ABSTRACT
Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM) is a genetically heterogeneous form of neonatal diabetes characterized by hyperglycemia that remits during infancy with a tendency to recur in later life. This case report presents the history of a male infant with transient neonatal diabetes mellitus. The patient was treated with a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system until the age of 2 months, when the normoglycemia connected with a withdrawal of treatment was noted. The genetic test results excluded the majority of known mutations related to TNDM. This case report focuses on various genetic mutations and the clinical features connected with them that cause TNDM and highlights the difficulties in the diagnostic and therapeutic processes of this disease. CSII and CGM systems seem to be a safe and effective treatment option in TNDM and may be used in the therapy.
ABSTRACT
An imbalance between exaggerated autoaggressive T cell responses, primarily CD8 + T cells, and impaired tolerogenic mechanisms underlie the development of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Disease-modifying strategies, particularly immunotherapy focusing on FoxP3 + T regulatory cells (Treg), and B cells facilitating antigen presentation for T cells, show promise. Selective depletion of B cells may be achieved with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb). In a 2-year-long flow cytometry follow-up, involving 32 peripheral blood T and B cell markers across three trial arms (Treg + rituximab N = 12, Treg + placebo N = 13, control N = 11), we observed significant changes. PD-1 receptor (+) CD4 + Treg, CD4 + effector T cells (Teffs), and CD8 + T cell percentages increased in the combined regimen group by the end of follow-up. Conversely, the control group exhibited a notable reduction in PD-1 receptor (+) CD4 + Teff percentages. Considering clinical endpoints, higher PD-1 receptor (+) expression on T cells correlated with positive responses, including a higher mixed meal tolerance test AUC, and reduced daily insulin dosage. PD-1 receptor (+) T cells emerged as a potential therapy outcome biomarker. In vitro validation confirmed that successful Teff suppression was associated with elevated PD-1 receptor (+) Treg levels. These findings support PD-1 receptor (+) T cells as a reliable indicator of treatment with combined immunotherapy consisting of Tregs and anti-CD20 mAb efficacy in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , Rituximab , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/immunology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/drug effects , Rituximab/pharmacology , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Child , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/metabolism , Female , Male , Adolescent , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background and aims: MiniMed 780G is the first Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (AHCL) system in Poland, approved in the EU in 2020. To date, observations of glycemic control up to 12 months have been published. This study aimed to analyze glycemic control and anthropometric parameters in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after two years of using the AHCL system. Materials and methods: We prospectively collected anthropometric data, pump, and continuous glucose records of fifty T1D children (9.9 ± 2.4 years, 24 (48%) boys, T1D for 3.9 ± 2.56 years) using an AHCL system. We compared the two-week AHCL records obtained after AHCL enrollment with data 6, 12, and 24 months after starting AHCL. Results: Time in range (70-180 mg/dl) and BMI z-score did not change during the 2 years of observation (p>0.05). The percentage of autocorrection in total daily insulin increased significantly (p<0.005). Conclusion: Glycemic control in the investigated group of children with T1D treated with the AHCL system for 2 years remained stable. Children in this group maintained weight and optimal metabolic control, most likely due to autocorrection boluses.
