Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 2939, 2024 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316884

ABSTRACT

Diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is made by cytological examination of pleural fluid or histological examination of pleural tissue from biopsy. Unfortunately, detection of malignancy using cytology has an overall sensitivity of 50%, and is dependent upon tumor load, volume of fluid assessed, and cytopathologist experience. The diagnostic yield of pleural fluid cytology is also compromised by low abundance of tumor cells or when morphology is obscured by inflammation or reactive mesothelial cells. A reliable molecular marker that may complement fluid cytology for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion is needed. The purpose of this study was to establish a molecular diagnostic approach based on pleural effusion cell-free DNA methylation analysis for the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion and benign pleural effusion. This was a blind, prospective case-control biomarker study. We recruited 104 patients with pleural effusion for the study. We collected pleural fluid from patients with: MPE (n = 48), indeterminate pleural effusion in subjects with known malignancy or IPE (n = 28), and benign PE (n = 28), and performed the Sentinel-MPE liquid biopsy assay. The methylation level of Sentinel-MPE was markedly higher in the MPE samples compared to BPE control samples (p < 0.0001) and the same tendency was observed relative to IPE (p = 0.004). We also noted that the methylation signal was significantly higher in IPE relative to BPE (p < 0.001). We also assessed the diagnostic efficiency of the Sentinel-MPE test by performing receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC). For the ROC analysis we combined the malignant and indeterminate pleural effusion groups (n = 76) and compared against the benign group (n = 28). The detection sensitivity and specificity of the Sentinel-MPE test was high (AUC = 0.912). The Sentinel-MPE appears to have better performance characteristics than cytology analysis. However, combining Sentinel-MPE with cytology analysis could be an even more effective approach for the diagnosis of MPE. The Sentinel-MPE test can discriminate between BPE and MPE. The Sentinel-MPE liquid biopsy test can detect aberrant DNA in several different tumor types. The Sentinel-MPE test can be a complementary tool to cytology in the diagnosis of MPE.


Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Pleural Effusion, Malignant , Pleural Effusion , Humans , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/diagnosis , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/genetics , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/pathology , DNA Methylation , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Pleural Effusion/diagnosis , Pleural Effusion/pathology
2.
Res Sq ; 2023 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37886511

ABSTRACT

Background: Diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is made by cytological examination of pleural fluid or histological examination of pleural tissue from biopsy. Unfortunately, detection of malignancy using cytology has an overall sensitivity of 50%, and is dependent upon tumor load, volume of fluid assessed, and cytopathologist experience. The diagnostic yield of pleural fluid cytology is also compromised by low abundance of tumor cells or when morphology is obscured by inflammation or reactive mesothelial cells. A reliable molecular marker that may complement fluid cytology malignant pleural effusion diagnosis is needed. The purpose of this study was to establish a molecular diagnostic approach based on pleural effusion cell-free DNA methylation analysis for the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion and benign pleural effusion. Results: This was a blind, prospective case-control biomarker study. We recruited 104 patients with pleural effusion for the study. We collected pleural fluid from patients with: MPE (n = 48), PPE (n = 28), and benign PE (n = 28), and performed the Sentinel-MPE liquid biopsy assay. The methylation level of Sentinel-MPE was markedly higher in the MPE samples compared to BPE control samples (p < 0.0001) and the same tendency was observed relative to PPE (p = 0.004). We also noted that the methylation signal was significantly higher in PPE relative to BPE (p < 0.001). We also assessed the diagnostic efficiency of the Sentinel-MPE test by performing receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC). For the ROC analysis we combined the malignant and paramalignant groups (n = 76) and compared against the benign group (n = 28). The detection sensitivity and specificity of the Sentinel-MPE test was high (AUC = 0.912). The Sentinel-MPE appears to have better performance characteristics than cytology analysis. However, combining Sentinel-MPE with cytology analysis could be an even more effective approach for the diagnosis of MPE. Conclusions: The Sentinel-MPE test can discriminate between BPE and MPE. The Sentinel-MPE liquid biopsy test can detect aberrant DNA in several different tumor types. The Sentinel-MPE test can be a complementary tool to cytology in the diagnosis of MPE.

3.
Chest ; 163(2): e79-e82, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36759122

ABSTRACT

CASE PRESENTATION: An 84-year-old woman presented to the interventional pulmonary clinic for evaluation of a right middle lobe lung mass. Her medical history was notable for atrial fibrillation on rivaroxaban and recurrent bilateral breast cancer that had required multiple lumpectomies, radiation, and chemotherapy. She is a former smoker of five-pack years. She underwent a right and left heart catheterization at an outside facility 2 months prior to her presentation for evaluation of dyspnea that showed minimal coronary artery disease but elevated pulmonary artery pressures of 55/24 mm Hg. The procedure itself was complicated by hemoptysis that required hospital admission for observation. She underwent a chest radiography during her hospitalization (Fig 1) There was no recent imaging for comparison. She was seen by a pulmonologist as an outpatient and underwent bronchoscopy with BAL and bronchial brushing for concerns of malignancy. The results were not diagnostic. She was then referred to the interventional pulmonary service for further evaluation.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea , Lung , Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Dyspnea/etiology , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Hemoptysis/etiology , Radiography , Rivaroxaban
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL