Unravelling the clinical heterogeneity of undefined recurrent fever over time in the European registries on Autoinflammation.

BACKGROUND: Systemic autoinflammatory disorders (SAIDs) represent a growing spectrum of diseases characterized by dysregulation of the innate immune system. The most common pediatric autoinflammatory fever syndrome, Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, Adenitis (PFAPA), has well defined clinical diagnostic criteria, but there is a subset of patients who do not meet these criteria and are classified as undefined autoinflammatory diseases (uAID). This project, endorsed by PRES, supported by the EMERGE fellowship program, aimed to analyze the evolution of symptoms in recurrent fevers without molecular diagnosis in the context of undifferentiated AIDs, focusing on PFAPA and syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF), using data from European AID registries. METHODS: Data of patients with PFAPA, SURF and uSAID were collected from 3 registries including detailed epidemiological, demographic and clinical data, results of the genetic testing and additional laboratory investigations with retrospective application of the modified Marshall and PRINTO/Eurofever classification criteria on the cohort of PFAPA patients and preliminary SURF criteria on uSAID/SURF patients. RESULTS: Clinical presentation of PFAPA is variable and some patients did not fit the conventional PFAPA criteria and exhibit different symptoms. Some patients did not meet the criteria for either PFAPA or SURF, highlighting the heterogeneity within these groups. The study also explored potential overlaps between PFAPA and SURF/uAID, revealing that some patients exhibited symptoms characteristic of both conditions, emphasizing the need for more precise classification criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recurrent fevers without molecular diagnoses represent a clinically heterogeneous group. Improved classification criteria are needed for both PFAPA and SURF/uAID to accurately identify and manage these patients, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.

[Protocols in pediatric rheumatology (PROKIND): treat-to-target in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis]. / Protokolle in der Kinderrheumatologie (PROKIND): Treat-to-Target bei polyartikulärer juveniler idiopathischer Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the PROKIND protocols are improvement and harmonization of the diagnostics, monitoring, treatment decision and prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This article reports the results of a prospective treat-to-target observational study of patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) during the first year of treatment. Disease activity was assessed with the 10-joint juvenile arthritis disease activity score (JADAS-10), functional limitation with the childhood health assessment questionnaire disability index (CHAQ-DI) and with information on overall well-being, on pain, on fatigue and on global estimation of disease activity. RESULTS: Overall, 129 patients with polyarticular JIA (rheumatoid factor, RF, positive (+) polyarthritis n = 22, RF negative (-) polyarthritis n = 133 from 23 pediatric rheumatology institutions in Germany and Austria were recruited. Patients with initial treatment with methotrexate formed cohort 1, patients with additional repeated intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy formed cohort 2 and patients with concomitant intra-articular corticosteroid administration in at least 5 joints formed cohort 3. The mean JADAS10 showed a decrease in disease activity from 16.4 ± 6.1 to 2.8 ± 3.6 and the decrease in the CHAQ-DI from 1.0 ± 0.8 to 0.3 ± 0.5 showed the improvement in functional capacity. Similarly, improvements in quality of life, pain and fatigue were demonstrable. A JADAS inactive disease was achieved by 18.1% at month 3, 47.7% at month 6 and 66.7% at month 12. In cohort 1 a JADAS remission was achieved by 72.4%, by 50% in cohort 2 and by 69.2% in cohort 3. An escalation to treatment with biologics was necessary in 38% of patients in cohort 1, 60% in cohort 2 and 46% in cohort 3. CONCLUSION: Using a treat-to-target approach a dramatic improvement in disease activity, functional capacity and quality of life in polyarticular JIA could be achieved. Even after 12 months an inactive disease was achieved in the majority of cases.

Outcome of children with oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis compared to polyarthritis on methotrexate- data of the German BIKER registry.

