Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Genet Mol Res ; 13(1): 386-95, 2014 Jan 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24535865

ABSTRACT

The full-length cDNA sequence of a novel expressed sequence tag (GenBank accession No. HQ184338) that was differentially expressed during Newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection in chickens was cloned from the chicken spleen by a rapid amplification of cDNA ends assay. This gene was further analyzed using bioinformatic methods and named grni. The full-length cDNA sequence was 1698 bp without introns, locating between 104,691,934 and 104,693,618 in galGal4 on chromosome 2. The open reading frame (ORF) contained 261 bp and encoded a deduced protein of 86 amino acid residues. Furthermore, the encoded protein contained two transmembrane regions without signal peptides, indicating that this protein is located in the mitochondrial membrane. Moreover, its homologous protein was not identified. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the dynamic mRNA expression of this gene in the spleen, thymus, bursa of Fabricius, and trachea of NDV-infected chickens. Results suggested that the gene was involved in the transcriptional response of chicken to NDV infection. To obtain a fusion protein and prepare rabbit anti-serum, the predicted ORF of this gene was expressed in Escherichia coli. The expression of this gene at the protein level was further confirmed in the spleen, thymus, and bursa of Fabricius of NDV-infected chickens using Western blot analysis. In conclusion, a novel protein-coding gene named grni was successfully cloned and identified in chickens. Furthermore, this gene was found to be involved in the response of chickens to NDV infection.


Subject(s)
Avian Proteins/genetics , Chickens/genetics , Open Reading Frames , Amino Acid Motifs , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Avian Proteins/chemistry , Avian Proteins/metabolism , Base Sequence , Cloning, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Data , Organ Specificity , Protein Structure, Tertiary , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism
2.
Fertil Steril ; 75(4): 744-8, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11287029

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether women who were administered the first injection of DMPA+E(2)C on day 7 of their menstrual cycle (delayed injection) exhibit the same degree of ovarian suppression as women who receive it on day 5 of their menstrual cycle. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Reproductive health clinics. PATIENT(S): Women aged between 18 and 38 years (inclusive) willing to use DMPA+E(2)C as their method of contraception. INTERVENTION(S): Participants received a DMPA+E(2)C injection on day 5 (control group, n = 41) or day 7 (delayed-injection group, n = 117) of their menstrual cycle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ovarian activity and follicular development determined by serial serum progesterone levels and vaginal ultrasound. RESULT(S): Participants who received DMPA+E(2)C on day 5 of their menstrual cycle (control group) exhibited no more than limited follicular growth (no follicle >16 mm). Of those women who received DMPA+E(2)C on day 7 of their menstrual cycle (delayed-injection group), 21 (18%) showed some follicular growth, of whom 4 (3%) ovulated. CONCLUSION(S): The first injection of DMPA+E(2)C given on day 7 of a menstrual cycle does not provide the same inhibition of ovarian activity as that observed when it is administered on day 5 of the menstrual cycle.


Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Estradiol/administration & dosage , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Ovary/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Delayed-Action Preparations , Estradiol/analogs & derivatives , Female , Humans , Menstrual Cycle , Ovarian Follicle/diagnostic imaging , Ovarian Follicle/drug effects , Ovarian Follicle/physiology , Ovary/diagnostic imaging , Ovary/drug effects , Ovulation/drug effects , Progesterone/blood , Ultrasonography
3.
Contraception ; 64(6): 363-8, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11834235

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to assess whether women who were administered the first injection of the once-a-month contraceptive containing estradiol cypionate and 25 mg depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA+E(2)C) on Day 7 of their menstrual cycle (delayed injection) exhibit the same degree of cervical mucus changes as women who receive it on Day 5 of their menstrual cycle. This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. A total of 158 women, aged between 18 and 38 years (inclusive), who, were willing to use MPA+E(2)C as their contraceptive method participated in the trial. Participants received a MPA+E(2)C injection on Day 5 (control group, n = 41) or Day 7 (delayed-injection group, n = 117) of their menstrual cycle. Participants who received MPA+E(2)C on Day 5 of their menstrual cycle (control group) exhibited fair or poor mucus quality and poor sperm penetration. Of those women who received MPA+E(2)C on Day 7 of their menstrual cycle (delayed-injection group), 3 (3%) showed good mucus or good sperm penetration at some time point during follow-up. It is possible to conclude that the first injection of MPA+E(2)C given on Day 7 of a menstrual cycle does not provide the same degree of inhibition of mucus quality and sperm penetration as that observed if it is administered on Day 5. However, the theoretical risk of pregnancy after receiving MPA+E(2)C on Day 7 would be expected to be low.


Subject(s)
Cervix Mucus/drug effects , Contraceptive Agents, Female/pharmacology , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/pharmacology , Estradiol/pharmacology , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/pharmacology , Adult , Cervix Mucus/physiology , Delayed-Action Preparations/pharmacology , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Estradiol/analogs & derivatives , Estradiol/blood , Female , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Ovary/drug effects , Ovary/physiology , Sperm-Ovum Interactions/drug effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL