Right ventrolateral and left dorsolateral 10 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar I and II depression: a double-blind, randomised, three-arm, sham-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the clinical importance of bipolar depression (BDE), effective treatment options are still limited. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven of moderate efficacy in major depression, but the evidence remains inconclusive for BDE. METHODS: A 4-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled study (trial ID ISRCTN77188420) explored the benefits of 10 Hz MRI-guided right ventrolateral (RVL) rTMS and left dorsolateral (LDL) rTMS as add-on treatments for BDE. Outcome measures included changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, self-assessment, response and remission rates, and side effects. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to study groups, and forty-six completed the double-blind phase. The mean change from baseline to Week 4 in MADRS was greater in both active groups compared to the sham, yet differences did not achieve significance (RVL vs sham: -4.50, 95%CI -10.63 to 1.64, p = 0.3; LDL vs sham: -4.07, 95%CI -10.24 to 2.10, p = 0.4). None of the other outcome measures yielded significant results. CONCLUSIONS: While not demonstrating the superiority of either 10 Hz rTMS over sham, with the limited sample size, we can not rule out a moderate yet clinically meaningful effect. Further well-powered studies are essential to elucidate the role of rTMS in managing BDE.

Neurostimulation Methods in the Treatment of Depression: A Comparison of rTMS, tDCS, and Venlafaxine Using a Pooled Analysis of Two Studies.

BACKGROUND: There are no head-to-head studies comparing the antidepressant effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). This pooled analysis compared indirectly the antidepressant efficacy and acceptability of rTMS, tDCS, and the antidepressant venlafaxine (VNF) extended-release. METHODS: The analysis (n=117, both patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and non-TRD were included) examined pooled data from two 4-week, single-centered, two-armed, double-blind, randomized studies (EUDRACT n. 2005-000826-22 and EUDRACT n. 2015-001639-19). The antidepressant efficacy of right-sided low-frequency rTMS (n=29) vs VNF (n=31) and left-sided anodal tDCS (n=29) vs VNF (n=28) was evaluated. The primary outcome was a change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to the treatment endpoint at week 4. The response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in the MADRS score and remission as the MADRS score ≤10 points, both were calculated for the primary treatment endpoint at week 4. RESULTS: Mean change in total MADRS scores from baseline to week 4 was 7.0 (95% CI, 4.8-9.1) points in the rTMS group, 7.6 (95% CI, 5.5-9.8) in the tDCS group, and 8.9 (95% CI, 7.4-10.4) among patients in the VNF group, a non-significant difference (F(2111)=0.62, p=0.54). Similarly, neither the response rates nor remission rates for rTMS (response 31%; remission 17%), tDCS (24%, 17%), or VNF (41%; 27%) significantly differed among treatment groups (χ 2=2.59, p=0.28; χ 2=1.66, p=0.44). Twenty patients (17%) dropped out of the studies in a similar proportion across groups (rTMS 3/29, tDCS 6/29, VNF 11/59, χ 2=1.41, p=0.52). CONCLUSION: Our current analysis found a comparable efficacy and acceptability in all three treatment modalities (rTMS, tDCS, and VNF) and clinical relevance for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.

Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Modulates Cortical Excitability But not Pain Perception.

Over the past decade, theta-burst stimulation (TBS) has become a focus of interest in neurostimulatory research. Compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), TBS produces more robust changes in cortical excitability (CE). There is also some evidence of an analgesic effect of the method. Previously published studies have suggested that different TBS parameters elicit opposite effects of TBS on CE. While intermittent TBS (iTBS) facilitates CE, continuous TBS (cTBS) attenuates it. However, prolonged TBS (pTBS) with twice the number of stimuli produces the opposite effect. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study with healthy subjects (n = 24), we investigated the effects of various pTBS (cTBS, iTBS, and placebo TBS) over the right motor cortex on CE and pain perception. Changes in resting motor thresholds (RMTs) and absolute motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed before and at two time-points (0-5 min; 40-45 min) after pTBS. Tactile and thermal pain thresholds were measured before and 5 min after application. Compared to the placebo, prolonged cTBS (pcTBS) transiently increased MEP amplitudes, while no significant changes were found after prolonged iTBS. However, the facilitation of CE after pcTBS did not induce a parallel analgesic effect. We confirmed that pcTBS with twice the duration converts the conventional inhibitory effect into a facilitatory one. Despite the short-term boost of CE following pcTBS, a corresponding analgesic effect was not demonstrated. Therefore, the results indicate a more complex regulation of pain, which cannot be explained entirely by the modulation of excitability.

Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) Versus Venlafaxine ER In The Treatment Of Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center Study With Open-Label, Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), a relatively new neuromodulation approach, provides some evidence of an antidepressant effect. This randomized, 4-week, double-blind study with 8-week, open-label, follow-up compared the efficacy and tolerability of left anodal tDCS with venlafaxine ER (VNF) in the treatment of depression and prevention of early relapse. METHODS: Subjects (n = 57) received tDCS (2 mA, 20 sessions, 30 mins) plus placebo (n = 29) or VNF plus sham tDCS (n = 28). Responders to both interventions entered the open-label follow-up. The primary outcome was score change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at week 4 of the study. Secondary outcomes were response, remission, dropout rates and relapse rates within the follow-up.The mean change in the MADRS score from baseline to week for patients treated with tDCS was 7.69 (95% CI, 5.09-10.29) points and 9.64 (95% CI, 6.20-13.09) points for patients from the VNF group, a nonsignificant difference (1.95, 95% CI -2.25-6.16; t (55) = 0.93, p= 0.36, Cohen´s d = 0.24). There were no significant between-group differences in the MADRS scores from baseline to endpoint (intention-to-treat analysis). The response/remission rate for tDCS (24%/17%) and VNF (43%/32%) as well as the dropout rate (tDCS/VNF; 6/6) did not differ significantly between groups. In the follow-up, relapse (tDCS/VNF; 1/2) and dropout (tDCS/VNF; 2/3) rates were low and comparable. LIMITATIONS: A relatively small sample size and short duration of the antidepressant treatment; no placebo arm. CONCLUSION: Overall, this study found a similar efficacy of tDCS and VNF in the acute treatment of depression and prevention of early relapse. The real clinical usefulness of tDCS and its optimal parameters in the treatment of depression should be further validated.

How to reduce stigmatization of people with mental illness in medical education: READ intervention.

Stigmatization of people with mental illness in health care is a serious problem contributing to poor provision of health care and preventive medicine, it decreases their willingness to seek help and reduces quality of their life and life expectancy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the anti-stigma training READ on medical students during their psychiatric module. The training was held by a psychiatrist and a peer lecturer. This study is a part of the international project INDIGO. A total of 53 medical students participated in this study (32 in intervention group, 21 in control group). Participants completed questionnaire at baseline and at immediate follow-up. It contained scales measuring attitudes, knowledge, empathy and intergroup anxiety. The intervention group demonstrated reductions in stigma-related attitudes, improvements in mental illness knowledge and reductions in intergroup anxiety. At immediate follow-up the control group demonstrated improvements in mental illness knowledge and reductions in intergroup anxiety. Based on the results of this study common psychiatric module at the medical school (including theoretical and practical education) does not contribute to the sufficient reduction of stigma. The training READ with an involvement of peer lecturers appears to be a convenient instrument how to reduce stigmatization of people with mental illness at medical schools. The contact with people who are not in the acute state of the illness is crucial for destigmatization.

Early change of prefrontal theta cordance and occipital alpha asymmetry in the prediction of responses to antidepressants.

BACKGROUND: The study evaluated the effectiveness of EEG alpha 1, alpha 2 and theta power, along with prefrontal theta cordance (PFC), frontal and occipital alpha 1, alpha 2 asymmetry (FAA1/2, OAA1/2) at baseline and their changes at week 1 in predicting response to antidepressants. METHOD: Resting-state EEG data were recorded from 103 depressive patients that were treated in average for 5.1 ±â€¯0.9 weeks with SSRIs (n = 57) and SNRIs (n = 46). RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of patients (n = 56) responded to treatment (i.e.reduction of Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score ≥ 50%) and 45% (n = 47) of treated subjects did not reach positive treatment outcome. No differences in EEG baseline alpha and theta power or changes at week 1 for prefrontal, frontal, central, temporal and occipital regions were found between responders and non-responders. Both groups showed no differences at baseline PFC, FAA1/2 and OAA1/2 as well as change of FAA1/2 at week 1. The only parameters associated with treatment outcome were decrease of PFC in responders and increase of OAA1/2 at week 1 in non-responders. There was no influence of the used antidepressant classes on the results. The PFC change at week 1 (PFCC) (area under curve-AUC = 0.75) showed only a numerically higher predictive ability than OAA change in alpha 1 (OAA1C, AUC = 0.64)/alpha 2 (OAA2C, AUC = 0.63). A combined model, where OAA1C was added to PFCC (AUC = 0.79), did not significantly improve response prediction. CONCLUSION: Besides PFCC, we found that OAA1C/OAA2C might be another candidate for EEG predictors of antidepressant response.