BACKGROUND: Oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (oligoJIA) is the most commonly diagnosed category of chronic arthritis in children. Nevertheless, there are no evidence- based guidelines for its treatment, in particular for the use of methotrexate (MTX). The primary objective of this analysis is to evaluate the outcomes in patients with persistent oligoJIA compared to those with extended oligoJIA and rheumatoid factor (RF) negative polyarthritis treated with methotrexate. METHODS: Patients with persistent or extended oligoJIA or RF negative PA recorded in the Biologics in Pediatric Rheumatology Registry (BiKeR), receiving methotrexate for the first time were included in the analyses. Efficacy was determined using the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (JADAS 10). Safety assessment included the documentation of adverse and serious adverse events. RESULTS: From 2005 through 2011, 1056 patients were included: 370 patients with persistent oligoJIA, 221 patients with extended oligoJIA and 467 patients with RF negative PA. Therapeutic efficacy was observed following the start of methotrexate. Over a period of 24 months JADAS-minimal disease activity (JADAS ≤2) was reached in 44% of patients with persistent oligoJIA, 38% with extended oligoJIA, 46% with RF negative PA, JADAS-remission defined as JADAS ≤1 was reached in 33% of patients with persistent oligoJIA, 29% with extended oligoJIA and 35% (RF negative PA). Patients with extended oligoJIA achieved JADAS remission significantly later and received additional biologic disease-modifying drugs significantly more often than patients with persistent oligoJIA or RF negative PA (p < 0.001). Tolerability was comparable. New onset uveitis occurred in 0.3 to 2.2 per 100 patient years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistent oligoJIA taking methotrexate are at least as likely to enter remission as patients with extended oligo JIA or polyarticular JIA. Patients with extended oligoJIA achieved JADAS remission significantly later. Within 2 years, almost half of the patients with persistent oligoJIA achieved JADAS-minimal disease activity.

Safety and efficacy of anakinra as first-line or second-line therapy for systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis - data from the German BIKER registry.

Background: The IL-1 receptor-antagonist anakinra is recommended for the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and was recently approved for first-line treatment. Long-term data from clinical practise are scarce. Methods: SJIA patients from the German biologics in pediatric rheumatology (BIKER) registry starting anakinra were grouped into two cohorts: Patients in the first-line cohort received no prior sJIA treatment except NSAID and a maximum of 3 days of steroids. Second-line cohort patients were pre-treated with steroids; DMARDs or biologics. Patient characteristics, disease-activity parameters, efficacy, and safety-parameters were compared. Results: Until December 2018, 51 anakinra patients were documented, representing 117.96 patient-years. Mean disease duration was 3.5 (± 3.8) years. At baseline, all anakinra first-line users had active systemic disease compared to 82% in the second-line users. Significant JADAS-10 improvement at last follow-up was observed in both cohorts (p = 0.02, p = 0.0014). Substantial numbers of patients in both groups reached JADAS-MDA/JADAS-remission/inactive disease (66.7%50%50% in first-liners and 60%45%70% in second-liners). Rates of serious adverse events were comparable and consistent with the overall AE profile of anakinra in patients. Conclusion: This analysis adds to the established safety profile of anakinra and demonstrates that anakinra is effective as first-line or second-line treatment.

Comparison of adverse events of biologicals for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review.

Objectives: Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis has changed rapidly since the introduction of various biologics almost twenty years ago. Many clinical trials have been performed to monitor efficacy and safety of new agents. The aim of this review is to summarize safety concerns, which were observed during prospective clinical trials. Methods: Since etanercept was the first biologic approved and remains the most frequently used, as first biologic in polyarticular JIA patients, the authors calculated the relative risk of the adverse events for all examined biologicals and compared the values with the value of etanercept. Results: Relative rates for all adverse events showed similar rates for etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, and tocilizumab, whereas adalimumab showed higher rates and abatacept lower rates. Comparison of rates for serious adverse events demonstrated, that rates seemed comparable for etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, and tocilizumab. Again, abatacept showed a lower rate, whereas golimumab seems to have a higher relative risk for serious adverse events. Rate of infection was lowest in patients treated with abatacept or tocilizumab, patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab and Infliximab again had similar rates. Conclusion: The safety profiles of actually approved biologics are highly acceptable. However, further observation, especially long-term observation through registry studies, is required.

