Effectiveness and Safety of Atezolizumab Monotherapy in Previously Treated Japanese Patients With Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent NSCLC: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study (J-TAIL).

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in previously treated patients with NSCLC have been established in the registrational phase 3 OAK trial. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab monotherapy in a large real-world cohort to confirm the reproducibility of the results of the registrational trial. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational study. Consecutive patients with previously treated NSCLC scheduled to receive atezolizumab monotherapy were enrolled. The primary end point was the 18-month overall survival (OS) rate. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs was evaluated. Results: Overall, 1002 patients were included in the safety analysis set and 1000 in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 11.5 months. Of the full analysis set, 62% were ineligible for the OAK trial (OAK-unlike subpopulation). The 18-month OS rate was 41.1%, with a median OS of 13.0 months (95% confidence interval: 12.2-15.1). The 18-month OS rate was 49.4% and 36.1% in OAK-like and OAK-unlike subpopulations, respectively; that in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2 was 14.3%. The incidence of AEs overall, in the OAK-like, and OAK-unlike subpopulations was 43.9%, 46.2%, and 42.5%; that of immune-related AEs was 19.0%, 20.1%, and 18.3%, respectively. Conclusions: The findings suggest that atezolizumab may be effective and safe for previously treated patients with NSCLC in real-world settings; however, atezolizumab administration should be considered carefully regarding the benefit-risk balance for the OAK-unlike subpopulation, especially in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2.

Venous Stent Placement for Malignant Vena Cava Syndrome in a Patient with Liposarcoma.

BACKGROUND Reports of venous stenting for inferior vena cava (IVC) syndrome (IVCS) due to sarcoma are limited, and the treatment's efficacy and safety are not clear. CASE REPORT A 36-year-old woman with myxoid liposarcoma was admitted to the Department of Respiratory Medicine for treatment of bilateral lower-leg edema and to be evaluated for acute liver dysfunction. She was 13 years old when she was diagnosed with myxoid liposarcoma. Over the next 18 years, she had 4 tumor resections and 1 round of radiation therapy. She had been on chemotherapy for 4 years and then pazopanib at the age of 35. The edema did not improve after admission despite treatment with diuretics. Computed tomography revealed a huge liposarcoma occupying the right thoracic cavity and a compressed IVC, which caused the edema. Although doxorubicin was administered as fifth-line treatment, there was no response. Since there was no additional chemotherapy regimen, her prognosis was considered to be less than 6 months. She could not be discharged to her home since she was unable to walk due to the edema; therefore, IVC stenting was performed to improve her dysmotility. After IVC stenting, the lower-leg edema improved without any adverse events, enabling her to walk and eventually return home. CONCLUSIONS In patients with IVCS caused by rare malignancies such as myxoid liposarcoma, an IVC stent can be safely implanted and can help to alleviate symptoms. IVC stenting can improve symptoms and allow for home care, resulting in improved quality of life.

Nab-Paclitaxel for Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of Safety and Efficacy for Patients With Renal Impairment.

BACKGROUND: Renal impairment can affect treatment tolerability and outcome in individuals with cancer. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal impairment enrolled in a phase 3 trial of nab-paclitaxel vs. docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously treated NSCLC patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive docetaxel (60 mg/m²) on day 1 or nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle. Safety and efficacy outcomes of treatment were evaluated according to renal function. RESULTS: Among the 503 patients enrolled in the phase 3 trial, 17.3% had moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance of ≤50 mL/min, n = 49 for docetaxel and n = 38 for nab-paclitaxel) and 53.1% had mild renal impairment (creatinine clearance of >50 to ≤80 mL/min, n = 133 for docetaxel and n = 134 for nab-paclitaxel). For patients with renal impairment, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was lower in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the docetaxel group. The difference in treatment efficacy for nab-paclitaxel vs. docetaxel among patients with moderate or mild renal impairment was similar to that among the overall study population. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel was found to be tolerable and beneficial for previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and mild or moderate renal impairment.

Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Lung Injury Induced by Nab-Paclitaxel.