Subject(s)
Body Fluids , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Adolescent , Male , Child , Humans , Female , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Glycemic Control , Prospective Studies , AnthropometryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects 5%-10% of paediatric population and is reportedly more common in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), exacerbating its clinical course. Proper treatment of ADHD in such patients may thus provide neurological and metabolic benefits. To test this, we designed a non-commercial second phase clinical trial comparing the impact of different pharmacological interventions for ADHD in children with T1D. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical trial in children and adolescents with ADHD and T1D. The trial will be conducted in four reference paediatric diabetes centres in Poland. Over 36 months, eligible patients with both T1D and ADHD (aged 8-16.5 years, T1D duration >1 year) will be offered participation. Patients' guardians will undergo online once-weekly training sessions behaviour management for 10 weeks. Afterward, children will be randomised to methylphenidate (long-release capsule, doses 18-36-54 mg) versus lisdexamphetamine (LDX, 30-50-70 mg). Pharmacotherapy will continue for 6 months before switching to alternative medication. Throughout the trial, the participants will be evaluated every 3 months by their diabetologist and online psychological assessments. The primary endpoint (ADHD symptom severity, Conners 3.0 questionnaire) will be assessed by a blinded investigator. Secondary endpoints will include HbA1c, continuous glucose monitoring indices and quality-of-life (PedsQL). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by Bioethical Committee at Medical University of Lodz and Polish regulatory agency (RNN/142/22/KE, UR/DBL/D/263/2022). The results will be communicated to the research and clinical community, and Polish agencies responsible for healthcare policy. Patient organisations focused on paediatric T1D will be notified by a consortium member. We hope to use the trial's results to promote collaboration between mental health professionals and diabetes teams, evaluate the economic feasibility of using LDX in patients with both diseases and the long run improve ADHD treatment in children with T1D. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR, 2022-001906-24) and NCT05957055.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Central Nervous System Stimulants , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Methylphenidate , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Outpatients , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as TopicABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to assess the nutrition of selected fermented dairy products available in Polish supermarkets and how many of them meet the criterion set by the European Parliament and Council Act (UE) no. 1924/2006 form 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods regarding low sugar content in a solid product. In the study 100 fermented products, widely available in Polish supermarkets, were selected, and their nutrition was analysed based on the information placed on the producer's label, and the carbohydrate content was compared against the recommended 5 g per 100 g of the solid product. As a result, it was determined that among natural products, 92% of the kefirs and 36% fulfilled the carbohydrate content criterion, whereas out of the analysed flavoured products, only one.
Subject(s)
Nutritional Status , Yogurt , Humans , Poland , Carbohydrates , Nutritive ValueABSTRACT
Background/objective: This long-term study aimed to analyze the associations between BMI Z-score, HbA1c, and daily insulin requirement (DIR) and the prevalence and duration of partial remission (PR) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: After retrieving retrospective data for 195 patients from their health records at 24, 48, and 72 months after T1D diagnosis, the study group was comprised of 119 (57 girls) children with a complete dataset for all 6 years. PR was defined according to the ISPAD guidelines. Analyses were carried out in the whole group and subgroups according to PR duration: no PR at all (NPR), PR lasting less than 2 years (PR < 2), and PR at least 2 years (PR ≥ 2). Results: PR was observed in 63% of the patients (78.9% of overweight and 100% of obese patients). NPR patients showed the lowest mean initial BMI Z-score [-0.65 ± 1.29 vs. 0.02 ± 1.42, (PR < 2), p = 0.01 and vs. 0.64 ± 1.43 (PR ≥ 2), p = 0.17]. The dissimilarity in BMI across patients declined over time. Within the NPR group, the initial mean BMI Z-score significantly increased within the first 2 years (unadjusted p < 0.001) and remained constant afterward. In the PR <2 group, the highest increase in BMI Z-score occurred after 4 years (p < 0.001) and then decreased (p = 0.04). In the PR ≥2, the BMI Z-score slightly decreased within the first 2 years (p = 0.02), then increased (p = 0.03) and remained unchanged for the last 2 years. Six years after T1D started, the mean DIRs do not differ among the patient groups (ANOVA p = 0.272). Conclusion: During 6 years of follow-up, PR occurred in almost two-thirds of the studied children including almost all overweight and obese children. We observed a gradual normalization of the BMI Z-score at the end of the follow-up. BMI Z-score increased slightly in children with no remission initially but remained later constant until the end of observation. In both remitter groups, the increase in BMI Z-score appeared later when the protective honeymoon period ended. Regardless of BMI Z-score, the ß-cell destruction process progresses, and after 6 years, the DIR is similar for all patients.