Update of the evidence based, interdisciplinary guideline for anti-inflammatory treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIAU) is frequently associated with the development of complications and visual loss. Topical corticosteroids are the first line therapy, and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are commonly used. However, treatment has not been standardized. METHODS: Interdisciplinary guideline were developed with representatives from the German Ophthalmological Society, Society for Paediatric Rheumatology, Professional Association of Ophthalmologists, German Society for Rheumatology, parents' group, moderated by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany. A systematic literature analysis in MEDLINE was performed, evidence and recommendations were graded, an algorithm for anti-inflammatory treatment and final statements were discussed in a consensus meeting (Nominal Group Technique), a preliminary draft was fine-tuned and discussed thereafter by all participants (Delphi procedure). RESULTS: Consensus was reached on recommendations, including a standardized treatment strategy according to uveitis severity in the individual patient. Thus, methotrexate shall be introduced for uveitis not responding to low-dose (≤ 2 applications/day) topical corticosteroids, and a TNFalpha antibody (preferably adalimumab) used, if uveitis inactivity is not achieved. In very severe active uveitis with uveitis-related deterioration of vision, systemic corticosteroids should be considered for bridging until DMARDs take effect. If TNFalpha antibodies fail to take effect or lose effect, another biological should be selected (tocilizumab, abatacept or rituximab). De-escalation of DMARDs should be preceded by a period of  ≥ 2 years of uveitis inactivity. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary, evidence-based treatment guideline for JIAU is presented.

Adalimumab versus adalimumab and methotrexate for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: long-term data from the German BIKER registry.

OBJECTIVE: Adalimumab (ADA) has become a valuable treatment option for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The importance of combination with methotrexate (MTX) is unclear. METHOD: Data from the German Biologics in Paediatric Rheumatology (BIKER) registry are reported. Response to treatment was analysed using JIA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) scores, 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS10), and improvement of functional status and ACR inactive disease criteria. Compa-risons between rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) provided data for the safety assessment. RESULTS: Overall, 584 patients with non-systemic JIA started ADA therapy, 61% of whom received concomitant MTX treatment at baseline. The latter patients were younger (p < 0.001), with shorter disease duration (p = 0.001), more frequently had antinuclear antibodies (p = 0.04), and had higher baseline JADAS10 scores (p = 0.03). In patients with ADA monotherapy, enthesitis-related arthritis (p = 0.004) and presence of human leucocyte antigen-B27 (p = 0.008) were documented more often. Mean treatment duration in both cohorts was 15 months. Comparable last follow-up rates for JIA ACR 30/50/70/90% response, JADAS minimal disease activity, JADAS remission, and ACR inactive disease were, respectively, 75/72/64/49%, 66%, 46%, and 58% for ADA monotherapy, and 77/72/61/45%, 64%, 48%, and 55%, for ADA + MTX. During 1082 patient-years (PY) of ADA exposure, 725 AEs (67/100 PY), including 57 SAEs (5.3/100 PY), were reported. Serious infections were reported in 10 patients (0.9/100 PY) and 11 (1.0/100 PY) had varicella infections/zoster reactivation. Rates of AEs, SAEs, infectious events, and serious infections did not differ between the cohorts. Elevated transaminases (p = 0.005) and gastrointestinal events (p < 0.0001) were reported more often in the combination cohort. Two pregnancies and no deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: ADA demonstrated an acceptable risk profile and high percentages of patients in both cohorts showed sufficient treatment response. No differences in treatment response or adherence to treatment were found.

[Transition in pediatric rheumatology-experiences from the pediatric rheumatism center Sankt Augustin]. / Transition in der Kinderrheumatologie ­ Erfahrungen aus dem Kinderrheumazentrum Sankt Augustin.

