Image-Guided Brachytherapy a Comparison Between 192Ir and 60Co Sources in Carcinoma Uterine Cervix.

INTRODUCTION: Combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) with concurrent chemotherapy (Cisplatin 40mg/m2/weekly) is the standard treatment of approach for the carcinoma of uterine cervix. In this study for image based HDR brachytherapy of intracavitary both 192Ir and 60Co sources were used for dosimetry and the dose distribution compared between point doses and volume doses as per the recommendation of ICRU89 and GEC-ESTRO on 3D image based planning. The dosimetry and clinical outcome will decide decisionmaking on choice of radionuclide for HDR brachytherapy of cervix in addition to economic reason. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Study conducted for 27 patients of cancer cervix stage IIB or IIIB with vaginal involvement limited to the upper third of vagina. All patients underwent concurrent chemoradiation Cisplatin 40mg/m2 weekly throughout EBRT by 3D conformal therapy 46Gy in 23# followed by two fractions of HDR brachytherapy with 9Gy/1Fr. Post implants 3mm slice selection of pelvic CT scans performed with ring applicator in place followed by T2 weighted paracorpal or paracoronal section of MRI imaging. The solid ring applicator (AL13017000) from library used for applicator reconstruction. Initially all plan calculated with TG-43 formalism using 192Ir radionuclide (Varian, GammaMed HDR Plus source) and then modelled 60Co radionuclide (Eckert < Ziegler BEBIG GmbH, Co0. A86) used for dose computation. ICRU89 recommended points and volumes of targets and OARs evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The study concludes that 60Co based point-A, BICRU and RICRU doses showed a comparable result with that of 192Ir HDR source based dosimetry. The volume based criterion for the target such as GTV, CTVHR, CTVIR for D90, D98, V150%and V200% are all within 5% dose level comparing two sources. CONCLUSION: 60Co a viable alternate to 192Ir by taking into consideration frequency of source exchange and cost reserve with comparable dosimetry.

Impact of GBBS algorithm on post-mastectomy scar boost irradiation of breast using catheter flap.

PURPOSE: Post-mastectomy radiation therapy significantly reduces locoregional recurrence rates, which can be achieved with external beam radiotherapy delivered to chest wall, followed by scar irradiation either by electron or high-dose-rate (HDR) mould brachytherapy. The present study evaluates dosimetric advantage of Acuros® BV, a TG-186 MBDCA, over TG-43 formalism using 192Ir source for HDR brachytherapy in chest wall scar boost using catheter flap. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 25 patients, free of cardiac and pulmonary co-morbidities, who met the inclusion criteria were involved in the study. Catheter flap made of silicon with 20 channels was used to deliver a total dose of 7.5 Gy/3 fx by HDR surface mould brachytherapy to delineated scar volume. Plan was optimized with iterative method to obtain desired results with TG-43 formalism, followed by Acuros® BV (GBBS algorithm) without altering dwell positions or time. The two algorithm plans were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively with dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: The mean D98% CTV-HDR_evl coverage decreased by 1.16% compared to TG-43, and near-maximum dose decreased by 8.18% (p = 0.000), mean Dmax dose to CTV-HDR_evl, and mean Dmean dose was lesser by 6.25% (p = 0.000) and 10.82% (p = 0.000), respectively, compared to TG-43. Heart D2% showed significant results, whereas Dmedian (cGy) revealed very significant difference. A 5 mm thick skin contour showed statistically significant results (p = 0.000) for V150% and V200%. CONCLUSIONS: The presented data showed how Acuros® BV, algorithm-based calculation in scar boost irradiation of breast, accounting for a mass density of the medium and scatter condition, considered actual dose prediction in a medium.

Exit fluence analysis using portal dosimetry in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

AIM: In measuring exit fluences, there are several sources of deviations which include the changes in the entrance fluence, changes in the detector response and patient orientation or geometry. The purpose of this work is to quantify these sources of errors. BACKGROUND: The use of the volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment with the help of image guidance in radiotherapy results in high accuracy of delivering complex dose distributions while sparing critical organs. The transit dosimetry has the potential of Verifying dose delivery by the linac, Multileaf collimator positional accuracy and the calculation of dose to a patient or phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The quantification of errors caused by a machine delivery is done by comparing static and arc picket fence test for 30 days. A RapidArc plan, created for the pelvis site was delivered without and with Rando phantom and exit portal images were acquired. The day to day dose variation were analysed by comparing the daily exit dose images during the course of treatment. The gamma criterion used for analysis is 3% dose difference and 3 mm distance to agreement with a threshold of 10% of maximum dose. RESULTS: The maximum standard deviation for the static and arc picket fence test fields were 0.19 CU and 1.3 CU, respectively. The delivery of the RapidArc plans without a phantom shows the maximum standard deviation of 1.85 CU and the maximum gamma value of 0.59. The maximum gamma value for the RapidArc plan delivered with the phantom was found to be 1.2. The largest observed fluence deviation during the delivery to patient was 5.7% and the maximum standard deviation was 4.1 CU. CONCLUSION: It is found from this study that the variation due to patient anatomy and interfraction organ motion is significant.