Overall survival analysis of patients enrolled in a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib and erlotinib for previously treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma (WJOG5108LFS).

BACKGROUND: Since the overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in the first clinical phase III trial (WJOG5108L) was not recorded owing to time constraints, the present study (WJOG5108LFS) with a longer follow-up (66.6 months) aimed to compare OS of those treated with erlotinib (ER) and gefitinib (GE) for lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. METHODS: Among 536 enrolled patients, 362 (67.5%) were EGFR mutation-positive, including 182 in the ER arm and 180 in the GE arm. Median survival time (MST) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. OS and PFS were determined for patients with EGFR mutation. RESULTS: MSTs of ER (n = 182) and GE arms (n = 180) were 31.97 and 27.98 months, respectively (P = 0.3573, hazard ratio = 1.116). MSTs of exon 19 mutation patients in ER (n = 99) and GE arms (n = 89) were 37.49 and 28.91 months, respectively (P = 0.3791). MSTs of L858 mutation patients in ER (n = 82) and GE arms (n = 89) were 22.98 and 27.79 months, respectively (P = 0.7836). In patients with brain metastasis harboring mutation, response rates were 32.8% and 22.2% (P = 0.160), MSTs were 23.46 and 23.89 months (P = 0.7410), and PFS were 9.49 and 6.98 months (P = 0.1481) in the ER (n = 67) and GE arms (n = 72), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in OS were observed between the ER and GE arms in all patients with EGFR mutation and those with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation.

Pre-Existing Interstitial Lung Abnormalities Are Independent Risk Factors for Interstitial Lung Disease during Durvalumab Treatment after Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Introduction/Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a life-threatening toxicity caused by these treatments; however, risk factors for the ILD have not yet been established. Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are computed tomography (CT) findings which manifest as minor interstitial shadows. We aimed to investigate whether ILAs could be risk factors for grade-two or higher ILD during durvalumab therapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with NSCLC who received durvalumab after CRT from July 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. We obtained patient characteristics, laboratory data, radiotherapeutic parameters, and chest CT findings before durvalumab therapy. Results: A total of 148 patients were enrolled. The prevalence of ILAs before durvalumab treatment was 37.8%. Among 148 patients, 63.5% developed ILD during durvalumab therapy. The proportion of patients with grade-two or higher ILD was 33.8%. The univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age, high dose-volume histogram parameters, and the presence of ILAs were significant risk factors for grade-two or higher ILD. The multivariate analysis showed that ILAs were independent risk factors for grade-two or higher ILD (odds ratio, 3.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.69−7.72; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We showed that pre-existing ILAs are risk factors for ILD during durvalumab treatment after CRT. We should pay attention to the development of grade-two or higher ILD during durvalumab treatment in patients with ILAs.

Clinical value of cancer-associated myositis-specific antibodies, anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1-γ, and anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 antibodies in a retrospective cohort of dermatomyositis/polymyositis in a Japanese community hospital.

Among the myositis-specific antibodies (MSA), anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1 (TIF1)-γ and anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP2) antibodies are reportedly associated with cancer-associated myositis (CAM). We aimed to investigate patient characteristics of CAM and the clinical role of cancer-associated MSA (caMSA) in a retrospective cohort from a city hospital. All patients visiting our department between April 2014 and October 2021 with newly diagnosed dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis were included. Anti-TIF1-γ and anti-NXP2 antibodies were collectively considered as caMSA. First, we compared clinical characteristics in CAM, defined as cases showing onset or recurrence of malignancy within 5 years, versus non-CAM. Second, we investigated independent risk factors for CAM. Third, we compared clinical characteristics with and without caMSA within CAM. Finally, we investigated whether caMSA was predictive of poor prognosis. The cohort of 39 patients included 12 (30.7%) CAM cases. Compared with non-CAM, CAM had significantly more dermatomyositis and higher frequencies of dysphagia, anti-TIF1-γ antibody, and caMSA. Using logistic regression analysis, caMSA was an independent risk factor for CAM. In a comparison between caMSA and non-caMSA within CAM, caMSA was associated with higher frequencies of stage ≥ II. However, caMSA did not necessarily indicate a poor prognosis. Only caMSA represented an independent risk factor for CAM and showed a significant association with advanced cancer. Key Points • Cancer-associated MSA was an independent risk factor for cancer-associated myositis. • Cancer-associated MSA was associated with advanced cancer.