BACKGROUND: Transition is a joint effort of the young patients, their families and the attending pediatric and adult rheumatologists. The quality of the transitional process for patients with rheumatic diseases was retrospectively reviewed using a standardized questionnaire. Patients were transferred to rheumatologists for adult care through personal contact, if possible. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of chronic inflammatory rheumatic joint disease or systemic rheumatic disease, duration of care for >2 years in the pediatric rheumatology center and ≥2 presentations at the age of 17-18 years. A telephone interview was performed using a standardized questionnaire on the type of care, medication, diagnosis, satisfaction with the care and the transition process. RESULTS: Of the 62 enrolled patients 50 (81%) had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In total, 40 patients (65%) were seen by an adult rheumatologist on a regular basis. Reasons for discontinuation of medical care were mainly freedom of symptoms, lack of time and non-compliance. Before and after transition, 15 and 9 patients, respectively were treated with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and 27 and 27, respectively with biologics. The subjective assessment of medical care in pediatric rheumatology was (mean ± SD) 9.3 ± 1.05, in adult rheumatology 7.6 ± 1.1 and the satisfaction with the transition process was 7.7 ± 2.1. Problem issues mentioned by some patients were lack of time with the rheumatologist and long waiting periods for appointments. DISCUSSION: Individual transfer of patients from pediatric to adult rheumatology care was associated with a high degree of satisfaction in this analysis. Change of diagnosis or an unexpected termination of rheumatology treatment was not detected.

IL-6 blockade in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis - achievement of inactive disease and remission (data from the German AID-registry).

BACKGROUND: Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a complex disease with an autoinflammatory component of unknown etiology related to the innate immune system. A major role in the pathogenesis has been ascribed to proinflammatory cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6), and effective drugs inhibiting their signaling are being developed. This study evaluates sJIA patients treated with the IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab (TCZ) concerning clinical response rate, disease course and adverse effects in a real-life clinical setting. METHODS: In 2009 a clinical and research consortium was established, including an online registry for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) ( https://aid-register.de ). Data for this retrospective TCZ study were documented by 13 centers. RESULTS: From 7/2009 to 4/2014, 200 patients with sJIA were recorded in the AID-registry. Out of these, 46 (19 m, 27 f, age 1-18 years) received therapy with TCZ. Long term treatment (median 23 months) has been documented in 24/46 patients who were evaluated according to Wallace criteria (active disease 6/24, inactive disease 5/24, remission 13/24 cases). Under observation co-medication were used in 40/46 cases. Adverse events were reported in 11/46 patients. The clinical response rate (no clinical manifestation, no increased inflammation parameters) within the first 12 weeks of treatment was calculated to be 35%. CONCLUSION: Out of 200 sJIA children reported in the German AID-registry, 46 were treated with TCZ, showing a clinical response rate of 35% during the first 12 weeks, and inactive disease and/or remission under medication in 75% after one year. Adverse events were seen in 24% and severe adverse events in 4%. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The AID-Registry is funded by the BMBF (01GM08104, 01GM1112D, 01GM1512D).

[Myositis-specific antibodies associated with juvenile dermatomyositis]. / Myositisspezifische Antikörper bei juveniler Dermatomyositis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare autoimmune disease associated with typical skin changes and muscle weakness. Within the framework of the diagnostics, myositis-associated (MAA) and myositis-specific antibodies (MSA) can be detected. These are important for the assessment of the course of the disease and the prognosis. METHOD: In this study we searched for MAA and MSA by means of a line immunoassay in 12 currently supervised JDM patients in the Rheumatism Center Sankt Augustin. RESULTS: In 10 of the 12 patients a total of 15 myositis antibodies were detected where 3 patients each had Mi2, SRP or NXP2 antibodies, 2 had TIF-1γ antibodies and Jo1 or Mi2ß antibodies were found in 1 patient each. Of the patients two had additional PM-Scl antibodies. In the 10 patients with detected antibodies, a good phenotype-serotype correlation was found with deviation from the phenotypes described in the literature in only 3 patients. CONCLUSION: The frequent detection of certain antibodies and the good correlation with those phenotypes described in the literature, show that the determination of MSA is an important diagnostic tool to assess the course, complications and outcome and to initiate adequate therapy at an early stage.