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Pediatric Obesity , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Child , Body Mass Index , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Overweight/complications , Pediatric Obesity/complications , Pediatric Obesity/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Insulin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Given the steadily rising incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D), particularly among the youngest preschool children, coupled with well-documented challenges of achieving and maintaining optimal metabolic control in this age group, there is a growing need for advanced technological devices. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycaemic control in children below the age of seven with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assess the safety of the advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) system in comparison to the previous treatment method, a sensor-augmented pump with predictive low-glucose suspend (SAP-PLGS). METHOD: Data from 10 children (aged 2.60-6.98 years) with T1D who transitioned to the AHCL system from SAP-PLGS were analysed. SAP-PLGS records from two weeks prior to the initiation of AHCL were compared with records from the initial four weeks post-switch (excluding the training period). These data were examined at two 2-week intervals and compared with records from two weeks post six-month usage of the AHCL. RESULTS: A significant decrease in the average nighttime glucose concentration was observed compared to pre-AHCL values (p= 0.001, concordance W = 0.53). The Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) value significantly decreased from 6.88 ± 0.37% to 6.52 ± 0.32% (p= 0.018, rbc = 0.93) immediately following the device switch and stabilized at 6.50 ± 0.28% (p= 0.001, W = 0.53) and 6.55 ± 0.41% (p= 0.001, W = 0.53) at subsequent stages of the study. An improvement was also observed in mean glucose values for time spent < 54 mg/dl, while the proportion of time within this range was maintained, both during the day (p< 0.001, W = 0.58) and at night (p= 0.002, W = 0.83). CONCLUSION: The AHCL MiniMed 780GTM system improved glycaemic control in the studied group of children under seven years of age with T1D compared to previous SAP-PLGS therapy. It proved to be safe for delivering insulin in this age group.
ABSTRACT
Standard markers of glycaemic control, such as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and self-measurement of blood glucose (SMBG), have proven insufficient. HbA1c is an averaged measurement that does not give information about glucose variability. SMBG provides limited, intermittent blood glucose (BG) values over the day and is associated with poor compliance because of the invasiveness of the method and social discomfort. In contrast to glucometers, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices do not require finger-stick blood samples, but instead measure BG via percutaneous or subcutaneous sensors. The immediate benefits of CGM include prevention of hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia, and automated analysis of long-term glycaemic data enables reliable treatment adjustments. This review describes the principles of CGM and how CGM data have changed diabetes treatment standards by introducing new glycaemic control parameters. It also compares different CGM devices and examines how the convenience of sharing CGM data in telehealth applies to the current coronavirus-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Application of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has moved diabetes care from a reactive to a proactive process, in which a person with diabetes can prevent episodes of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, rather than taking action only once low and high glucose are detected. Consequently, CGM devices are now seen as the standard of care for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Evidence now supports the use of CGM in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on any treatment regimen, not just for those on insulin therapy. Expanding the application of CGM to include all people with T1DM or T2DM can support effective intensification of therapies to reduce glucose exposure and lower the risk of complications and hospital admissions, which are associated with high healthcare costs. All of this can be achieved while minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia and improving quality of life for people with diabetes. Wider application of CGM can also bring considerable benefits for women with diabetes during pregnancy and their children, as well as providing support for acute care of hospital inpatients who experience the adverse effects of hyperglycemia following admission and surgical procedures, as a consequence of treatment-related insulin resistance or reduced insulin secretion. By tailoring the application of CGM for daily or intermittent use, depending on the patient profile and their needs, one can ensure the cost-effectiveness of CGM in each setting. In this article we discuss the evidence-based benefits of expanding the use of CGM technology to include all people with diabetes, along with a diverse population of people with non-diabetic glycemic dysregulation.