Randomized Phase III Study of Gefitinib Versus Cisplatin Plus Vinorelbine for Patients With Resected Stage II-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutation (IMPACT).

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of gefitinib as an adjuvant therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IMPACT (WJOG6410L; University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000006252), a randomized, open-label, phase III study, included patients with completely resected pathologic stage II-III non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) during September 2011 to December 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib (250 mg once daily) for 24 months or cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; cis/vin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Overall, 234 patients were randomly assigned. Among 232 eligible patients (116 each; excluding two who withdrew consent), the median DFS was 35.9 and 25.1 months in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. However, Kaplan-Meier curves crossed around 4 years after surgery with no statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank P = .63; hazard ratio by stratified Cox proportional hazards model = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.28). Overall survival (OS) was also not different (stratified log-rank P = .89; hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.65), with the 5-year OS rates being 78.0% and 74.6% in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0 and three patients in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although adjuvant gefitinib appeared to prevent early relapse, it did not prolong DFS or OS. However, similar DFS and OS may justify adjuvant gefitinib in the selected patient subsets, especially those deemed ineligible for platinum-doublet adjuvant therapy; however, this was not a noninferiority trial.

Effect of Second-generation vs Third-generation Chemotherapy Regimens With Thoracic Radiotherapy on Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: 10-Year Follow-up of a WJTOG0105 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Insufficient data are available regarding the long-term outcomes and cumulative incidences of toxic effects that are associated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate survival and late toxic effects 10 years after patients were treated with curative CRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, phase 3 West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 0105 randomized clinical trial was conducted between September 2001 and September 2005 in Japan. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer with unresectable stage III disease were assessed for eligibility. Additional data were analyzed from January 2018 to December 2019. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 440 eligible patients were randomly assigned to groups as follows: A (control), 4 cycles of mitomycin/vindesine/cisplatin plus thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) of 60 Gy; B, weekly irinotecan/carboplatin for 6 weeks plus TRT of 60 Gy followed by 2 courses of irinotecan/carboplatin consolidation; or C, weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin for 6 weeks plus TRT of 60 Gy followed by 2 courses of paclitaxel/carboplatin consolidation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was 10-year survival probability after CRT. The secondary outcome was late toxic effects that occurred more than 90 days after initiating CRT. RESULTS: From September 2001 to September 2005, 440 patients (group A, n = 146 [33.2%; median (range) age, 63 (31-74) years; 18 women (12.3%)]; group B, n = 147 [33.4%; median (range) age, 63 (30-75) years; 22 women (15.0%)]; group C, n = 147 [33.4%; median (range) age, 63 (38-74) years; 19 women (12.9%)]) were enrolled. The median (range) follow-up was 11.9 (7.6-13.3) years. In groups A, B, and C, median (range) overall survival times were 20.5 (17.5-26.0), 19.8 (16.7-23.5), and 22.0 (18.7-26.2) months, respectively, and 10-year survival probabilities were 13.6%, 7.5%, and 15.2%, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall survival among treatment groups. The 10-year progression-free survival probabilities were 8.5%, 6.5%, and 11.1% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 late toxic effect rates were 3.4% (heart, 0.7%; lung, 2.7%) in group A, and those only affecting the lung represented 3.4% and 4.1% in groups B and C, respectively. No other cases of late toxic effects (grades 3/4) were observed since the initial report. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this 10-year follow-up of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, group C achieved similar efficacy and toxic effect profiles as group A 10 years after initiating treatment. These results serve as a historical control for the long-term comparisons of outcomes of future clinical trials of CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000030811.

Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and the Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the efficacy and survival outcomes of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the association between irAEs and the prognosis of patients with AGC treated with nivolumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2017 to November 2020, patients who had been diagnosed with advanced unresected gastric cancer and treated with nivolumab at our institution were included in this analysis. We compared the clinical and survival outcomes between the irAE and non-irAE groups. We also evaluated the factors associated with better survival in patients treated with nivolumab. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included in the present study, and irAEs were observed in 13 (25%). Among the patients with measurable lesions (n = 29), the disease control rates were significantly higher in the irAE group than in the non-irAE group (88 vs. 24%; P = 0.0033). At the 8- and 12-week landmark analyses, the median overall survival (OS) in the irAE group was significantly longer than that in the non-irAE group, whereas the median progression-free survival was comparable between the groups. A multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazard regression at the 8-week landmark revealed that the development of irAEs (hazard ratio 0.18; 95% confidence interval 0.0099-0.86) alone was positively associated with a longer OS. CONCLUSIONS: The development of irAEs might be associated with survival outcomes with nivolumab treatment in patients with AGC.

Site-Specific and Targeted Therapy Based on Molecular Profiling by Next-Generation Sequencing for Cancer of Unknown Primary Site: A Nonrandomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Although profiling of gene expression and gene alterations by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to predict the primary tumor site and guide molecularly targeted therapy might be expected to improve clinical outcomes for cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), to our knowledge, no clinical trial has previously evaluated this approach. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical use of site-specific treatment, including molecularly targeted therapy based on NGS results, for patients with CUP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at 19 institutions in Japan and enrolled 111 previously untreated patients with the unfavorable subset of CUP between March 2015 and January 2018, with 97 patients being included in the efficacy analysis. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of unfavorable CUP after mandatory examinations, including pathological evaluation by immunohistochemistry, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography scans, and a positron emission tomography scan. INTERVENTIONS: RNA and DNA sequencing for selected genes was performed simultaneously to evaluate gene expression and gene alterations, respectively. A newly established algorithm was applied to predict tumor origin based on these data. Patients received site-specific therapy, including molecularly targeted therapy, according to the predicted site and detected gene alterations. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was 1-year survival probability. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, safety, efficacy according to predicted site, and frequency of gene alterations. RESULTS: Of 97 participants, 49 (50.5%) were women and the median (range) age was 64 (21-81) years. The cancer types most commonly predicted were lung (21 [21%]), liver (15 [15%]), kidney (15 [15%]), and colorectal (12 [12%]) cancer. The most frequent gene alterations were in TP53 (45 [46.4%]), KRAS (19 [19.6%]), and CDKN2A (18 [18.6%]). The 1-year survival probability, median OS, and median PFS were 53.1% (95% CI, 42.6%-62.5%), 13.7 months (95% CI, 9.3-19.7 months), and 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.3-7.1 months), respectively. Targetable EGFR mutations in tumor specimens were detected in 5 patients with predicted non-small-cell lung cancer (5.2%), 4 of whom were treated with afatinib; 2 of these patients achieved a durable PFS of longer than 6 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study's findings suggest that site-specific treatment, including molecularly targeted therapy based on profiling gene expression and gene alterations by NGS, can contribute to treating patients with the unfavorable subset of CUP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Identifier: UMIN000016794.

A randomized phase 3 study of maintenance therapy with S-1 plus best supportive care versus best supportive care after induction therapy with carboplatin plus S-1 for advanced or relapsed squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (WJOG7512L).

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase 3 study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with S-1 after induction therapy with carboplatin plus S-1 in patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced or relapsed squamous NSCLC were treated with carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 on day 1 every 3 weeks) plus S-1 (40 mg/m2 twice per day on days 1-14 every 3 weeks) as induction therapy. Patients who did not progress after 4 cycles of induction therapy were randomized to receive either S-1 plus best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone. The primary objective of the study was to confirm the superiority of S-1 plus BSC in comparison with BSC alone with respect to progression-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 365 patients enrolled in the study, 347 participated in the induction phase, and 131 of these individuals were randomized to receive S-1 plus BSC (n = 67) or BSC alone (n = 64). The risk of disease progression was significantly lower for patients in the S-1 plus BSC arm than those in the BSC-alone arm (hazard ratio, 0.548; 95% confidence interval, 0.374-0.802; P = .0019). The most common toxicities during maintenance therapy with S-1 included anorexia, anemia, and fatigue, but most cases were not severe. CONCLUSIONS: Continued maintenance with S-1 plus BSC is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with advanced squamous NSCLC previously treated with carboplatin plus S-1.

Randomized Phase III Study of Continuation Maintenance Bevacizumab With or Without Pemetrexed in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: COMPASS (WJOG5610L).

PURPOSE: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been shown to benefit from maintenance therapy. COMPASS evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with or without pemetrexed as continuation maintenance therapy after carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab induction therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without confirmed EGFR 19 deletion or L858R mutation received first-line therapy with carboplatin area under the curve 6, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Patients without disease progression during the induction therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 for maintenance therapy with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) after random assignment. RESULTS: Between September 2010 and September 2015, 907 patients received induction therapy. Of those, 599 were randomly assigned: 298 received pemetrexed plus bevacizumab, and 301 received bevacizumab. The median OS was 23.3 v 19.6 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.05; 1-sided stratified log-rank P = .069). In the wild-type EGFR subset, the OS HR was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99; 1-sided unstratified log-rank P = .020). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 v 4.0 months (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.79; 2-sided log-rank P < .001). The safety data were consistent with previous reports of treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: In terms of the primary end point of OS, no statistically significant benefit was observed; however, PFS in the total patient population and OS in patients with wild-type EGFR was prolonged with the addition of pemetrexed to bevacizumab maintenance therapy.

Multicenter phase II study of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (JSWOG-C3 study).

BACKGROUND: Triweekly capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) was not a replacement for fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) because of the potential for greater toxicity. Recently, it has reported that mCAPIRI is well tolerated and non-inferior to FOLFIRI. In this study, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC with reduced toxicity and preserved efficacy. METHODS: Patients with mCRC who had received prior chemotherapy, including oxaliplatin-based regimens, were eligible for this study. The treatment protocol administered capecitabine at 1000 mg/m2 twice daily from the evening of day 1 to the morning of day 8, intravenous irinotecan at 150 mg/m2 on day 1, and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg on day 1 every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints for this study were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, response rate (RR), and disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.23-7.40 months], and median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.57-20.23 months). The RR was 14.6% (95% CI 6.5-28.4%), and the DCR was 66.7% (95% CI 51.5-79.2%). Hypertension was the most common Grade 3 adverse event (27.5%), followed by neutropenia (17.6%). Only two patients suffered from grade 3 hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: In mCRC patients, biweekly CAPIRI + bevacizumab appears effective and feasible as a second-line chemotherapy with relatively low toxicities, and has potential as a useful substitute for FOLFIRI + bevacizumab.

Carboplatin Plus Nab-paclitaxel in Performance Status 2 Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This phase I/II study aimed at assessing the efficacy of combination therapy with carboplatin (CBDCA) on day 1 and nab-paclitaxel (Nab-PTX) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle in performance status (PS) 2 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PS 2 patients with NSCLC were enrolled into a phase I study using a 3 + 3 design. Once the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was established, the patients were enrolled into phase II. RESULTS: Based on the phase I findings, the RP2D was determined as CBDCA area under the curve 6 mg/ml/min and Nab-PTX 100 mg/m2 In the phase II part, 27 patients were evaluable. The overall response rate was 44%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.2 months and 14.0 months, respectively. There was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: CBDCA plus Nab-PTX therapy is a promising treatment strategy for PS 2 patients with NSCLC.

A subanalysis of Japanese patients in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of nivolumab for patients with advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2).

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death-1 agent, showed survival benefits in Asian patients, including Japanese, with gastric/gastro-esophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. We report the analysis of the Japanese subpopulation from ATTRACTION-2 that evaluated nivolumab versus placebo in unresectable advanced or recurrent G/GEJ cancer after ≥ 2 chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: Data from the Japanese subpopulation in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial were analyzed (data cutoff, February 25, 2017). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Among the overall study population of 493 patients, 226 (nivolumab 152; placebo 74) were enrolled from 28 sites in Japan. In the Japanese subset, median OS was longer with nivolumab versus placebo (5.4 months, 95% CI 4.6-7.4 versus 3.6 months, 95% CI 2.8-5.0). The risk of death was lower in the nivolumab versus placebo group (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.78; p = 0.0002). Incidences of serious adverse events were 23% (35/152) and 25% (18/72) in the nivolumab and placebo groups, respectively. In the Japanese ITT population, 22% of nivolumab-treated and 28% of placebo-treated patients received prior ramucirumab treatment. Overall, clinical activity of nivolumab was observed regardless of prior ramucirumab use. In the nivolumab group, ORR and PFS were numerically higher in patients with prior ramucirumab use than in those without. CONCLUSIONS: In the Japanese subpopulation, patients receiving nivolumab had longer OS, similar to the overall population, with a manageable safety profile. The interaction between nivolumab and ramucirumab will be clarified in ongoing clinical trials.

ASP8273 tolerability and antitumor activity in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations occur in approximately 50% of East Asian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). ASP8273 is an irreversible EGFR-TKI, given orally, that inhibits EGFR activating mutations and has shown clinical activity in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI-naïve Japanese adult patients (≥20 years) with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations were enrolled in this open-label, single-arm, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02500927). Patients received ASP8273 300 mg once daily until discontinuation criteria were met. The primary end-point was to determine the safety of ASP8273 300 mg; the secondary end-point was antitumor activity defined by RECIST version 1.1. Thirty-one patients (12 men and 19 women; median age, 64 years [range, 31-82 years]) with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were enrolled; as of 23 February 2016, 25 patients (81%) were still on study. Of the 31 patients, 27 (87%) had an exon 19 deletion (n = 13, 42%) or an L858R (n = 14, 45%) EGFR activating mutation, and two (7%) had an L861Q mutation. Five patients (16%) had other EGFR activating mutations, two had an activating mutation and the T790M resistance mutation. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea (n = 24, 77%). All patients had at least one post-baseline scan; one patient (3%) achieved a confirmed complete response, 13 (42%) had a confirmed partial response, and 15 (48%) had confirmed stable disease (disease control rate, 94% [n = 29/31]) per investigator assessment. Once-daily ASP8273 at 300 mg was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity in TKI-naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Prevalence, Concomitance, and Distribution of Ossification of the Spinal Ligaments: Results of Whole Spine CT Scans in 1500 Japanese Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence, concomitance, and distribution of various types of ossification of the spinal ligaments in healthy subjects using computed tomography (CT). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CT has better diagnostic accuracy for ossification of the spinal ligaments compared to plain radiography. Currently there is no study that examines the prevalence of ossification of the spinal ligaments using whole spine CT scans. METHODS: One thousand five hundred Japanese patients (888 men and 612 women) who underwent positron emission tomography and CT (PETCT) in a private health check center between 2006 and 2013 were included. This PETCT was performed on self-paying participants as a preventive cancer screen. Existence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), ligamentum flavum (OLF), anterior longitudinal ligament (OALL), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), and nuchal ligament (ONL) was examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of spinal ligament ossifications was found to be 6.3% in cervical OPLL (8.3% in men and 3.4% in women), 23% in ONL (33% in men and 8.8% in women), 1.6% in thoracic OPLL (1.4% in men and 2.0% in women), 12% in thoracic OLF (15% in men and 7.7% in women), 37% in thoracolumbar OALL (45% in men and 26% in women), and 12% in DISH (16% in men and 6.2% in women). Thirteen percent of patients with cervical OPLL had thoracic OPLL, 34% of cervical OPLL had thoracic OLF, 45% of cervical OPLL had ONL, and 36% of cervical OPLL had DISH. The most common level was C5 for cervical OPLL, T1/2 for thoracic OPLL, T11 for thoracic OLF, and T8/9 for OALL. CONCLUSION: Accurate prevalence of various types of ossification of the spinal ligaments evaluated by CT was revealed. High concomitance was observed in each classification of spinal ligament ossification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gefitinib With Erlotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: WJOG 5108L.

PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase has been an important target for non-small-cell lung cancer. Several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved, and both gefitinib and erlotinib are the most well-known first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This randomized phase III study was conducted to investigate the difference between these two EGFR-TKIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or erlotinib. This study aimed to investigate the noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-one patients were randomly assigned, including 401 patients (71.7%) with EGFR mutation. All baseline factors (except performance status) were balanced between the arms. Median PFS and overall survival times for gefitinib and erlotinib were 6.5 and 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.125; 95% CI, 0.940 to 1.347; P = .257) and 22.8 and 24.5 months (HR, 1.038; 95% CI, 0.833 to 1.294; P = .768), respectively. The response rates for gefitinib and erlotinib were 45.9% and 44.1%, respectively. Median PFS times in EGFR mutation-positive patients receiving gefitinib versus erlotinib were 8.3 and 10.0 months, respectively (HR, 1.093; 95% CI, 0.879 to 1.358; P = .424). The primary grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rash (2.2% for gefitinib v 18.1% for erlotinib) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (6.1%/13.0% for gefitinib v 2.2%/3.3% for erlotinib). CONCLUSION: The study did not demonstrate noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib in terms of PFS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma according to the predefined criteria.

Nedaplatin plus docetaxel versus cisplatin plus docetaxel for advanced or relapsed squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (WJOG5208L): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of nedaplatin, a cisplatin derivative, and docetaxel showed promising activity for advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma in a previous phase 1-2 study. We compared nedaplatin plus docetaxel with cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with previously untreated advanced or relapsed squamous cell lung carcinoma to determine effects on overall survival. METHODS: We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study at 53 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included pathologically proven squamous cell lung cancer with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrence, age 20-74 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, no previous chemotherapy or recurrence more than a year after previous adjuvant chemotherapy, and adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to 100 mg/m(2) nedaplatin and 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel intravenously, or 80 mg/m(2) cisplatin and 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel, every 3 weeks for four to six cycles (at the treating oncologist's discretion). Randomisation was done centrally at the West Japan Oncology Group data centre via a computer-generated allocation sequence with dynamic minimisation that balanced stage (IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent), sex, and institution. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the modified intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients who were randomly assigned and met the inclusion criteria). Safety analyses were done in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study regimen. This trial is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000002015, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between July 6, 2009, and July 26, 2012, 355 patients were randomly assigned. 349 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (177 in the nedaplatin group and 172 in the cisplatin group). Overall survival was significantly longer in the nedaplatin group (median 13·6 months, 95% CI 11·6-15·6) than in the cisplatin group (11·4 months,10·2-12·2; hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·65-1·02; p=0·037, one-sided stratified log-rank test). Grade 3 or worse nausea (seven of 177 patients in the nedaplatin group and 25 of 175 in the cisplatin group), fatigue (six vs 20), hyponatraemia (24 vs 53), and hypokalaemia (four vs 15) were more frequent in the cisplatin group than in the nedaplatin group, whereas grade 3 or worse leucopenia (98 vs 77), neutropenia (146 vs 123), and thrombocytopenia (16 vs none) were more frequent in the nedaplatin group than in the cisplatin group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in four and three patients in nedaplatin and cisplatin groups, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Overall survival was significantly longer with nedaplatin plus docetaxel than with cisplatin plus docetaxel, and the regimens had different safety profiles. Nedaplatin plus docetaxel could be a new treatment option for advanced or relapsed squamous cell lung cancer. FUNDING: West Japan Oncology Group and Sanofi.