Clinical and Molecular Phenotypes of Low-Penetrance Variants of NLRP3: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges.

OBJECTIVE: Cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS) result from gain-of-function mutations in the NLRP3 gene, which causes excessive release of interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and systemic inflammation. While pathogenetic NLRP3 variant phenotypes are well-characterized, low-penetrance NLRP3 variants represent a significant clinical challenge. The aims of this study were to determine the clinical phenotype, the in vitro biologic phenotype, and the effect of anti-IL-1 treatment in patients with low-penetrance NLRP3 variants. METHODS: A multicenter study of consecutive symptomatic patients with low-penetrance NLRP3 variants recruited from 7 centers between May 2012 and May 2013 was performed. The observed findings were transferred into a study database, from which they were extracted for analysis. Controls were patients with a known pathogenetic NLRP3 variant. Clinical presentation and CAPS markers of inflammation were captured. Functional assays of inflammasome activation, including caspase 1 activity, NF-κB release, cell death, and IL-1ß release, were performed. Treatment effects of IL-1 were determined. Comparisons between low-penetrance and pathogenetic NLRP3 variants were performed. RESULTS: The study included 45 patients, 21 of which were female (47%); 26 of the patients (58%) were children. NLRP3 low-penetrance variants identified in the patients were Q703K (n = 19), R488K (n = 6), and V198M (n = 20). In the controls, 28 had pathogenetic NLRP3 variants. Patients with low-penetrance NLRP3 variants had significantly more fever (76%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (73%); eye disease, hearing loss, and renal involvement were less common. Functional inflammasome testing identified an intermediate phenotype in low-penetrance NLRP3 variants as compared to wild-type and pathogenetic NLRP3 variants. All treated patients responded to IL-1 inhibition, with complete response documented in 50% of patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with low-penetrance NLRP3 variants display a distinct clinical phenotype and an intermediate biologic phenotype, including IL-1ß and non-IL-1ß-mediated inflammatory pathway activation.

Safety and efficacy of etanercept and adalimumab in children aged 2 to 4 years with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

The TNF inhibitors etanercept (ETA) and adalimumab (ADA) are approved for treating patients older than 2 years with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Because long-term experience of treating children younger than 4 years is limited, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ETA or ADA in patients aged 2-4 years. This prospective, long-term, observational registry study documented baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, disease activity parameters, and safety of patients treated with ETA or ADA. Efficacy was determined using the JADAS-10, the JADAS criteria for minimal disease activity (MDA) and remission, and the PedACR response criteria after 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Between January 2001 and March 2015, 85 patients with polyarticular JIA aged 2-4 years started anti-TNF-α treatment. Seventy-four (54 girls) patients were treated with ETA and 11 (7 girls) with ADA. After 6/12/24 months of treatment, JADAS-MDA was reached by 55/58/58 % of ETA patients and 50/71/66 % of ADA patients. Furthermore, JADAS-Remission was achieved by 35/44/50 % of ETA patients and 16/28/66 % of ADA patients. PedACR 50/70/90 response was achieved by 64/54/41 % of ETA patients and 56/33/22 % of ADA patients at the last treatment observation. Discontinuation because of remission or inefficacy was recorded in 24 (29 %) and 28 (33 %) patients, respectively. Seventy-nine adverse events and four serious adverse events were reported. Administration of ETA and ADA in JIA patients younger than 4 years was efficacious, well tolerated, and safe. Patients younger than 4 years may show marked improvement following anti-TNF-alpha therapy.

[Autoinflammatory syndromes in childhood]. / Autoinflammatorische Syndrome im Kindesalter.

Systemic autoinflammatory diseases are a group of hereditary and non-hereditary diseases of the innate immune system, characterized by inflammation with no apparent cause, recurrence at irregular intervals and manifestation on the skin, mucous membranes, joints, bone, gastrointestinal tract, blood vessels and the central nervous system (CNS). Amyloidosis and other possibly severe long-term complications are important. Advances in genetics and molecular biology have improved understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases, including familial Mediterranean fever, mevalonate kinase deficiency syndrome, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome, cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome and improved others. The vast majority of these diseases are based on activation of the interleukin-1 (IL-1) pathway, so that inhibition of IL-1 provides a therapeutic option. Other syndromes are characterized by a granulomatous inflammation. Newer autoinflammatory diseases, such as chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature (CANDLE) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING)-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI) are, however, driven by interferons.

Incidence of herpes zoster infections in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients.

The risk of herpes zoster among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) exposed to biologics has not been evaluated. We determined incidence rates of herpes zoster among children with JIA in correlation with medication at time of occurrence and total drug exposure. The German biologics register database was used to identify patients with herpes zoster. Crude infection rates and incidence ratios (IRR) were compared to published rates. Demographics and overall exposure and particular exposure time to corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs and biologics were analyzed. The JIA cohort included 3,042 patients with 5,557.9 person-years of follow-up; 1,628 have used corticosteroids, 2,930 methotrexate and 1,685 etanercept. In total, 17 herpes zoster events have been documented [6/1,000 patients (3.5-9.0); 3.1/1,000 patient-years (1.9-4.9)]. Thus, the incidence rate in JIA patients was higher than expected [IRR 2.9 (1.8-4.5), p < 0.001]. In all patients, the event resolved completely. There were two complications, one patient developed intercostal neuralgia, and one had a recurrent herpes zoster. Compared to the healthy population, a significant higher IRR is observed in JIA patients who received a monotherapy with etanercept or in combination with steroids and methotrexate, but not in JIA patients exposed to methotrexate without biologics. In comparison with our control group of patients treated with methotrexate, the IRR was higher for exposure to etanercept monotherapy and combination of etanercept and corticosteroids irrespective of methotrexate use. A generally higher incidence rate in JIA patients treated with etanercept was observed. No serious or refractory manifestations occurred.

Safety and efficacy of etanercept in children with the JIA categories extended oligoarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriasis arthritis.

The approval of etanercept for the treatment of the juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) categories extended oligoarthritis (ExtOA), enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and psoriasis arthritis (PsA) was recently added to the approval for the treatment of polyarticular-course JIA (PA). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etanercept in a large number of patients with the additional JIA categories. The Biologika in der Kinderrheumatologie (BIKER) registry documents baseline demographics, clinical characteristics and disease activity parameters. Efficacy was determined using the PedACR 30/50/70 response criteria and the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS)-10. Safety assessments were based on adverse events' reports. Until December 2012, a total of 1,678 JIA patients, incorporating 238 ERA, 315 ExtOA and 127 PsA patients were included. JADAS-10 demonstrated marked improvement compared to baseline after 3 to 24 months in ExtOA [16.1 ± 7.6 (baseline), 5.1 ± 5.2 (3 months), 3.0 ± 3.5 (24 months)]; ERA (15.3 ± 7.2, 4.4 ± 4.7, 4.0 ± 4.9) and PsA (14.7 ± 6.4, 5.0 ± 4.6, 5.3 ± 6.4). Compared to patients with PA, the rate of serious adverse events [relative risk (RR) 1.39 (0.95-2.03, p = 0.08)] and nonserious [1.18 (1.02-1.35; p = 0.03)] adverse events were elevated. The rate of uveitis flares was significantly higher in PsA (3.3/100 patient-years), ExtOA (2.8/100 patient-years) and ERA (2.7/100 patient-years) than in rheumatoid factor (RF)-negative polyarticular JIA (1.3/100 pat.yrs) or RF-positive polyarticular JIA (0.27/100 patient-years). Reports on chronic inflammatory bowel disease were numerically more frequent in ExtOA, ERA and PsA. Administration of etanercept in patients with the JIA categories ExtOA, ERA and PsA is safe and very efficacious in children. Attention should be paid to the occurrence of extraarticular autoimmunopathies.