ABSTRACT
Technological advances offer the opportunity to improve glycemic control and reduce the risk of complications and burden of type 1 diabetes while improving patient quality of life. Closed-loop insulin delivery systems take the technology to a larger scale by integrating CGM systems with an insulin pump and an algorithm that automates insulin delivery (HCL systems). Several systems using hybrid closed loop technology are currently offered in the global marketplace: the MiniMed™ 670G and MiniMed™ 780G (SmartGuard™) system from Medtronic; the T slim x2 Control IQ from Tandem; the Omnipod5 automated mode (HypoProtect™)5 from Insulet; and the CamAPS FX DanaRS or Ypso pump. Insulet's Omnipod5 automated mode (HypoProtect™) is currently in clinical trials. As technology moves forward, advanced systems are being developed that include an elaborate algorithm with individualization of major target points, automated correction bolus functionality, and increased stability of the automated mode (Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop - AHCL systems). The AHCL systems include: MiniMed™ 780G (SmartGuard™); Tandem's T slim x2 Control IQ; Insulet's Omnipod5-Automated mode (HypoProtect™); and CamAPS FX. The purpose of this paper is to present commercial devices using HCL and AHCL in 2022, also from a scientific point of view. It is an undeniable fact that "auto-mode" systems represent a new stage that can be confidently called a revolution in diabetology.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose , Quality of Life , Insulin Infusion Systems , Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringABSTRACT
Technological progress in the treatment of type 1 diabetes requires doctors to use modern methods of insulin therapy in all areas of medicine that patients may come into contact with, including surgical interventions. The current guidelines indicate the possibility of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in minor surgical procedures, but there are few reported cases of using a hybrid closed-loop system in perioperative insulin therapy. This case presentation focuses on two children with type 1 diabetes who were treated with an advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system during a minor surgical procedure. In the periprocedural period, the recommended mean glycemia and the time in range were maintained.
ABSTRACT
Background: Information on the influence of insulin treatment using advanced hybrid closed loop systems (AHCL) on body weight of young patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is scarce. The aim of this study was to observe whether there were any changes in body mass index (BMI) of children and adolescents with T1D treated using the Medtronic Minimed 780G AHCL after 1 year of follow up and to analyze potential associations between these changes and the insulin doses. Materials and methods: For 50 children and adolescents (age 5.4-16.8 years, 24 (48%) boys, T1D for 3.9 ± 2.56 years) using an AHCL system anthropometric and AHCL data were collected prospectively. BMI Z-scores and two-week AHCL records obtained after AHCL enrollment were compared with data after 6 months and also 1 year after starting AHCL. Results: The BMI Z-score of the patients at 1 year follow-up did not change from time of AHCL initiation (0.51 ± 2.79 vs 0.57 ± 2.85, p>0.05). There was a slight increase in total daily insulin per kg of body weight (0.67 ± 0.21 U/kg vs 0.80 ± 0.21 U/kg, p <0.001), but the percent of basal insulin was unchanged (34.88 ± 6.91% vs 35.08 ± 6.30%, p>0.05). We observed also no change (AHCL start vs after 1 year) in glycemic control parameters: average sensor glucose (131.36± 11.04 mg/dL vs 132.45 ± 13.42 mg/dL, p>0.05), coefficient of variation (34.99± 5.17% vs 34.06 ± 5.38%, p>0.05), glucose management indicator (6.45 ± 0.26% vs 6.48 ± 0.32%, p>0.05), and time spent in the range of 70-180 mg/dL (79.28 ± 8.12% vs 80.40 ± 8.25%, p>0.05). Conclusion: During the 1 year of follow-up the BMI of children and adolescents with T1D treated with an AHCL system remained stable. Although there was a slight increase in the total daily insulin dose, the percent of basal insulin was unchanged. The patients maintained recommended glycemic control.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Adolescent , Child , Male , Humans , Child, Preschool , Female , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Insulin Infusion Systems , Body Mass Index , Glycemic Control , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Blood Glucose , Insulin/therapeutic use , Glucose , Body WeightABSTRACT