Randomized Phase II Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Long-term S-1 versus Cisplatin+S-1 in Completely Resected Stage II-IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 versus cisplatin (CDDP)+S-1 in patients with completely resected stage II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, and to identify predictive biomarkers whose expression in the tumors was significantly associated with patient outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 200 patients were randomly assigned to receive either S-1 (40 mg/m(2) twice per day) for 2 consecutive weeks repeated every 3 weeks for 1 year (S group) or CDDP (60 mg/m(2)) on day 1 plus oral S-1 (40 mg/m(2) twice per day) for 2 consecutive weeks repeated every 3 weeks for four cycles (CS group) within 8 weeks after surgery. The primary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS) at 2 years and identification of predictive biomarkers whose expressions have been reported to be associated with CDDP or fluoropyrimidine sensitivity. RESULTS: The RFS rate at 2 years was 65.6% (95% confidence intervals; CI, 55.3-74.0%) in the S group and 58.1% (95% CI, 47.7-67.2%) in the CS group. The only gene with interaction of P < 0.05 was uridine monophosphate synthase (UMPS; P = 0.0348). The benefit that members of the S group had over members of the CS group was higher expression of UMPS. In vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that overexpression of UMPS enhanced the antitumor effect of fluoropyrimidine. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy might be preferable to CDDP+S-1 for patients with completely resected NSCLC. UMPS expression may define a patient subset that would benefit from long-term postoperative S-1 monotherapy.

Randomized phase III trial comparing weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin versus docetaxel monotherapy every 3 weeks in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the intergroup trial JCOG0803/WJOG4307L.

PURPOSE: This phase III trial aimed to confirm the superiority of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin over docetaxel monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage III, stage IV, or recurrent NSCLC age ≥ 70 years with a performance status of 0 or 1 who were considered unsuitable for bolus cisplatin administration were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 3 weeks, or docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the first interim analysis, OS of the doublet arm was inferior to that of the monotherapy arm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.49), and the predictive probability that the doublet arm would be statistically superior to the monotherapy arm on final analysis was 0.996%, which led to early study termination. In total, 276 patients with a median age of 76 years (range, 70 to 87 years) were enrolled. At the updated analysis, the median survival time was 14.8 months for the monotherapy arm and 13.3 months for the doublet arm (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.69). The rates of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were higher in the monotherapy arm, and those of anorexia and hyponatremia were higher in the doublet arm. CONCLUSION: This study failed to demonstrate any survival advantage of weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin over docetaxel monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in elderly patients.

[Assessment of risk factors for adverse events due to pemetrexed in patients with reduced renal function].

Pemetrexedis a key drug in the first and second -line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. It exhibits an increased area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve, and it has a prolonged half -life when administered to patients with reduced renal function, resulting in a high frequency of neutropenia. Accordingly, pemetrexed is administered to these patients with caution. Herein, we retrospectively investigated the background characteristics of patients with a creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) of<45 mL/min, who experienced severe adverse events due to pemetrexed. Thirty-eight patients with a Ccr of <45 mL/min were administered pemetrexed. Of these patients, 13 (34%) developed severe adverse events (≥Grade 3) such as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that a Ccr of <30 mL/min (p= 0.033) and the concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p=0.012) were significant risk factors for adverse events. Therefore, whenever possible, pemetrexed administration should be avoided in patients with a Ccr of <30 mL/ min and in those receiving concomitant non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Analysis of risk factors for severe adverse events of chemotherapy with pemetrexed and comparison of adverse event occurrence according to renal function.

Various factors, including renal function and the combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, influence the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed. In this study, we aimed to determine the risk factors for severe adverse events associated with pemetrexed administration. We retrospectively examined the medical records of 82 patients who received pemetrexed. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that a creatinine clearance (CCr) of less than 45 mL/min and administration of pemetrexed as early-line treatment were significant risk factors. We then retrospectively compared the adverse events associated with pemetrexed between patients with normal renal function (CCr≥45 mL/min) and those with impaired renal function (CCr<45 mL/min). With regard to hematological toxicity, the frequency of occurrence of grade 3 neutropenia was significantly higher among patients with a CCr of <45 mL/min. With regard to non-hematological toxicity, the frequency of occurrence of grade 2 or higher nausea was significantly higher among patients with a CCr of <45 mL/min. However, the efficacy of pemetrexed did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Our findings suggest that, for patients with a decline in renal function (CCr <45 mL/min), attention must be paid to the possibility of serious adverse events such as neutropenia and nausea when considering the administration of pemetrexed.