on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Intraoperative excisional tissue sample cultures grew M. abscessus. The patient was started on empiric tigecycline, cefoxitin, and linezolid. Preliminary culture susceptibilities showed resistance to linezolid. Linezolid was discontinued, amikacin was started, and cefoxitin and tigecycline were continued. Tigecycline, cefoxitin, and amikacin were continued and final susceptibilities showed sensitivity to the current treatment. The patient received a total of four months of treatment with tigecycline, cefoxitin, and amikacin. The second case was of a 28-year-old woman who underwent a BBL a week after the first patient by the same surgeon and developed multiple gluteal and body abscesses. The patient underwent bilateral thigh and gluteal, right chest wall, and breast surgical debridements with intraoperative cultures at a different hospital facility, which grew M. abscessus. Susceptibilities were not performed there. The patient was transferred to our facility for further care. Intraoperative cultures remained negative, and the patient was treated with a six-month course of tigecycline, cefoxitin, and amikacin.
ABSTRACT
In this study, the development and assessment of a modified, efficient, and cost-efficient protocol for mDNA (metagenomic DNA) extraction from contaminated water samples was attempted. The efficiency of the developed protocol was investigated in comparison to a well-established commercial kit (Epicentre, Metagenomic DNA Isolation Kit for Water). The comparison was in terms of degree of shearing, yield, purity, duration, suitability for polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing in addition to the quality of next-generation sequencing data. The DNA yield obtained from the developed protocol was 2.6 folds higher than that of the commercial kit. No significant difference in the alpha (Observed species, Chao1, Simpson and PD whole tree) and beta diversity was found between the DNA samples extracted by the commercial kit and the developed protocol. The number of high-quality sequences of the samples extracted by the developed method was 20% higher than those obtained by the samples processed by the kit. The developed economic protocol successfully yielded high-quality pure mDNA compatible with complex molecular applications. Thus we propose the developed protocol as a gold standard for future metagenomic studies investigating a large number of samples.
Subject(s)
Analytic Sample Preparation Methods/methods , Bacteria/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Fresh Water/microbiology , Metagenomics/economics , Metagenomics/methods , Analytic Sample Preparation Methods/economics , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Fresh Water/chemistry , Phylogeny , Sequence Analysis, DNAABSTRACT
In this study, the development and assessment of a modified, efficient, and cost-efficient protocol for mDNA (metagenomic DNA) extraction from contaminated water samples was attempted. The efficiency of the developed protocol was investigated in comparison to a well-established commercial kit (Epicentre, Metagenomic DNA Isolation Kit for Water). The comparison was in terms of degree of shearing, yield, purity, duration, suitability for polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing in addition to the quality of next-generation sequencing data. The DNA yield obtained from the developed protocol was 2.6 folds higher than that of the commercial kit. No significant difference in the alpha (Observed species, Chao1, Simpson and PD whole tree) and beta diversity was found between the DNA samples extracted by the commercial kit and the developed protocol. The number of high-quality sequences of the samples extracted by the developed method was 20% higher than those obtained by the samples processed by the kit. The developed economic protocol successfully yielded high-quality pure mDNA compatible with complex molecular applications. Thus we propose the developed protocol as a gold standard for future metagenomic studies investigating a large number of samples.(AU)
ABSTRACT
Abstract In this study, the development and assessment of a modified, efficient, and cost-efficient protocol for mDNA (metagenomic DNA) extraction from contaminated water samples was attempted. The efficiency of the developed protocol was investigated in comparison to a well-established commercial kit (Epicentre, Metagenomic DNA Isolation Kit for Water). The comparison was in terms of degree of shearing, yield, purity, duration, suitability for polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing in addition to the quality of next-generation sequencing data. The DNA yield obtained from the developed protocol was 2.6 folds higher than that of the commercial kit. No significant difference in the alpha (Observed species, Chao1, Simpson and PD whole tree) and beta diversity was found between the DNA samples extracted by the commercial kit and the developed protocol. The number of high-quality sequences of the samples extracted by the developed method was 20% higher than those obtained by the samples processed by the kit. The developed economic protocol successfully yielded high-quality pure mDNA compatible with complex molecular applications. Thus we propose the developed protocol as a gold standard for future metagenomic studies investigating a large number of samples.
ABSTRACT
Abstract In this study, the development and assessment of a modified, efficient, and cost-efficient protocol for mDNA (metagenomic DNA) extraction from contaminated water samples was attempted. The efficiency of the developed protocol was investigated in comparison to a well-established commercial kit (Epicentre, Metagenomic DNA Isolation Kit for Water). The comparison was in terms of degree of shearing, yield, purity, duration, suitability for polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing in addition to the quality of next-generation sequencing data. The DNA yield obtained from the developed protocol was 2.6 folds higher than that of the commercial kit. No significant difference in the alpha (Observed species, Chao1, Simpson and PD whole tree) and beta diversity was found between the DNA samples extracted by the commercial kit and the developed protocol. The number of high-quality sequences of the samples extracted by the developed method was 20% higher than those obtained by the samples processed by the kit. The developed economic protocol successfully yielded high-quality pure mDNA compatible with complex molecular applications. Thus we propose the developed protocol as a gold standard for future metagenomic studies investigating a large number of samples.