Background/Aim: Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-PTX) has been widely used to treat several advanced cancers. Nab-PTX can cause drug-induced lung injury (DILI); however, its clinical and radiographic features have not been clarified. We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics of Nab-PTX-induced lung injury and identify its associated risk factors. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively investigated 304 patients who received Nab-PTX at Chiba University Hospital between November 2010 and November 2017. We obtained information regarding the clinical course, laboratory findings, and chest computed tomography findings from their medical records. Results: Forty-one patients (13%) developed DILI. Grade 1 lung injury occurred in 27 patients (8.8%), grade 2, 8 patients (2.6%); grade 3, 3 patients (0.9%); grade 4, 1 (0.3%); and grade 5, 2 (0.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that age >56 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.0), pre-existing interstitial lung changes (OR: 3.2), and combined drugs with gemcitabine (OR: 2.7) were independent risk factors for DILI owing to Nab-PTX administration. Conclusion: Nab-PTX-induced lung injury is not rare; however, most cases are asymptomatic (grade 1). Older age, pre-existing interstitial lung changes, and combined drugs with gemcitabine could increase the incidence of Nab-PTX-induced lung injury; such patients should be treated with greater care.

Bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in Japanese patients with advanced, metastatic, EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is a promising candidate for combination treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (eg, erlotinib), which could improve outcomes for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have previously shown in NEJ026, a phase 3 trial, that the combination of bevacizumab plus erlotinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in these patients. In further analyses, we aimed to examine the effects of bevacizumab-erlotinib on overall survival, time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death, and quality of life. METHODS: This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial (NEJ026) was done in 69 hospitals and medical, community-based centres across Japan. Eligible patients had stage IIIB, stage IV, or postoperative recurrent, EGFR-mutant (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg point mutation) NSCLC, had not previously received systemic chemotherapy, and were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation sequence and minimisation to receive either 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily plus 15 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab once every 21 days, or 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified according to sex, smoking status, EGFR mutation subtype, and clinical disease stage. All participants, investigators, and study personnel (including those assessing outcomes) were unmasked to treatment allocation. We report the secondary outcomes of overall survival and quality of life (the period from enrolment to confirmation of a minimally important difference on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30), and the exploratory outcome of time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death. Overall survival and the exploratory outcome were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had response evaluations. Quality of life was analysed in patients in the modified intention-to-treat population who had completed the quality of life questionnaires. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000017069, and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180056, and is currently closed. FINDINGS: Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were enrolled. 112 patients who received bevacizumab-erlotinib and 112 who received erlotinib only were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. At data cutoff (Nov 30, 2019) and a median follow-up of 39·2 months (IQR 23·9-43·5), the median overall survival was 50·7 months (95% CI 37·3-not estimable [NE]) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 46·2 months (38·2-NE) in the erlotinib-only group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·007, 95% CI 0·681-1·490; p=0·97). In analysis of the exploratory outcome, after a median follow-up of 23·9 months (IQR 14·2-39·1), the median time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death was 28·6 months (95% CI 22·1-35·9) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 24·3 months (20·4-29·1) in the erlotinib-only group (HR 0·773, 95% CI 0·562-1·065). The median time between enrolment and confirmation of a minimally important difference on the EORTC QLQ-C30 was 6·0 months (95% CI 5·2-11·3) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 8·3 months (5·7-13·9) in the erlotinib-only group (p=0·47). INTERPRETATION: The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not prolong survival in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but both treatment groups had relatively long survival durations. Why the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not affect overall survival is unclear, but it is possible that the beneficial effects of combination therapy were not seen because overall survival was influenced by treatment regimens used after disease progression. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Real-world survey of pneumonitis and its impact on durvalumab consolidation therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received chemoradiotherapy after durvalumab approval (HOPE-005/CRIMSON).

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of real-world pneumonitis and durvalumab rechallenge during chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab consolidation for non-small cell lung cancer is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 302 consecutive patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer who started chemoradiotherapy between May 2018 and May 2019. RESULTS: Median age was 70 (range: 40-87) years. Volume of lung parenchyma that received 20 Gy (V20) exceeded 35% in 2% and mean lung dose exceeded 20 Gy in 1% of patients. Durvalumab consolidation was delivered to 225 patients (75%). Overall, 83% (n = 251), 34% (n = 103), 7% (n = 21), and 1% (n = 4) of the patients developed any grade of pneumonitis, symptomatic pneumonitis, ≥grade 3 pneumonitis, and fatal (grade 5) pneumonitis, respectively. Corticosteroids were administered to 25% of the patients to treat pneumonitis. Multivariate analysis identified the predictive factors for the development of symptomatic pneumonitis: V20 Gy or more ≥ 25% (odds ratio [OR]: 2.37, P = 0.008) and mean lung dose (MLD) ≥ 10 Gy (OR: 1.93, P < 0.0047). Of the 52 patients who received corticosteroids for pneumonitis after durvalumab initiation, 21 were rechallenged with durvalumab. Overall, 81% of patients met the PACIFIC study's rechallenge criteria and did not experience a severe pneumonitis relapse. CONCLUSION: High V20 and MLD were independent risk factors of symptomatic pneumonitis. More than 80% of the patients who were rechallenged with durvalumab after pneumonitis met the PACIFIC study's rechallenge criteria. Consequently, severe relapse did not occur. Cooperation between radiation and medical oncologists is important for safe chemoradiotherapy and the safe completion of durvalumab consolidation therapy.

Phase 3 Trial Comparing Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel With Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab-) paclitaxel for previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, noninferiority phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive docetaxel (60 mg/m2) on day 1 or nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Between May 22, 2015, and March 12, 2018, a total of 503 patients were randomly allocated to the treatment. Median OS was 16.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.4-19.0) for the 252 patients allocated to nab-paclitaxel and 13.6 months (95% CI: 10.9-16.5) for the 251 patients allocated to docetaxel (hazard ratio = 0.85, 95.2% CI: 0.68-1.07). Median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.9-5.0) for the nab-paclitaxel group versus 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.9-4.1) for the docetaxel group (hazard ratio = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.92, p = 0.0042). The objective response rate was 29.9% (95% CI: 24.0-36.2) for the nab-paclitaxel group and 15.4% (95% CI: 10.9-20.7) for the docetaxel group (p = 0.0002). Adverse events of grade greater than or equal to 3 included febrile neutropenia (5 of 245 patients [2%] in the nab-paclitaxel group versus 55 of 249 patients [22%] in the docetaxel group) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (24 [10%] versus 2 [1%], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Nab-paclitaxel was noninferior to docetaxel in terms of OS. It should, thus, be considered a standard treatment option for previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC.

Risk factors for skeletal-related events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with bone-modifying agents.

PURPOSE: The risk factors for skeletal-related events (SREs) among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients during treatment with bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are not yet well-understood. METHODS: The medical records of 238 consecutive NSCLC patients treated with BMAs, including zoledronic acid and denosumab, at the Chiba University Hospital from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed in the present study. SREs were defined as either pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, the need for bone irradiation or surgery, or hypercalcemia. The risk factors for earlier occurrence of the first SRE from the time of the first bone metastasis diagnosis after the initiation of BMA treatment were identified. RESULTS: Of the 238 included patients, 92% (n = 220) had a performance status (PS) of 0-2 at diagnosis of bone metastasis. Forty-eight (20%) patients developed at least one SRE. The most common first SRE was the need for bone irradiation surgery (n = 27, 56%). Significant risk factors included poor PS (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.36; p = .024), male sex (HR: 2.17; p = .022), and the use of zoledronic acid (HR: 1.91; p = .032). The overall survival (OS) from the first bone metastasis diagnosis was 394 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 331-465). The OS of patients with PS 3 and 4 at the diagnosis of bone metastasis (median: 36 days; 95% CI: 13-50) was significantly (p < 0.0001) shorter than that of patients with PS 0-2 (median: 411 days; 95% CI: 354-558) (HR: 4.53; 95% CI: 2.62-7.35). CONCLUSIONS: Careful observation is needed for patients with the identified risk factors, which include poor PS and male sex, despite the BMA treatment.