Background: The aim of this prospective open-label single-arm single-center follow-up study was to analyze glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with the advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) system in relation to a sensor-augmented pump with low-glucose suspend (SAP-LGS) or predictive low-glucose suspend (SAP-PLGS). Materials and Methods: The data for 50 children and adolescents (age 5.5-19.6 years) with type 1 diabetes, receiving insulin through an AHCL system after being switched from SAP-LGS/PLGS systems, were included in the analysis. The SAP-LGS/PLGS records from 2 weeks preceding the AHCL connection were compared with the records from the first 4 weeks of AHCL use, represented as two separate 2-week intervals. Results: Significant improvements in most of the parameters, namely time spent in the range of 70-140 mg/dL (from 53.80% ± 12.35% to 61.70% ± 8.42%, P < 0.001) and 70-180 mg/dL (from 76.17% ± 10.28% to 81.32% ± 7.71%, P < 0.001), average sensor glucose (from 138.61 ± 16.66 to 130.02 ± 10.91 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and glucose management indicator (from 6.54% ± 0.45% to 6.27% ± 0.29%, P = 0.001), were observed within 2 weeks of switching to the AHCL. More evident improvements were observed for the parameters monitored at night than during the day. The potential limitations of this study were the short observation time, lack of glycated hemoglobin measurements, and no control arm. Conclusion: The AHCL system can significantly improve glycemic control even in well-controlled children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes by increasing the proportion of time spent in the narrower range of 70-140 mg/dL and decreasing the mean glucose concentration, especially during the night.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemia , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Insulin Infusion Systems , Follow-Up Studies , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Blood Glucose/analysis , Insulin/therapeutic use , Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are several observations that the onset of coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with an increase in the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, due to heterogeneity in study designs and country-specific healthcare policies, more national-level evidence is needed to provide generalizable conclusions. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of DKA in Polish children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) between the first year of COVID-19 pandemic (15 March 2020 to 15 March 2021) and the preceding year (15 March 2019 to 15 March 2020). METHODS: Reference centers in 13 regions (covering ~88% of Polish children) retrospectively reported all new-onset T1D cases in children from assessed periods, including DKA status at admission, administered procedures and outcomes. Secondly, we collected regions' demographic characteristics and the daily-reported number of COVID-19-related deaths in each region. RESULTS: We recorded 3062 cases of new-onset T1D (53.3% boys, mean age 9.5 ± 4.3 years old) of which 1347 (44%) had DKA. Comparing pre- and post-COVID-19 period, we observed a significant increase in the rate of DKA (37.5%-49.4%, p < .0001). The fraction of moderate (+5.4%) and severe (+3.4%) DKA cases increased significantly (p = .0089), and more episodes required assisted ventilation (+2.1%, p = .0337). Two episodes of DKA during 2020/2021 period were fatal. By region, change in DKA frequency correlated with initial COVID-19 death toll (March/April 2020) (R = .6, p = .0287) and change in T1D incidence (R = .7, p = .0080). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical picture of new-onset children T1D in Poland deteriorated over a 2-year period. The observed increase in the frequency of DKA and its severity were significantly associated with the overlapping timing of the COVID-19 epidemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Adolescent , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/complications , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Pandemics , Poland/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIMS: Monotherapy with autologous expanded CD4+ CD25high CD127- T regulatory cells (Tregs) or rituximab has been documented to slow disease progression in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Whether a combined therapy including both drugs would further benefit this patient population is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a three-arms clinical trial to explore the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment with Tregs and rituximab in paediatric patients with T1DM. The patients were allocated to three groups: Tregs only (n = 13), Tregs + rituximab (n = 12) and control (n = 11). The key primary efficacy analyses were C-peptide levels (mixed meal tolerance test) and the proportion of patients in remission at 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: At month 24, as compared with the control, both treatment groups remained superior in the area under the curve of C-peptide mixed meal tolerance test, whereas in the analysis of all visits only the combined therapy improved area under the curve at 12 and 24 months. The proportion of patients in remission was significantly higher in the combined group than in the control group at 3, 6, 9 and 21 months but not at 18 and 24 months. There was no significant difference between the Tregs only group and control group. Adverse events occurred in 80% patients, mostly in the combined group and Tregs only group. No adverse events led to the withdrawal of the intervention or death. All comparisons were performed with alpha level of 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Over 2 years, combined therapy with Tregs and rituximab was consistently superior to monotherapy in delaying T1DM progression in terms of C-peptide levels and the maintenance of remission.