Safety and efficacy of etanercept in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis below the age of 2 years.

Etanercept is approved for the treatment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) above the age of 2 years. Experience with younger children is limited. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with etanercept in children with JIA younger than 2 years. The prospective long-term observational BIKER registry documents baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, disease activity parameters and safety issues. Efficacy was determined using the PedACR response criteria, the JADAS-10 and the proposed criteria for inactive disease and remission after 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Safety assessments were based on adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAEs) reports. Between January 2001 and June 2013, a total of 13 patients including four patients with systemic JIA (sJIA), four patients with extended oligoarthritis, one patient with persistent oligoarthritis and four patients with RF negative polyarthritis were treated with etanercept. Eleven patients with follow-up assessments were analysed in our study. Prior to etanercept, all patients have been exposed to methotrexate. At last observation, 6/11 patients reached a PedACR 70 response. Two patients with sJIA and 1 with nonsystemic JIA achieved inactive disease. Tolerability was good in most of the patients. Eight AE and one SAE occurred. One patient with sJIA was affected by Hodgkin's disease 18 months after discontinuation of etanercept. New onset uveitis occurred in two patients. Reasons for discontinuation were inefficacy in three (2 sJIA), intolerance in two, remission in three (2 sJIA) and the parents' request in one patient. Etanercept seems to improve JIA patients younger than 2 years including some of the patients with sJIA. Attention should be paid to the development of malignancies and autoimmune disorders.

[Current news from the BIKER register]. / Aktuelles aus dem BIKER-Register.

Innovative developments in the pharmacotherapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and especially biologics allow the formulation of new therapeutic targets, such as the rapid induction of remission with shortening of the period of active disease and therefore preventing damage and disability. These new therapies also represent a challenge to the monitoring of drug safety, the pharmacovigilance. For this purpose the Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology has set up an early register to record achievements in treatment improvement and in addition to independently assess information on drug safety, acute tolerance and long-term safety.

[Therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in early adulthood with biologics: transition from pediatric to adult care]. / Biologikatherapie der juvenilen idiopathische Arthritis im jungen Erwachsenenalter: Übergang von der pädiatrischen in die Erwachsenenversorgung.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) need specialized care when they enter adulthood. An increasing number of these patients take biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at the time of transition. The biologic register BiKeR provides information about the health status and healthcare situation of JIA patients during childhood and adolescence and with their entrance into adulthood these patients are systematically transferred to JuMBO, the follow-up register for young adults with JIA treated with biologics and nonbiologic DMARDs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the healthcare situation of patients with JIA during transition from pediatric to adult care. METHODS: The current analyses included patients who were successfully transferred from the BiKeR to JuMBO registers. The DMARD treatment and patient-reported outcome (i.e. disease activity, pain and functional ability) were assessed at the last documentation in BikeR and at the first as well as the last documentation in JuMBO. RESULTS: During the transition period 1 in 10 JIA patients stopped DMARD therapy and 1 in 20 patients did not visit a physician for adults. Three-quarters of the adult JIA patients included in JuMBO (N = 811) reached adult rheumatology care. Adult rheumatologists usually continued therapy with biologics in these patients. Every second patient was still being treated with etanercept, 5 years after the start of the first treatment with biologics. Adult rheumatologists changed the biologic substance in every fourth patient, mainly because of treatment failure. In comparison to patients in regular adult rheumatology care, those who did not remain in specialized care had a higher discontinuation rate of biologics. Moreover, patients with sporadic use of medical care had a significantly poorer health status than those with a regular use of medical care at least every 6 months. CONCLUSION: The data show that there is a need for improving healthcare during the period of transition from pediatric to adult rheumatology.