Durvalumab for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer and grade 1 radiation pneumonitis following concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Introduction/Background Durvalumab demonstrated a good efficacy and safety in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the PACIFIC trial. Although a history of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has been reported to increase the risk of pneumonitis associated with programmed death-1 inhibitors, the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in patients with baseline Grade 1 RP have not been assessed. Therefore, we carried out a multicenter prospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in these patients. Patients and Methods This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of 35 patients with Grade 1 RP after CCRT and before durvalumab initiation. This study was a first prespecified analysis for the first 20 patients with the primary objective of assessing the short-term safety; it was assessed 3 months after durvalumab initiation. Results Twenty patients were enrolled in this study between March 1, 2019, and September 3, 2019. Three patients (15%) experienced drug-related Grade ≥3 adverse events, while three patients (15%) had Grade ≥2 pneumonitis/RP within 3 months after durvalumab initiation. Three months after durvalumab initiation, all the patients were alive and four patients (20%) experienced disease progression. Conclusion Durvalumab can be a feasible treatment option for patients with stage III NSCLC with baseline Grade 1 RP following CCRT.(Trial registration number: UMIN000036061. The registration period was between March 2019 and December 2019.).

Efficacy and safety of carboplatin with nab-paclitaxel versus docetaxel in older patients with squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CAPITAL): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, docetaxel, a cytotoxic monotherapy, is the standard drug administered to older patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel has shown a high objective response rate in patients with squamous histology and was suggested to improve overall survival in patients aged 70 years and older. The CAPITAL trial aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel versus docetaxel as first-line therapy for patients aged 70 years and older with advanced squamous NSCLC. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was carried out at 92 medical institutions in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 70 years and older, had advanced squamous NSCLC with no previous systemic chemotherapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Using an electronic data capture system, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL per min for 30 min) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle and intravenous nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 for 60 min) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks or intravenous docetaxel (60 mg/m2 for 60 min) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Randomisation was computer-generated per participant and stratified by ECOG performance status, clinical stage, sex, age, and institution. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured in the full analysis set and defined as the time from registration to the date of death due to any cause. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the trial treatment. This trial is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000019843, and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs041180110. After the planned interim analysis in Aug 3, 2020, the independent data monitoring committee recommended that the trial be stopped early. This report represents the final analysis. FINDINGS: Between Feb 24, 2016, and Aug 11, 2020, 196 patients were enrolled and were randomly assigned to the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel group (n=98) or the docetaxel group (n=98). Of these patients, four (carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel group, n=3; docetaxel group, n=1) did not receive any treatment and two patients in the docetaxel group were excluded from the full analysis set. Median overall survival in the full analysis set was 16·9 months (95% CI 12·6-25·4) in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel group and 10·9 months (8·5-12·4) in the docetaxel group (hazard ratio 0·52 [90% CI 0·38-0·70]; p=0·0003). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 79 (83%) patients in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel group and 77 (79%) patients in the docetaxel group (p=0·63). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel group and the docetaxel group were leukopenia (44 [46%] vs 55 [57%]; p=0·20), neutropenia (60 [63%] vs 75 [77%]; p=0·046), febrile neutropenia (nine [10%] vs 19 [20%]; p=0·073), and anaemia (37 [39%] vs two [2%]; p<0·0001). Serious treatment-related adverse events of all grades occurred in 13 (14%) patients in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel group and 11 (11%) patients in the docetaxel group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in two (2%; respiratory failure n=1, visceral arterial ischaemia n=1) patients in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel group and one (1%; sepsis) patient in the docetaxel group. INTERPRETATION: Our study showed that overall survival was longer with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel than with docetaxel, suggesting that carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel can be used as standard first-line treatment for patients aged 70 years and older with advanced squamous NSCLC. FUNDING: Taiho Pharmaceutical.

Prognostic factors for patients with metastatic or recurrent thymic carcinoma receiving palliative-intent chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Thymic malignancies are a model of rare cancer. However, little clinical data is available based on the large database. We aimed to clarify the prognostic factors, particularly the metastatic sites, for thymic malignancies using one of the largest, representative, multi-institutional databases, the NEJ023 database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Stage IVA/IVB or recurrent thymic carcinoma were enrolled between 1995 and 2014. Clinicopathologic information was evaluated, and the patients were subdivided according to the metastatic organs of involvement (serosal dissemination, liver, lymph node, pulmonary, and bone metastasis). A Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression were used to evaluate survival. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients with metastases and a predominantly squamous histology (66.7%) were included. Most patients (53.0%) had serosal dissemination, whereas 26.5%, 21.9%, 19.7%, and 15.8% had pulmonary, lymph node, bone and liver metastases, respectively. Over a median follow-up time of 21.5 months, the median overall survival (mOS) was 30.7 months. When the subjects were grouped according to involved metastatic sites, patients with more than 3 involved metastatic organs had the worst survival outcome. Among patients with isolated involvement, those with bone metastasis had the poorest survival, followed by patients with liver metastasis. Subjects with hypoalbuminemia also had poor survival outcomes. When patients treated with platinum and anthracycline-containing pharmacotherapy were compared with those treated with platinum and non-anthracycline-containing pharmacotherapy, no significant difference was observed. Bone metastasis (P = 0.0005), liver metastasis (P =  0.047), and hypoalbuminemia (P =  0.0021) were identified as prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The site of metastatic involvement affects the survival outcomes of patients with thymic carcinoma, and this result may reflect the sensitivity of metastatic sites to pharmacotherapy. As a next step, controlling liver metastasis with pharmacotherapy could help to improve the prognosis of patients with thymic carcinoma.

A Phase 2 Study of Atezolizumab for Pretreated NSCLC With Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonitis.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is one of the most common and poor prognostic comorbidities in patients with NSCLC and a known risk factor for pneumonitis. Atezolizumab monotherapy is an established treatment for recurrent NSCLC and reported to have a lower risk of pneumonitis than programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced or recurrent NSCLC with idiopathic IP. METHODS: Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC with comorbid idiopathic, chronic fibrotic IP with % forced vital capacity of greater than 70% and no history of immune checkpoint inhibitors were enrolled. The patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg) every 3 weeks until the discontinuation criteria were met. The primary end point of this study was the 1-year survival rate. A sample size of 38 patients was set. RESULTS: This study was terminated early owing to high incidence of pneumonitis. A total of 17 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 70 years. The median % forced vital capacity and % diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide at baseline were 85.4% and 54.4%, respectively. The incidence of pneumonitis was 29.4% (5 of 17) for all grades, 23.5% (4 of 17) for grade greater than or equal to 3, and 5.9% (1 of 17) for grade 5. A total of 57.1% patients (4 of 7) with honeycomb lung developed pneumonitis with a grade greater than or equal to 3, whereas only one patient (10%) without honeycomb lung (n = 10) with grade 1 pneumonitis was found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCLC with comorbid IP as defined by the selection criteria for this study might have an increased risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pneumonitis.

Nocturnal Hypoxemia and High Circulating TNF-α Levels in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Objective Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a form of pulmonary hypertension caused by persistent thromboemboli of the pulmonary arteries, and one of its etiological factors may be inflammation. Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is reportedly an important complication of pulmonary hypertension. However, the association between SDB and inflammation in CTEPH has been undefined. This prospective observational study analyzed the association between the severity of SDB, pulmonary hemodynamic parameters and the systemic inflammation level in patients with CTEPH. Methods CTEPH patients admitted for a right heart catheter (RHC) examination were consecutively enrolled from November 2017 to June 2019 at the pulmonary hypertension center in Chiba University Hospital. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) were also enrolled as a control group. All patients underwent a sleep study using a WatchPAT 200 during admission. Results The CTEPH patients showed worse nocturnal hypoxemia, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and apnea-hypopnea index than the IPAH patients. Among these factors, only the nocturnal mean percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) was negatively correlated with the pulmonary hemodynamic parameters. The circulating tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) level was also high in the CTEPH group, and a multivariate analysis showed that the nocturnal mean SpO2 was the most important predictive factor for a high TNF-α level. Conclusion We showed that CTEPH patients had high serum TNF-α levels and that the nocturnal mean SpO2 was a predictive factor for serum TNF-α levels. Further investigations focused on nocturnal hypoxemia and the TNF-α level may provide novel insight into the etiology and new therapeutic strategies for CTEPH.

Evaluation of plasma EGFR mutation as an early predictor of response of erlotinib plus bevacizumab treatment in the NEJ026 study.