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , C-Peptide , Child , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Humans , Rituximab/therapeutic use , T-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Monogenic diabetes caused by mutation in the glucokinase gene (GCK-MD) is a rare disorder manifesting in childhood as mild, prevalent hyperglycemia. By consensus, it is managed by dietary supervision and infrequent consultations. However, its impact on the mental health of the affected children is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in children with monogenic glucokinase-related diabetes (GCK-MD) and evaluate their association with quality of life (QoL). METHODS: The study invited children with GCK-MD aged 5-18 years identified in the Central National Registry and treated in 3 pediatric diabetes centers in Poland. The control group comprised children with type 1 diabetes (T1D, the most common diabetes type in youth) matched for age and family history of diabetes. Participants underwent a semistructured clinical interview diagnostic for psychiatric comorbidities, questionnaires assessing behavioral problems, depressive symptoms, parental stress, and measuring general and diabetes-related QoL (PedsQl). RESULTS: We included 35 patients with GCK-MDMD and 199 with T1D. Eight (22.9%) GCK-MD patients were diagnosed with psychiatric disorder in their lifetime, compared with 16 (8.1%) in the T1D group (odds ratio 3.4 [95% confidence interval: 1.3-8.7]). Patients with GCK-MD showed better parent-reported general QoL (87.1 ± 11.9 vs 82.0 ± 14.0, P = 0.0060) and higher diabetes-related QoL in both parental (84.5 ± 13.8 vs 74.1 ± 15.2, P < 0.0001) and child's perspective (87.6 ± 10.9 vs 77.3 ± 13.9, P < 0.0001). Psychiatric disorders (+P) were associated with worse child-reported diabetes QoL (T1D+P 66.6 ± 16.7, T1D-P 78.2 ± 13.3, GCK-MD+P 79.6 ± 16.3, GCK-MD-P 90.1 ± 7.5, P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: High prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children with GCK-MD and lower QoL emphasizes the need for psychologic surveillance in those otherwise mildly-treated patients.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Glucokinase , Hyperglycemia , Mental Disorders , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/genetics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Glucokinase/genetics , Hyperglycemia/complications , Hyperglycemia/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Quality of Life , Comorbidity , Mental Disorders/genetics , Databases, Genetic , Poland/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state (HHS) is a very severe condition characterised by hyperosmolality, hyperglycaemia and dehydration without significant ketosis. The article presents the case of a 14.5-year-old cachectic patient with diagnosed HHS. Appropriate treatment per the ISPAD Guidelines was implemented. After metabolic stabilisation was achieved, the patient was transferred for further treatment to the Pediatric Gastroenterology Department due to her life-threatening cachexia. Normal glucose levels were observed during hospitalisation and the patient required no further insulin supplementation. Unfortunately, two months after discharge from hospital, the patient suffered sudden death at home. The patient did not live until full diabetological diagnostics could be performed. The transient hyperglycaemia may have been caused by a very early stage of type 1 diabetes (pre-diabetes), malnutrition-related diabetes mellitus (MRDM) or stress-induced hyperglycaemia (SIH). The case demonstrates that HHS can develop not only secondary to diabetes, but also be a severe complication of transient carbohydrate metabolism disorders in the course of cachexia.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Hyperglycemia , Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Coma , Malnutrition , Metabolism, Inborn Errors , Adolescent , Cachexia/complications , Carbohydrate Metabolism , Child , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/complications , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Hyperglycemia/complications , Hyperglycemia/diagnosis , Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Coma/complications , Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Coma/diagnosis , Malnutrition/complications , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/complicationsABSTRACT
The ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) is now established as the standardised, practical one-page report for graphically presenting a summary of glycaemic control status in patients with diabetes who use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems as part of their daily diabetes care. The AGP report provides both a visual and a statistical summary of the glucose metrics that, as agreed in the 2019 international consensus for assessing glycaemic control, should be analysed in all people with diabetes who are using CGM systems. The AGP report can be analysed in a systematic fashion to understand current glycaemic control and to monitor, in real time, the impact of adjustments to therapy in both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Here we provide a practical guide to the glycaemic measures that are summarised in the AGP Report and illustrate the essential components of an AGP review in a series of hypothetical, real-world, patient-centred case studies (see Supplementary Materials).