BACKGROUND: The NEJ026 Phase 3 study demonstrated that erlotinib and bevacizumab (BE)-treated NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with erlotinib alone (E). This study included a prospective analysis of the relationship between the mutational status of EGFR in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and the efficacy of TKI monotherapy or combination therapy. We describe these results herein. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from patients enrolled in NEJ026 at the start of treatment (P0), 6 weeks after the start of treatment (P1), and upon confirmation of progressive disease (P2). Plasma ctDNA was analyzed using a modified PNA-LNA PCR clamp method. PFS and OS according to EGFR status at the time of plasma collection were evaluated. FINDINGS: Plasma activating EGFR mutation (aEGFR) at P0 was detected in 68% of cases; patients without plasma aEGFR had longer PFS. The frequency of T790M mutation at P2 was similar in both arms: 8 (19.0%) in BE and 11 (20.8%) in E. Based on the aEGFR profiles, PFS was evaluated among three groups: type A [P0(-), P1(-)], type B [P0(+), P1(-)], and type C [P0(+), P1(+)]. This revealed that BE was more efficacious than E, and that BE was associated with improved PFS in all types. INTERPRETATION: Pre-treatment plasma aEGFR status have a potential of early predictor of response of TKI efficacy. Monitoring plasma aEGFR mutation will contribute to selection and continuation of treatment with BE or E. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Spondylodiscitis and spinal epidural abscess related to long-term placement of an airway stent for malignant central airway obstruction.

A 70-year-old male was referred to our hospital with lower limb muscle weakness and numbness of the left hand. The patient had previously been diagnosed seven years ago with lung cancer accompanied by central airway obstruction and had received chemoradiotherapy following placement of a metallic stent. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed an osteolytic lesion which was adjacent to the fractured stent. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated high signal intensity in the disc space. The patient was diagnosed with spondylodiscitis and spinal epidural abscess related to the airway stent. Despite hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and long-term antibiotic therapy, the infection was uncontrolled. Moreover, osteolytic destruction and kyphotic deformity progressed. Removal of the airway stent was necessary; however, it was impossible because bronchial resection was required and the risk of mediastinal injury was considered to be high. The patient subsequently received palliative care. Long-term airway stenting can cause spondylodiscitis and spinal epidural abscess. Indications for the placement of metallic stents for malignant central airway obstruction should be carefully evaluated after considering the difficulty in removal and the long-term risk of severe complications. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study Long-term placement and fracture of the airway stent can cause spondylodiscitis and spinal epidural abscess. What this study adds The indication of placement of a metallic stent for malignant central airway obstruction should be considered with caution, especially if long-term survival can be expected.

A phase II study of atezolizumab for pretreated advanced/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: rationale and design for the TORG1936/AMBITIOUS study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are complicated with comorbid interstitial pneumonia (IP) with a poor prognosis. The pharmacotherapy for advanced lung cancer occasionally induces fatal acute exacerbation of pre-existing IP. Due to the lack of prospective studies, there is an urgent need to establish a safe and effective pharmacotherapy, especially for second-line or later settings. Atezolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 antibody, is thought to be the safest candidate for second-line therapy among various immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, compared with patients without IP, the patients with comorbid IP may have higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) or microsatellite instability (MSI), which are partly associated with a more favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: The Thoracic Oncology Research Group 1936/AMBITIOUS study is an ongoing, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab for pretreated advanced/recurrent patients with NSCLC complicated with idiopathic, chronic fibrotic IP with a forced vital capacity of >70%. The patients will receive atezolizumab (1200 mg, day 1) every 3 weeks until the discontinuation criteria are met. The primary end point of this study is the 1-year survival rate, and a sample size of 38 patients is set. As a translational research, we will perform the analysis of TMB, somatic mutations, and MSI for nucleic acids extracted from archival tumor samples. DISCUSSION: Since there is no standard second-line or later therapy of advanced NSCLC with IP, the results of this study are expected to have a major impact on clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190084, registered 26 August 2019 - retrospectively registered, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031190084.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of drug-induced lung injury by ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A single center retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: If anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement in lung cancer is identified, ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) can be an effective treatment. However, the details of drug-induced lung injury (DILI) caused by ALK-TKI, which can be a serious side effect of ALK-TKIs, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and the onset risk factors of DILI by ALK-TKIs in clinical practice. METHODS: The clinical features of 56 consecutive patients who received crizotinib, alectinib, and/or ceritinib at our hospital from 2012 to 2018 were retrospectively examined. Among these, patients diagnosed with DILI due to ALK-TKIs were evaluated in terms of clinical features and parameters. Each clinical parameter before the administration of ALK-TKIs was compared between the DILI onset group and the non-onset group. RESULTS: A total of seven cases were diagnosed with DILI due to ALK-TKIs; no DILI-related deaths were observed. Chest computed tomography (CT) scan findings identified six patients with the organizing pneumonia (OP) pattern and one with the hypersensitivity pneumonia pattern. The onset of DILI was significantly different in patients age ≥ 64 years and with a creatinine clearance <80 mL/minute. CONCLUSIONS: Extra caution for DILI due to ALK-TKIs may be needed when recommending ALK-TKIs for patients over 64 years of age, or with decreased renal function. CT images of the majority of patients with DILI by ALK-TKIs show an OP pattern. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study: Extra caution is needed when recommending ALK-TKIs for patients over 64 years of age or those with decreased renal function. Computed tomography images of the majority of patients with DILI by ALK-TKIs show an OP pattern. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The same or a different ALK-TKI may be considered as a treatment option after the onset of DILI, based on careful judgment.

ALK Rearrangement Adenocarcinoma with Histological Transformation to Squamous Cell Carcinoma Resistant to Alectinib and Ceritinib.

Specific tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancers with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations. However, most treated patients eventually develop resistance to the TKIs. The histological transformation into small cell carcinoma is well known to be the underlying mechanism for acquired resistance; however, transformation to squamous cell carcinoma is extremely rare. We, herein, report a case of ALK rearrangement-positive adenocarcinoma that transformed to squamous cell carcinoma after administration of alectinib, and was found to be resistant to ceritinib.

Multicenter prospective phase II trial of nivolumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal melanoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poorer response compared with cutaneous melanoma. Prospective trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma have not been reported. PURPOSE: This phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria were as follows: histological diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma; age ≥ 20 years; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; and with measurable lesions. Patients received nivolumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, disease control rate, and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled between December 2014 and July 2017. Two patients without measurable lesions and one patient with uveal melanoma were excluded from analysis of efficacy. The best overall RR was 23.5%. One patient achieved a complete response, three partial response, and five stable disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.2-2.8). The median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 3.5 to not reached). The 1-year overall survival was 50.0% (95% CI 25.9-70.0%). Treatment-related adverse events of grades 3 or 4 occurred in 15% (3/20) of the patients. Grade 3 adverse events were resolved by corticosteroid treatment. CONCLUSION: Although this trial met the primary endpoint, the RR was still unsatisfactory. Therefore, further treatment development is required.

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to first-generation or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy develops in almost half of patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after 1 year of treatment. The JO25567 phase 2 trial comparing erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy with erlotinib monotherapy established the activity and manageable toxicity of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC. We did a phase 3 trial to validate the results of the JO25567 study and report here the results from the preplanned interim analysis. METHODS: In this prespecified interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase 3 NEJ026 trial, we recruited patients with stage IIIB-IV disease or recurrent, cytologically or histologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR genomic aberrations from 69 centres across Japan. Eligible patients were at least 20 years old, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease, and one or more measurable lesions based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg per day plus intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 21 days, or erlotinib 150 mg per day monotherapy. Randomisation was done by minimisation, stratified by sex, smoking status, clinical stage, and EGFR mutation subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. This study is ongoing; the data cutoff for this prespecified interim analysis was Sept 21, 2017. Efficacy was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of treatment and had at least one response evaluation. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000017069. FINDINGS: Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (n=114) or erlotinib alone (n=114). 112 patients in each group were evaluable for efficacy, and safety was evaluated in 112 patients in the combination therapy group and 114 in the monotherapy group. Median follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 7·0-15·7). At the time of interim analysis, median progression-free survival for patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group was 16·9 months (95% CI 14·2-21·0) compared with 13·3 months (11·1-15·3) for patients in the erlotinib group (hazard ratio 0·605, 95% CI 0·417-0·877; p=0·016). 98 (88%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 53 (46%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was rash (23 [21%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 24 [21%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). Nine (8%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and five (4%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse events were grade 4 neutropenia (two [2%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group) and grade 4 hepatic dysfunction (one [1%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and one [1%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The results of this interim analysis showed that bevacizumab plus erlotinib combination therapy improves progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC. Future studies with longer follow-up, and overall survival and quality-of-life data will be required to further assess the efficacy of this combination in this setting. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.